|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
Good eye, Ben. There are actually two trains at the end of the book from 1936, which this car was from, and I failed to note that previously. My apologies.
Earl Tuson
Good eye, Ben. There are actually two trains at the end of the book from 1936, which this car was from, and I failed to note that previously. My apologies.
Earl Tuson
|
By
Earl Tuson
·
#70083
·
|
|
Re: 1940s tank car questions
Was this the famous "Grapevine Hill" of "Hot Rod Lincoln" fame?
NOTE: Lincolns used gasoline that was shipped by FREIGHT CARS in the STEAM ERA.
KL
Was this the famous "Grapevine Hill" of "Hot Rod Lincoln" fame?
NOTE: Lincolns used gasoline that was shipped by FREIGHT CARS in the STEAM ERA.
KL
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#70082
·
|
|
Re: 1940s tank car questions
Yeah, I know, we're way off topic here, but I can't resist adding to
Lindsay's account that I well remember driving up the Grapevine in the
summer with my family in the years before and during WW II
Yeah, I know, we're way off topic here, but I can't resist adding to
Lindsay's account that I well remember driving up the Grapevine in the
summer with my family in the years before and during WW II
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#70081
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
All true as far as it goes, but Ben's perspective here is that of a
historian and modeler whose primary interest is eastern RRs. Ten foot
high automobile cars, many of the 50'6" in length, were
All true as far as it goes, but Ben's perspective here is that of a
historian and modeler whose primary interest is eastern RRs. Ten foot
high automobile cars, many of the 50'6" in length, were
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#70080
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
The car number cited by Earl, NYC 56331, must be in error since there
were no 56000-series numbers assigned before the Lot 633-B cars Ben
cites below.
Earl, could it be other than 56?
Jeff
The car number cited by Earl, NYC 56331, must be in error since there
were no 56000-series numbers assigned before the Lot 633-B cars Ben
cites below.
Earl, could it be other than 56?
Jeff
|
By
Jeff English
·
#70079
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
Ben,
The same applies to Tony's response. I had a 1937 CBC that had references back to December 1928 and then later showed a Plate B clearance diagram. I was not careful about what had transpired
Ben,
The same applies to Tony's response. I had a 1937 CBC that had references back to December 1928 and then later showed a Plate B clearance diagram. I was not careful about what had transpired
|
By
water.kresse@...
·
#70078
·
|
|
Re: O Scale Magazine
Tom,
try:
www.oscalemag.com
This may be the magazine you are hunting.
Later,
Bill Kelly
Thomas Baker wrote:
Tom,
try:
www.oscalemag.com
This may be the magazine you are hunting.
Later,
Bill Kelly
Thomas Baker wrote:
|
By
Bill Kelly
·
#70077
·
|
|
O Scale Magazine
Is the magazine called "O Scale Railroading" or "O Scale Modeling" still being published. It used to have a website, but recently I have been unable to find the site.
Tom
Is the magazine called "O Scale Railroading" or "O Scale Modeling" still being published. It used to have a website, but recently I have been unable to find the site.
Tom
|
By
Thomas Baker
·
#70076
·
|
|
Re: 1940s tank car questions
Dennis,
In the 1940s loads were smaller and even tough I was yet to be a
teenager, I have used hand carts to load and unload trucks. During
WWII they used whatever was available. I once drove a
Dennis,
In the 1940s loads were smaller and even tough I was yet to be a
teenager, I have used hand carts to load and unload trucks. During
WWII they used whatever was available. I once drove a
|
By
W. Lindsay Smith <wlindsays2000@...>
·
#70075
·
|
|
Re: Single vs. double insulated wheelsets
Guys -
I have to use double insulated wheelsets on metal trucks because I
have many brass/metal cars. I also use only brass couplers, and it
is possible to have a short from the tender back through
Guys -
I have to use double insulated wheelsets on metal trucks because I
have many brass/metal cars. I also use only brass couplers, and it
is possible to have a short from the tender back through
|
By
proto48er
·
#70074
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
Al Kresse wrote:
"By 1928 the standard AAR auto-boxes had changed the clearance
envelope and auto-boxes were starting to get bigger . . . but the
smaller ones would still be around."
Al, do you have
Al Kresse wrote:
"By 1928 the standard AAR auto-boxes had changed the clearance
envelope and auto-boxes were starting to get bigger . . . but the
smaller ones would still be around."
Al, do you have
|
By
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
·
#70073
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
Tony,
You are correct. I was looking at a 1937 CBC and they (AAR) were making historical references to post-USRA structural problems. You are also correct that I wasn't able to find a standard
Tony,
You are correct. I was looking at a 1937 CBC and they (AAR) were making historical references to post-USRA structural problems. You are also correct that I wasn't able to find a standard
|
By
water.kresse@...
·
#70072
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
You mean, of course, the ARA, since the AAR came along in 1934; and there really wasn't a "standard" ARA automobile car that I know of. The AAR adopted such a standard in 1942.
Tony Thompson
You mean, of course, the ARA, since the AAR came along in 1934; and there really wasn't a "standard" ARA automobile car that I know of. The AAR adopted such a standard in 1942.
Tony Thompson
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#70071
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
Earl,
Thanks for the insite. By 1928 the standard AAR auto-boxes had changed the clearance envelop and auto-boxes were starting to get bigger . . . but the smaller ones would still be around.
Earl,
Thanks for the insite. By 1928 the standard AAR auto-boxes had changed the clearance envelop and auto-boxes were starting to get bigger . . . but the smaller ones would still be around.
|
By
water.kresse@...
·
#70070
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
These illustrate some of the pre-Evans auto loader era automobile
cars of the NYCS:
CCC&StL 91672 - Lot 585-B, steel, built 1929:
http://www.canadasouthern.com/caso/images/lot-585.jpg
MC 89468 - Lot
These illustrate some of the pre-Evans auto loader era automobile
cars of the NYCS:
CCC&StL 91672 - Lot 585-B, steel, built 1929:
http://www.canadasouthern.com/caso/images/lot-585.jpg
MC 89468 - Lot
|
By
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
·
#70069
·
|
|
Re: 1940s tank car questions
Most, but not all. It was the Army's goal to be 100% gasoline engines but they never got there. The notable exceptions were M10 Gun Motor Carriages ("tank destroyers", but to most people they are
Most, but not all. It was the Army's goal to be 100% gasoline engines but they never got there. The notable exceptions were M10 Gun Motor Carriages ("tank destroyers", but to most people they are
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#70068
·
|
|
Re: 1940s tank car questions
Obviously, the stuff you use to keep the kid's hamster from squeaking :-)
Most likely short for petroleum oil, to differentiate it from
vegetable oil.
Dennis
Obviously, the stuff you use to keep the kid's hamster from squeaking :-)
Most likely short for petroleum oil, to differentiate it from
vegetable oil.
Dennis
|
By
Dennis Storzek <destorzek@...>
·
#70067
·
|
|
Re: 1940s tank car questions
wrote:
Indeed. Pre WWII diesel engines tended to be massive, heavy, and low
RPM machines, not at all suitable for applications where excessive
weight was detrimental, such as highway vehicles or off
wrote:
Indeed. Pre WWII diesel engines tended to be massive, heavy, and low
RPM machines, not at all suitable for applications where excessive
weight was detrimental, such as highway vehicles or off
|
By
Dennis Storzek <destorzek@...>
·
#70066
·
|
|
Re: AUTO BOX RESPONSE
Again, this does not answer your question directly, either, but here are the cars hauling automobile or auto parts traffic in a 1929-30 B&M Wheel
Again, this does not answer your question directly, either, but here are the cars hauling automobile or auto parts traffic in a 1929-30 B&M Wheel
|
By
Earl Tuson
·
#70065
·
|
|
Re: 1940s tank car questions
Oh, I thought maybe it was what you got when you squeezed your wiener
dog too tightly.
immerse
Oh, I thought maybe it was what you got when you squeezed your wiener
dog too tightly.
immerse
|
By
feddersenmark
·
#70064
·
|