Re: travel to Cocoa Beach
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
Tony Thompson says:
I'd been planning to bring a group of model freight cars toThe easiest way to insure that models will not be tampered with is also more costly...probably. One never knows with airlines. Anyhow...too late this yr...but when I went to the NMRA National in Seattle in 2004, the security line consisted of three people...and my wife and I were two of them. How could this be? We went out of Melbourne, FL. Unfortunately, you also have to leave via another small airport on the way back to achieve the same effect. Leaving Seattle, someone had, apparently, decided that the best way to keep Osamma Hisself from boarding one of our planes was to check out every male of over 6'3". Presto! I was led into a private area and my shoes were searched with infinite care. Fortunately, I did not have one of my SC&F head end cars hidden in one of my shoes. Now, I had no problem with the search...but the security guys in Melbourne apparently heard me speak and determined I was not from the Middle East...Anyhow, the security line in Seattle was about 300 people...and we were 2 of them. Good luck. I want to see the models. Incidentally...I hope Judge Brock doesn't beat up on me too much for going out of scope...sorta [ I'm guessing he won't ], but I'll be bringing my UP 200,000 gal steel water tank and water treatment plant to Prototype Rails. Why is this significant? I just finished applying Archer rivets to it. It's not complete but has about 80% of the rivets needed. Maybe I'll find time to finish it. Anyhow, I used the double row for those in the upright position...as the photos show...and single row for parallel. I'm going to do a clinic on it on Thursday night at 9:30PM. I learned a few lessons regarding applying long decals of rivets which I'll share...if I'm still standing by then AND remotely coherent. This follows my op session earlier and various start up activities at the hotel. Should be fun. Mike Brock
|
|
Re: NEWSPRINT
Paul <buygone@...>
Schuyler:
4" of reinforced concrete is all that was needed for the landing pads on the intermodal trailers at the Southern Pacific ramps. When you consider that some of the trailers grossed out at just under 60,000 lbs, the pressure under the sand shoes was a lot greater than the forklift wheels even under load. 5" was more than needed and 10" would be an overkill. Paul C. Koehler _____ From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Schuyler Larrabee Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 6:29 PM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [STMFC] NEWSPRINT Several people have written in this thread something on the order of Nothing special just a concrete dockWell, actually I'd be pretty sure that the concrete dock is a little bit special as it has to be quite thick to withstand the shear pressures involved, particularly in a warehouse where they may be stacked two-high. There are also some extraordinary stresses when a forklift carries these things around. An ordinary concrete slab on a loading dock is likely 5" thick. I'd guess that the concrete slab for the loading dock designed for large paper in rolls would be at least 10", maybe 12" SGL E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.508) Database version: 6.14030 http://www.pctools. <http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/> com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
|
|
Re: travel to Cocoa Beach
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
Tony,
As has been suggested in the past would mailing (or UPS/FedEx) them be better. It's kind of a crap shoot anyway it's tried. UPS/FedEx are usually good about the 5 working days. I have found that UPS you have to declare a value and pay for insurance but FedEx you just declare a value. I found this out by shipping some silver to a foundry. They (FedEx) insured it for over a thousand and didn't charge any extra. Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
travel to Cocoa Beach
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
I'd been planning to bring a group of model freight cars to Cocoa but the recent news about airline security seems worrying. Has anyone heard anything specific about searches of carry-on luggage? One of those nightmare scenarios is the ham-fisted TSA guy wrenching models out of boxes.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Re: NEWSPRINT
Schuyler Larrabee
Several people have written in this thread something on the order of
Nothing special just a concrete dockWell, actually I'd be pretty sure that the concrete dock is a little bit special as it has to be quite thick to withstand the shear pressures involved, particularly in a warehouse where they may be stacked two-high. There are also some extraordinary stresses when a forklift carries these things around. An ordinary concrete slab on a loading dock is likely 5" thick. I'd guess that the concrete slab for the loading dock designed for large paper in rolls would be at least 10", maybe 12" SGL E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.508) Database version: 6.14030 http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
|
|
Re: NEWSPRINT
Douglas Harding <dharding@...>
As a kid in the 60's, I carried papers for the local twice weekly, which had it's own printing press back then. Paperboys were
suppose to enter via the back loading dock to get our papers, not the front office entry, so I witnessed the unloading of paper rolls. The loading dock was a raised open concrete affair. The paper rolls came in an enclosed back of a straight van body delivery truck. I don't recall a forklift. The paper rolls were placed on a wheeled frame, similar to a barrel rack and rolled into place to reload the printing press. The rack was at the right height to allow the paper to roll right into the press, once the "axle" had been inserted into the roll. Extra rolls were stored near the loading dock, so delivery was not an every week occurrence. It is quite possible they came standing on end (eye to the sky) and tipped over onto a tilted up rack, just like handling a barrel, only larger round object. I don't know where paper came from, the town was served by both the RI & the CB&Q, but neither had tracks anywhere near the newspaper building. If paper came via boxcar I suspect the newspaper had a warehouse where paper was stored then the local truck was sent every time they needed paper. Or more likely the paper was shipped to a warehouse in Des Moines and local paper sent a truck to Des Moines each time it need a few rolls. Doug Harding www.iowacentralrr.org
|
|
Was Wilson - NRHS
rdgbuff56
Rich,
This is a great site. I will have to look over it to see how to take the dates. It has for the Reading: RDG NS 7/99 7/2000 Does that mean they only used the reporting marks for that period of time? Their is still a Reading covered hopper in original paint and reporting marks in my area. I saw it yesterday headed north through town. Francis A. Pehowic, Jr. in Sunbury, Pa. ________________________________ From: "SUVCWORR@aol.com" <SUVCWORR@aol.com> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 1:28:02 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: Wilson reefer (bogus?) Tim, According to the NRHS website TRAX was first added in 4/54 by ART. http://www.nrhs. com/reporting_ marks/aar_ reporting_ marks.htm Rich Orr -----Original Message----- From: Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@ comcast.net> To: STMFC@yahoogroups. com Sent: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 12:06 am Subject: [STMFC] Re: Wilson reefer (bogus?) Gene, you've made me wonder about the relative sizes of Swift, Armour and Wilson. (To say nothing of Oscar Mayer, et al) Looking at fleets, in 1953 there were 4000 SRLX (Swift) reefers= 3747 ARLX (Armour) reefers = 1469 WCLX (Wilson) reefers However I'm not sure if there were other reporting marks used by these companies. I have later 50's photos of Armour TRAX cars for example. I can't pinpoint when they began using the TRAX mark. Tim O'Connor At 12/30/2009 11:01 PM Wednesday, you wrote: Thanks to all who answered. Your answers were about what I expected but, sinceI really didn't know, I thought I would ask. My layout would likely only see the occasional Wilson reefer. Swift and Armour will be more frequent visitors. or two on Western Grocers in Marshalltown. ------------ --------- --------- ------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
New Year
Marcelo Lordeiro <mrcustom@...>
A great NEW YEAR < on the tracks > to Everyone !
Marcelo Lordeiro www.mrcustom.com.br trens@mrcustom.com.br Tel.: +55 21 2273-2758
|
|
Happy New Years
Dennis Williams
Happy New Years to Everyone!!!
Dennis Dennis Williams Munhall, Pa. www.resinbuilders4u.com
|
|
Re: NEWSPRINT
Jim Lancaster
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "geodyssey" <riverob@...> wrote:
Yes. I drove by it about two weeks ago and there were five or six boxcars spotted at the dock. Jim Lancaster
|
|
Re: Coal: Pre-1900 list?
water.kresse@...
Is there a freight car list that specializes in post-Civil War to pre-WW1 coal rail operations?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Al Kresse
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Allen" <dallen@nmu.edu> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:46:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [STMFC] Coal: Coos Bay and Vancouver Island Esteemed colleagues: I offer the following, hoping for the indulgence of the prosecutor, judge (no jury) and jailer Mr. Brock. Abdill, in This Was Railroading, pg 186, has a photo of the Beaver Hill tipple. It is not particularly small. CBR&E $5 is spotting some CBR&E coal cars for loading; a loaded car is in the foreground. It is ToC era. (As a side note, does anybody know where I can find additional information about these coal cars?) And on pg 186 is a photo which has a ramp up to one of the bay-side coal dock. Obviously a commercial venture at that time. Austin and Dill, in The Southern Pacific in Oregon, have some discussion about this mine as well. A photo on pg 234, taken in 1914, shows a coal dock in Marshfield - a single-sided dock like the one in Two Harbors, MN, but quite a bit shorter, with a covered top. And they say: "In the summer of 1894 a two-mile branch had been extended west from Beaver Hill Junction to the Beaver Hill coal mine by the Coos Bay, Roseburg and Eastern Railroad & Navigation Company. Initially the coal was hauled to Marshfield for loading onto ships. When the Southern Pacific obtained control of the Coos Bay, Roseburg and Eastern Railroad & Navigation Company they intended to use the coal for locomotive fuel. However, the coal proved to be a poor grade, unsuitable for locomotives, and the plan, which proved to be an embarrassment for certain Southern Pacific officials, was dropped. The Beaver Hill spur was abandoned in November of 1926." And I do not believe that Vancouver Island Coal has been mentioned. While initially mined by the original inhabitants of the island commercial mining didn't start until a bit before 1850 at Fort Rupert at the northern tip of the island. But the more southerly mines on the east side of the island were the favored developments, initially by Robert Dunsmuir in 1850. And these various mines continued in operation through the steam era. Turner, in Vancouver Islands Railroads, discusses this quite well. Many thanks to the data provided by Nelson and the map provided by Karig; these items present the "modern" (for a 1905 modeler) context quite nicely. Dave Allen
|
|
New Barber Lateral Motion Truck
brianleppert@att.net
A Barber Lateral Motion 50-Ton freight car truck is now available in HO scale from Tahoe Model Works.
The Barber Lateral Motion Device used steel rollers and a roller seat between the springs and special bolster to provide a little side-to-side movement of the car body to the truck, resulting in a smoother ride and reduced wear to wheel flanges, journals and couplers. John C. Barber invented this device and formed the Standard Car Truck Company in the late 1890s to market arch bar trucks with this feature. It was later applied to Andrews, T-Section Bettendorfs, Vulcans and eventually ARA trucks with one-piece U section sideframes--what our hobby has called a "bettendorf". The spotting feature for trucks with the BLM device is the narrow horizontal roller seat casting located between the top of the springs and the truck bolster. Examples may be seen in Richard Hendrickson's truck article in Railway Prototype Cyclopedia #4, Figs. 1, 6, 7, 10, 12, 19 and 42. Fig. 23 is the BLM device adapted to a Barber S-1 truck, in this case with a modified spring package for NYC's LCL Pacemaker service. Fig. 15 is actually, I believe, a rare Symington Lateral Motion truck. More photos of trucks with the BLM device can be found in Richard's truck article in the Feb. '90 issue of Railmodel Journal, #1, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21 and 22. Drawings of trucks with The Barber Lateral Motion Device can be found in these Car Builders' Cyclopedias: 1922(pages 608, 609), 1925(pages 606,607), 1928(pages 776,777), 1931(pages 766, 768, 769), 1937(pages 912, 914), 1940(pages 1123, 1138) and 1943(page 1096). U-section trucks with this feature were manufactured from the early 1920s to the late 1930s. Railroads that fully embraced this style of truck included ATSF, B&O, CB&Q, CP, C&NW, DL&W, IC, NP, RI, SL-SF, SP, T&NO, UP and WP. Also PFE and SFRD. CN, CV, CogG, C&EI, Erie, GTW, MP and T&P all had some cars with Barber Lateral Motion trucks, as well as a few cars owned by C&O, Wabash and Western Maryland. For most of these railroads, purchases of Barber Lateral Motion trucks ended with the Great Depression. However, B&O, CB&Q and CP continued buying them into the later parts of the 1930s. The shape of sideframes varied greatly, as was typical of trucks of that period. The prototype trucks for TMW's offering have sideframes cast by American Steel Foundries in the 1940s for both SP and UP. These were actually replacement sideframes for older trucks, most likely T-section Bettendorfs. Prototype research was conduted at the Nevada State Railroad Museum in Carson City, NV and at the Western Pacific Railroad Museum at Portola, CA. Flyers for these new HO trucks are still available. Please contact me OFF-LIST at brianleppert@att.net Rob Adams should soon be posting the new flyer and order form on steamfreightcars.com . You can also find info of all of Tahoe Model Works trucks there, listed under Modeling, and then Detail Parts. Brian Leppert Tahoe Model Works Carson City, NV
|
|
Coal: Coos Bay and Vancouver Island
David Allen
Esteemed colleagues:
I offer the following, hoping for the indulgence of the prosecutor, judge (no jury) and jailer Mr. Brock. Abdill, in This Was Railroading, pg 186, has a photo of the Beaver Hill tipple. It is not particularly small. CBR&E $5 is spotting some CBR&E coal cars for loading; a loaded car is in the foreground. It is ToC era. (As a side note, does anybody know where I can find additional information about these coal cars?) And on pg 186 is a photo which has a ramp up to one of the bay-side coal dock. Obviously a commercial venture at that time. Austin and Dill, in The Southern Pacific in Oregon, have some discussion about this mine as well. A photo on pg 234, taken in 1914, shows a coal dock in Marshfield - a single-sided dock like the one in Two Harbors, MN, but quite a bit shorter, with a covered top. And they say: "In the summer of 1894 a two-mile branch had been extended west from Beaver Hill Junction to the Beaver Hill coal mine by the Coos Bay, Roseburg and Eastern Railroad & Navigation Company. Initially the coal was hauled to Marshfield for loading onto ships. When the Southern Pacific obtained control of the Coos Bay, Roseburg and Eastern Railroad & Navigation Company they intended to use the coal for locomotive fuel. However, the coal proved to be a poor grade, unsuitable for locomotives, and the plan, which proved to be an embarrassment for certain Southern Pacific officials, was dropped. The Beaver Hill spur was abandoned in November of 1926." And I do not believe that Vancouver Island Coal has been mentioned. While initially mined by the original inhabitants of the island commercial mining didn't start until a bit before 1850 at Fort Rupert at the northern tip of the island. But the more southerly mines on the east side of the island were the favored developments, initially by Robert Dunsmuir in 1850. And these various mines continued in operation through the steam era. Turner, in Vancouver Islands Railroads, discusses this quite well. Many thanks to the data provided by Nelson and the map provided by Karig; these items present the "modern" (for a 1905 modeler) context quite nicely. Dave Allen
|
|
Re: NEWSPRINT
Paul <buygone@...>
Paul:
LA Times owned Publishers Paper Co. in Portland OR. This is where their newsprint came from by the trainload. Paul C. Koehler _____ From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Catapano Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 9:54 AM To: Steam_Era Subject: [STMFC] NEWSPRINT C. 1952 Was much newsprint produced in the US? Or had it's production moved to Canada? Paul Catapano
|
|
Re: NEWSPRINT
Greg Martin
Rob,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
If memory serves me correct, it is the Herald Examiner plant. I can check tonight as I have an SP "Spins List" booklet for that area at home from the 80s. Greg Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: geodyssey <riverob@gmail.com> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 7:12 am Subject: [STMFC] Re: NEWSPRINT Isn't there a huge rail-served Times printing plant in Santa Ana or Costa Mesa, visible just north of the I-405? When I was switching on the UP back in the late 70s-early 80s, a midnight job would take four 100-ton boxcars of paper three or four times a week to a Times printing plant via a switchback behind the DART warehouse. I think this plant printed phone books. An NW2 with a running start and sanding would not always be able to push two cars up the steep grade. Back up and take another run... Rob Simpson --- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <buygone@...> wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: NEWSPRINT
Dave Owens
My newspaper, The Hartford Courant, gets paper via the old CV and
sometimes at our siding on Amtrak's New Haven-Springfield line. Most of the paper comes via the old CV and is transloaded at Monson, Mass. into trucks for the final trip to the printing plant on the first floor of our building in Hartford. Every once in a while, though, I see a car or two on the siding. I rarely see the NSC newsprint cars on the Hartford line so I don't know what they're doing in New Haven. Maybe they're getting it by truck too. The Waterbury Republican-American used to have regular delivery of newsprint cars by Guilford (as regular as Guilford service can be), although I don't know what the situation has been the past few years. What several folks have said about the importance of proper handling is true. Although huge and heavy, rolls of newsprint are quite fragile. And with the focus of using every bit of paper as can be used in order to save money, divits in rolls and damaged ends are a huge no-no. Dave Owens West Hartford, CT . -- 2010 New England/Northeast Prototype Modelers Meet June 4-5, 2010 (Always the weekend after Memorial Day) Collinsville, Connecticut www.neprototypemeet.com
|
|
Re: Wilson reefer (bogus?)
SUVCWORR@...
Tim,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
According to the NRHS website TRAX was first added in 4/54 by ART. http://www.nrhs.com/reporting_marks/aar_reporting_marks.htm Rich Orr
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@comcast.net> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 12:06 am Subject: [STMFC] Re: Wilson reefer (bogus?) Gene, you've made me wonder about the relative sizes of Swift, Armour and Wilson. (To say nothing of Oscar Mayer, et al) Looking at fleets, in 1953 there were 4000 SRLX (Swift) reefers= 3747 ARLX (Armour) reefers = 1469 WCLX (Wilson) reefers However I'm not sure if there were other reporting marks used by these companies. I have later 50's photos of Armour TRAX cars for example. I can't pinpoint when they began using the TRAX mark. Tim O'Connor At 12/30/2009 11:01 PM Wednesday, you wrote: Thanks to all who answered. Your answers were about what I expected but, sinceI really didn't know, I thought I would ask. My layout would likely only see the occasional Wilson reefer. Swift and Armour will be more frequent visitors. or two on Western Grocers in Marshalltown.
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Re: NEWSPRINT
cornbeltroute <cornbeltroute@...>
Joel,
Marty remarked on the Central Vermont's newsprint operation. For several years I have been reading the Boston & Maine list, too (BM_RR). If you search the archives there, can't imagine you won't find paper mill postings. Model Railroad carried a detailed, two-part article on a New England paper mill. Perhaps Andy or Marty will correct me if needed, but I recall it centered on a B&M serviced industry at Berlin, N.H.: * An industry you can model, part 1: Papermaking and the railroads Model Railroader, October 1998 page 100 ("MCGUIRK, MARTY", PAPER, PROTOTYPE) * An industry you can model, part 2: Papermaking and the railroads today Model Railroader, November 1998 page 90 An industry with great kitbashing potential ("HEDIGER, JIM", PAPER, PROTOTYPE) If my memory serves me well, Marty presented an N scale layout based on this mill, Jim an HO layout based on same. (I saved both articles, came across them recently, but think I can find them now? Nooooooo.) I don't recall its name, but the printing plant just 10-12 miles north of Kalmbach's Waukesha offices is monstrously huge. Man, it's big, big, big. But, you're looking for a 1950s operation. I think the above MR articles would help you a lot. Brian Brian Chapman Evansdale, Iowa
|
|
Re: Hopper train lines
bob_karig <karig@...>
I have just posted a copy of the brake arrangement drawing for the 50-ton, twin AAR Standard hopper car in the photo section. Unfortunately, I didn't copy the 70-ton version, but it should follow the 50-ton practice pretty closely.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Bob Karig
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Clark Propst" <cepropst@...> wrote:
|
|
NEWSPRINT
Paul Catapano
C. 1952
Was much newsprint produced in the US? Or had it's production moved to Canada? Paul Catapano [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|