|
Re: PRR Boxcars (ad hominem)
Ok Guys, let's tone it down a bit. This has gotten way off base.
Bill - Welcome to the STMFC list. You're suppossed to sign your last name. Ben pointed that out. No doubt you will next time. No need
Ok Guys, let's tone it down a bit. This has gotten way off base.
Bill - Welcome to the STMFC list. You're suppossed to sign your last name. Ben pointed that out. No doubt you will next time. No need
|
By
branchline@...
·
#67498
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
Dave (or anyone),
Is the reason for using distilled water so that on drying it will not leave a whitish deposit of dissolved salts? Or is there another reason, such as the effect on the decals
Dave (or anyone),
Is the reason for using distilled water so that on drying it will not leave a whitish deposit of dissolved salts? Or is there another reason, such as the effect on the decals
|
By
Barry Roth
·
#67497
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
Tim,
Looks like you do not have anything to loose here so why not try a light media blast of the heavy area. The stipper jar will still be there if you don't like the results.
Mont
Tim,
Looks like you do not have anything to loose here so why not try a light media blast of the heavy area. The stipper jar will still be there if you don't like the results.
Mont
|
By
Mont Switzer <mhts_switzerm@...>
·
#67496
·
|
|
Re: PRR Boxcars (ad hominem)
BILL NAVARI wrote:
Manufacturers are frequent offenders in this area, BIll, so this is a feeble excuse. And you gave no hint in your post that it wasn't your own knowledge.
Read the
BILL NAVARI wrote:
Manufacturers are frequent offenders in this area, BIll, so this is a feeble excuse. And you gave no hint in your post that it wasn't your own knowledge.
Read the
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#67495
·
|
|
PRR Plain Keystone Hoppers was Re: Re: PRR Boxcars (ad hominem)
In a message dated 11/8/2007 4:00:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
timboconnor@... writes:
don't understand why my message this MORNING did not get through
on this subject. I think PRR
In a message dated 11/8/2007 4:00:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
timboconnor@... writes:
don't understand why my message this MORNING did not get through
on this subject. I think PRR
|
By
SUVCWORR@...
·
#67520
·
|
|
Re: PRR Boxcars (ad hominem)
Bill:
I think that you missed Ben's point. 1st when you joined this list the
rules were spelled out that you need to include your full name with any
post. Not everybody knows that Bill and
Bill:
I think that you missed Ben's point. 1st when you joined this list the
rules were spelled out that you need to include your full name with any
post. Not everybody knows that Bill and
|
By
Paul <buygone@...>
·
#67494
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
The current issue of Finescale Modeler has an insert on air-brushing of acrylic paints (but I will still stick with Floquil) and an article on the use of Future. In reading past articles in Finescale
The current issue of Finescale Modeler has an insert on air-brushing of acrylic paints (but I will still stick with Floquil) and an article on the use of Future. In reading past articles in Finescale
|
By
Jack Burgess <jack@...>
·
#67493
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
I bought a model on Ebay that was well painted, but it looks like it
got a Future "dip" -- the thing is just ridiculously shiny ALL OVER.
So I'm afraid this one is headed for the stripper... Since
I bought a model on Ebay that was well painted, but it looks like it
got a Future "dip" -- the thing is just ridiculously shiny ALL OVER.
So I'm afraid this one is headed for the stripper... Since
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#67491
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
Rob
I think Future is gettting to be pretty mainstream. I was firly
sceptical at first but having hads some models completed fora few
years with no sign of yellowing or other advers effects I have
Rob
I think Future is gettting to be pretty mainstream. I was firly
sceptical at first but having hads some models completed fora few
years with no sign of yellowing or other advers effects I have
|
By
Aidrian Bridgeman-Sutton <smokeandsteam@...>
·
#67490
·
|
|
Re: PRR Boxcars (ad hominem) a final word
Apologies to the group, this was not meant to invoke what his has. The point
I was trying to make, perhaps incorrectly, was lost and the discussion has
veered on an alternate tangent.
The point
Apologies to the group, this was not meant to invoke what his has. The point
I was trying to make, perhaps incorrectly, was lost and the discussion has
veered on an alternate tangent.
The point
|
By
Bill Navari
·
#67513
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
On the few occasions I have used Floquil for a whole paint job,
I premix Crystal Cote (not Gloss) into the color. IMO this gives
a smoother finish than with the Gloss.
If you want a THIN glossy coat
On the few occasions I have used Floquil for a whole paint job,
I premix Crystal Cote (not Gloss) into the color. IMO this gives
a smoother finish than with the Gloss.
If you want a THIN glossy coat
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#67489
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
I have used Testor's Gloss coat with good results. Whatever you use, the
important thing is to get a light coat; you don't need much to decal
properly. Use too much and you may get
a yellowish
I have used Testor's Gloss coat with good results. Whatever you use, the
important thing is to get a light coat; you don't need much to decal
properly. Use too much and you may get
a yellowish
|
By
Ray Meyer
·
#67488
·
|
|
Re: PRR Boxcars (ad hominem)
You know Ben Hom, or is it Ad-HOM-inem? Not everyone may be perfect like
you. I got my infomation from the website of a major manufacturer of PRR
products. Since the question was asked, I thought
You know Ben Hom, or is it Ad-HOM-inem? Not everyone may be perfect like
you. I got my infomation from the website of a major manufacturer of PRR
products. Since the question was asked, I thought
|
By
Bill Navari
·
#67492
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
about it on
associated
experimental as
Future is very easy to use and most likely won't harm your finish.
I have used it a few times with excellant results. I use a mix of
30% alcohol and 70%
about it on
associated
experimental as
Future is very easy to use and most likely won't harm your finish.
I have used it a few times with excellant results. I use a mix of
30% alcohol and 70%
|
By
hummerdaves
·
#67487
·
|
|
Re: Gloss coat for decalling
Rob,
The simple answer is that you can do any one of the four things you've
listed.
In fact I would suggest that you try all 4 and figure out the one you
prefer the best,
For what it's worth I've
Rob,
The simple answer is that you can do any one of the four things you've
listed.
In fact I would suggest that you try all 4 and figure out the one you
prefer the best,
For what it's worth I've
|
By
pierreoliver2003 <pierre.oliver@...>
·
#67486
·
|
|
Gloss coat for decalling
I'm still learning about using the airbrush to paint cars, and still discovering the various paint manufacturers and their products. In a recent effort, I tried out some Floquil colours and really
I'm still learning about using the airbrush to paint cars, and still discovering the various paint manufacturers and their products. In a recent effort, I tried out some Floquil colours and really
|
By
Rob Kirkham <rdkirkham@...>
·
#67485
·
|
|
Re: PRR boxcar
John Golden writes:
"Hey Phil,
No way--don't bow out, buddy. The purpose of this forum is to ask
questions and learn from the best. We all learn that way."
Absolutely right. You should see some of
John Golden writes:
"Hey Phil,
No way--don't bow out, buddy. The purpose of this forum is to ask
questions and learn from the best. We all learn that way."
Absolutely right. You should see some of
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#67484
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Wisconsin Central Photos
Tom,
I can help you narrow that era a lot, since in 1909 the Wisconsin
Central was leased by the Soo Line, becoming the Soo's Chicago
Division, and totally lost its separate identity. In 1961 the WC
Tom,
I can help you narrow that era a lot, since in 1909 the Wisconsin
Central was leased by the Soo Line, becoming the Soo's Chicago
Division, and totally lost its separate identity. In 1961 the WC
|
By
Dennis Storzek <destorzek@...>
·
#67483
·
|
|
Re: PRR boxcar
Hey Phil,
No way--don't bow out, buddy. The purpose of this forum is to ask
questions and learn from the best. We all learn that way. I don't
post often but I read every message.
Another option you
Hey Phil,
No way--don't bow out, buddy. The purpose of this forum is to ask
questions and learn from the best. We all learn that way. I don't
post often but I read every message.
Another option you
|
By
golden1014
·
#67482
·
|
|
Re: PRR Boxcars
Ben Hom wrote:
Well said, Ben, and I couldn't agree more--in the Internet age it's more important than ever to nip bogosity in the bud. Otherwise it spreads at dismaying speed and is really hard
Ben Hom wrote:
Well said, Ben, and I couldn't agree more--in the Internet age it's more important than ever to nip bogosity in the bud. Otherwise it spreads at dismaying speed and is really hard
|
By
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
·
#67481
·
|