Re: Accurail 41' gon: Not a New Haven Model
Peter Ness
Not a New Haven gon - too many ribs, panels too narrow, too tall.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Regards, Peter Ness
----- Original Message -----
From: "gary laakso" <vasa0vasa@...> To: <STMFC@...>; <STMFC@...> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 9:16 PM Subject: [STMFC] Accurail 41' gon: Not a Great Northern Model Its not a Great Northern gondola either. |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Al Brown wrote:
Shall we collate? Following is the list from Schuyler's original post, with answers interpolated. The format of each entry is:SP and T&NO, not even close. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history |
|
Accurail 41' gon: Not a Great Northern Model
gary laakso
Its not a Great Northern gondola either.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
gary laakso south of Mike Brock vasa0vasa@...
----- Original Message -----
From: al_brown03 To: STMFC@... Sent: 5/9/2011 7:55:20 PM Subject: [STMFC] Re: Accurail 41' gon Shall we collate? Following is the list from Schuyler's original post, with answers interpolated. The format of each entry is: road: answer, correspondent, post # --- In STMFC@..., "Schuyler Larrabee" <schuyler.larrabee@...> wrote: <snip> Candidate roads from Accurail listing: D&RGW CNW: yes, Larrabee, 99867 (in which color?) T&P: yes, Sexton 99873 D&H: no, Sexton 99873 GM&O PRR SP ACL: yes, Blake 99869 and Sexton 99873 C&O: no, Welch 99874 and Kresse 99880 MP GN NP CN: no, Lucas 99882 SF C&NW (black): yes, Larrabee, 99867 (in which color?) SBD: if this means SCL then yes, Blake 99869 and Sexton 99873 SP&S DM&IR N&W NYC WAB PM KGB&W SOU: no, Welch 99874 L&N: no, Welch 99874 MON: no, Aufderheide 99876 NKP: yes, Glow 99881 Frisco MC NH B&M W&LE: yes, Kline 99885 CofG: close, Sexton 99873 Virginian: no?, Welch 99874 B&O: no, Witt 99870 DL&W WP CNJ: no, Kline 99885 UP B&LE RDG: no, Kline 99885 IC: no, Welch 99874 LV RUT T&NO CCC&StL P&LE: no, Kline 99885 MP ERIE RI WM: no, Kline 99885 NC&StL: no, Welch 99874 DT&I MKT CGW: no, Propst 99879 Not listed, but info provided: CRR: no, Welch 99874 P&WV: yes, Gatwood 99883 Georgia Railroad: yes, May 99887 -- hth -- -- Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
mopacfirst
Solved.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Message 59648, of 31 Jan 2007. A bit hard to find, but it's the message I remember. Do today's messages add anything not in that one? I happily threw together, er, assembled, the ACL and GM&O ones. Don't remember why I didn't go for the CNW one -- maybe the LHS didn't have one or it wasn't out yet at the time I bought these. Anyway, I'm not here to build one of everything, I only need stuff that came to Kansas on the MoPac so probably the CNW would still be worthwhile. Ron Merrick
--- In STMFC@..., "mopacfirst" <ron.merrick@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
mopacfirst
And no for MP. The T&P cars would not be quite right either, as the prototype was built 1925-28 and had Murphy ends.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Ron Merrick
--- In STMFC@..., "al_brown03" <abrown@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
Mike Fleming
Per Terrry Link's freight car roster you can add no to NYC and CCC$St.L
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Mike Fleming Superintendent, Bluff City Div. SER, NMRA President Emeritus, Memphis Society of Model Railroaders Vice President, Memphis Railroad and Trolley Museum Model Railroad Club, a 100% NMRA Member Club
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "al_brown03" <abrown@...> To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: Accurail 41' gon Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 23:55:08 -0000 Shall we collate? Following is the list from Schuyler's original post, with answers interpolated. The format of each entry is: road: answer, correspondent, post # --- In STMFC@..., "Schuyler Larrabee" <schuyler.larrabee@...> wrote: <snip> Candidate roads from Accurail listing: D&RGW CNW: yes, Larrabee, 99867 (in which color?) T&P: yes, Sexton 99873 D&H: no, Sexton 99873 GM&O PRR SP ACL: yes, Blake 99869 and Sexton 99873 C&O: no, Welch 99874 and Kresse 99880 MP GN NP CN: no, Lucas 99882 SF C&NW (black): yes, Larrabee, 99867 (in which color?) SBD: if this means SCL then yes, Blake 99869 and Sexton 99873 SP&S DM&IR N&W NYC WAB PM KGB&W SOU: no, Welch 99874 L&N: no, Welch 99874 MON: no, Aufderheide 99876 NKP: yes, Glow 99881 Frisco MC NH B&M W&LE: yes, Kline 99885 CofG: close, Sexton 99873 Virginian: no?, Welch 99874 B&O: no, Witt 99870 DL&W WP CNJ: no, Kline 99885 UP B&LE RDG: no, Kline 99885 IC: no, Welch 99874 LV RUT T&NO CCC&StL P&LE: no, Kline 99885 MP ERIE RI WM: no, Kline 99885 NC&StL: no, Welch 99874 DT&I MKT CGW: no, Propst 99879 Not listed, but info provided: CRR: no, Welch 99874 P&WV: yes, Gatwood 99883 Georgia Railroad: yes, May 99887 -- hth -- -- Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
seaboard_1966
I am thinking SBD is meant to be SAL. Not good for SAL.. Correct car is available from WrightTrak.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Denis Blake Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: "al_brown03" <abrown@...> Sender: STMFC@... Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 23:55:08 To: <STMFC@...> Reply-To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: Accurail 41' gon Shall we collate? Following is the list from Schuyler's original post, with answers interpolated. The format of each entry is: road: answer, correspondent, post # --- In STMFC@..., "Schuyler Larrabee" <schuyler.larrabee@...> wrote: <snip> Candidate roads from Accurail listing: D&RGW CNW: yes, Larrabee, 99867 (in which color?) T&P: yes, Sexton 99873 D&H: no, Sexton 99873 GM&O PRR SP ACL: yes, Blake 99869 and Sexton 99873 C&O: no, Welch 99874 and Kresse 99880 MP GN NP CN: no, Lucas 99882 SF C&NW (black): yes, Larrabee, 99867 (in which color?) SBD: if this means SCL then yes, Blake 99869 and Sexton 99873 SP&S DM&IR N&W NYC WAB PM KGB&W SOU: no, Welch 99874 L&N: no, Welch 99874 MON: no, Aufderheide 99876 NKP: yes, Glow 99881 Frisco MC NH B&M W&LE: yes, Kline 99885 CofG: close, Sexton 99873 Virginian: no?, Welch 99874 B&O: no, Witt 99870 DL&W WP CNJ: no, Kline 99885 UP B&LE RDG: no, Kline 99885 IC: no, Welch 99874 LV RUT T&NO CCC&StL P&LE: no, Kline 99885 MP ERIE RI WM: no, Kline 99885 NC&StL: no, Welch 99874 DT&I MKT CGW: no, Propst 99879 Not listed, but info provided: CRR: no, Welch 99874 P&WV: yes, Gatwood 99883 Georgia Railroad: yes, May 99887 -- hth -- -- Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
al_brown03
Shall we collate? Following is the list from Schuyler's original post, with answers interpolated. The format of each entry is:
road: answer, correspondent, post # --- In STMFC@..., "Schuyler Larrabee" <schuyler.larrabee@...> wrote: <snip> Candidate roads from Accurail listing: D&RGW CNW: yes, Larrabee, 99867 (in which color?) T&P: yes, Sexton 99873 D&H: no, Sexton 99873 GM&O PRR SP ACL: yes, Blake 99869 and Sexton 99873 C&O: no, Welch 99874 and Kresse 99880 MP GN NP CN: no, Lucas 99882 SF C&NW (black): yes, Larrabee, 99867 (in which color?) SBD: if this means SCL then yes, Blake 99869 and Sexton 99873 SP&S DM&IR N&W NYC WAB PM KGB&W SOU: no, Welch 99874 L&N: no, Welch 99874 MON: no, Aufderheide 99876 NKP: yes, Glow 99881 Frisco MC NH B&M W&LE: yes, Kline 99885 CofG: close, Sexton 99873 Virginian: no?, Welch 99874 B&O: no, Witt 99870 DL&W WP CNJ: no, Kline 99885 UP B&LE RDG: no, Kline 99885 IC: no, Welch 99874 LV RUT T&NO CCC&StL P&LE: no, Kline 99885 MP ERIE RI WM: no, Kline 99885 NC&StL: no, Welch 99874 DT&I MKT CGW: no, Propst 99879 Not listed, but info provided: CRR: no, Welch 99874 P&WV: yes, Gatwood 99883 Georgia Railroad: yes, May 99887 -- hth -- -- Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla. |
|
Re: New Freight Car Model from Spring Mills Depot
Bob
From the spacing of the center sill beams, it appears to be a sliding center-sill (cushion underframe) box car -- so it seems likely to be a post-1960 box car. Tim O'Connor I am unfamiliar with the brake cylinder as illustrated in the partial drawing posted on their web site: http://www.smd.cc/ Bob Witt |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Looks like it will be way shorter to list the right ones than the foobies. <g>
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history |
|
SP Modoc Line Conductors train book 1936-37
sp1930s
Dear List,
I recently borrowed a SP Freight Conductor's Train Book from Tom Dill and want to share it. The conductor's name was Partridge, the location is on the S.P.'s Modoc Line mostly between Alturas and Wendel during 1936 and 1937. This is the line connecting S.P.'s Oregon operations to the Overland route at Fernley Nevada. This is the same conductor as the 1938 to 1939 book I added earlier. You can find it in the photo section at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFC/photos/album/624993677/pic/list This is the last of the three books I had access to. If more become available I will add them. Enjoy Larry Castle - Seattle |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
Justin May <jmay59@...>
Add Georgia RR to the list of correct prototypes. ACL ordered 500 cars and diverted 100 cars of Lot 3618 to Georgia. The cars were built in September of 1951 to the ACL K-17 class specifications. Jerry Glow has a decal set too boot, albeit the cars were painted brown instead of black.
http://home.comcast.net/~jerryglow/samples/GA_gondola.jpg Justin May |
|
New Freight Car Model from Spring Mills Depot
rwitt_2000
Another "teaser" this time from Spring Mils Depot. I believe it will be
a freight car. I am not sure if it will be pre- or post-1960 era. I am unfamiliar with the brake cylinder as illustrated in the partial drawing posted on their web site: http://www.smd.cc/ "The time is near! SMD's very own first signature car is becoming a reality. Starting on 5/9/2011, we will be posting a new picture each day of our car that is currently on the way. Will you be able to tell what the car is from just one photo? Highly unlikely. We encourage you to visit our site each day to obtain a new clue as to what it might be. We can say the car has never been produced in brass, plastic, or resin before. We can say it will be available in HO scale and will be an RTR plastic car. Price is TBD. When the test shots of the car arrive (soon), we will post actual photos. The test shots of the car should be available for viewing at the next Great Scale Model Train Show in Timonium, MD on June 25-26, 2011. We aren't sure where our tables will be at the show as we don't know if the show will be in the Exhibition Hall or the Four H Building." Bob Witt |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
Larry Kline
Yes for W&LE, No for CNJ, P&LE, RDG, and WM
Larry Kline Pittsburgh, PA |
|
Re: G-26 Mill Gondola
Thanks Rich and others,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I knew the ribs in the center area were different but I didn't have a clue about the ends. I can overlook a difference or two but the ends were the tipping point. So I'll dig out a tray of water and use the PRR decals. I do have several other PRR cars and I didn't want to overpower my roster with these speciality cars. Back in the 60's a similar mill gondola kit (wooden sticks mostly) was made by Regal Kits with the choice of several road name decals--PRR, Eric, MILW etc. which lead me to ponder the possibilities. Bob Werre BobWphoto.com
--- In STMFC@..., Rich C <rhcdmc@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon (UNCLASSIFIED)
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Caveats: NONE It is very good for the series P&WV had, 300 cars, numbers 7501-7799; 50-ton cars. In fact, this car has the (unusual) correct end. Equipco handbrakes on all. Be aware, P&WV mixed wood floors with steel floors, in the series. Check your ORERs. The cars also had odd stepped bottom end grabs, and some had yellow-painted grabs and stirrups. Match to a photo! Elden Gatwood
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of jerryglow@... Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 12:17 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: Accurail 41' gon I'd have to check on T&P but include NKP and converted coke cars both of which I have decals for. There was an article in RMC on the NKP cars awhile back. Jerry Glow http://home.comcast.net/~jerryglow/decals.html --- In STMFC@... <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> , "Larry Sexton" <SSEXTON9@...> wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
Steve Lucas <stevelucas3@...>
The CN model is not accurate.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Steve Lucas.
--- In STMFC@..., "Schuyler Larrabee" <schuyler.larrabee@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
jerryglow2
I'd have to check on T&P but include NKP and converted coke cars both of which I have decals for. There was an article in RMC on the NKP cars awhile back.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Jerry Glow http://home.comcast.net/~jerryglow/decals.html
--- In STMFC@..., "Larry Sexton" <SSEXTON9@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
water.kresse@...
No, for C&O . . . 9 side-stakes vs. Accurail's 10 . . . and then the end panel combo's: w or w/o exteded or extentions. Maybe I missed one series in a very quick look at 50-ton high-sided gons?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Al Kresse
----- Original Message -----
From: cepropst@q.com To: STMFC@... Sent: Monday, May 9, 2011 10:50:46 AM Subject: [STMFC] Re: Accurail 41' gon No, for CGW. Clark Propst [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
Re: Accurail 41' gon
Clark Propst
No, for CGW.
Clark Propst |
|