Re: mortuary trains
Alex Schneider
The site mentioned indicates that over 6000 fallen soldiers were brought home on a single liberty ship, whose arrival prompted the Life magazine article. Did other ships bring back more? Were the dead of other theaters of war brought back in a similar manner?
After the cars completed their service in this role what was done with them?
Alex Schneider
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2015 4:13 PM To: Era Freight Car List Steam Subject: [STMFC] Re: mortuary trains
Jim Murrie’s above post of earlier in the day is pretty modest inasmuch as Jim is surely the ranking expert on the Mortuary Trains; and the excellent article in the current RAILROAD HISTORY that he has authored is drawn directly from his ground-breaking clinic at Cocoa Beach several years ago.
I am certain that Jim was both motivated and energized on this subject by the distinguished moderator of this Freight Car List, in his alter ego as Director of said Cocoa Beach shlamazz.
For unknown reasons, to now, the Mortuary trains have received little note or any other attention- ever.
Denny
Denny S. Anspach MD Sacramento
|
||
|
||
Re: Car Service Rules
Dan,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I'm not sure you understand the drift of my thread ... I'm asking "under what conditions would the car service rules -not- be followed". For instance - in the example I've used and you quoted ... wouldn't a West coast car be supplied from Roseburg more often than they would get an appropriate (by the car service rules) car from even as 'close' (?) as Eugene. I get it that if there is an appropriate car right there in Roseburg that one would usually be used - I'm asking about the situation where an 'appropriate' car isn't available 'easily'. Perhaps I should ask the related question - isn't it more economical for SP Roseburg to provide, for instance, a GN box car to the plywood mill to go to St. Louis than it is to haul an empty from Eugene that would satisfy the car service rules? Isn't that - considerably- less cost? And doesn't SP make more money on a load carried in their own car than in some other RR's car? Even when the load is going to St. Louis on some other RR's rails? Of course the car demand in Roseburg was, for the most part, pretty predictable ... so adding some "empties for Roseburg" to a Southbound freight out of Eugene is certain something they might have done on a regular basis. And probably even did on an almost daily basis - during the peak season for loads out of Roseburg. But wouldn't those types of moves have been as much about "balancing" the empties based upon where they are needed - as it was to provide cars based upon the car service rules. Related "how was it actually done" question - how common was it for any RR to haul empties relatively long distances ... just to satisfy the car service rules? For instance if the SP has a glut of East coast box cars then they would 'ship some of them East' ... but just how common was that? Did it happen every week, every month, a few times a year, only in the event of an "off season" where they knew that the demand for box cars (going any where) would be low for some period of time. Please understand - I am not disputing the 'rules', nor even the stats on how often they were followed. I'm interested in "how much effort (money and time) was spent in following the car service rules" and the closely related question "what were the conditions where a car that doesn't 'fit the rules' was used". - Jim B. P.S. To those of you who are asking yourselves ... the answer is "Yes, I took the time to download, print out, read ... and study ... Tony's excellent treatise (clinic?) on "Freight Car Handling and Distribution". Again, it seems to focus more on the way things are supposed to work than on how they really work(ed). On 9/5/2015 11:46 AM, STMFC@... wrote:
There are 15 messages in this issue. |
||
|
||
Re: Any Recommendations on the C&O Freight Cars 1937-1946 book?
Gerry Fitzgerald
The book is very nicely done and is essentially a hardcover update with some additions of the earlier C&OHS publication "Freight Car Equipment of the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway, August 1, 1937." That book was edited by Earl Shaver and produced in softcover in 1980 and was later reproduced in revised form in 1989. As far as I know those were the only two publication runs of that text -I could be wrong- and both are out of print... but a copy can be found online or at a train show if you look hard enough.
The Shaver text was about 170 pages. The 2015 book, which lists Carl Shaver, Al Kresse, and Karen Parker as the authors, runs about 225 pages and has more photos as well as some newer WWII and postwar material and as such is much more fully updated to "later" periods. If you do not have the earlier book you should definitely purchase this new version. Even if you have the older book this is a nice edition to the library if you are a C&O freight car geek or just a more run of the mill freight car geek. Al Kresse knows as much about C&O freight car history as anyone else alive. Overall it is a very useful freight car modeling guide and pretty much supersedes everything else the C&OHS has produced to date when looking at the overall C&O freight car fleet. At 35 dollars it it a nice purchase, especially since it is hardcover. Photo quality -all B&W as i think about it- is pretty good throughout as are the car diagrams. I still have an original soft cover copy of "Chesapeake & Ohio Freight Cars to 1945" that was "complied" by Dean Freytag and Ted Wetterstroem back in 1974 which ran 52 pages. That I suppose is where this book project really began. Best, Gerard Gerard J. Fitzgerald Charlottesville, Virginia |
||
|
||
Re: mortuary trains
Anspach Denny <danspachmd@...>
My apologies to Mike in advance because although the era matches STMFC the remains were emphatically not Freight, but Passenger, Deceased. Jim Murrie’s above post of earlier in the day is pretty modest inasmuch as Jim is surely the ranking expert on the Mortuary Trains; and the excellent article in the current RAILROAD HISTORY that he has authored is drawn directly from his ground-breaking clinic at Cocoa Beach several years ago. I am certain that Jim was both motivated and energized on this subject by the distinguished moderator of this Freight Car List, in his alter ego as Director of said Cocoa Beach shlamazz. For unknown reasons, to now, the Mortuary trains have received little note or any other attention- ever. Denny Denny S. Anspach MD Sacramento |
||
|
||
MKT boxcar color and slogan circa 1947-1948?..
bill stanton
Were MKT steel boxcars painted all yellow and did they have the slogan "Serves the Southwest Well" in 1947? Were earlier single sheathed boxcars repainted yellow as well? (My understanding is that the slogan omitted the "Well" when first used and the sides, roofs, and ends were yellow) |
||
|
||
Re: Broadway Limited 6000 gallon chemical tank car
Bill Welch
Given that BLI has just recently started talking to a well known Freight Car Historian with good information about these AC&F cars, I would not be looking for the models this year.
Bill Welch |
||
|
||
Any Recommendations on the C&O Freight Cars 1937-1946 book?
gary laakso
Has anyone seen this book and, if so, any comments on its contents?
gary laakso
south of Mike Brock |
||
|
||
Assembled, weathered freight cars for sale
Clark Propst
Time to do fall cleaning. These are surplus cars used on previous
layouts.
Email me OFF LIST at cepropst@q.com for the
list.
Clark
Propst Mason City Iowa |
||
|
||
Re: Broadway Limited 6000 gallon chemical tank car
genegreen1942@...
The 3 extra cars from the BLI tank car 4-pack were spoken for within minutes of my post. If you have not received an email from me notifying you that you got one of the cars, then your request was received too late. Beyond the 3 mentioned above there were 10 additional requests for cars as follows: Brown Company 2 Shippers Car Line 6 Stauffer Chemical 2 That means, to me at least, that there are 14 people on this list alone who wish to buy only one tank car instead of a 4-pack. BLI should sell the cars individually. Further, if the above numbers are any indication, maybe there should be a Shippers Car Line 4-pack. At least one dealer on this list has announced he will break up 4-packs for individual sale and I'm sure some hobby shops will also even though doing so may cause dealers to be stuck with unsold cars that turn out to be less popular with the tank car buying public. To be honest, I didn't actually order the 4 pack until I was sure I could get rid of the other 3 cars. So far, on my model railroad, there is no industry planned that would either ship or receive chemicals. The Ethyl car will merely be part of the "scenery" on a CNW freight that just passes through Marshalltown. So far, on my model railroad, there is no industry planned that would either ship or receive chemicals. There will be shipments of tallow, linseed oil, soybean oil, gasoline, oils, lubricants, kerosene, diesel oil, heating oil, molasses and lard but no chemicals. Gene Green Out in the Badlands of New Mexico |
||
|
||
Re: B&O Gondola color
dale florence <dwwesley@...>
From: bnonut@... [STMFC] ; To: ; Subject: [STMFC] B&O Gondola color Sent: Sat, Sep 5, 2015 4:10:44 AM
|
||
|
||
Re: Funaro & Camerlengo kit box chronology(?)
Accurail sells very nice kit boxes. They are on their on line catalog sheet. |
||
|
||
Re: Funaro & Camerlengo kit box chronology(?)
Armand Premo
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
There are actually two cards.One for
maintenance / inventory purposes and the other for operation.Both
cards are preprinted.The one that remains with the car in its' box
and the other strictly for operation,the ones with the pocket.Armand
Premo----- Original Message -----
|
||
|
||
Re: PS PS-3 open top hoppers
Justin May <jmay59@...>
At least one exexGN exBN car went on to become WICT 7010 and went to IRM (IRYM 7010) until it was panted back to GN 70104 to start the cycle again.Mark, I located the IRM site folder and went through every photo. For those needing to detail the new Tangent Scale Models PS-3 kit, it's a wealth of information. http://www2.irm.org/blogs/archives/20-Great-Northern-70104.html Use the "Next" link at the top of the page to navigate through the transformation of the car from initial condition to fully repainted. So far based upon my research, I've determined the following roads used the following trucks: ACL, 2750 cuft, ASF A-3 with Stein axle retainers, triangular shaped bearing caps Alaska RR, 2960 cuft, National C-1, triangular shaped bearing caps B&M, 2750 cuft, ASF A-3, roller bearings DT&I, 2750 cuft, ASF A-3, solid bearings GN, 2750 cuft, National C-1, 3 visibile springs, triangular shaped bearing caps L&N, 2750 cuft, See list below. Later 2750 cuft series (153000-154699) used ASF A-3 ride control trucks with triangular shaped roller bearing caps, appearance of integrated roping staple on ends of car begins (1960, 1961 orders), and later 2960 cuft series exceed the scope of this list. Rock Island, 2750 cuft, ASF A-3, solid bearings Southern, 2750 cuft, ASF A-3, solid bearings Utah, 2750 cuft, ASF A-3, solid bearings For currently available accurate trucks, the use of the Tangent 100-1 for ASF A-3 with solid bearings is included with the kit. For those equipped with roller bearings, the Tangent ASF A-3 placed under their PRR X58 model is appropriate (B&M, some L&N). ACL's truck is best rendered by modifying the Tangent, Exactrail or Kato ASF A-3 roller bearing truck with two visible springs, and creating one's own Stein axle retainers, and the National C-1 truck design that Atlas produces is not correct given it is a solid bearing design for use on both GN and some L&N examples. Tahoe Model Works also produces a 70-ton ASF A-3 truck with a 5'8" wheelbase, but given the fidelity of the Tangent truck, I see no need to replace it. As delivered L&N PS-3s rode on 5'8" trucks of the following designs: 73000-74499, ASF A-3, solid bearing (1957-1958) http://freight.railfan.ca/cgi-bin/image.pl?i=ln73735&o=ln 74500-74999, Barber S-2-A, solid bearing (1957-1958) 150000-151699, ASF A-3, solid bearing (1959) http://freight.railfan.ca/cgi-bin/image.pl?i=ln150000&o=ln 151700-152499, Barber S-2-A, solid bearing (1959) 152500-152999, National C-1, solid bearing (1959) 153000-154699, ASF A-3 , roller bearing (April-August 1960) http://freight.railfan.ca/cgi-bin/image.pl?i=ln153720&o=ln 154700-155599, ASF A-3 , roller bearing (January-February 1961) 155600-155874, ASF A-3 , roller bearing (May-June 1961) http://freight.railfan.ca/cgi-bin/image.pl?i=ln155607&o=ln 155875-156149, Barber S-2-A, roller bearing (May-June 1961) http://freight.railfan.ca/cgi-bin/image.pl?i=ln156047&o=ln Hope this helps PS-3 modelers, Justin May |
||
|
||
mortuary cars
ed_mines
thanks to all who answered my question. Ed Mines |
||
|
||
Re: Funaro & Camerlengo kit box chronology(?)
Schuyler Larrabee
Armand, I wish I’d started such a list years and years ago, but is it just a card file? Why not on the computer (with a backup program such as Carbonite) in case of fire?
And Clark, you can buy uniform boxes. Reboxx at least used to have kit-sized boxes. But I understand, the “original box” notion . . .
Schuyler
I save all the boxes.I keep the cars not being used in boxes on book shelves.In each box I have a car card with information such as source,cost, purchase date,matching paint,weight, trucks ,couplers,repairs,last date on layout and value.And they are safe and do not collect dust.Armand Premo
|
||
|
||
Re: Funaro & Camerlengo kit box chronology(?)
hvyweight41
Thank you Al. As a man with many years of resin experience, can you tell me if there is any color or type of resin I should avoid or be concerned about? Is there a good source for learning "all things resin"? Keith Kempster
|
||
|
||
Re: mortuary trains
james murrie
My apologies to Mike in advance because although the era matches STMFC the remains were emphatically not Freight, but Passenger, Deceased.
However, in the interests of knowledge, to learn about the US Army mortuary cars get the current (Spring-Summer) issue of Railroad History magazine. It has a 20 page article. There was also a thread several years ago on the Yahoo Passenger Car List. Jim Murrie |
||
|
||
Re: Broadway Limited 6000 gallon chemical tank car
SUVCWORR@...
Tony,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I am a BLI dealer and I will be splitting the 4 packs to sell single cars. Just let me know what you want. I generally price 10% over my cost plus shipping and I do not yet know what the discount will be on these as BLI has variable discounts on their products. Rich Orr -----Original Message-----
From: Tony Thompson tony@... [STMFC] To: STMFC Sent: Fri, Sep 4, 2015 7:41 pm Subject: Re: [STMFC] Broadway Limited 6000 gallon chemical tank car
Gene Green wrote:
Does anyone want to split up any of the other BLI four-packs? I might be interested in participating.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, tony@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
|
||
|
||
Re: MONON box cars
Chad Boas
Also, #1271 was assigned to Globe Industries in Lowell Indiana. Chad Boas |
||
|
||
Re: PS PS-3 open top hoppers
caboose9792@...
In a message dated 8/26/2015 7:51:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
STMFC@... writes:
At least one exexGN exBN car went on to become WICT 7010
and went to IRM (IRYM 7010) until it was panted back to GN 70104 to start the
cycle again.
Mark Rickert |
||
|