Re: ADMIN: Oddball Decals
Thomas Baker
MIKE,
I have the very same question. IF it's a go with ODDBALLS, I plan to place an order. Tom ________________________________________ From: STMFC@... [STMFC@...] on behalf of Mike Brock [brockm@...] Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 11:05 AM To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] ADMIN: Oddball Decals Since an advertisement for Oddballs decals has made it to the STMFC and since there have been several messages showing concern about Oddballs capability to produce product in a timely manner, I think it is a good time to inquire to the members if anyone has received a decal from Oddballs in, say, the last 3 months. Please send any responses to: STMFC-owner@... Please do not send responses to the STMFC. Thanks Mike Brock STMFC Owner ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Re: Photo of PT on SP flat
Brian, Folks,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
As I noted earlier, this isn't really a very good cargo for long-distance movement by rails due to the beam of these PR boats. However there are other "boats" that fit the WWII era and would be most appropriate. One is readily modeled in HO (not sure about N) and these are LCVP landing craft. They were transported on their sides on flat cars over long distances, There is a photo of some on the Erie in the book America's Fighting Railroads by Don DeNevi. Alternatively, and more difficult to model would be other boats. One of the most interesting "boat cargos" I have seen are 2 Army tugboats or tenders shown in photos at the signal corps archives at the Library of Va. The shipment is carried on 3 flat cars and consists of 2 cars carrying the hulls, in an upright position with very little on the decks, and one flat carry two deckhouses the boats. A scratch building project for sure <G>! Al Brown has also modeled a private motor vessel secured to a PRR F22 as shown in photos from the Florida archive... and which likely represents a private vessel being returned to its owner following requisition into the coastal defense forces. Regards Bruce Bruce F. Smith Auburn, AL https://www5.vetmed.auburn.edu/~smithbf/ "Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield." __ / \ __<+--+>________________\__/___ ________________________________ |- ______/ O O \_______ -| | __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ | | / 4999 PENNSYLVANIA 4999 \ | ||__||__||__||__||__||__||__||__|| |/_____________________________\|_|________________________________| | O--O \0 0 0 0/ O--O | 0-0-0 0-0-0
On Sep 17, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Brian wrote:
I wish someone made one close to 1:160! Take Care, Brian R. Termunde Midvale, UT
|
|
Re: Coupling distance
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
--- In STMFC@..., "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@...> wrote:
Of course there was a standard distance, it was defined by the ARA standard couplers, first the D, later the E, and the draft gear in use, which almost universally had a three inch travel during most of the period covered by this list. The draft gear stops were fitted to the center sill so that the coupler had three inches of travel before the "horn" on the back of the head came into contact with the "striker" a heavy casting fitted to the end of the center sills to take the blow of the coupler horn under heavy impact. Both the Type E and Type D coupler before it had a 12" striker horn to pulling face dimension, so at rest two coupled cars would be 30" between the strikers. This could vary as much as 6" in either direction, but only at the moment of sever impacts; the draft gears would quickly return to their normal length. The normal variation of distance between strikers was 1", the amount of "free knuckle slack" designed into both the D and E couplers. Prior to WWI, when couplers of the MCB pattern were still in use the distance between strikers was somewhat shorter, as the MCB couplers were only 10.25" between striker horn and pulling face. After the advent of hydraulic cushioning, the amount of travel in the draft gear became much longer, and coupled cars are noticeably further apart. I don't think it's really possible to get the proper distance between cars using the full size KD coupler or any of it's "clones", the couplers are oversize and to get the proper length over the pulling faces, the striker almost disappears under the car, which looks worse than a couple extra scale inches between the car ends. Both the Accumate PROTO:HO coupler and the Sergent with narrow draft gear, which uses the PROTO:HO box, will give the correct distance between cars if the striker end of the box is mounted where the prototype striker is in relationship to the car body. Dennis Storzek Accurail, Inc.
|
|
Re: Photo of PT on SP flat
Brian Termunde
I wish someone made one close to 1:160!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Take Care, Brian R. Termunde Midvale, UT "My Train of Thought left the station without me!"
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC <STMFC@...> To: STMFC <STMFC@...> Sent: Sat, Sep 15, 2012 7:48 am Subject: [STMFC] Digest Number 7542 ________________________________________________________________________ a. Re: Photo of PT on SP flat Posted by: "lnbill" fgexbill@... lnbill Date: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:20 am ((PDT)) I don't know about the flat but Revell made a 1/96th scale of the Higgins PT. I m not sure if they are still in production but they can be found. Bill Welch ---
|
|
Re: FUTURE FLOOR WAX
Al Brown wrote
> Yellowing over time needn't imply any pigment is present initially. > Reaction with air You mean oxygen and nitrogen, both colorless, transparent gases? > or light If by "light" you mean UV, then you'd better believe your model color is going to change, and HOW! Here's how to test Future (it's NOT a floor wax!) theory: 1) Find a piece of pure, clear acrylic sheet 2) Overspray it with Future (if you dilute use only distilled water) 3) Dry it and leave it in a dark, smoke free place for 20 years 4) Now check the color by holding it up out of doors -- see any YELLOW? 5) No? I didn't think so. Tim O'Connor
|
|
Intermountain NYC Pacemaker boxcars
The IM NYC Pacemaker boxcars are beginning to hit the intermountain dealer.
When the ad first came out (March 2011, Yikes!) we discussed ends for the cars. Andy carlson wrote: Intermountain already has two "3/4" improved Dreadnaught ends for 10-0 IH cars. The first is the thin-R+3/4 IDE, which is the end sold when buying loose parts. The 2nd is a 3/4 IDE, which has no thin rectangular top rib, but does have a middle crease at the top. I also seem to remember when Intermountain first brought out their GN 12 panel 40' boxcar in the 1990s, they had another 3/4 end, which I remember because the mold gates were on the side edges of the ends, competing with the "D" nubs pretending to be rivets. Has anyone purchased these cars and can tell what end IM used? Brian J. Carlson, P.E. Cheektowaga, NY
|
|
Re: Photo and negative collections
railsnw@frontier.com <railsnw@...>
I do if I get a chance. Recently picked up nearly 1,000 medium format B&W negs of electric railways in the US, Canada, and UK. A number were of freight motors and in some cases freight cars.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Richard Wilkens
--- In STMFC@..., wlhoss@... wrote:
|
|
Re: 2012 RPM/Naperville Conference re Speakers
Gene <mopac1@...>
Richard,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
What would nenice is a list of topics along with the speakers. Gene Semon
--- In STMFC@..., Rhbale@... wrote:
|
|
Re: FUTURE FLOOR WAX
al_brown03
Yellowing over time needn't imply any pigment is present initially. Reaction with air or light or ambient moisture (or various other less likely agents) to create something colored would do it. Also, many colors when highly dilute appear yellow. I haven't studied the materials in "Future" so can't be more specific, and I haven't used it on my STMFCs (required content).
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
--- In STMFC@..., tgregmrtn@... wrote:
|
|
Re: Photo and negative collections
billsoman
And the PNRA (Pacific Northwest Railroad Archive) for Northwest roads, a joint venture of multiple railroad historical societies. The member societies generally accept and accession the donations, with some exceptions.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
http://pnrarchive.org http://www.gn-npjointarchive.org --- Bill Sornsin, Seattle
--- In STMFC@..., "tedander2000" <tedander@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Coupling distance
spsalso
Rob,
I doubt there was a standard distance. The only reason to be concerned was that a brakeman could make it between two cars on the roofwalks/running boards/whatever they were/are. Other than that, I think the distance you mention just "happened", mostly based on the dimensions of the couplers and their shanks. On a slight different note, EMD E's and F's were spaced 36" apart measured at the end of the car body (from Kalmbach's "Cyclopedia, Vol. 2"), and lightweight passenger cars were about 30" apart (from the Davies UP passenger car books). Unless, of course, I'm wrong. Ed Edward Sutorik
|
|
Re: ACF drawings
Ed Hawkins
On Sep 16, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Tom Vanwormer wrote:
Gregory Roberts wrote:Greg, In case there is a misunderstaning, the Barriger National Railroad Library (so named for donator John Barriger) is part of the St. Louis Mercantile Library, which is located on the campus of the University of Missouri - St. Louis (or UMSL as it is called). In addition to the many items donated by John Barriger, they have the ACF builder's photo collection as well as other documentation donated by ACF to this institution in the mid-1990s. The Mercantile Library does not have any drawing collections to my knowledge. Washington University, also in St. Louis, has a collection of builder's photos of the St. Louis Car Company. This company produced no freight cars to speak of, but they did manufacture a number of caboose orders and many passenger cars, gas-electrics, and street cars. The ACF drawing collection that I alluded to earlier is at the Museum of Transportation at Kirkwood, Missouri (St. Louis area). The MOT is not affiliated with the Mercantile Library or Washington University. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
Re: ACF drawings
Tom Vanwormer
Gregory Roberts wrote:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Anybody check the Beringer Collection at Washington University in
|
|
ADMIN: Oddball Decals
Since an advertisement for Oddballs decals has made it to the STMFC and since there have been several messages showing concern about Oddballs capability to produce product in a timely manner, I think it is a good time to inquire to the members if anyone has received a decal from Oddballs in, say, the last 3 months. Please send any responses to:
STMFC-owner@... Please do not send responses to the STMFC. Thanks Mike Brock STMFC Owner
|
|
Re: F39
cinderandeight@...
Bill,
Here are the drawing numbers I am aware of: E456381 Guard Rail Assy. D455907 Universal Hand brake Arrangement A455944 Brake Arrangement A455333 General Arrangement E455326 Brake piping Diagram Rich Burg
|
|
F39
Bill Lane
If anyone has the PRR drawings or knows the drawing numbers for the
following for the F39 (Not the F39a or F39b) please reply directly to bill@... General Arrangement Frame/underframe Flip down ramps I have other F39 materials & builders photos if you want to trade. Thank You, Bill Lane Modeling the Mighty Pennsy & PRSL in 1957 in S Scale since 1988 See my finished models at: <http://www.lanestrains.com/> http://www.lanestrains.com Look at what has been made in PRR in S Scale! See my layout progess at: <http://www.lanestrains.com/My_Layout.htm> http://www.lanestrains.com/My_Layout.htm Custom Train Parts Design <http://www.lanestrains.com/SolidWorks_Modeling.htm> http://www.lanestrains.com/SolidWorks_Modeling.htm PRR Builders Photos Bought, Sold & Traded (Trading is MUCH preferred) <http://www.lanestrains.com/PRRphotos.xls> http://www.lanestrains.com/PRRphotos.xls ***Join the PRR T&HS*** The other members are not ALL like me! <http://www.prrths.com/> http://www.prrths.com <http://www.lanestrains.com/PRRTHS_Application.pdf> http://www.lanestrains.com/PRRTHS_Application.pdf Join the Pennsylvania Reading Seashore Lines Historical Society It's FREE to join! <http://www.prslhs.com/> http://www.prslhs.com Preserving The Memory Of The PRSL
|
|
Coupling distance
roblmclear <rob.mclear3@...>
Hello to all this may seem like a bit of a stupid question and I am sure that the information has been posted somewhere before but I can't seem to locate it, do any of you freight car doyens out there know what the standard (if there was one) coupling distance between freight cars was. I am curious because I want to set my couplers to as prototypical distance as possible.
I am pretty sure that there would be differences in types of cars, but for starters can we limit it to boxcars and reefers. What was the standard distance between cars of this type. Any help would be appreciated thanks. Regards Rob McLear Kingaroy Australia.
|
|
Re: FUTURE FLOOR WAX
NHJJ4@...
I don't know about Floquil. I used Scale Coat and Baked it on No clear, no
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
gloss nutten but the old scale coat from the late 60s early 70s. But was told use Future ?? With that paint you don't need a clear gloss. Maybe in the last forty + years they changed the formula. And as far as a ( WAX ) yellowing Yes it does All the time. I used to take care of floors at a school. And Wax does yellow. The Formula on the Future has been changed I would guess BUT there are plenty of people who can tell you it did yellow. I have the engine to prove it. My Buddy Ed has a model plane that should have white under side of wings and when folded they have a yellow tint. These were Hi Class model winners at ( IPMS ) For runner of the RPM types we have now a days And are still around today. Went to a show today. Models that went ( Floor Waxed) didn't turn. I don't care if it has changed or not. I wont use it & lots of luck if you do. Jim Evans
In a message dated 9/15/2012 7:40:57 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
Rashputin@... writes: It is "Pledge with Future" and Kmart keeps it in stock all the time now. I asked at two different stores and they said it's a standard stock item so I don't think that would be regional or anything. I have things I used it on in the early eighties and they haven't yellowed yet so I agree with the post about it being some of the underlying Floquil glaze that causes they yellowing. R Hume [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: FUTURE FLOOR WAX
Tom Vanwormer
folks,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In Colorado you find the Pledge with Future at Wal Mart. Tom VanWormer Monument CO Gary Ray wrote:
|
|
Re: FUTURE FLOOR WAX
Gary Ray
Tried our local Kmart last week with no luck - just two fragrances of Pledge
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
(neither with Future - and I certainly don't want scents). Will try Home Depot tomorrow. Gary Ray Near Paradise, CA
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Rashputin Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 7:41 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: FUTURE FLOOR WAX It is "Pledge with Future" and Kmart keeps it in stock all the time now. I asked at two different stores and they said it's a standard stock item so I don't think that would be regional or anything. I have things I used it on in the early eighties and they haven't yellowed yet so I agree with the post about it being some of the underlying Floquil glaze that causes they yellowing. R Hume ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|