Re: Northern Pacific stock car(was weathering)
George Simmons
--- In STMFC@..., "Steve Sandifer" <steve.sandifer@...>
wrote: movements. ______________Also, they were used for hauling cantaloupes and possibly other melon to market. George Simmons Dry Prong, LA
|
|
Re: Northern Pacific stock car(was weathering)
Steve SANDIFER
Roads lined the cars with cardboard and used them for grain movements.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
______________ J. Stephen (Steve) Sandifer mailto:steve.sandifer@... Home: 12027 Mulholland Drive, Meadows Place, TX 77477, 281-568-9918 Office: Southwest Central Church of Christ, 4011 W. Bellfort, Houston, TX 77025, 713-667-9417
----- Original Message -----
From: George To: STMFC@... Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 4:04 PM Subject: [STMFC] Northern Pacific stock car(was weathering) Follow up to an earlier post. In one of my videos on the Northern Pacific (1950's with lots of New York Mills shots) it shows stock cars with the slats filled with what appears to be unpainted 2x4's or 2x6's. I'd wondered if these were used for winter wheat? A comment was made earlier about the NP keeping these cars clean for livestock hauling. Any knowledge of grains being hauled in the cars? Any other road fill in the slats of stock cars with 2 by's? Thanks, George Courtney
|
|
Re: 3 dome tank
Steve Lucas <stevelucas3@...>
Bruce--
A two-or-three-dome resin tank car kit on the shelf? Not likely for me. I've built two resin tank cars so far, with a third from Norwest being heavily resin-bashed into a McColl-Frontenac (Texaco of Canada) car. Bring it on--I bet that I'll find a Canadian or major US car fleet (UTLX, GATX) prototype to suit it. Steve Lucas. --- In STMFC@..., "Bruce Smith" <smithbf@...> wrote: this is a relatively rare car and of course, because of the Athearn car, the3 dome car is alas, a modeling cliche.SC&F. Of course, as a resin kit, it will likely end up on the shelf nextto many other resin tank car kits ;^)
|
|
Re: ACF 1958cft covered hopper roofs
Ed,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
There is a good photo of a roof in the Mike Spoor / MS book "CB&Q color Guide..." of a CB&Q HC-1B. It's a Paul Winters on page 82. In the Burlington Buletin No.20 ( Covered Hoppers) also has 3 photos. 1 is from Rod (Bat) Masterson pp 8 and 2 are Hol Wagner's pp18. The earliest cars were built at Galesburg with welded roof panels. That series was 180000 - 180099. The balance of the ACF cars had the desired ribbed roof. Thanks for keeping them honest. We modelers appreciate all youe work. Sicerely, Rob Manley
----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Hawkins To: STMFC@... Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 4:07 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] ACF 1958cft covered hopper roofs On Feb 2, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Tim O'Connor wrote: > Before I forget, I thought I would mention that Frank Angtead > (Intermountain) did not know about the roofs with seam caps > that were found on CB&Q, AT&SF and other owners ACF 1958cft > covered hoppers. If anyone has good photos (I just ran across > a nice CB&Q example in the MS ATSF Color Guide p.97) of those > roofs I think Frank would like to see them. We might finally > get a correct ACF roof for a number of owners. Tim, Frank generally doesn't know anything (or even care) about the freight cars InterMoutain produces. Nearly 3 years ago (just prior to Marty McGuirk's departure), I sent InterMountain an entire set of AC&F construction drawings for this car. Included were drawings of various hatch configurations, different side variations (i.e., open or closed sides), and two primary roof arrangements (flat roof and roof with seam caps). I was happy to hear that test shots were shown at Cocoa Beach. I have asked (more like begged & pleaded) the production manager at InterMountain for the opportunity to review the test shots for accuracy prior to their decision to go into full production. Whether they will take my offer or not remains unknown to me. All I want is the chance to review them, and if there are any significant errors, to have them be aware before going into full production (basically to obviate a replication of the PFE R-40-10 debacle). I have provided InterMountain with as much of a complete roster of these cars that I can compile based on available data and photographs. I have also encouraged them to consider at least three hatch arrangements, two roof arrangements, and of course the open and closed side arrangements. This is in addition to other details such as locking bar variations. The open/closed sides option appears to be part of their planning, but so far I have been led to believe there's only the flat roof and one hatch arrangement being planned. Perhaps this can be changed to include other variations. I have also offered to assist them with painting specs (to the extent this data is available) on these cars as well offering photos to help with the decoration. On occasion I will call the production manager for an update on the ART reefer project, which continues to languish with unending delays to receive an assembled & decorated pilot model of the 1950 scheme. While I have not yet received a definitive answer to when the ART "phase II" project will commence, I've used the opportunity to ask for updates on the 1,958 c.f. covered hopper project and to continue to remind them of my voluntary offer to review the test shots before the production decision is made. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
Re: Northern Pacific stock car(was weathering)
Mark
The PRR hauled bricks on pallets in there stockcars!
Mark Morgan --- George <gsc3@...> wrote: Follow up to an earlier post. In one of my videos ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
|
|
Re: ACF 1958cft covered hopper roofs
Ed Hawkins
On Feb 2, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Tim O'Connor wrote:
Before I forget, I thought I would mention that Frank AngteadTim, Frank generally doesn't know anything (or even care) about the freight cars InterMoutain produces. Nearly 3 years ago (just prior to Marty McGuirk's departure), I sent InterMountain an entire set of AC&F construction drawings for this car. Included were drawings of various hatch configurations, different side variations (i.e., open or closed sides), and two primary roof arrangements (flat roof and roof with seam caps). I was happy to hear that test shots were shown at Cocoa Beach. I have asked (more like begged & pleaded) the production manager at InterMountain for the opportunity to review the test shots for accuracy prior to their decision to go into full production. Whether they will take my offer or not remains unknown to me. All I want is the chance to review them, and if there are any significant errors, to have them be aware before going into full production (basically to obviate a replication of the PFE R-40-10 debacle). I have provided InterMountain with as much of a complete roster of these cars that I can compile based on available data and photographs. I have also encouraged them to consider at least three hatch arrangements, two roof arrangements, and of course the open and closed side arrangements. This is in addition to other details such as locking bar variations. The open/closed sides option appears to be part of their planning, but so far I have been led to believe there's only the flat roof and one hatch arrangement being planned. Perhaps this can be changed to include other variations. I have also offered to assist them with painting specs (to the extent this data is available) on these cars as well offering photos to help with the decoration. On occasion I will call the production manager for an update on the ART reefer project, which continues to languish with unending delays to receive an assembled & decorated pilot model of the 1950 scheme. While I have not yet received a definitive answer to when the ART "phase II" project will commence, I've used the opportunity to ask for updates on the 1,958 c.f. covered hopper project and to continue to remind them of my voluntary offer to review the test shots before the production decision is made. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
Northern Pacific stock car(was weathering)
George Courtney
Follow up to an earlier post. In one of my videos on the Northern
Pacific (1950's with lots of New York Mills shots) it shows stock cars with the slats filled with what appears to be unpainted 2x4's or 2x6's. I'd wondered if these were used for winter wheat? A comment was made earlier about the NP keeping these cars clean for livestock hauling. Any knowledge of grains being hauled in the cars? Any other road fill in the slats of stock cars with 2 by's? Thanks, George Courtney
|
|
Northern Pacific stock car(was weathering)
George Courtney
Follow up to an earlier post. In one of my videos on the Northern
Pacific (1950's with lots of New York Mills shots) it shows stock cars with the slats filled with what appears to be unpainted 2x4's or 2x6's. I'd wondered if these were used for winter wheat? A comment was made earlier about the NP keeping these cars clean for livestock hauling. Any knowledge of grains being hauled in the cars? Any other road fill in the slats of stock cars with 2 by's? Thanks, George Courtney
|
|
Re: Weather Freight Cars
leakinmywaders
--- In STMFC@..., LOUIS WHITELEY <octoraro1@...> wrote:
stock cars be painted/weathered? Lou, I asked this some years ago on another list with regard to NP's wooden-side stock cars, and Matt Herson sent a couple of scans of rare interior photos that I believe Rufus Cone had collected (NP 82741 when new in 1936). The interiors of the side slats floors, doors and roof panels of these cars were unpainted, or possibly finished with an unpigmented oil. Only the structural members running the length of the tops of the carsides behind the fascia appear to have been painted, and the roof trusses. An interior car number was stenciled in white over one door opening. The photos are black and white, so the color of the painted members is uncertain, but it looks like it could be fresh oxide red (but can't rule out black). Of course, other roads may have done things differently... Given the use and cleaning regime I imagine the interior weathered to silver gray, with the floor of course going darker and browner from ground-in waste, grime,and straw dust. One can speculate the lower slats might show some heavier bleaching and scale deposits on their interior faces from lime treatment, plus the effects of kicking and rubbing by the guests they confined. I can echo Richard's observation that photos show that NP stock cars, when in consistent use for stock shipping, appeared quite clean. They actually got dirtier when relegated to hay shipping or MofW service. Chris Frissell Polson, MT
|
|
Re: ACF 1958cft covered hopper roofs
Tony
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I figure this may be our last chance (in our lifetimes) to get this model done right in HO scale... Of course Sunshine still makes a mini-kit for these roofs so at least resin modelers can get around the problem. Tim O'
Tim O'Connor wrote:Before I forget, I thought I would mention that Frank AngteadThe list of what Frank Angstead does not know about railroads
|
|
Re: ACF 1958cft covered hopper roofs
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Tim O'Connor wrote:
Before I forget, I thought I would mention that Frank Angtead (Intermountain) did not know about the roofs with seam caps that were found on CB&Q, AT&SF and other owners ACF 1958cft covered hoppers.The list of what Frank Angstead does not know about railroads generally and about freight cars in particular would be a long one <g>, but Tim's suggestion to provide prototype information to InterMountain is a good one. The more information they have, the more information that might possibly some day affect their products. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
ACF 1958cft covered hopper roofs
Before I forget, I thought I would mention that Frank Angtead
(Intermountain) did not know about the roofs with seam caps that were found on CB&Q, AT&SF and other owners ACF 1958cft covered hoppers. If anyone has good photos (I just ran across a nice CB&Q example in the MS ATSF Color Guide p.97) of those roofs I think Frank would like to see them. We might finally get a correct ACF roof for a number of owners. Tim O'Connor
|
|
Re: Jack Delano color photos
Richard Hendrickson
On Feb 2, 2008, at 10:02 AM, proto48er wrote:
Richard -[snip] Just wondering what the Maxwell photos show. Different photographer,Actually, the color in the Maxwell slides seems very accurate to me. These transparencies were shot on early ASA 10 Kodachrome and processed by Technicolor in Hollywood; in 1941 local color processing was nonexistent, and Technicolor worked to the highest professional standards - their primary business was, after all, processing motion picture film. Jack's exposures were excellent and he stored his originals very carefully; I see no evidence in my copies of color shift. I will add that, unlike many subscribers to this list, I spent a lot of time hanging around railroads and rail yards in the 1940s where the freight cars were every bit as grimy as shown in Delano's photos. To the terminological quibble raised by Mike Brock and others that the steam era extended into the 1950s, when there were many more new or repainted cars and the advent of diesels rendered the environment less dirty, I will just say that I do, in fact, consider the '50s the transition era, as Mike suggested. On the railroad I model, steam was still prevalent almost everywhere in the late 1940s but was largely gone by 1952-'53 and entirely gone by '55. The point I keep trying to make about weathering freight car models is that conditions on the prototype changed over time, sometimes quite a bit over relatively short spans of time. Hence large scale generalizations are misleading, especially when based on evidence from later periods. Realistic aging and weathering for the late 1950s and later is absolutely wrong for the 1930s and '40s (and, to some extent, the early 1950s). Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Re: 3 dome tank
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
Why?! ;^)<Because I like multi-dome tank cars. Because there are none (correctly done, not brass) currently on the market. I will buy Jon's (neat name huh!) when it's done. I would prefer one (plastic) with different domes but that's an additional manufacturing cost (mold work) so the Micro-Trains one would be acceptable. Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
Re: shelving resin tank car kits/was 3 dome
Jon Cagle <jscagle@...>
Bruce Smith wrote:
"As an AC&F 3-dome (or for that matter any of the other builders) this is arelatively rare car and of course, because of the Athearn car, the 3 domecar is alas, a modeling cliche.Note that we will shortly have a nicely detailed two dome car from SC&F. Of course, as a resin kit, it will likely end up on the shelf next to manyother resin tank car kits ;^)Bruce SmithAuburn, AL" Bruce, did you not see how easy this kit is going to be to build? It has a one piece cast frame! How much more do you want from me? OH THE HUMANITY!!!! jon To: STMFC@...: smithbf@...: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:56:21 -0600Subject: Re: [STMFC] 3 dome tank On Fri, February 1, 2008 10:22 pm, Jon Miller wrote:> OK. Bottom line is I want this car in HO.>> Jon MillerWhy?! ;^)As an AC&F 3-dome (or for that matter any of the other builders) this is arelatively rare car and of course, because of the Athearn car, the 3 domecar is alas, a modeling cliche.Note that we will shortly have a nicely detailed two dome car from SC&F. Of course, as a resin kit, it will likely end up on the shelf next to manyother resin tank car kits ;^)Bruce SmithAuburn, AL
|
|
Re: Freight car weathering [Was: Jack Delano color photos]
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
Well, that's not surprising as there were only 14-15,000 printed. You can try www.railpub.com who had it for $6 + shipping in their last flyer (1/1/08) or Ebay, which is where I got mine. Be advised there was a follow-up article in the June 1997 issue.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
KL
----- Original Message -----
From: Lawrence Rast To: STMFC@... Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 1:52 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: Freight car weathering [Was: Jack Delano color photos] I just checked the RMJ website and December 1995 is NOT available. Any suggestions on how to obtain Richard's article?
|
|
Re: 3 dome tank
Andy Carlson
Rare is dependent on what route it is travelling. I give an example:
The Ojai Branch of the SP (Southern California) had 5 bulk oil distributors and an orange packing plant served by the RR at the end of the line. Since small oil distributors sold several products (kerosene, 2 grades of auto fuel) it was economical to ship in multiple compartment tank cars when a full car load would be excessive. So on the Ojai branch 2 and 3 compartment tank cars were quite common. Out on the coast line, though, these cars would be overwhelmed by the large numbers of single compartment tank cars. -Andy Carlson Ojai CA Bruce Smith <smithbf@...> wrote: On Fri, February 1, 2008 10:22 pm, Jon Miller wrote: > OK. Bottom line is I want this car in HO. > > Jon Miller Why?! ;^) As an AC&F 3-dome (or for that matter any of the other builders) this is a relatively rare car and of course, because of the Athearn car, the 3 dome car is alas, a modeling cliche. Note that we will shortly have a nicely detailed two dome car from SC&F. Of course, as a resin kit, it will likely end up on the shelf next to many other resin tank car kits ;^) Bruce Smith Auburn, AL
|
|
Re: 3 dome tank
On Fri, February 1, 2008 10:22 pm, Jon Miller wrote:
OK. Bottom line is I want this car in HO.Why?! ;^) As an AC&F 3-dome (or for that matter any of the other builders) this is a relatively rare car and of course, because of the Athearn car, the 3 dome car is alas, a modeling cliche. Note that we will shortly have a nicely detailed two dome car from SC&F. Of course, as a resin kit, it will likely end up on the shelf next to many other resin tank car kits ;^) Bruce Smith Auburn, AL
|
|
Re: Freight car weathering [Was: Jack Delano color photos]
Lawrence Rast
I just checked the RMJ website and December 1995 is NOT available.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Any suggestions on how to obtain Richard's article? Best, Lawrence Rast
On Jan 30, 2008 8:10 PM, Gene Green <bierglaeser@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Weathering techniques
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Jack Burgess wrote:
(I also don't see evidence of the rust problems on freight cars of our era compared to current-day freight cars, either due to the premature failure of the paint which is designed to protect the metal and/or lack of scheduled repainting of current-day freight cars.)This is an important point Jack is making, particularly with regard to roofs. I have seen steam-era models whose roof treatments echo contemporary paint failure and galvanized failure, with large rust patches on each roof panel. This is indeed readily seen today, but is rare to nonexistent in pre-1950 photographs (to echo Mike Brock's comment about the "true" steam era). Paint failure to reveal galvanizing underneath, yes, to some extent, but heavy rust on roof panels, no. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|