|
Re: Those Trusses
Alan Welch said:
Well, sure, Alan, and that's why diagonals expected to carry compression
are heavier in section, so they WON'T buckle.
Obviously Alan doesn't know a great deal about fatigue in
Alan Welch said:
Well, sure, Alan, and that's why diagonals expected to carry compression
are heavier in section, so they WON'T buckle.
Obviously Alan doesn't know a great deal about fatigue in
|
By
thompson@...
·
#2411
·
|
|
Re: Upon Further Review...
Richard correctly notes:
However, said wife learned much from the clinic...as she was supposed to
do...and has been practicing on me...with variously interesting results ever
since. All in all...not
Richard correctly notes:
However, said wife learned much from the clinic...as she was supposed to
do...and has been practicing on me...with variously interesting results ever
since. All in all...not
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#2410
·
|
|
Those Trusses
Am I missing something here?
In a bridge, diagonals under compression fail due to buckling, if they are long enough, slender enough and loaded enough. Diagonals are even more prone to buckling
Am I missing something here?
In a bridge, diagonals under compression fail due to buckling, if they are long enough, slender enough and loaded enough. Diagonals are even more prone to buckling
|
By
Alan C. Welch <acwelch@...>
·
#2409
·
|
|
Re: transcontinental freight through the SE USA
This whole discussion has been unaffected by reality. I'd hoped that by
the time I returned from a brief trip out of town it would, like Pospero's
conjuring, have "vanished into air, into thin air,"
This whole discussion has been unaffected by reality. I'd hoped that by
the time I returned from a brief trip out of town it would, like Pospero's
conjuring, have "vanished into air, into thin air,"
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#2408
·
|
|
Re: Upon Further Review...
Good grief! I go away for three days and look at the nonsense that ensues.
Brock discovers a non-existent mistake in the IM reefer kit, Thompson
issues an unjustified mea culpa not only on his own
Good grief! I go away for three days and look at the nonsense that ensues.
Brock discovers a non-existent mistake in the IM reefer kit, Thompson
issues an unjustified mea culpa not only on his own
|
By
Richard Hendrickson
·
#2407
·
|
|
Re: Any car will do two
Tom,
This agent's book is for Fairfax MN on the M&StL. The fella posting
the info name is Sam. Sam just posted more, he has done the last half of
1947. From the time the cars were unloaded then
Tom,
This agent's book is for Fairfax MN on the M&StL. The fella posting
the info name is Sam. Sam just posted more, he has done the last half of
1947. From the time the cars were unloaded then
|
By
Clark Propst <cepropst@...>
·
#2406
·
|
|
Re: Any car will do two
"Tim O'Connor" <timoconnor@...> wrote:
A USRA-clone all-steel box car of 8'7" IH, with 4-4 Dreadnaught
ends and Youngstown doors. Specifically from Lot 559-B, built by
ACF St Louis
"Tim O'Connor" <timoconnor@...> wrote:
A USRA-clone all-steel box car of 8'7" IH, with 4-4 Dreadnaught
ends and Youngstown doors. Specifically from Lot 559-B, built by
ACF St Louis
|
By
Jeff English
·
#2405
·
|
|
Re: Branchline Reefers
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:14:37 -0400 "Tim O'Connor"
<timoconnor@...> writes:
Tim, .
My display case is not in my bedroom, therefore I don't sleep with them.
I enjoy them in the same way I
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:14:37 -0400 "Tim O'Connor"
<timoconnor@...> writes:
Tim, .
My display case is not in my bedroom, therefore I don't sleep with them.
I enjoy them in the same way I
|
By
byronrose@...
·
#2418
·
|
|
Re: Branchline Reefers
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:07:13 -0400 "Tim O'Connor"
<timoconnor@...> writes:
Please explain.
Tim, you obviously missed my cop-out notice. I have NOT studied them.
Also, of course I meant
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:07:13 -0400 "Tim O'Connor"
<timoconnor@...> writes:
Please explain.
Tim, you obviously missed my cop-out notice. I have NOT studied them.
Also, of course I meant
|
By
byronrose@...
·
#2419
·
|
|
Beer Can Tank Cars
Hi Group;
I model an Eastern Coal Hauler type railroad set in the 1960s and 1970s. The
prototype had several oil refineries along it on the portion that I am not
modeling. I would like to know IF
Hi Group;
I model an Eastern Coal Hauler type railroad set in the 1960s and 1970s. The
prototype had several oil refineries along it on the portion that I am not
modeling. I would like to know IF
|
By
thetrainman00@...
·
#2404
·
|
|
Re: Any car will do two
--- Clark Propst <cepropst@...> wrote:
I know in 1938 Lignite was shipped in box cars because it
tended to crumble as it dried out. What part of the country
was this book from? How many
--- Clark Propst <cepropst@...> wrote:
I know in 1938 Lignite was shipped in box cars because it
tended to crumble as it dried out. What part of the country
was this book from? How many
|
By
Tom Gloger
·
#2403
·
|
|
Re: Any car will do two
Not sure what this is.
A double sheathed ARA car, built 1926
Dunno.
A 36 ft box; a Fowler clone?
A 1923 ARA design car
An M-53 wagontop?
Timothy O'Connor <timoconnor@...>
Marlborough,
Not sure what this is.
A double sheathed ARA car, built 1926
Dunno.
A 36 ft box; a Fowler clone?
A 1923 ARA design car
An M-53 wagontop?
Timothy O'Connor <timoconnor@...>
Marlborough,
|
By
Tim O'Connor <timoconnor@...>
·
#2402
·
|
|
Any car will do two
I'm admittedly ignorant about the rules governing how cars are to be
loaded. I have found something curious in the agents seal book enteries
from another group. This is a small rural community that
I'm admittedly ignorant about the rules governing how cars are to be
loaded. I have found something curious in the agents seal book enteries
from another group. This is a small rural community that
|
By
Clark Propst <cepropst@...>
·
#2401
·
|
|
August Trains Photo
In the midst of a very interesting article on helper engines in the August
issue of Trains is an exceptionally interesting photo of a UP 2-8-8-0 and
trailing caboose in the Glenns Ferry area of Idaho.
In the midst of a very interesting article on helper engines in the August
issue of Trains is an exceptionally interesting photo of a UP 2-8-8-0 and
trailing caboose in the Glenns Ferry area of Idaho.
|
By
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
·
#2400
·
|
|
Re: IM R-40-10 AB brake question
Hey, I woulda been surprised by such an assertion, knowing that SP's
practice of painting trucks the same olive as the body dated back into
Harriman times. Harley may not be the ONLY guy who was out
Hey, I woulda been surprised by such an assertion, knowing that SP's
practice of painting trucks the same olive as the body dated back into
Harriman times. Harley may not be the ONLY guy who was out
|
By
thompson@...
·
#2399
·
|
|
Re: Stopping cars with magnet was Uncoupling magnets
off the rail?
>
Well, a friend of mine uses magnets to stop his cars at the end of
his stub ended gravity yard. There is a slight lurch when the end car
reaches the magnet but it's not enough to
off the rail?
>
Well, a friend of mine uses magnets to stop his cars at the end of
his stub ended gravity yard. There is a slight lurch when the end car
reaches the magnet but it's not enough to
|
By
fwj@...
·
#2398
·
|
|
Re: Uncoupling magnets
By
Dave & Libby Nelson <muskoka@...>
·
#2397
·
|
|
Re: Branchline Reefers
Byron, I forgot to add: the nose on that SD-60 is 4"
too long. Very obvious and serious flaw to us modern
modelers... ;o) [See recent magazine article devoted
to correcting massive frame, truck and
Byron, I forgot to add: the nose on that SD-60 is 4"
too long. Very obvious and serious flaw to us modern
modelers... ;o) [See recent magazine article devoted
to correcting massive frame, truck and
|
By
Tim O'Connor <timoconnor@...>
·
#2396
·
|
|
Re: Branchline Reefers
Byron, if those are your real scores for those freight car
models then I can only say that your results are more than
a little inconsistent with one another. Perhaps you apply a
tougher standard to
Byron, if those are your real scores for those freight car
models then I can only say that your results are more than
a little inconsistent with one another. Perhaps you apply a
tougher standard to
|
By
Tim O'Connor <timoconnor@...>
·
#2395
·
|
|
Re: Uncoupling magnets
Great idea, Dave! However I think it might work ok
if the magnets were simply fixed with respect to the
Accurail rod, and stood on outriggers as you've shown
but not touching down on the roadbed.
Great idea, Dave! However I think it might work ok
if the magnets were simply fixed with respect to the
Accurail rod, and stood on outriggers as you've shown
but not touching down on the roadbed.
|
By
Tim O'Connor <timoconnor@...>
·
#2394
·
|