Date   

Re: Trends in model paints. Was: Great Northern Omaha Orange

william darnaby
 

I guess to fill the void left by Floquil, Motrak Models is offering several black shades, white and earth tones in Scalecoat II flat for weathering purposes and general painting.  Scalecoat blended these flat finish paints specifically for Motrak and the bottles are labeled as such.  I picked up a bottle of each at Naperville but have not had an opportunity to experiment with them.  I saw that he had them at Train Fest and presume that he will bring them to Cocoa.

 

Bill Darnaby

 




This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.



Re: Micro Mask

Schuyler Larrabee
 

That’s not a bad idea, Chuck.  I was just reading Denny’s plaint, and I am wondering if my success with MM is due to my not trying to stretch it out and use less, when more works, maybe, better.  Better in the sense of the MM sticking together more and being easier to pull off, than a thin film of it would be.  I have a tendency to lay it on thick.

 

When there is something I can do in modeling relatively casually and non-obsessively (Me?  Obsess?) I tend to let it go.

 

Schuyler

 

From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 12:26 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: Re: [STMFC] Micro Mask

 

 

Yes, the old tender I used for my test was aged flat paint and possibly not very clean.  But then the caboose I plan

to overspray and weather is also not freshly painted and is quite flat.  Perhaps I should wash and use Future before

masking?  It wouldn't matter to the end result as the glossy Future would get covered  with the overspray weathering.

Chuck Peck

 

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:12 PM, 'Schuyler Larrabee' schuyler.larrabee@... [STMFC] <STMFC@...> wrote:

 

Chuck, not sure why you are not getting the lift-off, but I have used Micro-Mask multiple times with great success.  As Tim O’C wrote, there are situations where the line of color separation is simply too complex to accomplish with tape, and I generally find I will end up with better results with masking and spraying, than using a brush to detail the edges.

 

I take it from your description that the “old tender” was already painted? My work has been over paint, but generally new paint.  Perhaps your original base coat was . . . weathered?  Dirty?  A very flat coat of paint (vs. glossy)?  I suspect any of those conditions might play a role.

 

Schuyler

 

I could use some pointers on using Microscale  Micro Mask.  I had in mind to use it to protect

already installed caboose windows.  To be cautious with a product new to me, I first tried it

on the side of an old tender. In one area I did a double coat and in another I did a single coat.

Then did a quick spray from a rattle can of primer.

Neither area seems to want to release from the base coat.  I tried a couple of different tapes and got

some partial pickup of the paint but not a clean peel off like I expected.  Somehow I had

thought this would be something like rubber cement but with a water base.  A clean easy peel off.

Do I need some sort of surface prep? Could the product get old?  Or just give up and start cutting

masking tape?

Any suggestions?

Chuck Peck

Gainesville FL

 


Re: Micro Mask

Charles Peck
 

I tried scrubbing the test tender with a toothbrush under running water. I remove the Micro Mask but also 
a significant portion of the non masked overspray. No clear dividing line between the masked and non-masked
areas at all.  
Perhaps this is one of those "Your mileage may vary." products. 
Chuck Peck 

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Aidrian Bridgeman-Sutton smokeandsteam@... [STMFC] <STMFC@...> wrote:
 

Isn't Micro Mask water soluble? If so a wet cloth, and perhaps a good soaking for the really tough spots should get rid of any shreds. 

Aidrian





What safe removal tricks can be offered by others that have had more experience with Micro Mask ? 

Denny   

 



Re: Micro Mask

Tim O'Connor
 

Andy

For journal ends (and other uses) I use small bits of poster putty.
Easy to use, and re-use over and over.

https://tw-projects.s3.amazonaws.com/twduckbrand/prod/images/products/900569611f4c4bede4a927d2bda7a60015e5f86f.jpg

Tim O'

I use Micro Mask all the time, BUT I mainly use it to protect the pointed journal ends of wheelset axles when I airbrush them. I also use it for such things as piston rods and some crosshead guides on steam locomotives. In those applications it works very well, and I never have any trouble removing it. I can't remember using it on a detail part with a complex shape.

So long,

Andy


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Trends in model paints (UNCLASSIFIED)

Tim O'Connor
 

I included this link in the first post -- it explains the different
paint products in detail. Vallejo also makes other products besides paint.

http://www.acrylicosvallejo.com/en_US/model-paints/faqs/3

My LHS has ONE type of Vallejo paint. Have not idea which one it is. The stuff is practically as thick as tar, but when thinned with diH20, airbrushes as nicely as most other acrylics. I have gotten excellent finishes with this paint, although the need to thin it extensively has kept me from using it when I had alternatives.

Regards
Bruce Smith


Re: Micro Mask

Andy Sperandeo
 

Hi Denny,

I use Micro Mask all the time, BUT I mainly use it to protect the pointed journal ends of wheelset axles when I airbrush them. I also use it for such things as piston rods and some crosshead guides on steam locomotives. In those applications it works very well, and I never have any trouble removing it. I can't remember using it on a detail part with a complex shape.

So long,

Andy


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Trends in model paints (UNCLASSIFIED)

Bruce Smith
 

Tim,

My LHS has ONE type of Vallejo paint. Have not idea which one it is. The stuff is practically as thick as tar, but when thinned with diH20, airbrushes as nicely as most other acrylics. I have gotten excellent finishes with this paint, although the need to thin it extensively has kept me from using it when I had alternatives.

Regards
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL

On Nov 12, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Tim O'Connor timboconnor@... [STMFC] <STMFC@...> wrote:


Elden, perhaps you were not listening :-&#92; Vallejo makes FOUR (4) different
TYPES of paint. Two types are for airbrushing, and two are for brush painting.
Each type has its own set of colors.

Looking at military models painted (airbrushed) with them, I get the idea they
may be very good for weathering, structures, etc.

Tim O'



I agree with Jack; they are very good for brush-painting figures and landscaping elements, but I have not found them good for painting RR cars, or vehicles. The paint is rather "thick", which is not a problem on a person or fireplug, but tends to conceal shallow detail, which I do not like. You can, of course, thin them, but I have found that does not eliminate the thickness of the paint when applied or dry. They do have a really extensive range of colors, which may be useful to you when trying to get some shade you cannot get from the other lines, so you may find use for them in other applications, like dry-brushing or painting an odd colored roof, or something.

Elden Gatwood


------------------------------------
Posted by: Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...>
------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links



Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Re: Trends in model paints (UNCLASSIFIED)

Tim O'Connor
 

Elden, perhaps you were not listening :-&#92; Vallejo makes FOUR (4) different
TYPES of paint. Two types are for airbrushing, and two are for brush painting.
Each type has its own set of colors.

Looking at military models painted (airbrushed) with them, I get the idea they
may be very good for weathering, structures, etc.

Tim O'

I agree with Jack; they are very good for brush-painting figures and landscaping elements, but I have not found them good for painting RR cars, or vehicles. The paint is rather "thick", which is not a problem on a person or fireplug, but tends to conceal shallow detail, which I do not like. You can, of course, thin them, but I have found that does not eliminate the thickness of the paint when applied or dry. They do have a really extensive range of colors, which may be useful to you when trying to get some shade you cannot get from the other lines, so you may find use for them in other applications, like dry-brushing or painting an odd colored roof, or something.

Elden Gatwood


Announcement: Signature Press Winter Sale

Tony Thompson
 

Signature Press has begun our first Winter Sale on slower-moving titles, 35% discount if you buy direct. To see which titles and to order securely online, you may visit our web site at www.signaturepress.com . The sale runs until Dec. 31, but to ensure Christmas delivery, we recommend ordering by December 1.

Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, tony@...
Publishers of books on railroad history


Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Re: Trends in model paints (UNCLASSIFIED)

Gatwood, Elden J SAD
 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Guys;

I agree with Jack; they are very good for brush-painting figures and landscaping elements, but I have not found them good for painting RR cars, or vehicles. The paint is rather "thick", which is not a problem on a person or fireplug, but tends to conceal shallow detail, which I do not like. You can, of course, thin them, but I have found that does not eliminate the thickness of the paint when applied or dry. They do have a really extensive range of colors, which may be useful to you when trying to get some shade you cannot get from the other lines, so you may find use for them in other applications, like dry-brushing or painting an odd colored roof, or something.

Elden Gatwood

-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 1:46 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [STMFC] Re: Trends in model paints



Yes, Vallejo paints are great for brush painting figures, details, etc. They dry relatively quickly, cover perfectly, and leave no brush marks. After I bought my first set of Vallejo paints, I threw out all of my Testors and other bottles I used for figure painting. I haven't tried the air brush line primarily since I, like Denny, prefer Floquil and also because I can't mix paints to match a color. Mix up a boxcar red from Vallejo Air? No a chance of getting it right...



Jack Burgess



From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 10:35 AM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Trends in model paints





Denny Anspach wrote

> It has been interesting to me, and perhaps instructive, to observe the current
> renaissance of solvent-based model paints vs. the acrylics that not too long ago
> were predicted

Denny there has been a lengthy thread on the Sergent couplers group about Vallejo
paints -- they make 4 different types of water-based acrylic paints (including TWO
lines that are intended for brush painting). Folks are raving about how good these
paints are. I have not tried any b ut I think I will try a bottle of the brush-on
just to see how it works.

The paints are made in Spain and are not specific to railroads. One line of the
paint ("Premium") is made from a polyurethane-acrylic resin!

http://www.acrylicosvallejo.com/en_US/model-paints/faqs/3

Tim O'Connor







Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE


Re: Micro Mask

Aidrian Bridgeman-Sutton
 

Isn't Micro Mask water soluble? If so a wet cloth, and perhaps a good soaking for the really tough spots should get rid of any shreds. 

Aidrian





What safe removal tricks can be offered by others that have had more experience with Micro Mask ? 

Denny   

 


Re: Trends in model paints

Jack Burgess <jack@...>
 

Yes, Vallejo paints are great for brush painting figures, details, etc. They dry relatively quickly, cover perfectly, and leave no brush marks. After I bought my first set of Vallejo paints, I threw out all of my Testors and other bottles I used for figure painting. I haven't tried the air brush line primarily since I, like Denny, prefer Floquil and also because I can't mix paints to match a color. Mix up a boxcar red from Vallejo Air? No a chance of getting it right...

 

Jack Burgess

 

From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 10:35 AM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Trends in model paints

 



Denny Anspach wrote

  > It has been interesting to me, and perhaps instructive, to observe the current
  > renaissance of solvent-based model paints vs. the acrylics that not too long ago
  > were  predicted

Denny there has been a lengthy thread on the Sergent couplers group about Vallejo
paints -- they make 4 different types of water-based acrylic paints (including TWO
lines that are intended for brush painting). Folks are raving about how good these
paints are. I have not tried any but I think I will try a bottle of the brush-on
just to see how it works.

The paints are made in Spain and are not specific to railroads. One line of the
paint ("Premium") is made from a polyurethane-acrylic resin!

http://www.acrylicosvallejo.com/en_US/model-paints/faqs/3

Tim O'Connor




Re: Trends in model paints

Tim O'Connor
 

Denny Anspach wrote

  > It has been interesting to me, and perhaps instructive, to observe the current
  > renaissance of solvent-based model paints vs. the acrylics that not too long ago
  > were  predicted

Denny there has been a lengthy thread on the Sergent couplers group about Vallejo
paints -- they make 4 different types of water-based acrylic paints (including TWO
lines that are intended for brush painting). Folks are raving about how good these
paints are. I have not tried any but I think I will try a bottle of the brush-on
just to see how it works.

The paints are made in Spain and are not specific to railroads. One line of the
paint ("Premium") is made from a polyurethane-acrylic resin!

http://www.acrylicosvallejo.com/en_US/model-paints/faqs/3

Tim O'Connor


Trends in model paints. Was: Great Northern Omaha Orange

Anspach Denny <danspachmd@...>
 

It has been interesting to me, and perhaps instructive, to observe the current renaissance of solvent-based model paints vs. the acrylics that not too long ago were  predicted,  if not advocated  to take over our world  by the predominant model press and a lot of modelers (“Get On Board!")  I never made the change, solely on the grounds that I was not going to personally  hazard a lifetime’s accumulated skills, comfort, and experience in favor of having to learn an entirely new skill set with new equipment.   

Currently, I still rely upon my cache of accumulated Floquil paints, including not a few from the square bottle era. Their alterations in color hue over the years has been frustrating (yes), but perhaps  the changes are no more so than the real time practices of the prototype railroad painters whose work we so diligently attempt to emulate and copy.    I really have appreciated the Floquil’s covering ability, and their flat finish- a flatness hard to replicate with DullCote.  

This said Accupaint and ScaleCoat I have been far more forgiving paints for me than Floquil, and so far, Tru Color has made for me the gift of some very fine finishes.  I am also moving more into other model paints such as Tamaya, which I am also finding covers very well and is pretty forgiving.  

I note that Tru Color is now moving into the flat finishes, not surprisingly to fill the vacuum left by Floquil’s demise.  Ditto for Model Master (easy because of Testor ownership). Note again that the owners of Tru Color has related to me that they purchased the paint formulae, etc. from Accuaint’s manufacturer, George Bishop, and if I heard correctly, the present TriColor is of the same formula.

On occasion, I also still use -when needed- ancient SUPER RR lacquer colors (read: automotive-based paint from the ’50’s and ’40’s) whose deep and rich colors reflect beautifully the lead content that made such older paints so very rich. I also have a long string custom painted  multicolor brass passenger cars expertly painted with some new old-stock automotive lacquer that is simply…. stunning. 

The threads on useful solvents and formulation is always interesting and not-infrequently very much instructive.  I personally use automotive lacquer thinner for all cleaning purposes, and Floquil thinning. However, I bite the bullet and purchase cans/bottles of the specific thinning agents that each manufacturer recommends for his/hers particular paints: cautionary money very well spent relative to the time and trouble that I put into model finishing.

I would hope that this post would not prompt a host of safety and environmental cautions, all of which I am very much aware, do not minimize, and of which I exercise reasonable caution; but also the use of which of which I place on the balance of the pleasures of my everyday life  (I do not eat all cold food, or take colds showers  because I am fearful of potential household fires or gas fumes; nor not cross the street because of the fear of being hit).  I already have useful defenses against these hazards, not excluding common sense!).

Despite several attempts in the past, I still do NOT understand the circumstances why one would choose Scalecoat I over Scalecoat II, the latter seemingly more useful and with shorter drying times?  I have used SC I for years and love it, especially on brass, but-  why would not SC II do the same thing with less hassle?  H-mmm?
 
Denny

Denny S. Anspach MD
Sacramento





Re: Micro Mask

Charles Peck
 

Yes, the old tender I used for my test was aged flat paint and possibly not very clean.  But then the caboose I plan
to overspray and weather is also not freshly painted and is quite flat.  Perhaps I should wash and use Future before
masking?  It wouldn't matter to the end result as the glossy Future would get covered  with the overspray weathering.
Chuck Peck

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:12 PM, 'Schuyler Larrabee' schuyler.larrabee@... [STMFC] <STMFC@...> wrote:
 

Chuck, not sure why you are not getting the lift-off, but I have used Micro-Mask multiple times with great success.  As Tim O’C wrote, there are situations where the line of color separation is simply too complex to accomplish with tape, and I generally find I will end up with better results with masking and spraying, than using a brush to detail the edges.

 

I take it from your description that the “old tender” was already painted? My work has been over paint, but generally new paint.  Perhaps your original base coat was . . . weathered?  Dirty?  A very flat coat of paint (vs. glossy)?  I suspect any of those conditions might play a role.

 

Schuyler

 

I could use some pointers on using Microscale  Micro Mask.  I had in mind to use it to protect

already installed caboose windows.  To be cautious with a product new to me, I first tried it

on the side of an old tender. In one area I did a double coat and in another I did a single coat.

Then did a quick spray from a rattle can of primer.

Neither area seems to want to release from the base coat.  I tried a couple of different tapes and got

some partial pickup of the paint but not a clean peel off like I expected.  Somehow I had

thought this would be something like rubber cement but with a water base.  A clean easy peel off.

Do I need some sort of surface prep? Could the product get old?  Or just give up and start cutting

masking tape?

Any suggestions?

Chuck Peck

Gainesville FL



Re: Micro Mask

Charles Peck
 

Yes, there is rubber cement and I have used it in the past although that bottle is now aged beyond use.
But I was concerned about the effect of the rubber cement solvent attacking both the clear plastic
window and the painted frame around the window.   
Thus I thought the Micro Mask might be a similar product but with a safer base, being that it says
to clean brush with water.   
Chuck Peck

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Tim O'Connor timboconnor@... [STMFC] <STMFC@...> wrote:
 


Because the masked area may be very irregular -- For example, the smokebox
of a steam locomotive. But a small bit of tape underneath will help lift off
the masking, which adheres to itself more than to the model. Ambroid also
made a masking liquid, and there's always rubber cement!

Tim O'

>Maybe it's because I had a long day, but why would one use the masking if one had to place tape first? Just use tape?
>
>Brian J. Carlson, P.E.
>Cheektowaga NY



Re: Micro Mask

Anspach Denny <danspachmd@...>
 

This thread has been of considerable interest to me inasmuch as to date I have only had fair success with Micro Mask, difficulties arising from efforts at safe removal from around complex parts. The trick with masking tape is welcome news, the only caveat being that perhaps it should be limited to low tack tapes such as drafting tape. I have spent hours (hours!) removing Micro Mask from around brass steam locomotive detailing, leading me to believe that perhaps I should not use it around undercut 3D parts? (of course, painstakingly taping the same parts might result in the same time expenditure). 

What safe removal tricks can be offered by others that have had more experience with Micro Mask ? 

Denny   

     
Denny S. Anspach MD
Sacramento





Re: IM 1958 coupler pocket

Clark Propst
 

Yes, I also scraped the rivet lines off the rood and scratch built new latch mechanisms and added the correct brake wheel of course. It’s decals with the Milwaukee billboard scheme.
I’ve actually over built my roster! Here’s what I’ve added since Naperville.
Athearn RTR PS2 3 bay MILW 98047
ExactRail RTR Ribside MILW 18542
Intermountain  Undec kit AAR 37 C&O 3041
Intermountain  Undec kit AAR 37M CB&Q 62549
Intermountain  Kit Ribside MILW 22681
Intermountain  Undec kit 1958 LO MILW 99276
Intermountain  RTR 1958 LO RI 445
Intermountain  Undec kit AAR 37M SOO 137102
Ribside Cars Kit DD Ribeside MILW 6502
Ribside Cars Kit Ribside MILW 18286
Ribside Cars Kit Ribside MILW 22709
Ribside Cars Kit Ribside MILW 27012
Ribside Cars Kit Ribside MILW 21329
 
 
I thought it would take a lot longer to finish the roster. But, we’ve had swap meets/train shows every weekend.
Clark Propst
Mason City Iowa


Re: Micro Mask

Schuyler Larrabee
 

Chuck, not sure why you are not getting the lift-off, but I have used Micro-Mask multiple times with great success.  As Tim O’C wrote, there are situations where the line of color separation is simply too complex to accomplish with tape, and I generally find I will end up with better results with masking and spraying, than using a brush to detail the edges.

 

I take it from your description that the “old tender” was already painted? My work has been over paint, but generally new paint.  Perhaps your original base coat was . . . weathered?  Dirty?  A very flat coat of paint (vs. glossy)?  I suspect any of those conditions might play a role.

 

Schuyler

 

I could use some pointers on using Microscale  Micro Mask.  I had in mind to use it to protect

already installed caboose windows.  To be cautious with a product new to me, I first tried it

on the side of an old tender. In one area I did a double coat and in another I did a single coat.

Then did a quick spray from a rattle can of primer.

Neither area seems to want to release from the base coat.  I tried a couple of different tapes and got

some partial pickup of the paint but not a clean peel off like I expected.  Somehow I had

thought this would be something like rubber cement but with a water base.  A clean easy peel off.

Do I need some sort of surface prep? Could the product get old?  Or just give up and start cutting

masking tape?

Any suggestions?

Chuck Peck

Gainesville FL


Re: NYC (MDT) Boxcars ?? Lot 852 -B

Tim O'Connor
 

If this web site is correct then 852-B cars were exactly the same dimensionally
as lot 815-B and 820-B box cars.

http://www.canadasouthern.com/caso/boxcars.htm

Tim O'Connor

Have you tried the NYC Historical Society???? What photos they have are filed by Lot Number

Ralph

I have many NYC photos but I've never seen one of these. Probably looks
like other Despatch cars built before and after. In 1954 I'd guess it got
Roman lettering and used a white New York Central System emblem stencil,
and the side sheathing would be 5+8 riveted panels (i.e. like Branchine)

Tim O'Connor

Has anyone got any photos (builder's or in-service) of the 50 foot, double door boxcars
in Lot 852-B? That lot of 100 cars was built in late 1954 with Despatch end and roof stampings.
The car numbers were NYC 73900 to 73999.

Ralph Schiring - Omaha