Date
1 - 4 of 4
Safety Appliance question
byronrose@...
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:50:26 -0800 (PST) Tom Gloger <tomgloger@...>
writes: At what time did the roofwalk extensions (the ones on theTom, I hope you mean "on the right" taken from being on the car roof, instead of approaching the car from on the ground. In any case, the requirement went into effect in 1911 as part of the first "Safety appliance Standards." But they didn't require a lateral roofwalk as much as requiring a non-slip surface between the car side ladders and the roofwalk. Chances are the entire roof on that stock car you're looking at is wood and therefore just as non-slip as a separate wood lateral would be. The separate roofwalk was required to give the players a level playing surface. It was raised up from the roof surface not as a requirement, but to prevent water in the crevices from rotting it out. That's also the reason why some reefers have platforms around the hatches and some don't. The don'ts have wood surface or otherwise non-slip roofs, the haves have metal surface roofs. Before you ask why do some reefers with metal roofs, mostly PFE, not have platforms, the answer is they added sand to the roofing paint to make an acceptable non-slip surface. I know that these answers are more than you asked for. Just consider it an added service at no extra charge. BSR ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. |
|
Richard Hendrickson
Tom Gloger asked:
At what time did the roofwalk extensions (the ones on theTom, those were called lateral running boards (to distinguish them from the longitudinal running boards, commonly though incorrectly called "roof walks" by many modelers). And they were never required on cars with outside wood roofs, as was the case with most stock cars, but only on cars with metal-sheathed or steel roofs, where the roof surface was slippery when wet. Richard H. Hendrickson Ashland, Oregon 97520 |
|
John Nehrich <nehrij@...>
Tom - I think there are people on this list who have a more definite answer,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
but I was under the assumption that a car with a wood roof didn't need the cross-walks (excuse me, cross running boards). - John ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Gloger" <tomgloger@...> To: <STMFC@...> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:50 PM Subject: [STMFC] Safety Appliance question At what time did the roofwalk extensions (the ones on thehttp://auctions.yahoo.com/
|
|
Tom Gloger
At what time did the roofwalk extensions (the ones on the
right as you approach the end of the car) become mandatory? The Cyc at home (1923, I think) shows them on box cars but not on stock cars. Maybe my MDC 36' cars aren't authentic, but I'd at least like them legal for 1938. - Tom "fresh meat" Gloger e-mail: mailto:tomgloger@... web page: http://pws.prserv.net/usinet.tgloger __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/ |
|