Re: Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar
Frederick Freitas <prrinvt@...>
Mark,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
You can always visit here in Vermont; we measure snoww in feet. That's why I call this my building season. Only 28 resin kits to go on the bench! Fred Freitas Benninton, VT
--- On Sun, 12/7/08, Mark Morgan <bnonut@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Mark Morgan <bnonut@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, December 7, 2008, 1:25 AM OOPS I meant 2" of the white stuff. Mark --- On Sun, 12/7/08, Mark Morgan <bnonut@yahoo. com> wrote: From: Mark Morgan <bnonut@yahoo. com> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar To: STMFC@yahoogroups. com Date: Sunday, December 7, 2008, 1:19 AM Thank You very much Mr. Hawkins. I had 5 kits to build and this one stumped me as no pictures could be found on the internet. The list had the SAL, an Erie 40 PS Inter., Erie 50' fur. LL, MP 40' RC and B&O M-26 RC. With 2' of snow (Bellville, OH)and more on the way its time to put some of these together. Sincerely, Mark Morgan --- On Sat, 12/6/08, Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@sbcglobal . net> wrote: From: Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@sbcglobal . net> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar To: STMFC@yahoogroups. com Date: Saturday, December 6, 2008, 11:58 PM On Dec 6, 2008, at 10:30 PM, Mark Morgan wrote: I have a IMWX boxcar 40' SAL kit. Car number 19797 class B-9. What door would this car and did they had black roof? ThanksMark, Series 19700-19799 had Superior doors. All 300 B-9 cars when built in 1945 had black car cement applied to the roofs. This per Pullman-Standard bill of materials data. Regards, Ed Hawkins [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar
Ed Hawkins
On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:56 AM, Allen Cain wrote:
In addition to the Series 19700-19799, what were the other carAllen, The answer to your question, as well as the original question about doors on SAL 19797, is found in the STMFC web site roster of 1937 AAR box cars. In the interest of promoting more accurate scale models, I will elaborate since the data is available from the Pullman-Standard bills of materials, a collection of which I obtained in 2002 when the Bessemer plant (then owned by Trinity Industries) was in process of closing. These included cars built from 1929 to mid-1947 and mostly built at the Bessemer plant. The entire B-9 series included SAL 19700-19999. They were built as two separate orders of 250 and 50, respectively, with some variations between the orders. Lot 5804, 19700-19949, built 9-45. Superior doors 19700-19799, Youngstown Steel Doors 19800-19949. Running boards/brake steps: Apex 19700-19749, U.S. Gypsum 19750-19849, Blaw-Knox 19850-19949. Ajax hand brakes. AAR spring plank trucks with chilled wheels. Lot 5806, 19950-19999, built 10-45. Superior doors, Ajax hand brakes, U.S.G. R/B & B/S, same trucks as above except one-wear steel wheels. The B-9 cars were identical to earlier B-8 cars, SAL 19500-19699, built 9-44. These 200 cars had YSD, Ajax hand brakes, Apex R/B & B/S, and AAR spring plank trucks with one-wear steel wheels. Pullman-Standard denoted this order (lot 5768) as "Victory Box" as it meant the builder was permitted to construct the order as all-steel box cars rather than having to continue building to the emergency design. Paint specs for B-8 and B-9 cars when built: DuPont SAL Std. Color #374-822 Frt. Car Paint - Sides, Ends, U/F, Trucks Black (Car Cement) - Roof White (Snolite) - Stencils Fire Plug Red - Monogram Background Builder's photos for B-8 and B-9 cars (all three available from Smithsonian Institution) had "The Route of Courteous Service" slogans. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
WWII 50 foot Steel Box
devansprr
I'm reviewing my WWII era freight car fleet analysis, and find that
there is a significant gap in 50 foot steel box cars in HO for that period. The '43 ORER shows around 31,000 steel 50 footers, and around 20,000 wood 50 footers. For steel cars, it seems like the only non-resin cars available in HO are the PRR cars from Bowser. Am I missing something? Is this because not many 50 footers to that point were of a common design, hence few models? Is it because immediate post war 50 footers quickly became the dominant fleet, which is why everyone is making post-war 50 footers? And not being very resin literate, any resin recommendations for a WWII 50 foot steel box fleet (probably need just a few - recognizing they were only 3.5% of the national boxcar fleet?) Thanks, Dave Evans
|
|
Re: The Atlas model of Cudahy meat reefers
Rhbale@...
Steve...
As a point of clarification, the proper title of the book you reference is Cyclopedia, not Encyclopedia. Perhaps other nit pickers on this list can provide a better definition, but it is my understanding that an encyclopedia attempts to cover everything, whereas a cyclopedia focuses on one general subject -- in this case that one subject would be railroad equipment. Richard Bale ************** Stay in touch with ALL of your friends: update your AIM, Bebo, Facebook, and MySpace pages with just one click. The NEW AOL.com. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&amp;icid=aolcom40vanity& ncid=emlcntaolcom00000012)
|
|
Re: Cudahy meat reefers
Donald B. Valentine <riverman_vt@...>
Thanks for both of your very helpful responses Doug, and to
Richard and Dennis as well. Looks like I have another book to purchase....after still another bookcase is purchased! While not surprised that early reefers were tried with only four hinges per door, it has always surprised me that someone would have reverted to that practice AFTER 1900, by which time the obvious problems with only four should have been well documented. Both the NYC and Rutland (due to NYC control at the time) utilized MDT constructed reefers that went the opposite way. These cars used EIGHT hinges per door and, like the four hinge variety, are quite distictive because of it. I don't have to have a Cudahy car but am interested in having a four hinge car for the variety and simply wished to have it "right". Some reworking is not beyond possibility to do so. I was not, however, even aware that this item had been retooled to utilize working doors. While I've always been a proponent of operable doors on HO scale box cars we will have to see how they work out on a reefer. Again, however, does anyone know of an accurate source of decals (or dry transfers) for such a car in the post WW II period? They do not have to be for Cudahy, just a four hinge door car that can be made from the Atlas model. I would certainly agree that Atlas could have picked a more common meat reefer to model and also wish they had. While there are several of Marty Lofton's "meat fleet" and the Red Caboose Mather cars on hand there is still the issue of limtied time and trying to model the whole railroad. Aw well, if I live to 110....... Thanks again, Don Valentine --- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Douglas Harding" <dharding@...> wrote, in part: reefers, esp in early years. Manufactures moved to the six hinge design because it added security that a door would remain in placeif a hinge broke or failed, ie screws pulled out of rotted wood, enroute.SNIP Unfortunately they choose a car apparently used by only one company, than decided it needed operating doors and ice hatches like it'slarger O scale brethren. This lead to oversized hinges. I laid in a stock of Grandt Line reefer hinges and intend to modify part ofmy Atlas reefer fleet by gluing the doors shut and adding new hinges, 3 per side. Atlas offered the car in a variety of paintschemes, the schemes appear to be accurate, but none to my knowledge were used on the Cudahy car, which is why I bought abunch of undecs. We all would have been better served if Atlas had chosen the General American car or another builder who suppliedcars to many meat packer car fleets.
|
|
Re: Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar
Allen Cain <allencain@...>
Ed,
In addition to the Series 19700-19799, what were the other car numbers in the series which included the 300 B-9 car built in 1945 which had black car cement applied to the roofs? Thanks, Allen Cain
|
|
Re: Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar
Mark
OOPS I meant 2" of the white stuff.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Mark
--- On Sun, 12/7/08, Mark Morgan <bnonut@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Mark Morgan <bnonut@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, December 7, 2008, 1:19 AM Thank You very much Mr. Hawkins. I had 5 kits to build and this one stumped me as no pictures could be found on the internet. The list had the SAL, an Erie 40 PS Inter., Erie 50' fur. LL, MP 40' RC and B&O M-26 RC. With 2' of snow (Bellville, OH)and more on the way its time to put some of these together. Sincerely, Mark Morgan --- On Sat, 12/6/08, Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@sbcglobal. net> wrote: From: Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@sbcglobal. net> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar To: STMFC@yahoogroups. com Date: Saturday, December 6, 2008, 11:58 PM On Dec 6, 2008, at 10:30 PM, Mark Morgan wrote: I have a IMWX boxcar 40' SAL kit. Car number 19797 class B-9. What door would this car and did they had black roof? Thanks Mark, Series 19700-19799 had Superior doors. All 300 B-9 cars when built in 1945 had black car cement applied to the roofs. This per Pullman-Standard bill of materials data. Regards, Ed Hawkins [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar
Mark
Thank You very much Mr. Hawkins.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I had 5 kits to build and this one stumped me as no pictures could be found on the internet. The list had the SAL, an Erie 40 PS Inter., Erie 50' fur. LL, MP 40' RC and B&O M-26 RC. With 2' of snow (Bellville, OH)and more on the way its time to put some of these together. Sincerely, Mark Morgan
--- On Sat, 12/6/08, Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
From: Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@sbcglobal.net> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, December 6, 2008, 11:58 PM On Dec 6, 2008, at 10:30 PM, Mark Morgan wrote: I have a IMWX boxcar 40' SAL kit. Car number 19797 class B-9. What door would this car and did they had black roof? Thanks Mark, Series 19700-19799 had Superior doors. All 300 B-9 cars when built in 1945 had black car cement applied to the roofs. This per Pullman-Standard bill of materials data. Regards, Ed Hawkins [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Cudahy meat reefers
Richard Hendrickson
On Dec 6, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Brian J Carlson wrote:
Ok, what I think I know based on the posts. Cudahy Reefers with CRLX Yes. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Re: Cudahy meat reefers
Dennis Storzek
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Brian J Carlson" <brian@...> wrote:
Patrick Cudahy reefers were leased from NRC. I didn't see the photoin the NRC section that Dennis mentioned but maybe he was talking about theCorrect, although photos of the NRC cars with the Patrick Cudahy banner herald have been published elsewhere. Note that this was used before the company name was officially changed from Cudahy Brothers Co. to Patrick Cudahy Co.; Patrick Cudahy was one of their brand names. Dennis
|
|
Re: Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar
Ed Hawkins
On Dec 6, 2008, at 10:30 PM, Mark Morgan wrote:
I have a IMWX boxcar 40' SAL kit. Car number 19797 class B-9.Mark, Series 19700-19799 had Superior doors. All 300 B-9 cars when built in 1945 had black car cement applied to the roofs. This per Pullman-Standard bill of materials data. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
CRLX Company History -- Cudahy Packing Co., WRT Omaha, Chicago, and East Chicago.
Dave Nelson
I'm reposting this until a new thread title so if anyone wants to ask more
questions we all know which company the discussion is supposed to be about. Dave Nelson =============== Ok, so we have the history of Patrick Cudahy, now the other company -- Cudhay Packing of Omaha -- which has this history. The Irish-born Cudahy brothers started working in the Milwaukee meat business in the early 1860s; there they met Philip Armour, whom they followed to Chicago during the 1870s. In the years that followed, the Cudahys operated small packing plants in Chicago. In 1887, with Armour's backing, Michael Cudahy and his brothers started an Armour-Cudahy packing plant in Omaha, Nebraska. The Cudahy Packing Co. was created in 1890, when Michael bought Armour's interest. Over the next 30 years, the company added branches across the country, including a cleaning products plant at East Chicago, Indiana, built in 1909. In 1911, the company's headquarters were transferred from Omaha to Chicago. By the mid-1920s, Cudahy was one of the nation's leading food companies, with over $200 million in annual sales and 13,000 employees around the country. Although it was hard hit by the Great Depression, the company still employed about 1,000 Chicago-area residents during the mid-1930s. Following World War II, the company moved its headquarters first to Omaha and, in 1965, to Phoenix, where it took the name Cudahy Co. During the 1970s, after it was purchased by General Host, Cudahy was dismantled. ===================== Now according to my copy of Moody's Industrial's, 1947 edition, the Armour-Cudahy Packing Company purchased the Jersey City packing plants of the Nagle Packing Co in 1919, opened large plants in St Paul MN in 1925, San Diego in 1930, Denver in 1933, Albany GA in 1936. The also owned and operated the Barry Machinery Co of Chicago, Dow Cheese (WI), Bissel Leather (MA), The American Salt Company, location unk., and finally it lists the Old Dutch Cleanser facilities in England and Australia. Brand names of Puritan, Rex, Gold Coin, Sunlight, and Old Ducth Cleanser. 65 branch houses across the US and overseas. More details: Slaughter Houses in South Side Omaha, Kansas City, Souix City, Wichita, North Salt Lake, St Paul, San Diego, Denver, Albany GA. Other important plants include East Chicao IN -- soap, cleanser, wool pullery AND reefer construction and repair shops. Leewood TN, refine vegetable oils; Toronto ON, cleanser; Lyons KS, salt mine. Produce collection points at Washington Court House, OH, Victoria TX, Fairmount ND, Neosho MO, New Ulm MN, Alma NE, Fond du Lac WI. As of the August 1945, the company owns 975 reefers, has 150 more on order, and 45 tankcars. ============== So taking all that into consideration, IMO it's reasonable to assume one might see cars owned by this company moving in and out of major urban locations anywhere in the US. There are some discreptencies with what Doug Harding posted. Nothing significant... Just some variation, perhaps due to the dates of the sources. Also, Moody's does not list the Patrick Cudahy Company... But that is probably on account the that company had not sold bonds into the securities markets. Further, the 1940 ORER clearly connects the CRLX and COTX car marks with the Cudahy Packing Company and cites East Chicago IN as the place to send repair and destroyed notices, with GATX on record as handling interchange and milage reports. I think that should clear up a few questions. Dave Nelson
|
|
Seaboard Air Line IMWX boxcar
Mark
I have a IMWX boxcar 40' SAL kit. Car number 19797 class B-9.
What door would this car and did they had black roof? Thanks Mark
|
|
Re: Cudahy meat reefers
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
Ok, what I think I know based on the posts. Cudahy Reefers with CRLX
reporting marks were owned by the Cudahy Packing company of East Chicago (In 1957). The Sunshine kit 24.17 is for these cars. Also, this means the intro paragraph on page 27 of Gene Green's "Refrigerator Car Color Guide" from Morning Sun is incorrect since he attributes the CRLX reporting marks to Patrick Cudahy of Wisconsin. Patrick Cudahy reefers were leased from NRC. I didn't see the photo in the NRC section that Dennis mentioned but maybe he was talking about the Billboard Reefer book, which I do not own. Do I have this correct? Brian J Carlson P.E. Cheektowaga NY
|
|
Computers in freight cars
Schuyler Larrabee
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----Well, yeah, since when IBM shipped computers out of Endicott NY on the ERIE, they used baggage cars, which are cars on another list entirely . . . SGL NO, guys, NO! NO!! Do NOT turn this into a thread!
|
|
Re: The Atlas model of Cudahy meat reefers
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
Richard Hendrickson notes:
"The day when every piece of information known to man can be googled may be coming, but it ain't here yet." Maybe not but it probably won't be too long before it is. The problem is, of course, it probably won't be any more correct than those bogus renditions that Atlas has apparently produced. About all it takes to be "a expert" on the internet is to buy a computer. BTW, just in case anyone is curious, discussions about computers...unless directly associated with a frt car...are out of scope. My point is that, even on the STMFC, anyone can act like "a expert" but the real ones have lengthy credits in places other than the internet...places where their information has been scrutinized by others for validation. Mike Brock
|
|
Re: The Atlas model of Cudahy meat reefers
Richard Hendrickson
On Dec 6, 2008, at 5:39 AM, Donald B. Valentine wrote:
Cudahy was also represented in the Boston area at least up I'm always surprised (though perhaps I shouldn't be, by now) when a lot of speculation and mis-information is posted on a subject which is well documented. The responses to Don's query are a notable example. 36" meat reefers with four hinges on each door were not at all exclusive to Cudahy; large numbers of them were built in the 1920s (as well as 40' cars with the same door hinge arrangement) by the Pressed Steel Car Co.'s Hegewich, IL plant. North American Despatch owned many such cars and applied a variety of billboard P/L schemes to them, and smaller numbers were owned by other leasing companies (e.g., MDT). There are many photos of these cars in the Billboard Refrigerator Car book by myself and Ed Kaminski that was recently published by Signature Press. For the Cudahy cars, see pp. 39-40 and 180; for the NADX cars, see pp. 50-59. Other examples are scattered elsewhere in the book. That's not to say that some of the Atlas models aren't bogus - a bunch of them are - but some are correct (except for the model's unfortunate shortcomings) and the book shows many other examples that Atlas hasn't yet produced, but could. This is yet another instance where what you want to know may not be on the internet but is readily available elsewhere. The book has been widely advertised and reviewed, and if you don't want to buy it, then any library should be able to get a copy via interlibrary loan. The day when every piece of information known to man can be googled may be coming, but it ain't here yet. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Re: Lifelike Fowler CN
red_gate_rover
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Lucas" <stevelucas3@...> wrote:
Good idea, but I model Maine two footers and this is supposed to help me represent a standard gauge train in Farmington where there wasn't such a shed. I knew about the plans for True Line to redo this car and still hope it happens. However, the owner announced here a couple of weeks ago that the project is on hold indefinitely due to errors in the tooling and expenses mounting up. So I bought this on a whim, not knowing that it didn't come with a frame. Live and learn. -Jim
|
|
Re: Cudahy meat reefers
Roger Hinman <rhinman@...>
They were definitely two separate companies although genetically
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
connected back in the nineteenth century. When I did my pitch on NRC last year, my opening slide was called "Cudahy Confusion" to explain this before anyone raised their hand Roger Hinman
On Dec 6, 2008, at 12:38 AM, Brian J Carlson wrote:
OK now I am confused. I thought the Sunshine meat reefer for Cudahy
|
|
PRR etched metal detail parts.
Denny Anspach <danspach@...>
Some years ago I purchased some pretty fine etched metal Pennsy detail parts (Keystone, locomotive, trust plates, etc.) from a supplier that I believe was Schuykill Division. Does anyone know whether they are still in business, or more importantly, are their fine parts still available?
Denny Denny S. Anspach MD Sacramento
|
|