|
Re: SP CaC2 Car (was NYC Cement Car (Not)?)
Mike Dudley wrote:
I found a photo of SP #598051 on page 344 of Tony Thompson's Volume 3 of "SP's Freight Cars - Automobile and Flat Cars."
In the photo after the last light weight weighing in
Mike Dudley wrote:
I found a photo of SP #598051 on page 344 of Tony Thompson's Volume 3 of "SP's Freight Cars - Automobile and Flat Cars."
In the photo after the last light weight weighing in
|
By
Tim Gilbert <tgilbert@...>
·
#56277
·
|
|
Re: AHM container car(s)
wouldn't make more sense to have someone like AMB create a kit for
the SP "structure" on a correct SP flat car, if it is currently made?
I have already built an NYC car and it is different from the SP
wouldn't make more sense to have someone like AMB create a kit for
the SP "structure" on a correct SP flat car, if it is currently made?
I have already built an NYC car and it is different from the SP
|
By
Captain Dudley
·
#56276
·
|
|
Re: NYC Cement Car?
AHM "calcium carbide" car, rather than the SHPX car which has 28
slots (but was also modeled by AHM)..
with 22 demountable calcium carbide containers. CN 63000 seems to
be bogus.
There
AHM "calcium carbide" car, rather than the SHPX car which has 28
slots (but was also modeled by AHM)..
with 22 demountable calcium carbide containers. CN 63000 seems to
be bogus.
There
|
By
Captain Dudley
·
#56275
·
|
|
Re: SP CaC2 Car (was NYC Cement Car (Not)?)
help
124800
Tim:
Also note that the SP car rode on roller bearing journals and the
NYC car did not...
Mike Dudley
help
124800
Tim:
Also note that the SP car rode on roller bearing journals and the
NYC car did not...
Mike Dudley
|
By
Captain Dudley
·
#56273
·
|
|
Re: AHM container car(s)
Mike and all,
I have been following this message and was just wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to have someone like AMB create a kit for the SP "structure" on a correct SP flat car, if it is
Mike and all,
I have been following this message and was just wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to have someone like AMB create a kit for the SP "structure" on a correct SP flat car, if it is
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#56274
·
|
|
Re: NYC Cement Car?
Mike:
Does the SP car you refer to look like this?
http://www.us-train50.de/N-Bilder/400/490.JPG
http://www.us-train50.de/N-Bilder/400/488.JPG
If so, then this is probably the prototype for the 22
Mike:
Does the SP car you refer to look like this?
http://www.us-train50.de/N-Bilder/400/490.JPG
http://www.us-train50.de/N-Bilder/400/488.JPG
If so, then this is probably the prototype for the 22
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#56272
·
|
|
Re: SP CaC2 Car (was NYC Cement Car (Not)?)
Light
Cyclopedia? Or
us
4/1961
The car number is SP #598051. The LD LMT 124800. LT WT 83200.
Interesting enough the caption on the photo says..Load Limit 124800
and light weight 82500.
Mike
Light
Cyclopedia? Or
us
4/1961
The car number is SP #598051. The LD LMT 124800. LT WT 83200.
Interesting enough the caption on the photo says..Load Limit 124800
and light weight 82500.
Mike
|
By
Captain Dudley
·
#56271
·
|
|
Re: SP CaC2 Car (was NYC Cement Car (Not)?)
Mike Dudley wrote:
Mike,
Can you read the "itty bitty" numbers of the Load Limit and/or Light Weight of the photo on page 164 of the 1961 Carbuilders Cyclopedia? Or is there a reference to either in
Mike Dudley wrote:
Mike,
Can you read the "itty bitty" numbers of the Load Limit and/or Light Weight of the photo on page 164 of the 1961 Carbuilders Cyclopedia? Or is there a reference to either in
|
By
Tim Gilbert <tgilbert@...>
·
#56270
·
|
|
Re: NYC Cement Car?
Mike Dudley wrote:
Ah, the 1961 Cyc. Those are the same photos I have from SP sources, and which I used in my Vol. 3 on SP Freight Cars to depict the two cars which SP converted.
Tony
Mike Dudley wrote:
Ah, the 1961 Cyc. Those are the same photos I have from SP sources, and which I used in my Vol. 3 on SP Freight Cars to depict the two cars which SP converted.
Tony
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#56268
·
|
|
Re: AHM container car(s)
container cars, neither of which included containers.
http://tycotrain.tripod.com/ahmhoscaletrainscollectorsresource/id4.ht
ml
the other type, pictured
container cars, neither of which included containers.
http://tycotrain.tripod.com/ahmhoscaletrainscollectorsresource/id4.ht
ml
the other type, pictured
|
By
Captain Dudley
·
#56269
·
|
|
Re: NYC Cement Car?
wrote:
Color
Gilbert's
also
the
Freight
any
used
Tony:
I am sorry your are right the car I was talking about was SP 598051
and it was a Calcium Carbide Container flat. It used the F-70-F flat
car.
wrote:
Color
Gilbert's
also
the
Freight
any
used
Tony:
I am sorry your are right the car I was talking about was SP 598051
and it was a Calcium Carbide Container flat. It used the F-70-F flat
car.
|
By
Captain Dudley
·
#56267
·
|
|
AHM container car(s)
I was just realizing that there were actually two distinct AHM container cars, neither of which included containers.
The first (which I have) was the 5394 series, as pictured
I was just realizing that there were actually two distinct AHM container cars, neither of which included containers.
The first (which I have) was the 5394 series, as pictured
|
By
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
·
#56266
·
|
|
Re: NYC Cement Car?
Mike Dudley wrote:
What SP source is this? the documentation I used on my SP Freight Cars, Vol. 3, clearly said "calcium carbide," and I'm not aware of any SP cars set up for calcium chloride.
Mike Dudley wrote:
What SP source is this? the documentation I used on my SP Freight Cars, Vol. 3, clearly said "calcium carbide," and I'm not aware of any SP cars set up for calcium chloride.
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#56265
·
|
|
Re: NYC Cement Car?
meet and was
piece of
someone tell us a
(or anyone
freight car
operational
Sir:
There is a photo of this car in the Latest New York Central Color
Freight Car guide (Vol II)published by Morning Sun.
meet and was
piece of
someone tell us a
(or anyone
freight car
operational
Sir:
There is a photo of this car in the Latest New York Central Color
Freight Car guide (Vol II)published by Morning Sun.
|
By
Captain Dudley
·
#56264
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Models IC two-bay hopper model
Mark,
I've not been able to find any type of official description of these
cars anywhere. To an extent the cars followed the 1935 AAR Standard,
but the main differences are in the numbers of side
Mark,
I've not been able to find any type of official description of these
cars anywhere. To an extent the cars followed the 1935 AAR Standard,
but the main differences are in the numbers of side
|
By
Ed Hawkins
·
#56260
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Models IC two-bay hopper model
More from Frank:
--------------------------------
Ray
You can tell them it doesn't match the GN hopper at all. I've already
checked. It is only an IC hopper. The plans came from Ed Hawkins. It
More from Frank:
--------------------------------
Ray
You can tell them it doesn't match the GN hopper at all. I've already
checked. It is only an IC hopper. The plans came from Ed Hawkins. It
|
By
Ray Breyer <rbreyer@...>
·
#56263
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Models IC two-bay hopper model
By
Ray Breyer <rbreyer@...>
·
#56262
·
|
|
new IC hopper
Has anyone compared the new Sunshine IC hopper to DL&Ws 2 bay offset
hoppers?
Ed
Has anyone compared the new Sunshine IC hopper to DL&Ws 2 bay offset
hoppers?
Ed
|
By
ed_mines
·
#56261
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Models IC two-bay hopper model
Ben Hom wrote:
Thanks, it sounds like I've got my terminology wrong when it comes to
describing the IC/KGB/ELS/Army/Navy prototypes... since I shouldn't be
referring to them as "alternate standard
Ben Hom wrote:
Thanks, it sounds like I've got my terminology wrong when it comes to
describing the IC/KGB/ELS/Army/Navy prototypes... since I shouldn't be
referring to them as "alternate standard
|
By
Mark Mathu
·
#56259
·
|
|
Re: Sunshine Models IC two-bay hopper model
Rich,
Sorry, but no. The IC cars were 33' inside length and the GN cars were
34'-9" IL. Other than IC, roads having these 33' cars were ELS (5
cars), KGBW (20 cars), and the Army (7 cars) and Navy
Rich,
Sorry, but no. The IC cars were 33' inside length and the GN cars were
34'-9" IL. Other than IC, roads having these 33' cars were ELS (5
cars), KGBW (20 cars), and the Army (7 cars) and Navy
|
By
Ed Hawkins
·
#56257
·
|