|
Re: Safe Resins for Model Production?
Thanks Al.
Victor
thick walls, use dental plaster. The cheapest resin and easiest to
work with is polyester. However, it is the least safe. It outgasses
styrene monomer which in large quantities
Thanks Al.
Victor
thick walls, use dental plaster. The cheapest resin and easiest to
work with is polyester. However, it is the least safe. It outgasses
styrene monomer which in large quantities
|
By
reporterllc
·
#76674
·
|
|
Re: Safe Resins for Model Production?
Victor - If you want to be really safe and can use structures with thick walls, use dental plaster. The cheapest resin and easiest to work with is polyester. However, it is the least safe. It
Victor - If you want to be really safe and can use structures with thick walls, use dental plaster. The cheapest resin and easiest to work with is polyester. However, it is the least safe. It
|
By
Westerfield <westerfield@...>
·
#76672
·
|
|
Safe Resins for Model Production?
This is a little topic but its seem there are folks in this group that
are in the know here.
I actually am not interested in rolling stock but structures.
Thanks in advance
Victor Baird
Fort Wayne,
This is a little topic but its seem there are folks in this group that
are in the know here.
I actually am not interested in rolling stock but structures.
Thanks in advance
Victor Baird
Fort Wayne,
|
By
reporterllc
·
#76671
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
Bruce Smith wrote:
Quite true, and a trend which continues today, even if invisible from the viewpoint of this list. There may be fewer trains today, but annual tonnages are well in excess of
Bruce Smith wrote:
Quite true, and a trend which continues today, even if invisible from the viewpoint of this list. There may be fewer trains today, but annual tonnages are well in excess of
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#76670
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
already
surprisingle
Hi Frank
In the February 1932 ORER there were 31 box/auto cars over 50' 7 5/8"
IL. The MILW had 30 cars with IL = 60'0"; and the PRR had one with IL
= 70'6". Both were gone by
already
surprisingle
Hi Frank
In the February 1932 ORER there were 31 box/auto cars over 50' 7 5/8"
IL. The MILW had 30 cars with IL = 60'0"; and the PRR had one with IL
= 70'6". Both were gone by
|
By
laramielarry <ostresh@...>
·
#76669
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
Hi Al. No.
(And thanks for the C&O information.)
Best wishes,
Larry Ostresh
Laramie, Wyoming
Hi Al. No.
(And thanks for the C&O information.)
Best wishes,
Larry Ostresh
Laramie, Wyoming
|
By
laramielarry <ostresh@...>
·
#76668
·
|
|
Seeking Good Phone Numbers for Burg, Bob's Photo, and Paul Dunn
Howdy Ted and all others,
Thankyou for your assistance and taking the time find correct information on these parties listed below.
To recap I need good phone numbers and
Howdy Ted and all others,
Thankyou for your assistance and taking the time find correct information on these parties listed below.
To recap I need good phone numbers and
|
By
Bob McCarthy
·
#76673
·
|
|
Re: autoracks, ca. 1915
Re: Auto loading on flats:
In John White's "American Railroad Freight Car" (p394, Fig 6.17) there is a full side-on photo of what appears to be a nearly identical loading arrangement.
There are 9
Re: Auto loading on flats:
In John White's "American Railroad Freight Car" (p394, Fig 6.17) there is a full side-on photo of what appears to be a nearly identical loading arrangement.
There are 9
|
By
Richard Brennan <brennan8@...>
·
#76667
·
|
|
Re: Naperville-New Shipper Guide
As in the past Rails Unlimited will be at Naperville and will take all kinds of payment, possibly including bartering.
I will have many HO scale models, and the newest books, including those of
As in the past Rails Unlimited will be at Naperville and will take all kinds of payment, possibly including bartering.
I will have many HO scale models, and the newest books, including those of
|
By
Ted Schnepf
·
#76666
·
|
|
Re: Richard Burg where are you?
Bob - Rich Burg, 2155 E. Whittemore, Burton, MI 48529 313-483-8199 - Al Westerfield
Bob - Rich Burg, 2155 E. Whittemore, Burton, MI 48529 313-483-8199 - Al Westerfield
|
By
Westerfield <westerfield@...>
·
#76665
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
Thanks for that bit of info. I've been looking for some interesting
freight car projects and a couple of ventilator boxes was at the top
of the list, but I just didn't know if they would be correct
Thanks for that bit of info. I've been looking for some interesting
freight car projects and a couple of ventilator boxes was at the top
of the list, but I just didn't know if they would be correct
|
By
Earl T. Hackett <hacketet@...>
·
#76663
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
To add to Tony's response, looking at the number of cars is only half the equation. The cars being removed from the roster were small capacity cars, which were being replaced by fewer higher
To add to Tony's response, looking at the number of cars is only half the equation. The cars being removed from the roster were small capacity cars, which were being replaced by fewer higher
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#76662
·
|
|
Richard Burg where are you?
Howdy!
A group of us are working to reproduce a highly detailed Central of Georgia Door and a Half 40 ' boxcar in Scale S.
The president of the Central of Georgia Historical
Howdy!
A group of us are working to reproduce a highly detailed Central of Georgia Door and a Half 40 ' boxcar in Scale S.
The president of the Central of Georgia Historical
|
By
Bob McCarthy
·
#76664
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
Hi Earl,
Past 1952 and the K brake ban, you've essentially got four choices for a short boxcar on your roster: CN or CP "Fowler" single sheathed boxcars, ACL or SAL ventilated boxcars, DL&W
Hi Earl,
Past 1952 and the K brake ban, you've essentially got four choices for a short boxcar on your roster: CN or CP "Fowler" single sheathed boxcars, ACL or SAL ventilated boxcars, DL&W
|
By
Ray Breyer
·
#76661
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
. . .
an
Hi Earl
Welcome to our list! If you check the Excel file that I mentioned in
my post, you will see that in the July 1950 ORER there were 23,242
short cars (from a U.S. total of 712,098 box,
. . .
an
Hi Earl
Welcome to our list! If you check the Excel file that I mentioned in
my post, you will see that in the July 1950 ORER there were 23,242
short cars (from a U.S. total of 712,098 box,
|
By
laramielarry <ostresh@...>
·
#76660
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
Weren't there some pretty big (50+ foot) cars being built out west already
before WW1? I recall reading with some surprise about some surprisingle
massive cars, quite early along.
Frank
Weren't there some pretty big (50+ foot) cars being built out west already
before WW1? I recall reading with some surprise about some surprisingle
massive cars, quite early along.
Frank
|
By
destron@...
·
#76659
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
Earl T. Hackett wrote:
Welcome, Earl. This topic raises a number of points.
First of all, the cars ran freely everywhere, so it's not as if the SW cars lived there all their lives, and
Earl T. Hackett wrote:
Welcome, Earl. This topic raises a number of points.
First of all, the cars ran freely everywhere, so it's not as if the SW cars lived there all their lives, and
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#76656
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
Don Burn wrote:
"In additon there were a fair number of 40' wood box cars on a number
of north eastern railroads in that era."
Don is not the only one guilty of this example of sloppy terminology
Don Burn wrote:
"In additon there were a fair number of 40' wood box cars on a number
of north eastern railroads in that era."
Don is not the only one guilty of this example of sloppy terminology
|
By
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
·
#76655
·
|
|
Re: autoracks, ca. 1915
Being very careful with my terminology (Mr Thompson) I can see that on the nearest flat car, there
appears to be at least two ladder-shaped vertical frames which appear may be put into the
Being very careful with my terminology (Mr Thompson) I can see that on the nearest flat car, there
appears to be at least two ladder-shaped vertical frames which appear may be put into the
|
By
Schuyler Larrabee
·
#76654
·
|
|
Re: A Great Decline
Earl,
I don't have the references in front of me, but I believe the D&H, NH and Southern 36' box cars made it to 1950. L&N 36' box cars may have also. In additon there were a fair number of 40'
Earl,
I don't have the references in front of me, but I believe the D&H, NH and Southern 36' box cars made it to 1950. L&N 36' box cars may have also. In additon there were a fair number of 40'
|
By
Don Burn
·
#76653
·
|