|
Re: Model brake component size comparison to prototype
Dennis Storzek wrote:
Richard Hendrickson did the same to get some durable bracket-mount grabs. I still have a couple dozen of his parts, very nice brass. Don't know what reject rate
Dennis Storzek wrote:
Richard Hendrickson did the same to get some durable bracket-mount grabs. I still have a couple dozen of his parts, very nice brass. Don't know what reject rate
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#171244
·
|
|
Re: Model brake component size comparison to prototype
Well, we certainly have agreement here, don't we? Over the years I heard anywhere from "don't worry about it" to 7% shrinkage from pattern to investment cast part, although I dismiss both ends of that
Well, we certainly have agreement here, don't we? Over the years I heard anywhere from "don't worry about it" to 7% shrinkage from pattern to investment cast part, although I dismiss both ends of that
|
By
Dennis Storzek
·
#171243
·
|
|
Re: Model brake component size comparison to prototype
Paul Woods wrote:
Sorry, this is nonsense. The entire volume of the metal is shrinking as it solidifies and cools, and nothing in ordinary life can constrain it. The molten column AND the part
Paul Woods wrote:
Sorry, this is nonsense. The entire volume of the metal is shrinking as it solidifies and cools, and nothing in ordinary life can constrain it. The molten column AND the part
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#171242
·
|
|
Re: Model brake component size comparison to prototype
Paul,
I will disagree with your statement that shrinkage does not occur in the metal casting process.
If we assume the mold is filled out with molten brass, and the brass cools down to its phase
Paul,
I will disagree with your statement that shrinkage does not occur in the metal casting process.
If we assume the mold is filled out with molten brass, and the brass cools down to its phase
|
By
spsalso
·
#171241
·
|
|
Southwest Scale Productions Boxcar Doors
Following on on some previously posted material, attached are two formats of a document describing the post WWII boxcar doors produced by Southwest Scale Productions, with photos of both the prototype
Following on on some previously posted material, attached are two formats of a document describing the post WWII boxcar doors produced by Southwest Scale Productions, with photos of both the prototype
|
By
Steve and Barb Hile
·
#171240
·
|
|
Re: Illinois Central 40' ss boxcar information
Thanks Tim. Nice photo.
Chuck Cover
Santa Fe, NM
Thanks Tim. Nice photo.
Chuck Cover
Santa Fe, NM
|
By
Chuck Cover
·
#171239
·
|
|
Re: Model brake component size comparison to prototype
Hi Folks
For the benefit of anyone not familiar with the brass investment casting process: I do CAD design work for cast brass model railroad parts, along with other methods (laser, photoetch); the
Hi Folks
For the benefit of anyone not familiar with the brass investment casting process: I do CAD design work for cast brass model railroad parts, along with other methods (laser, photoetch); the
|
By
Paul Woods <paul@...>
·
#171238
·
|
|
Re: Reboxx 1.035 wheels
How many sets do you need, Brian?
Mike Schleigh in Grove City, Penna.
How many sets do you need, Brian?
Mike Schleigh in Grove City, Penna.
|
By
Schleigh Mike
·
#171237
·
|
|
Re: Reboxx 1.035 wheels
I found the same website last week, They only seem to offer 0.110" wheels. Reboxx were all 0.088" IIRC.
I really miss Reboxx.
--
Dave Parker
Swall Meadows, CA
I found the same website last week, They only seem to offer 0.110" wheels. Reboxx were all 0.088" IIRC.
I really miss Reboxx.
--
Dave Parker
Swall Meadows, CA
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#171236
·
|
|
Re: Reboxx 1.035 wheels
Brian,
I don't have any Reboxx wheels in my stash; but I've noticed an ad in the last few issues of RMC for "JB Wheelsets" that says "slightly different name...same great product!" There is a web
Brian,
I don't have any Reboxx wheels in my stash; but I've noticed an ad in the last few issues of RMC for "JB Wheelsets" that says "slightly different name...same great product!" There is a web
|
By
James Brewer
·
#171235
·
|
|
Reboxx 1.035 wheels
Does anyone know where any Reboxx 1.035 33“ wheels might exist on a hobby shop shelf or workbench someplace never to be used. I am looking for some for a project, either single or double insulated.
Does anyone know where any Reboxx 1.035 33“ wheels might exist on a hobby shop shelf or workbench someplace never to be used. I am looking for some for a project, either single or double insulated.
|
By
Brian Carlson
·
#171234
·
|
|
Re: circa 1946 freight car images
A color photo of these two has made the rounds before.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Eric Hansmann <eric@...>
Reply-To:
A color photo of these two has made the rounds before.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Eric Hansmann <eric@...>
Reply-To:
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#171233
·
|
|
Re: Illinois Central 40' ss boxcar information
Thanks, Ray!
Eric Hansmann
Murfreesboro, TN
Thanks, Ray!
Eric Hansmann
Murfreesboro, TN
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#171232
·
|
|
Re: Illinois Central 40' ss boxcar information
Thanks, Chuck. I also have this kit. I think I’ll cut the current door out of the side casting and remove all the door hardware. A Tichy replacement will be installed with companion half-door to
Thanks, Chuck. I also have this kit. I think I’ll cut the current door out of the side casting and remove all the door hardware. A Tichy replacement will be installed with companion half-door to
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#171231
·
|
|
Re: Illinois Central 40' ss boxcar information
1941-1942, not 1934. Most of the IC's single sheathed cars were rebuilt during the war years, and it does appear that all of them with wood doors (40' and 50'') got the rienforcing plate at the bottom
1941-1942, not 1934. Most of the IC's single sheathed cars were rebuilt during the war years, and it does appear that all of them with wood doors (40' and 50'') got the rienforcing plate at the bottom
|
By
Ray Breyer
·
#171230
·
|
|
Re: Illinois Central 40' ss boxcar information
Hi Eric,
In the Ted Culotta article in RMC that was referred to in Ben Hom’s response to me states that all of the car doors received steel reinforcing plates at the bottom of the doors during
Hi Eric,
In the Ted Culotta article in RMC that was referred to in Ben Hom’s response to me states that all of the car doors received steel reinforcing plates at the bottom of the doors during
|
By
Chuck Cover
·
#171229
·
|
|
Re: circa 1946 freight car images
John Larkin wrote:
What's actually odd about the photo is that the cars carry the post-1946 paint scheme of PFE, with both railroad emblems on both sides, yet that single grab iron has not been
John Larkin wrote:
What's actually odd about the photo is that the cars carry the post-1946 paint scheme of PFE, with both railroad emblems on both sides, yet that single grab iron has not been
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#171228
·
|
|
Re: circa 1946 freight car images
The second handhold on the left end of the car sides became a practice in the early 1930s.
I model 1926 and I need to remove the second handhold detail from many resin and plastic models.
The second handhold on the left end of the car sides became a practice in the early 1930s.
I model 1926 and I need to remove the second handhold detail from many resin and plastic models.
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#171227
·
|
|
Re: Anyone Want A First Generation SFRD Mechanical Reefer?
All-
Why do an interchange freight car prototype that had a hundred or less examples?
Have we completely run out of missed cars with broader multi road application?
I don’t think we have many
All-
Why do an interchange freight car prototype that had a hundred or less examples?
Have we completely run out of missed cars with broader multi road application?
I don’t think we have many
|
By
Charlie Vlk
·
#171226
·
|
|
Re: circa 1946 freight car images
And wouldn't that be a violation of the Safety Appliance regulations of the 1920's ??
I am amazed - thanks for pointing that out. The shop date is clear - dated 1950.
And wouldn't that be a violation of the Safety Appliance regulations of the 1920's ??
I am amazed - thanks for pointing that out. The shop date is clear - dated 1950.
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#171225
·
|