|
Re: Caboose restrictions
Rupert
In the time frame you are referring, the federal rules changed to requiring steel frames under cabooses.
Four wheel bosses almost always had wood frames and became illegal. The cause of the
Rupert
In the time frame you are referring, the federal rules changed to requiring steel frames under cabooses.
Four wheel bosses almost always had wood frames and became illegal. The cause of the
|
By
mark_landgraf
·
#169270
·
|
|
Caboose restrictions
Does anyone know about nation-wide legislative restrictions on the use of four wheel cabooses in about 1910, or employment agreements that may have restricted their use to branch lines or yards? I
Does anyone know about nation-wide legislative restrictions on the use of four wheel cabooses in about 1910, or employment agreements that may have restricted their use to branch lines or yards? I
|
By
Rupert Gamlen
·
#169269
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
Here are two other views of the Rutland 2777.
J. Stephen Sandifer
Here are two other views of the Rutland 2777.
J. Stephen Sandifer
|
By
Steve SANDIFER
·
#169268
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
Some years ago Stafford Swain wrote an article about modifying the Athearn 40' flat into one of the first steel flatcars built by GTR. There might be somebody in this group who has the issue of CN
Some years ago Stafford Swain wrote an article about modifying the Athearn 40' flat into one of the first steel flatcars built by GTR. There might be somebody in this group who has the issue of CN
|
By
Richard McQuade
·
#169267
·
|
|
Re: Looking for any info about Linde (CCBX) gondolas #801-815 and the containers.
#801-815
Jason,
My pleasure. From my trusty October 1958 ORER, page 688, entry for Union Carbide:
"Container Cars: The container (A.A.R. Mech. Designation LG) cars marked 'C.C.B.X' and numbered 801 to 803
Jason,
My pleasure. From my trusty October 1958 ORER, page 688, entry for Union Carbide:
"Container Cars: The container (A.A.R. Mech. Designation LG) cars marked 'C.C.B.X' and numbered 801 to 803
|
By
Garth Groff and Sally Sanford
·
#169266
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
Dave and Friends,
I just found a photo of a similar GT flat car in TRAIN SHED CYCLOPEDIA NO. 35 (reprint of the 1919 CBD), page 326. Grand Trunk 69611 has a lettering layout that mirrors the car on at
Dave and Friends,
I just found a photo of a similar GT flat car in TRAIN SHED CYCLOPEDIA NO. 35 (reprint of the 1919 CBD), page 326. Grand Trunk 69611 has a lettering layout that mirrors the car on at
|
By
Garth Groff and Sally Sanford
·
#169265
·
|
|
Re: Kits/Cars for Sale
Please send list Tom,Armand
Please send list Tom,Armand
|
By
Armand Premo
·
#169264
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
No. I have no plans. Attached are a couple pages from a March 1924 NYC freight car diagram book documenting these flat cars. General drawing numbers are listed for a few. Roger Hinman covered these in
No. I have no plans. Attached are a couple pages from a March 1924 NYC freight car diagram book documenting these flat cars. General drawing numbers are listed for a few. Roger Hinman covered these in
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#169263
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
Eric do you have plans?
Greg Martin
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Eric do you have plans?
Greg Martin
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
|
By
Greg Martin
·
#169262
·
|
|
Looking for any info about Linde (CCBX) gondolas #801-815 and the containers.
#801-815
Does anyone have any info they could share about these container gondolas? I'm trying to make a drawing of the containers anf gondolas working off pictures and the ORER dimensions on the gondola
Does anyone have any info they could share about these container gondolas? I'm trying to make a drawing of the containers anf gondolas working off pictures and the ORER dimensions on the gondola
|
By
Jason Kliewer
·
#169261
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
I think the MW just above the left-hand grab provides a pretty clear clue concerning company service versus interchange.
Whether the paint scheme actually represents a prototype car from "back in the
I think the MW just above the left-hand grab provides a pretty clear clue concerning company service versus interchange.
Whether the paint scheme actually represents a prototype car from "back in the
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#169260
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
Most likely the car GT 54559 was in company service, like GTW flat cars in this number series. As was the case with most other railroads, CNR and its associated lines did not list company service
Most likely the car GT 54559 was in company service, like GTW flat cars in this number series. As was the case with most other railroads, CNR and its associated lines did not list company service
|
By
mofwcaboose <MOFWCABOOSE@...>
·
#169259
·
|
|
Re: Photos From The Louis Edward Nollau Glass Negative Collection
the L&N gondola is one of 1000 composite gons that closely copied the RR's original 1000 USRA cars. The main difference is there is no flat diagonal straps on the end panels and they had cast sidearm
the L&N gondola is one of 1000 composite gons that closely copied the RR's original 1000 USRA cars. The main difference is there is no flat diagonal straps on the end panels and they had cast sidearm
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#169258
·
|
|
Photos From The Louis Edward Nollau Glass Negative Collection
Photos From The Louis Edward Nollau Glass Negative Collection
This collection is archived at the University of Kentucky.
Click on the photos to enlarge them.
Bob Chaparro
Hemet, CA
++++
Boxcar
Photos From The Louis Edward Nollau Glass Negative Collection
This collection is archived at the University of Kentucky.
Click on the photos to enlarge them.
Bob Chaparro
Hemet, CA
++++
Boxcar
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#169257
·
|
|
Reboxx 36 in. Wheel Chart
I had a request to post the Reboxx 36 in. Wheel Application Chart, so here it is.
Nelson Moyer
I had a request to post the Reboxx 36 in. Wheel Application Chart, so here it is.
Nelson Moyer
|
By
Nelson Moyer
·
#169256
·
|
|
My WWII loads clinic from Prototype Rails 2020, Cocoa Beach
Folks,
I have been asked to post my clinic from Cocoa Beach, Prototype Rails 2020 on WWII era military loads. I have placed it and the associated handout in a Google Drive that is accessible to all. I
Folks,
I have been asked to post my clinic from Cocoa Beach, Prototype Rails 2020 on WWII era military loads. I have placed it and the associated handout in a Google Drive that is accessible to all. I
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#169255
·
|
|
Re: Photo: Staley Tank Cars
AC&F Type 11, 10,000 gallon tank car.
Regards
Bruce
Bruce F. Smith
Auburn, AL
"Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield."
AC&F Type 11, 10,000 gallon tank car.
Regards
Bruce
Bruce F. Smith
Auburn, AL
"Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield."
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#169254
·
|
|
Photo: Staley Tank Cars
Photo: Staley Tank Cars
Undated photo from the Decatur Herald & Review:
https://tinyurl.com/taxs6pc
There are a number of other general railroad photos on the page that included the above
Photo: Staley Tank Cars
Undated photo from the Decatur Herald & Review:
https://tinyurl.com/taxs6pc
There are a number of other general railroad photos on the page that included the above
|
By
Bob Chaparro
·
#169253
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
With the obvious exception of the number of stake pockets, the GT car does look very similar to Central Vermont 4287 ( http://centralvermontrailway.blogspot.com/2018/08/wordless-wednesday-199.html)
With the obvious exception of the number of stake pockets, the GT car does look very similar to Central Vermont 4287 ( http://centralvermontrailway.blogspot.com/2018/08/wordless-wednesday-199.html)
|
By
Marty McGuirk
·
#169252
·
|
|
Re: Another Athearn 40' Flat Prototype [Was Rutland flatcar with trailer load]
The sidesills on those flats are slightly different. The sidesills on the GT car are deeper than those on the Rutland car. This also affects the angles of the fishbelly appearance.
The sidesills on those flats are slightly different. The sidesills on the GT car are deeper than those on the Rutland car. This also affects the angles of the fishbelly appearance.
|
By
Eric Hansmann
·
#169251
·
|