Re: some type of milk car?
Donald B. Valentine <riverman_vt@...>
Not sure what cars Bill Daniels is refering to as identical to these as I do not recall photos of any silk cars having ice hatches. In addition I do not recall any silk cars being owned by any eastern railroads. From what is seen I concur with Mike that these are in fact milk cars for milk shipped in cans. I wonder why they had ice hatches, however, since milk in cans was top iced with the ice being shoveled amongst the cans. Note, too, the end doors, which I'll bet disappeared in the first resheathing of the ends. The bottom of the doors appears to be just about the height of the top of standard 40 qt. milk cans carried in a single layer. Most can cars had racks attached to the interior side walls with short pieces of chain that could be swung down over the bottom layer of cans to provide a stable foundation for a second layer. With the exception of the ice hatches and the end doors these car are very similar to DL&W milk cars used for can shipment in the post war years,six of which were sold to the Rutland in early 1954 becoming Rutland #350 - #355, all of which were sold in the late spring of 1961. #350 was ex-DL&W #1667 and #351 was ex-DL&W #1654. I do not have the DL&W numbers for the other four cars. All of these were stated to have been constructed in 1925 in the Rutland Car Accountant's record book but the builder was not identified. Rail Works offered brass models of at least' very similar DL&W cars in brass in both DL&W and Rutland versions. Cordially, Don Valentine - a former can shipper before going to a bulk tank.
|
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [RealSTMFC] Roof Name help
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
Guys;
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Here are both types. Yes, indeed, the center embossing on the 1925 design runs short of the edge. Elden Gatwood
-----Original Message-----
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Lester Breuer Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 9:05 PM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [RealSTMFC] Roof Name help I checked the drawings ( I was using) in the August 2001 Model Railroader drawn by Harold W. Russell where the center rib stamping looks to be to the roof edge, maybe an inch off; however, in the 1922 Car Builders as Dave Parker wrote the center rib stamping is a few inches short of the roof edge. Lester Breuer
|
|
Etched freight car ladders
Eric Hansmann
Plano Model Products is introducing etched metal freight car ladders to their extensive line of details. We take an early look at the product in the latest Resin Car Works blog post. http://blog.resincarworks.com/more-etched-ladders/ Eric Hansmann
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Bill Welch
Indeed Tom yes the classic and in its time the ubiquitous Hutchins roof.
Bill Welch
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Tom Madden
Is this the roof we're talking about? Taken at the Orange Empire Railway Museum in Perris, CA over 20 years ago.
Tom Madden
|
|
Re: B&O C-16 Question
Nelson Moyer
Thanks, Bruce. How widely did the B&O C-16 cars roam? Were they ever sent to the West Coast, e.g. interchanged in Chicago to the CB&Q or other Midwestern roads with West Coast connections?
Nelson Moyer
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io]
On Behalf Of Bruce Griffin
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2019 8:46 PM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] B&O C-16 Question
Nelson, FWIW I can confirm a C-16 was an express car for passenger service and they were coach olive green until early 1947 and then repaints were BandO blue (no gold stripe like other express car classes). 125 M-53 boxcars car were converted to this service in
the early 40s. And by 1949 only 25 C-16 were on the roster and only five were blue. Car numbers after 1949 were 1875 to 1899. By 1959, all were converted back to M-53 boxcars.
|
|
Re: B&O C-16 Question
Nelson, FWIW I can confirm a C-16 was an express car for passenger service and they were coach olive green until early 1947 and then repaints were BandO blue (no gold stripe like other express car classes). 125 M-53 boxcars car were converted to this service in the early 40s. And by 1949 only 25 C-16 were on the roster and only five were blue. Car numbers after 1949 were 1875 to 1899. By 1959, all were converted back to M-53 boxcars.
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Lester Breuer
I checked the drawings ( I was using) in the August 2001 Model Railroader drawn by Harold W. Russell where the center rib stamping looks to be to the roof edge, maybe an inch off; however, in the 1922 Car Builders as Dave Parker wrote the center rib stamping is a few inches short of the roof edge.
Lester Breuer
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Bill Welch
The Yarmouth roof lacks the "V" shaped stamping at the end of the roof ribs plus the stamping in the middle of the panel extends to the edge of the roof. I think this incorrect. The "V" shape can be carved and filed into the rib. Dick Bale's article in Dec. 2016 MRH has a good illustration of the Hutchins Roof
Bill Welch
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Kemal Mumcu
http://www.yarmouthmodelworks.com/index.php/ModelDetailParts/FreightCarParts#roofs
The Sylvan line went to Yarmouth model works. Only 8 bucks and available today. Colin Meikle
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
I may at best the poorest person with a saw in this group and even I can saw the roof from the Accurail 8-panel car and that is before the razerblade saw became available.
Bill Welch
|
|
Re: B&O C-16 Question
Nelson Moyer
Thanks, Chuck. Your explanation sounds right, and since it’s a pass-through, the receptacle would be on both ends for cars so equipped.
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io]
On Behalf Of Charles Peck
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2019 4:47 PM To: main@realstmfc.groups.io Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] B&O C-16 Question
Nelson, I'm not an expert on the C-16, but I believe that was a passenger equipped express car. Thus, it would be reasonable to expect it to be equipped with pass-through electric in case it was between two electrified cars, one of which needed to be train-lined. The train-lining connector plugs were in the vestibule overhead so the cables could pass through the diaphragm above head height. While I would not expect to find an express box between occupied passenger cars, it would be possible that a messenger-baggage, RPO, or some such might be coupled ahead. Chuck Peck
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:17 PM Nelson Moyer <npmoyer@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: B&O C-16 Question
Nelson, I'm not an expert on the C-16, but I believe that was a passenger equipped express car. Thus, it would be reasonable to expect it to be equipped with pass-through electric in case it was between two electrified cars, one of which needed to be train-lined. The train-lining connector plugs were in the vestibule overhead so the cables could pass through the diaphragm above head height. While I would not expect to find an express box between occupied passenger cars, it would be possible that a messenger-baggage, RPO, or some such might be coupled ahead. Chuck Peck
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:17 PM Nelson Moyer <npmoyer@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Dave Parker
I agree with Bill. The drawings in the 1922 Cyc show the "riblets" stopping a few inches short of the eave.
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Bill Welch
Good start Lester. Are you sure the rib stamping in the middle of each panel extended to the edge?
Bill Welch
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Lester Breuer
Bill I agree. I thought about the Acccurail roof; however, changed my mind. This afternoon, I installed the kit roof and scribed grooves between the roof ribs and in the grooves installed Plastruct .010” styrene round rod. I have attached a photo of the result.
Lester Breuer
|
|
Re: Roof Name help
Bill Welch
Well actually it is what Steve thinks is a Hutchins roof. If you have an Accurail model w/their excellent Hutchins roof, it can be used to help detail the F&C roof: "V" like crimps on the very ends of the roof ribs; .010 styrene rod used to mimic the intermediate crimp in the roof panels; and an NBW towards the end of each roof rib. Or buy an Undec Accurail body—they are inexpensive—and cut the roof off. I have done that a few times too.
Bill Welch
|
|
Re: There were not a lot of 50 foot boxcars around in 1929
Eric Hansmann
Indeed, that is an Illinois Central 50-foot automobile boxcar. I don’t know why it lacks doors. CB&Q is to the right and a partial UP car finishes the 50-foot cars.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The weathering variations on the cars in this image is also very interesting. Just a couple cars to the left of the IC boxcar is a BR&P boxcar. This, and a companion negative with another BR&P boxcar, are two of the only late 1920s images I’ve seen featuring a BR&P car. IIRC, the Van Sweringens owned the BR&P at this time. Eric Hansmann Murfreesboro, TN
On May 5, 2019, at 2:56 PM, Claus Schlund \(HGM\) <claus@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: All-Beer Train
Jeff
One local layout owner, who's layout is a geographically oriented freelance set in 1952, has a Shay locomotive set off to the side with an 85-ft double-plug-door high-cube boxcar attached that will be assigned to anyone complaining about anachronisms. Here's your throttle. (with apologies to Bill Engvall) I bet such a colorful train gets quite a bit of attention from the passerbys. First you hook 'em (on model railroading) and then you reel' em in (to more prototypical modeling). Jeff Shultz
On Sun, May 5, 2019, 09:53 Garth Groff <sarahsan@...> wrote:
|
|
There were not a lot of 50 foot boxcars around in 1929
Claus Schlund \(HGM\)
Hi List Members,
There were not a lot of 50 foot boxcars around in
1929, but there were some.
Here is a nice view of three different ones, all
gathered together at the extreme right side of the image, taken in
1929.
Too bad the negative has some damage, and the film
resolution is not quite where we can make out the road numbers. I think the
rightmost one (partial view only) is Union Pacific, the next one moving left
might be CB&Q, but I cannot quite make out the other with the fishbelly
underframe, maybe it is Illiniois Central? Thoughts?
Enjoy!
Claus Schlund
|
|