Rutland Ps-1 boxcars


Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
 

I have 2 of the Kadee PS-1 boxcars, 248,294 built 3-56. I only have a 1955
ORER so how many of these cars did the Rutland have anyway, and how far
traveled were they? Were they purchased with any specific use in mind? I
searched the archives, (much faster now) but found no information.

I model NW Pa in 1957 and am contemplating using these cars on an Erie
Maybrook train.
Thanks.

Brian J Carlson P.E.
Cheektowaga NY


Ed Hawkins
 

On Tuesday, March 29, 2005, at 08:02 PM, Brian J Carlson wrote:

I have 2 of the Kadee PS-1 boxcars, 248,294 built 3-56. I only have a
1955
ORER so how many of these cars did the Rutland have anyway, and how far
traveled were they?  Were they purchased with any specific use in
mind? I
searched the archives, (much faster now) but found no information.

I model NW Pa in 1957 and am contemplating using these cars on an Erie
Maybrook train.
Brian,
Rutland had 100 cars built 1956 in series 200-299 with 7' door
openings. This followed 100 cars from three earlier orders built 1954
and 1955, series 100-199. In 8-56 Rutland added another 101 cars,
300-399, plus #223 that was a backfill likely to replace a wrecked car.
These had 8' door openings. In 4-57 the series was increased by adding
cars 400-450, plus #354 as another backfill, all having 8' door
openings. Photos of Rutland PS-1s show up in various locations around
the country, not necessarily because they were "common" but probably
because of their strikingly colorful and unique paint scheme. W.C.
Whittaker photographed Rutland 136 in San Francisco circa 1955. Bob's
Photo offers #106 photographed new in 1954 at San Diego, #248 in 1957
at Omaha, and #274 at Pekin, Illinois, in 1956. The latter two photos
are color and the #248 is taken from a higher angle that displays the
unpainted galvanized roof. These photos provide reasonable evidence
that the cars got around. I don't know if Rutland had any specific
reasons for buying the cars or any specific commodities they hauled.
Perhaps Jeff English might have some information about this.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins


Jeff English
 

--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:
Perhaps Jeff English might have some information about this.
Ed's information pretty well sums it up. The cars were not acquired
for a specific service but for general service in the nationwide pool.
Therefore they would be likely to be seen anywhere, but only in
proportion to their realtive numbers, i.e. quite infrequently.

Jeff English
Troy, New York


Garth Groff <ggg9y@...>
 

Jeff, Ed and Friends:

In Henderson's CLASSIC FREIGHT CARS two volumes on 40' boxcars there are several shots of Vermont Railway and Green Mountain Railway boxcars, some of which were inherited from the Rutland. The author mentions that one common load was talc for Johnson's Baby Powder (presumably bagged). Now I know Henderson's material is not always trustworthy, but would be a likely load for some of the Rutland PS-1s?

Kind regards,


Garth G. Groff

englishintroy wrote:

--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:

Perhaps Jeff English might have some information about this.
Ed's information pretty well sums it up. The cars were not acquired for a specific service but for general service in the nationwide pool. Therefore they would be likely to be seen anywhere, but only in proportion to their realtive numbers, i.e. quite infrequently.

Jeff English
Troy, New York


Montford Switzer <ZOE@...>
 

Jeff:

Sounds right. I recall seeing them in central Indiana in late 1950's
and early 1960's on both the NKP and MONON. They stood out.

Mont Switzer

-----Original Message-----
From: englishintroy [mailto:englij@...]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:55 AM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland Ps-1 boxcars



--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:
Perhaps Jeff English might have some information about this.
Ed's information pretty well sums it up. The cars were not acquired
for a specific service but for general service in the nationwide pool.
Therefore they would be likely to be seen anywhere, but only in
proportion to their realtive numbers, i.e. quite infrequently.

Jeff English
Troy, New York







Yahoo! Groups Links


benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
 

Garth Groff wrote:
"In Henderson's CLASSIC FREIGHT CARS two volumes on 40' boxcars there
are several shots of Vermont Railway and Green Mountain Railway
boxcars, some of which were inherited from the Rutland. The author
mentions that one common load was talc for Johnson's Baby Powder
(presumably bagged). Now I know Henderson's material is not always
trustworthy, but would be a likely load for some of the Rutland PS-1s?"

Yes. The Rutland served a talc plant at Gassetts, Vermont which
indeed supplied Johnson's and Johnson's. This has been modeled on the
NEB&W (photos from the free side of the website):
http://railroad.union.rpi.edu/images/visguide/summit.asp#gassetts
http://railroad.union.rpi.edu/images/photoarc/gassetts.asp

Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while...


Ben Hom


Garth Groff <ggg9y@...>
 

Ben,

I think I have been past that plant. Doesn't it still have a siding? It is still operating, and if so, do they ship by rail? I didn't notice any significant activity. I will be in the area again this September, and it might be worth seeking out. Looks like a great little industry.

Kind regards,


Garth G. Groff

benjaminfrank_hom wrote:

Garth Groff wrote:
"In Henderson's CLASSIC FREIGHT CARS two volumes on 40' boxcars there are several shots of Vermont Railway and Green Mountain Railway boxcars, some of which were inherited from the Rutland. The author mentions that one common load was talc for Johnson's Baby Powder (presumably bagged). Now I know Henderson's material is not always trustworthy, but would be a likely load for some of the Rutland PS-1s?"

Yes. The Rutland served a talc plant at Gassetts, Vermont which indeed supplied Johnson's and Johnson's. This has been modeled on the NEB&W (photos from the free side of the website):
http://railroad.union.rpi.edu/images/visguide/summit.asp#gassetts
http://railroad.union.rpi.edu/images/photoarc/gassetts.asp

Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while...


Ben Hom


buchwaldfam <duff@...>
 

Garth,

The plant in Gassetts is still standing, however it is currently
not producing. The company has consolidated the operations a few miles
down the track to Ludlow, Vt. I don't know if the spur is still in
place, since you really can't see down into the river bottom from the
road. Even so, it is well worth swinging by to check it out. Neat,
relatively small industry that was around in the late steam era, and
set in a very scenic location. Even if the tracks aren't there
anymore, it wouldn't be too hard to figure out where they were. Would
make a great diorama or focal point on a layout.
The Gassetts plant was put into operation in the mid/late 1950s,
so it could be one of the factors leading to the purchase of the PS-1s
by the Rutland. However, these were the first new box cars installed
by the Rutland since 1924 (unless you count the 7999), so the cars
were needed regardless of the new plant opening. Plus, the cars used
later by Green Mountain had captive service "return to" lettering on
them, and I have not seen any photos of the original Rutland cars with
this sort of stenciling. I think this indicates that (at least most
of) the PS-1s were in general interchange, not assigned service.
The Carsten's book "Rails Beyond Rutland" makes a statement that
the Gassets plant had a new bulk loading facility to handle covered
hoppers in the GMRR era. So the converse would be that all loadouts
during the steam/transition era would be by box car, even though the
Rutland had the PS-2s by 1957.
If you're going to be down there to do some Railroad archeology,
take a camera and stop by in Chester, too. One of the old Rutland DS
box cars is on the ground next to the depot. It's actually in very
good condition, considering.
Other cars worth seeing: there are some of the original Rutland
PS-1s sitting in GMRR paint on the west side of Rutland, just behind
the state fair grounds. There is also a Rutland wood caboose near the
old station in Licester (pronounce "Lester".... I got laughed at when
I tried to pronounce it how it's spelled!) For PRR fans, there are a
pair of X26c's in Middlebury, next to the Agway elevator.
The nice things about all of these relics are that you could
drive from Middlebury to Chester in maybe an hour and a half. So they
would make a good Sunday afternoon tour!

Best regards,
Phil Buchwald


--- In STMFC@..., Garth Groff <ggg9y@v...> wrote:
Ben,

I think I have been past that plant. Doesn't it still have a siding?
It
is still operating, and if so, do they ship by rail? I didn't notice
any
significant activity. I will be in the area again this September,
and it
might be worth seeking out. Looks like a great little industry.

Kind regards,


Garth G. Groff


Garth Groff <ggg9y@...>
 

Phil,

Thanks for the suggestions. Yes, I've been to Chester and photographed the depot and the grounded boxcar, as well as a tool car over near the general store that was still on its trucks.

I've only been up to Rutland just once (it's a fair distance from Ashland, NH, where my in-laws live), but saw several boxcars grounded near the VTR/GMRR engine shed, including what appears to be a rebuilt X29c (I think).

There is also a string of VTR cars over in New Hampshire between Keene and Walpole along the old Aushelot (sp, I know) line at a paper mill. The were very nice about letting me shoot them. Also don't forget the equipment in the yard at Bellows Falls, including a GMRR boxcar, a B&M milk car, and a couple of RDCs. The two freight cars were painted up for a movie, CIDER HOUSE RULES (IIRC) and still looked pretty good a couple of years ago, though the lettering is all wrong.

If you know where to look, you can find a lot of the old Rutland, plus other goodies.

Kind regards,


Garth G. Groff

buchwaldfam wrote:

Garth,

The plant in Gassetts is still standing, however it is currently not producing. The company has consolidated the operations a few miles down the track to Ludlow, Vt. I don't know if the spur is still in place, since you really can't see down into the river bottom from the road. Even so, it is well worth swinging by to check it out. Neat, relatively small industry that was around in the late steam era, and set in a very scenic location. Even if the tracks aren't there anymore, it wouldn't be too hard to figure out where they were. Would make a great diorama or focal point on a layout. The Gassetts plant was put into operation in the mid/late 1950s, so it could be one of the factors leading to the purchase of the PS-1s by the Rutland. However, these were the first new box cars installed by the Rutland since 1924 (unless you count the 7999), so the cars were needed regardless of the new plant opening. Plus, the cars used later by Green Mountain had captive service "return to" lettering on them, and I have not seen any photos of the original Rutland cars with this sort of stenciling. I think this indicates that (at least most of) the PS-1s were in general interchange, not assigned service.
The Carsten's book "Rails Beyond Rutland" makes a statement that the Gassets plant had a new bulk loading facility to handle covered hoppers in the GMRR era. So the converse would be that all loadouts during the steam/transition era would be by box car, even though the Rutland had the PS-2s by 1957. If you're going to be down there to do some Railroad archeology, take a camera and stop by in Chester, too. One of the old Rutland DS box cars is on the ground next to the depot. It's actually in very good condition, considering.
Other cars worth seeing: there are some of the original Rutland PS-1s sitting in GMRR paint on the west side of Rutland, just behind the state fair grounds. There is also a Rutland wood caboose near the old station in Licester (pronounce "Lester".... I got laughed at when I tried to pronounce it how it's spelled!) For PRR fans, there are a pair of X26c's in Middlebury, next to the Agway elevator. The nice things about all of these relics are that you could drive from Middlebury to Chester in maybe an hour and a half. So they would make a good Sunday afternoon tour!
Best regards,
Phil Buchwald


Norman+Laraine Larkin <lono@...>
 

I believe there was an article in RMC re. modeling the Gassetts plant. I'll rumage and see if I can locate it.
Regards,
Norm Larkin

----- Original Message -----
From: buchwaldfam
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:38 PM
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland PS-1 boxcars



Garth,

The plant in Gassetts is still standing, however it is currently
not producing. The company has consolidated the operations a few miles
down the track to Ludlow, Vt. I don't know if the spur is still in
place, since you really can't see down into the river bottom from the
road. Even so, it is well worth swinging by to check it out. Neat,
relatively small industry that was around in the late steam era, and
set in a very scenic location. Even if the tracks aren't there
anymore, it wouldn't be too hard to figure out where they were. Would
make a great diorama or focal point on a layout.
The Gassetts plant was put into operation in the mid/late 1950s,
so it could be one of the factors leading to the purchase of the PS-1s
by the Rutland. However, these were the first new box cars installed
by the Rutland since 1924 (unless you count the 7999), so the cars
were needed regardless of the new plant opening. Plus, the cars used
later by Green Mountain had captive service "return to" lettering on
them, and I have not seen any photos of the original Rutland cars with
this sort of stenciling. I think this indicates that (at least most
of) the PS-1s were in general interchange, not assigned service.
The Carsten's book "Rails Beyond Rutland" makes a statement that
the Gassets plant had a new bulk loading facility to handle covered
hoppers in the GMRR era. So the converse would be that all loadouts
during the steam/transition era would be by box car, even though the
Rutland had the PS-2s by 1957.
If you're going to be down there to do some Railroad archeology,
take a camera and stop by in Chester, too. One of the old Rutland DS
box cars is on the ground next to the depot. It's actually in very
good condition, considering.
Other cars worth seeing: there are some of the original Rutland
PS-1s sitting in GMRR paint on the west side of Rutland, just behind
the state fair grounds. There is also a Rutland wood caboose near the
old station in Licester (pronounce "Lester".... I got laughed at when
I tried to pronounce it how it's spelled!) For PRR fans, there are a
pair of X26c's in Middlebury, next to the Agway elevator.
The nice things about all of these relics are that you could
drive from Middlebury to Chester in maybe an hour and a half. So they
would make a good Sunday afternoon tour!

Best regards,
Phil Buchwald


--- In STMFC@..., Garth Groff <ggg9y@v...> wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I think I have been past that plant. Doesn't it still have a siding?
It
> is still operating, and if so, do they ship by rail? I didn't notice
any
> significant activity. I will be in the area again this September,
and it
> might be worth seeking out. Looks like a great little industry.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Garth G. Groff
>





Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFC/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
STMFC-unsubscribe@...

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


buchwaldfam <duff@...>
 

I've got to get back down to Rutland to see that one. The GMRR
had several X26c's. At least one had the diagonal panel roofs, but
the photo is high angle off of an overpass, and doesn't show the car
number. The two cars in Middlebury have rectangular panel roofs. If
the car in Rutland is an X29 rebuild, even better! That one is on my
to-do list, so reference material needs to be acquired!
For the really adventurous, there used to be a floating bridge
between Larabee's Point and Ticonderoga, NY. It had a nasty habit of
capsizing, and some equipment is still down there.

Best regards,
Phil Buchwald


--- In STMFC@..., Garth Groff <ggg9y@v...> wrote:
Phil,

Thanks for the suggestions. Yes, I've been to Chester and
photographed
the depot and the grounded boxcar, as well as a tool car over near
the
general store that was still on its trucks.

I've only been up to Rutland just once (it's a fair distance from
Ashland, NH, where my in-laws live), but saw several boxcars
grounded
near the VTR/GMRR engine shed, including what appears to be a
rebuilt
X29c (I think).

There is also a string of VTR cars over in New Hampshire between
Keene
and Walpole along the old Aushelot (sp, I know) line at a paper
mill.
The were very nice about letting me shoot them. Also don't forget
the
equipment in the yard at Bellows Falls, including a GMRR boxcar, a
B&M
milk car, and a couple of RDCs. The two freight cars were painted
up for
a movie, CIDER HOUSE RULES (IIRC) and still looked pretty good a
couple
of years ago, though the lettering is all wrong.

If you know where to look, you can find a lot of the old Rutland,
plus
other goodies.

Kind regards,


Garth G. Groff


centga@...
 

In a message dated 3/30/2005 1:50:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
hawk0621@... writes:
The latter two photos
are color and the #248 is taken from a higher angle that displays the
unpainted galvanized roof.
Ed, so does end the debate about the roof color on these cars finally? Todd
Horton


Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
 

Thanks to everyone who answered my PS-1 question.

Brian J Carlson P.E.
Cheektowaga NY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Montford Switzer" <ZOE@...>
To: <STMFC@...>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 7:32 AM
Subject: RE: [STMFC] Re: Rutland Ps-1 boxcars



Jeff:

Sounds right. I recall seeing them in central Indiana in late 1950's
and early 1960's on both the NKP and MONON. They stood out.

Mont Switzer

-----Original Message-----
From: englishintroy [mailto:englij@...]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:55 AM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland Ps-1 boxcars



--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:
Perhaps Jeff English might have some information about this.
Ed's information pretty well sums it up. The cars were not acquired
for a specific service but for general service in the nationwide pool.
Therefore they would be likely to be seen anywhere, but only in
proportion to their realtive numbers, i.e. quite infrequently.

Jeff English
Troy, New York







Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links







Ed Hawkins
 

On Wednesday, March 30, 2005, at 07:12 PM, centga@... wrote:

In a message dated 3/30/2005 1:50:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
hawk0621@... writes:
The latter two photos
are color and the #248 is taken from a higher angle that displays the
unpainted galvanized roof.
Ed, so does end the debate about the roof color on these cars finally?
Todd
Horton
Todd,
I don't know if the "debate" will ever be ended because there are
believers of the yellow roofs. When Kadee was in the planning stages
for their first Rutland PS-1 model, they received more credible
evidence that the roofs were unpainted than painted yellow and produced
their model accordingly with an aluminum painted roof (model
manufacturer's typically use aluminum to simulate unpainted galvanized
steel). After the models were released, Kadee apparently received
opposition from some who stated vociferously that the roofs should be
yellow. Photos taken from a low angle tend to show some yellow
overspray on the seam caps and this gave some people the appearance and
belief that the roofs were painted yellow. Even a Rutland PS-1 painting
and lettering diagram does not specify the roof to be painted yellow or
any other color. Kadee has continued to release subsequent Rutland PS-1
models with "unpainted galvanized" roofs.

One group of yellow roof believers is The Steam Shack of Rutland,
Vermont, who had InterMountain produce proprietary Rutland PS-1s for
them with yellow roofs. On their web site they make a big deal about
the yellow roofs and even provide a "skeptic's kit" for $5.00 that
provides masking tape and a gray metallic paint for changing the yellow
roof to "unpainted galvanized." Cute. If the sponsors of these models
want to believe that the roofs were painted yellow, then so be it. I've
personally seen enough color photos that proved to my satisfaction
(plus the Rutland painting diagram) that the cars had unpainted roofs.
The Bob's Photo of #248 is perhaps the best example. Heck, you never
know - maybe some Rutland PS-1s did get receive yellow roofs. Does
anyone have any convincing evidence?
Regards,
Ed Hawkins


buchwaldfam <duff@...>
 

It's funny how these cars have acquired almost a cult
following...

There's a site called "Remembering the Rutland", and on it there
was a report of an ex-Rutland PS-1 that was being moved to a museum.
I have pasted the following from the site. Hope this is ok to do.

"Rutland PS-1 No. 445 To Be Preserved at the RRMNE
by Steve Mumley
(09/03/02)

Ex-Rutland PS-1 box car #445 has been saved for preservation and is
on it's way to the Naugatuck Railroad (aka The Railroad Museum of
New England) near Waterbury, Connecticut. After its tenure on the
Rutland, the 445 was sold to Hudson Leasing and was leased to the
Vermont Railway. <snip> Upon close observation of the roof, you can
see where it was painted yellow! It's my understanding that it will
be restored to the Rutland yellow and green as-delivered paint
scheme.

-Steve Mumley"

The following link shows some photos of the car:

http://users.rcn.com/jimdu4/SaveTheRutland/Rutland_445.htm

Of course, the discription doesn't include details such as: Was
the yellow paint just overspray from the sides? Was the yellow
present only on the roof seam caps (they were sometimes sealed with
car cement and painted over, leaving the main panels unpainted)....
So the debate will probably still provide a lot of "enjoyment for
years to come!

Other info: Nimke's book on the Rutland includes a page from
the 1961 ORER. There is a note which states that the 2nd and 3rd
orders of PS-1s were equipped with permanent lading anchors. So at
least these two groups of cars were intended for something in
addition to talc loading.
Final word, then I'll shut up: One photo in Nimke's book shows
a good 3/4 view of a 200 series car. The one thing that strikes you
is how wavy the separation between the green and the yellow is. So,
don't be TOO careful when you mask your cars off! ;>

Best Regards,
Phil Buchwald

--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:

Todd,
I don't know if the "debate" will ever be ended because there are
believers of the yellow roofs.


Chet French <cfrench@...>
 

Ed,

The "Rutland in Color" by Philip R. Jordan includes a photo of brand
new car 100 at Rutland on August 23, 1954, for a dedication ceremony.
While the photo is from ground level, it appears that the roof is
painted yellow. The car was one of eight in the first shipment
received from the builder. Perhaps this one 'publicity' car did
receive a yellow roof. Several others photos of PS-1's in the book
show the roofs to be unpainted, including car 176.

Chet French
Dixon, IL


--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:

On Wednesday, March 30, 2005, at 07:12 PM, centga@a... wrote:

In a message dated 3/30/2005 1:50:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
hawk0621@s... writes:
The latter two photos
are color and the #248 is taken from a higher angle that displays
the
unpainted galvanized roof.
Ed, so does end the debate about the roof color on these cars
finally?
Todd
Horton
Todd,
I don't know if the "debate" will ever be ended because there are
believers of the yellow roofs. When Kadee was in the planning
stages
for their first Rutland PS-1 model, they received more credible
evidence that the roofs were unpainted than painted yellow and
produced
their model accordingly with an aluminum painted roof (model
manufacturer's typically use aluminum to simulate unpainted
galvanized
steel). After the models were released, Kadee apparently received
opposition from some who stated vociferously that the roofs should
be
yellow. Photos taken from a low angle tend to show some yellow
overspray on the seam caps and this gave some people the appearance
and
belief that the roofs were painted yellow. Even a Rutland PS-1
painting
and lettering diagram does not specify the roof to be painted
yellow or
any other color. Kadee has continued to release subsequent Rutland
PS-1
models with "unpainted galvanized" roofs.

One group of yellow roof believers is The Steam Shack of Rutland,
Vermont, who had InterMountain produce proprietary Rutland PS-1s
for
them with yellow roofs. On their web site they make a big deal
about
the yellow roofs and even provide a "skeptic's kit" for $5.00 that
provides masking tape and a gray metallic paint for changing the
yellow
roof to "unpainted galvanized." Cute. If the sponsors of these
models
want to believe that the roofs were painted yellow, then so be it.
I've
personally seen enough color photos that proved to my satisfaction
(plus the Rutland painting diagram) that the cars had unpainted
roofs.
The Bob's Photo of #248 is perhaps the best example. Heck, you
never
know - maybe some Rutland PS-1s did get receive yellow roofs. Does
anyone have any convincing evidence?
Regards,
Ed Hawkins


centga@...
 

Phil, I think that's the site where I originally ran up on this controversy. The issue seems to be were the cars delivered with the galvanized roof or not. It's highly possible that if they were repainted in the shops that they just sprayed the whole car yellow. IIRC this website has several "eye witness accounts" of the cars having a yellow roof. But I wonder if they have researched whether or not these were "as delivered" or simply shop repainted cars. Regardless of what eye witness accounts say or diagrams I'll take photographic evidence any day. If Mr Hawkins has a photo of the cars with a galvanized roof then that's pretty convincing evidence to me. Todd Horton

-----Original Message-----
From: buchwaldfam <duff@...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:30:02 -0000
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland PS-1 boxcars




It's funny how these cars have acquired almost a cult
following...

There's a site called "Remembering the Rutland", and on it there
was a report of an ex-Rutland PS-1 that was being moved to a museum.
I have pasted the following from the site. Hope this is ok to do.

"Rutland PS-1 No. 445 To Be Preserved at the RRMNE
by Steve Mumley
(09/03/02)

Ex-Rutland PS-1 box car #445 has been saved for preservation and is
on it's way to the Naugatuck Railroad (aka The Railroad Museum of
New England) near Waterbury, Connecticut. After its tenure on the
Rutland, the 445 was sold to Hudson Leasing and was leased to the
Vermont Railway. <snip> Upon close observation of the roof, you can
see where it was painted yellow! It's my understanding that it will
be restored to the Rutland yellow and green as-delivered paint
scheme.

-Steve Mumley"

The following link shows some photos of the car:

http://users.rcn.com/jimdu4/SaveTheRutland/Rutland_445.htm

Of course, the discription doesn't include details such as: Was
the yellow paint just overspray from the sides? Was the yellow
present only on the roof seam caps (they were sometimes sealed with
car cement and painted over, leaving the main panels unpainted)....
So the debate will probably still provide a lot of "enjoyment for
years to come!

Other info: Nimke's book on the Rutland includes a page from
the 1961 ORER. There is a note which states that the 2nd and 3rd
orders of PS-1s were equipped with permanent lading anchors. So at
least these two groups of cars were intended for something in
addition to talc loading.
Final word, then I'll shut up: One photo in Nimke's book shows
a good 3/4 view of a 200 series car. The one thing that strikes you
is how wavy the separation between the green and the yellow is. So,
don't be TOO careful when you mask your cars off! ;>

Best Regards,
Phil Buchwald







--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:

Todd,
I don't know if the "debate" will ever be ended because there are
believers of the yellow roofs.






Yahoo! Groups Links


buchwaldfam <duff@...>
 

Didja ever see the all-green, no-yellow Rutland PS-1s?

A guy down in Bellows falls showed me a black and white photo of
one that had been repainted that way. Yup, it was still a Rutland
car, not a GMRR!

Regards,
Phil Buchwald


--- In STMFC@..., centga@a... wrote:
Phil, I think that's the site where I originally ran up on this
controversy. The issue seems to be were the cars delivered with the
galvanized roof or not. It's highly possible that if they were
repainted in the shops that they just sprayed the whole car yellow.
IIRC this website has several "eye witness accounts" of the cars
having a yellow roof. But I wonder if they have researched whether
or not these were "as delivered" or simply shop repainted cars.
Regardless of what eye witness accounts say or diagrams I'll take
photographic evidence any day. If Mr Hawkins has a photo of the cars
with a galvanized roof then that's pretty convincing evidence to me.
Todd Horton

-----Original Message-----
From: buchwaldfam <duff@g...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:30:02 -0000
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland PS-1 boxcars




It's funny how these cars have acquired almost a cult
following...

There's a site called "Remembering the Rutland", and on it
there
was a report of an ex-Rutland PS-1 that was being moved to a
museum.
I have pasted the following from the site. Hope this is ok to do.

"Rutland PS-1 No. 445 To Be Preserved at the RRMNE
by Steve Mumley
(09/03/02)

Ex-Rutland PS-1 box car #445 has been saved for preservation and
is
on it's way to the Naugatuck Railroad (aka The Railroad Museum of
New England) near Waterbury, Connecticut. After its tenure on the
Rutland, the 445 was sold to Hudson Leasing and was leased to the
Vermont Railway. <snip> Upon close observation of the roof, you
can
see where it was painted yellow! It's my understanding that it
will
be restored to the Rutland yellow and green as-delivered paint
scheme.

-Steve Mumley"

The following link shows some photos of the car:

http://users.rcn.com/jimdu4/SaveTheRutland/Rutland_445.htm

Of course, the discription doesn't include details such as:
Was
the yellow paint just overspray from the sides? Was the yellow
present only on the roof seam caps (they were sometimes sealed
with
car cement and painted over, leaving the main panels
unpainted)....
So the debate will probably still provide a lot of "enjoyment
for
years to come!

Other info: Nimke's book on the Rutland includes a page from
the 1961 ORER. There is a note which states that the 2nd and 3rd
orders of PS-1s were equipped with permanent lading anchors. So at
least these two groups of cars were intended for something in
addition to talc loading.
Final word, then I'll shut up: One photo in Nimke's book
shows
a good 3/4 view of a 200 series car. The one thing that strikes
you
is how wavy the separation between the green and the yellow is.
So,
don't be TOO careful when you mask your cars off! ;>

Best Regards,
Phil Buchwald







--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:

Todd,
I don't know if the "debate" will ever be ended because there
are
believers of the yellow roofs.






Yahoo! Groups Links







armprem
 

Twofer:Generally the car number would be located on the frame almost in the
center of the car.I have a color shot of an all green PS-1 that I took.These
were painted solid green after the Rutland ceased operations.Other PS-1s
were leased to the MEC.Armand Premo

----- Original Message -----
From: "buchwaldfam" <duff@...>
To: <STMFC@...>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 2:44 PM
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland PS-1 boxcars




Didja ever see the all-green, no-yellow Rutland PS-1s?

A guy down in Bellows falls showed me a black and white photo of
one that had been repainted that way. Yup, it was still a Rutland
car, not a GMRR!

Regards,
Phil Buchwald


--- In STMFC@..., centga@a... wrote:
Phil, I think that's the site where I originally ran up on this
controversy. The issue seems to be were the cars delivered with the
galvanized roof or not. It's highly possible that if they were
repainted in the shops that they just sprayed the whole car yellow.
IIRC this website has several "eye witness accounts" of the cars
having a yellow roof. But I wonder if they have researched whether
or not these were "as delivered" or simply shop repainted cars.
Regardless of what eye witness accounts say or diagrams I'll take
photographic evidence any day. If Mr Hawkins has a photo of the cars
with a galvanized roof then that's pretty convincing evidence to me.
Todd Horton

-----Original Message-----
From: buchwaldfam <duff@g...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:30:02 -0000
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland PS-1 boxcars




It's funny how these cars have acquired almost a cult
following...

There's a site called "Remembering the Rutland", and on it
there
was a report of an ex-Rutland PS-1 that was being moved to a
museum.
I have pasted the following from the site. Hope this is ok to do.

"Rutland PS-1 No. 445 To Be Preserved at the RRMNE
by Steve Mumley
(09/03/02)

Ex-Rutland PS-1 box car #445 has been saved for preservation and
is
on it's way to the Naugatuck Railroad (aka The Railroad Museum of
New England) near Waterbury, Connecticut. After its tenure on the
Rutland, the 445 was sold to Hudson Leasing and was leased to the
Vermont Railway. <snip> Upon close observation of the roof, you
can
see where it was painted yellow! It's my understanding that it
will
be restored to the Rutland yellow and green as-delivered paint
scheme.

-Steve Mumley"

The following link shows some photos of the car:

http://users.rcn.com/jimdu4/SaveTheRutland/Rutland_445.htm

Of course, the discription doesn't include details such as:
Was
the yellow paint just overspray from the sides? Was the yellow
present only on the roof seam caps (they were sometimes sealed
with
car cement and painted over, leaving the main panels
unpainted)....
So the debate will probably still provide a lot of "enjoyment
for
years to come!

Other info: Nimke's book on the Rutland includes a page from
the 1961 ORER. There is a note which states that the 2nd and 3rd
orders of PS-1s were equipped with permanent lading anchors. So at
least these two groups of cars were intended for something in
addition to talc loading.
Final word, then I'll shut up: One photo in Nimke's book
shows
a good 3/4 view of a 200 series car. The one thing that strikes
you
is how wavy the separation between the green and the yellow is.
So,
don't be TOO careful when you mask your cars off! ;>

Best Regards,
Phil Buchwald







--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:

Todd,
I don't know if the "debate" will ever be ended because there
are
believers of the yellow roofs.






Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links







centga@...
 

Phil, that would be a neat shot to see. Maybe even a possible candidate to send to Kadee for a model. Todd Horton

-----Original Message-----
From: buchwaldfam <duff@...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:44:43 -0000
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland PS-1 boxcars




Didja ever see the all-green, no-yellow Rutland PS-1s?

A guy down in Bellows falls showed me a black and white photo of
one that had been repainted that way. Yup, it was still a Rutland
car, not a GMRR!

Regards,
Phil Buchwald


--- In STMFC@..., centga@a... wrote:
Phil, I think that's the site where I originally ran up on this
controversy. The issue seems to be were the cars delivered with the
galvanized roof or not. It's highly possible that if they were
repainted in the shops that they just sprayed the whole car yellow.
IIRC this website has several "eye witness accounts" of the cars
having a yellow roof. But I wonder if they have researched whether
or not these were "as delivered" or simply shop repainted cars.
Regardless of what eye witness accounts say or diagrams I'll take
photographic evidence any day. If Mr Hawkins has a photo of the cars
with a galvanized roof then that's pretty convincing evidence to me.
Todd Horton

-----Original Message-----
From: buchwaldfam <duff@g...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:30:02 -0000
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Rutland PS-1 boxcars




It's funny how these cars have acquired almost a cult
following...

There's a site called "Remembering the Rutland", and on it
there
was a report of an ex-Rutland PS-1 that was being moved to a
museum.
I have pasted the following from the site. Hope this is ok to do.

"Rutland PS-1 No. 445 To Be Preserved at the RRMNE
by Steve Mumley
(09/03/02)

Ex-Rutland PS-1 box car #445 has been saved for preservation and
is
on it's way to the Naugatuck Railroad (aka The Railroad Museum of
New England) near Waterbury, Connecticut. After its tenure on the
Rutland, the 445 was sold to Hudson Leasing and was leased to the
Vermont Railway. <snip> Upon close observation of the roof, you
can
see where it was painted yellow! It's my understanding that it
will
be restored to the Rutland yellow and green as-delivered paint
scheme.

-Steve Mumley"

The following link shows some photos of the car:

http://users.rcn.com/jimdu4/SaveTheRutland/Rutland_445.htm

Of course, the discription doesn't include details such as:
Was
the yellow paint just overspray from the sides? Was the yellow
present only on the roof seam caps (they were sometimes sealed
with
car cement and painted over, leaving the main panels
unpainted)....
So the debate will probably still provide a lot of "enjoyment
for
years to come!

Other info: Nimke's book on the Rutland includes a page from
the 1961 ORER. There is a note which states that the 2nd and 3rd
orders of PS-1s were equipped with permanent lading anchors. So at
least these two groups of cars were intended for something in
addition to talc loading.
Final word, then I'll shut up: One photo in Nimke's book
shows
a good 3/4 view of a 200 series car. The one thing that strikes
you
is how wavy the separation between the green and the yellow is.
So,
don't be TOO careful when you mask your cars off! ;>

Best Regards,
Phil Buchwald







--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@s...> wrote:

Todd,
I don't know if the "debate" will ever be ended because there
are
believers of the yellow roofs.






Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links