|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
At some point, it got one. I think the camera angle didn’t see it.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Tony Thompson <tony@...>
Reply-To:
At some point, it got one. I think the camera angle didn’t see it.
Thanks!
--
Brian Ehni
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Tony Thompson <tony@...>
Reply-To:
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#165463
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
good grief - wrong photo
--
*Tim O'Connor*
*Sterling, Massachusetts*
good grief - wrong photo
--
*Tim O'Connor*
*Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#165462
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
It appears to be one of Warren Weiss's outdoor railroad models - he scratchbuilds in a
large scale and has a beautiful outdoor layout in California. He often posts on Facebook.
It appears to be one of Warren Weiss's outdoor railroad models - he scratchbuilds in a
large scale and has a beautiful outdoor layout in California. He often posts on Facebook.
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#165461
·
|
|
ASF Catalog
I'm not sure this will be of interest to those on thislist.
This is a PDF of a American Steel Foundries Catalog from 1911. Itis a catalog of knuckles, pins and locks only (and is missing pages 5& 6 -
I'm not sure this will be of interest to those on thislist.
This is a PDF of a American Steel Foundries Catalog from 1911. Itis a catalog of knuckles, pins and locks only (and is missing pages 5& 6 -
|
By
Bob Webber
·
#165460
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
The one thing that gives it away is the rail joiner on the first track, amazing modelling.
Paul Doggett. England 🏴
The one thing that gives it away is the rail joiner on the first track, amazing modelling.
Paul Doggett. England 🏴
|
By
Paul Doggett
·
#165459
·
|
|
Re: 3 new 40'er for Collinsville
Armand,
KCS 21001-21300 (AC&F, 4-56) with 8' doors and 4/3/1 late Dreadnaught ends can be done with the Front Range or later Atlas(?) models. A builder's photo was in Ed
Armand,
KCS 21001-21300 (AC&F, 4-56) with 8' doors and 4/3/1 late Dreadnaught ends can be done with the Front Range or later Atlas(?) models. A builder's photo was in Ed
|
By
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
·
#165458
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
The photos look like a large scale (2.5” gauge) model built by Warren Weiss fromSoCal.
It is a B-50-13. I have attached another picture shown on his backyard railroad.
Gene Deimling
The photos look like a large scale (2.5” gauge) model built by Warren Weiss fromSoCal.
It is a B-50-13. I have attached another picture shown on his backyard railroad.
Gene Deimling
|
By
Gene Deimling
·
#165457
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
I thinks it’s a pacific limited o scale model.. perhaps done by Lee Turner an exquisite custom painter from MI.
Brad Andonian
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
I thinks it’s a pacific limited o scale model.. perhaps done by Lee Turner an exquisite custom painter from MI.
Brad Andonian
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
|
By
Brad Andonian
·
#165456
·
|
|
Re: RDG 70000 series 4-bay hoppers
I'm not a Reading expert, but HTn quad hoppers would fit the 1924 blt date. A photo of 70455 with a 3-48 reweigh date shows a vertical wheel geared handbrake. It's a broadside photo, so I can't ID
I'm not a Reading expert, but HTn quad hoppers would fit the 1924 blt date. A photo of 70455 with a 3-48 reweigh date shows a vertical wheel geared handbrake. It's a broadside photo, so I can't ID
|
By
Jack Mullen
·
#165455
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
Odd if it’s prototype, no coupler.
Tony Thompson
Odd if it’s prototype, no coupler.
Tony Thompson
|
By
Tony Thompson
·
#165454
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
I think it's a great modeling job. That photo required great examination, but a couple of things give it away. First is the track. Under a 40-foot boxcar on 39-foot rails would be at least a couple of
I think it's a great modeling job. That photo required great examination, but a couple of things give it away. First is the track. Under a 40-foot boxcar on 39-foot rails would be at least a couple of
|
By
MDelvec952 <MDelvec952@...>
·
#165453
·
|
|
Re: RDG 70000 series 4-bay hoppers
Jim,
I am not a READING hopper expert but I have a few photos. I believe that you would be mistaken to assume that these cars started life as composite cars. The options are HTL or HTN class
Jim,
I am not a READING hopper expert but I have a few photos. I believe that you would be mistaken to assume that these cars started life as composite cars. The options are HTL or HTN class
|
By
Bruce Smith
·
#165452
·
|
|
RDG 70000 series 4-bay hoppers
P&R 71000, class HTL, was built as an all-steel car with a horizontal (vertical staff) brakewheel.
Some reading:
P&R 71000, class HTL, was built as an all-steel car with a horizontal (vertical staff) brakewheel.
Some reading:
|
By
David
·
#165451
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
Look at the bare branches towering over the two story building on the left and curved over and towering over the boxcar. The tie plates are uniformly off of the ties, the wood pile beyond the
Look at the bare branches towering over the two story building on the left and curved over and towering over the boxcar. The tie plates are uniformly off of the ties, the wood pile beyond the
|
By
gary laakso
·
#165450
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
If it's a model, I don't think it can be in HO. There isn't a T-section Bettendorf truck in HO that looks quite like that. Also, the ties and trackwork don't look like HO either
PROTOTYPE gets my
If it's a model, I don't think it can be in HO. There isn't a T-section Bettendorf truck in HO that looks quite like that. Also, the ties and trackwork don't look like HO either
PROTOTYPE gets my
|
By
Dave Parker
·
#165449
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
Are there not latching features missing from the left hand side of the door? And, something about the rails looks too uniform and without the first sign of any joint. MODEL
Mike Schleigh Grove
Are there not latching features missing from the left hand side of the door? And, something about the rails looks too uniform and without the first sign of any joint. MODEL
Mike Schleigh Grove
|
By
Schleigh Mike
·
#165448
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
The trucks on the real cars had Barber Lateral Motion Devices, seen as a horizontal rectangular shape between the top of the springs and bottom of the bolster. This detail is missing in the photo. I
The trucks on the real cars had Barber Lateral Motion Devices, seen as a horizontal rectangular shape between the top of the springs and bottom of the bolster. This detail is missing in the photo. I
|
By
brianleppert@att.net
·
#165447
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Lehigh Valley Freight Car Diagrams
Steve, here are two that I have to share.
Eric Lombard
Homewood, IL
Steve, here are two that I have to share.
Eric Lombard
Homewood, IL
|
By
Eric Lombard
·
#165446
·
|
|
Re: MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
Damn fine model, IMO.
Thanks!
Brian Ehni
(Sent from my iPhone)
Damn fine model, IMO.
Thanks!
Brian Ehni
(Sent from my iPhone)
|
By
BRIAN PAUL EHNI
·
#165445
·
|
|
MODEL OR PROTOTYPE
I recently came across this image. I felt that it was a prototype photo until I noticed the chalk marks above the right truck. This seems to be one that is in the Clover House chalk mark set.
I recently came across this image. I felt that it was a prototype photo until I noticed the chalk marks above the right truck. This seems to be one that is in the Clover House chalk mark set.
|
By
WILLIAM PARDIE
·
#165444
·
|