Date
1 - 9 of 9
Hopper Cars
PennsyNut <PennsyNut@...>
Hello Listers.
I need help. Today, I received a flyer from Model Expo and in it was the Life Like Proto 2000 HO War Emergency Hoppers listed. Kits for $7.99 and R-T-R for $11.99. Now that's a bargain! Retail Kits $16.00 and R-T-R $28.00. So, what do I need help in?? Which of the prototypes available are the models accurate for? Yeah, I know - the model manufacturers wouldn't paint and letter any "non-prototypical" cars. Well, if you believe that, there's a bridge in Waco TX for sale! They offer, ATSF, B&O, C&O, IC, Southern & Wabash. In Kits, they have the undecorated, so I could always be safe! LOL Seriously, which of those protos would be best? And is it worth the extra for the R-T-R? Or is that subjective? Thanks in advance, Morgan Bilbo Ferroequinologist
|
|
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
Yeah, I know - the model manufacturers wouldn't paint and letter any"non-prototypical" cars.< P2K cars tend to be 99.9% accurate. The problem is defining the era. One might be correct for 1950 and another might be correct for 1942, etc. This is where this group comes in. You define the era (or cutoff date) and then you can find out which kits fit that era. Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax DCC owner, Chief/Zephyr systems NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
Tim O'Connor <timoconnor@...>
Jon Miller wrote
P2K cars tend to be 99.9% accurate.AHEM. Ain't nobody that accurate! Trucks and brake appliances are very often inaccurate. Running boards on house cars are pretty much hit or miss. Doors (including hopper doors) and door hardware often fail to meet the 90% accuracy test, much less 99.9%. And P2K lettering has been known to be less than 100% true to prototype... On the other hand, P2K only decorated the War Emergency hoppers for railroads that owned them, so they are 100% accurate in that sense. Tim O'Connor <timoconnor@attbi.com> Sterling, Massachusetts
|
|
tcschc <tculotta@...>
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "PennsyNut" <PennsyNut@H...> wrote:
Morgan: Here is some data on these cars. ATSF Classes Ga-60 (180400-180599) blt. 1943 by Pullman-Standard and Ga-62 (180600-180799) blt 1944 by Gen'l American B&O Class N-37 (30000-30524, 30525-30874 and 30875-31024) all built by Bethlehem Steel in 1943 and 1944, with Duryea underframes. Rebuilt in 1957 with steel siding C&O 53000-53749 blt by Pullman-Standard, Mich City, IN in 1943 53750-54249 blt by Pullman-Standard, Butler, PA in 1943 54250-55379 built by Gen'l American in 1943 55380-55999 blt by ACF, Huntington, WV in 1944 rebuilt to steel at Raceland, KY Shops in '53-'54 IC 73000-73599 built by IC's Centralia Shops (first cars ever built there) in 1943 rebuilt to steel when ? Southern 104500-105949 built by Pullman-Standard Bessemer, AL in 1943 rebuilt to steel when? Wabash 39000-39399 built in 1944 by Wabash Co. shops (along with 75 for the Ann Arbor), secondhand Andrews trucks Regards, Ted Culotta
|
|
Andrew S. Miller <asmiller@...>
Morgan,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Most hoppers remained on home roads. So much so that the freight car registry doesn't even summarize hoppers for each road like they do with other car types. Therefore, as a PRR fan, 70% of your hoppers should be PRR (bless you Bowser) For those occasional furriners that wander in and out perhaps the most important factor is your region. If you model PRR east then you could see B&O, C&O and maybe Southern. C&O fleet was the largest, if that helps. If you model PRR west, then IC, Wabash, and maybe Southern. In no case do expect to see ATSF on the PRR, unless its truly lost. As a PRR easterner, I may pick up a C&O kit if I ever find one. I don't need a RTR car. I have enough cars. I'm not a collector. But it would be fun to build one and the one I can rationalize is C&O. Regards, Andy Miller asmiller@mitre.org ================================================== PennsyNut wrote:
Hello Listers.
|
|
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
Morgan Bilbo asked regarding Proto 2000 War Emergency Hoppers:
Seriously, which of those protos would be best? And is it worth the extra for the R-T-R? Or is that subjective? All of the roadnames are valid - since you model Pennsy, the most appropriate cars would be B&O, C&O, and Wabash (all in relatively small quantities compared to the sea of Pennsy hoppers on your layout.) Some thoughts on RTR models - Advantage: - The model is already assembled. Disadvantages: - The model still needs to be weathered. - Unpainted components (trucks, couplers, underbody) detract from the appearance of the model. - Modifications to the model (detail changes, weight adjustments, etc.) may be more difficult because you might have to break apart cemented joints. The bottom line is there's still work to be done even for RTR. Ben Hom
|
|
James D Thompson <jaydeet@...>
Most hoppers remained on home roads.Hoppers remained on their home road more often than not, while the reverse was true for boxcars. Having said that, hoppers went off-line all the time and, depending on what part of the PRR one models, you would certainly need at least a handful of foreign cars. If you model the Sandusky line, you'll need solid trainloads of N&W cars, and a good number of C&O and VGN cars. David Thompson
|
|
tim gilbert <tgilbert@...>
"Andrew S. Miller" wrote:
If Andy would amend his statement by saying that MOST bituminous coal loadings were originated in home road hoppers, I could agree. For instance, at any time, there were probably more N&W and C&O hoppers off-road than at home even though there was a Car Service Bureau Order requiring that empty C&O and N&W hoppers on foreign roads be returned home empty. Far more coal which the C&O and N&W originated was terminated on foreign roads than on home rails. Accordingly, in 1947, the amount of cars which the N&W and C&O owned was far in excess of the daily average of home & foreign freight cars on line - in 1947, the percent of freight cars owned as a percent of freight cars on line were: - N&W, 168.2%; C&O, 117.2% vs. the PRR's 91.8% - the B&O had a 109.2%. Therefore, as a PRR fan, 70% of your hoppers shouldThe important factor is determining (or estimating) on which road the loaded hoppers carrying bituminous originated for the particular stretch of track being modeled. Unlike boxcars with their national distribution of ownership patterns, hoppers were far more regionally distributed. There were, however, extreme examples of a N&W hopper going over UP's Sherman Hill carrying Pocahontas Coal mined in West Virginia. Bituminous Coal mined in Pennsylvania was not in demand in the West although there were examples of RDG hoppers carrying anthracite going over Sherman Hill before WW II. Western coal was not in demand in the east during the Steam-Diesel transition era. Compared to Bituminous Loadings, there appears to have been less home road loadings of Anthracite in northeastern Pennsylvania. Anthracite loadings were largely restricted to cars owned by roads originating - RDG, LV, CNJ/CRP, DL&W, L&NE, D&H and PRR. It would be rare for a B&O loaded with Anthracite even though a high proportion of the bituminous carried by the RDG was originated on the B&O. If youThe roads cited by Andy above are restricted to those models released by P2K. Tim Gilbert
|
|
tchenoweth@...
If you want a Santa Fe Hopper be aware that their steel sided versions are
not correct for the Santa Fe. Tom Chenoweth
|
|