Date
1 - 20 of 26
SFRD Rr-30 Class Reefers From Athearn
Bob Chaparro <thecitrusbelt@...>
Andy Sperandeo alerted me to this and Craig Walker at Athearn sent
me a pdf. The following information is from that document. These are the reefers Santa Fe used mainly for frozen food service. Bob Chaparro Moderator Citrus Industry Modeling Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/citrusmodeling/ and Model Railroads of Southern California http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Model_Railroads_Of_Southern_California/ ==================================== Era: 1940 to 1960s • NEW body tooling • National B-1 Trucks (NEW tooling) • Fully assembled • Machined metal wheels • Weighted for optimal performance • Razor-sharp printing and painting • Magnetically operated knuckle couplers • Includes molded and wire-form grabirons, stirrup steps, recessed ladders and full underbody details • Positionable Santa Fe style "reversed" ice hatches with etched and formed hatch stops Announced: 4-18-06 Orders Due: 5-16-06 ETA: September 2006
|
|
leakinmywaders
Can someone offer the number series for the SFRD Rr-30 reefers? The
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
ORER doesn't appear to distinguish SFRD cars by that car class code. Also, is there a web site somewhere with good ATSF/SFRD+ freight car rosters? I never seem to be able to google this info up when I need it. Thx! Chris Frissell, Polson, MT
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Chaparro" <thecitrusbelt@...> wrote:
|
|
pullmanboss <tgmadden@...>
Chris Frissell wrote:
They were 50 foot cars, 100 of them built in 1940, numbered 37290 through 37389. Tom Madden
|
|
s shaffer
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "leakinmywaders" <leakinmywaders@yahoo.com> To: <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:39 PM Subject: [STMFC] Re: SFRD Rr-30 Class Reefers From Athearn Can someone offer the number series for the SFRD Rr-30 reefers? The ORER doesn't appear to distinguish SFRD cars by that car class code. Larry Occhiello book Santa Fe Railway Listing of Freight Cars by Class and Car Number 1906-1991 says Rr-30 #37290-37389 shows only 4 cars left in 1971 and none in 1973 Steve Shaffer
|
|
Andy Carlson
The Athearn model has been examined by a friend of mine, and I am repeating his observations.
Though 100 of these cars were built, the last 25 cars came equipped with fans, a bit unusual in that both fans were on the same side of the carbody. Unless Details West comes out with a fan set, we will have to make our own fans. The earlier class Rr-22 numbered 200 cars and differed in 2 big ways from the Rr30; earlier dreadnaught ends, and no National B-1 trucks. (I was told that the Athearn B-1 trucks are stunning in their appearence, blowing away the LifeLike version.) Maybe Athearn will tool a different end to do the similar Rr-22. Both the Rr-22s and the Rr-30s had Durea Cushioned underframes. Here is an area where Richard Hendrickson will probably have an opportunity to show us how to correct a built-in problem with the Athearn underframe. Brake rigging is connected to the floor and centersill on the model, whereas the real underframes had brackets holding the brake equipment to surfaces that would not move relative to each other thereby preventing the shearing of components when the underframe moved. Sounds like a nicely done model, though I would have hoped for a good model of something with more than only 75 cars. -Andy Carlson Ojai CA
|
|
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
Chris Frissell asked:
"Also, is there a web site somewhere with good ATSF/SFRD+ freight car rosters? I never seem to be able to google this info up when I need it." Chris, I STRONGLY recommend you invest in the following print resources from the SFRHMS : Santa Fe Railway Listing of Freight Cars by Class and Car Number 1906-1991, Compiled by Larry Occhiello. Currently out of print, but well worth buying if you come across one. Refrigerator Cars: Ice Bunker Cars 1884-1979, by Keith Jordan, Richard H. Hendrickson, John B. Moore and A. Dean Hale. The definitive SFRD ice bunker car reference - was out of print, but available again from the society as a digitally scanned reprint. http://www.atsfrr.org/store/book3.htm Furniture and Automobile Box Cars, by Richard H. Hendrickson, and Santa Fe Box Cars 1869-1953, by John Dobyne. http://www.atsfrr.org/store/book3.htm These are well worth the investment if you intend on doing a lot of work on Santa Fe reefers and boxcars, and will beat hands down any source currently on the internet. Ben Hom
|
|
Andy Sperandeo <asperandeo@...>
Hello Chris,
The Rr-30 class cars were numbers 37290 through 37389. Built in 1940, they lasted through the period of this list, with 98 cars still "live" in 1956, and 84 in 1965. So long, Andy Andy Sperandeo Executive Editor Model Railroader magazine asperandeo@mrmag.com 262-796-8776, ext. 461 FAX 262-796-11142
|
|
leakinmywaders
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "benjaminfrank_hom" <b.hom@...> wrote:
These are well worth the investment if you intend on doing a lot ofBen: Thank you, a very useful list, and I will save it to consider in future purchases. However, like may others, I only anticipate doing a little work on ATSF freight cars--sort of a slow trickle, and only a few car series, as they are foreign road cars for me. Over the past couple of years I have graduated from mostly ignoring prototype fidelity of foreign road cars to at least doing the research I can do, given that resources preclude investing in a complete collection of Color Guides, etc. (though I can see I am on the slippery slope to that end...). And a hearty thank you to Andy S. et al. for the number series and service data. Regards, Chris Frissell
|
|
Keith Jordan
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, Andy Carlson
<midcentury@...> wrote: and I am repeating his observations. equipped with fans, a bit unusual in that both fans were on the same side of the carbody. Unless Details West comes out with a fan set, we will have to make our own fans. big ways from the Rr30; earlier dreadnaught ends, and no National B-1 trucks. (I was told that the Athearn B-1 trucks are stunning in their appearence, blowing away the LifeLike version.) Maybe Athearn will tool a different end to do the similar Rr-22. underframes. Here is an area where Richard Hendrickson will probably have an opportunity to show us how to correct a built-in problem with the Athearn underframe. Brake rigging is connected to the floor and centersill on the model, whereas the real underframes had brackets holding the brake equipment to surfaces that would not move relative to each other thereby preventing the shearing of components when the underframe moved. for a good model of something with more than only 75 cars. Andy and Others, The Rr-22's Duryea underframe was the earlier version, with different crossbearers and torsion plates than that on the Rr-30. The hatch covers were different as well. Add this to Andy's comments about the ends and trucks. Also, while the Rr-31s were externally similar to the Rr-30s, they were two feet longer, with larger capacity ice bunkers. Hopefully, Athearn won't letter later runs for this class. A minor correction: As far as the fans are concerned, they weren't on "one side." It was the sheaves that attached to external motors (when stationary) and external controls that were on one side. Later fan versions put the sheaves/hardware on opposite sides. The fans themselves actually were at the bottom of the bunkers, running across the car. When Overland imported these 50 foot reefers several years ago, they included brass castings of the fan pulley sheaves. These could be easily used as molds and cast in resin. When the fan cars got repainted in the 1950s, the fan plates were painted black, providing an interesting contrast. I'm excited that Athearn did this, because it could be a harbinger of future projects based on "minor" prototypes. Keith Jordan
|
|
ed_mines
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, Andy Carlson <midcentury@...> wrote:
Sounds like a nicely done model, though I would have hoped for agood model of something with more than only 75 cars. I agree with Andy. Why do they pick unusual prototypes? Ed
|
|
Scott Pitzer
Wow, just 100 cars, and for 25 of them, it needs modification. I knew that photos were important-- detailed photos of the proposed prototype to be modeled. But this sounds like some ATSF guys have INCRIMINATING photos of someone at Athearn!<g>
Scott Pitzer
|
|
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
Keith Jordan writes:
I'm excited that Athearn did this, because it could be a harbingerHmmm. Tongue firmly in cheek...smiling....If one applies the Dave Nelson/Tim Gilbert "probability of occurrence" to these cars, one MIGHT be allowed one tenth of a car to be on the layout during a month of operating sessions. OTOH, if one were to...for some reason...model say two days [ as in May 14 and May 15, 1954 ] AND had proof that 4 of the Rr-30 reefers were in one train on one of those days in the area modeled...Bingo!...one could run 4 of them. No idea what to do about modeling and running the other 2400 or so cars active on those days in the area of the RR modeled. Not my problem. Still...one might be permitted to wonder about the manufacture of a car with total production of 100 prototype cars when the AAR Alt Standard 50 ton hopper...about 50,000 prototype cars [ and, no, I'm not going to look up the actual total numbers ]...has never been built or, of course, the UP S-40-10... OTOH, there were about 540 Pennsy Hippos [ 2-10-0 ] steam locos built as opposed to 25 UP Big Boys. Anyone care to guess which of these prototypes has had more models built of them? "The World Wonders"....Nimitz to Halsey, Oct 1944 Mike Brock
|
|
Gary Green <ggreen@...>
But what about a solid reefer block, say, in the early 1960s?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Gary Green ggreen@inreach.com
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Brock Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 8:06 PM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: SFRD Rr-30 Class Reefers From Athearn Snip... Hmmm. Tongue firmly in cheek...smiling....If one applies the Dave Nelson/Tim Gilbert "probability of occurrence" to these cars, one MIGHT be allowed one tenth of a car to be on the layout during a month of operating sessions.
|
|
Gary Green <ggreen@...>
Correction...I mean the late 1950s.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Gary Green
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary Green Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 8:18 PM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [STMFC] Re: SFRD Rr-30 Class Reefers From Athearn But what about a solid reefer block, say, in the early 1960s? Gary Green ggreen@inreach.com -----Original Message----- From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Brock Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 8:06 PM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: SFRD Rr-30 Class Reefers From Athearn Snip... Hmmm. Tongue firmly in cheek...smiling....If one applies the Dave Nelson/Tim Gilbert "probability of occurrence" to these cars, one MIGHT be allowed one tenth of a car to be on the layout during a month of operating sessions. Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
Gary Green writes:
"But what about a solid reefer block, say, in the early 1960s?" and follows it with: Correction...I mean the late 1950s.Clever fellow...that Gary. And quick. He could probably help Jeff Aley with clinics during Prototype Rails. Mike Brock
|
|
Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
According to Appendix F of the Santa Fe Railway Rolling Stock Reference
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Series - Volume 2, Refrigerator Cars, Ice Bunker Cars 1884-1979 there were 12,986 SFRD Reefers of all types in 1960. Based on Andy S's earlier email between 98 and 84 cars would have been active in 1960. If we use the higher number, 98, that means the Rr-30 class constituted approximately 0.75% of the SFRD fleet. Also, since these were frozen food cars they may have not been as free running as other reefers. (I need to reread the chapter in the book) These cars were a small percentage of the fleet. However, I'll still pick one up for my layout when they come out, and since they say Santa Fe, the great uneducated masses will buy them in droves. Which is great since it pays for the tooling and encourages Athearn to keep producing new models. Brian J Carlson P.E. Cheektowaga NY
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Green" <ggreen@inreach.com> To: <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 11:18 PM Subject: RE: [STMFC] Re: SFRD Rr-30 Class Reefers From Athearn But what about a solid reefer block, say, in the early 1960s?
|
|
Scott Pitzer
Athearn has heard "How many F-units do we need, anyway?" and "How many PS-2s do we need, anyway?" but at least they won't have to hear "How many Santa Fe 50' ice reefers do we need..."
Scott Pitzer
|
|
Thomas M. Olsen <tmolsen@...>
Mike,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Actually, there were 598 Hippos built and sadly enough, only 1 left. In the end, the Big Boys won out as there are at least 4 or 5 left. It seems that it took an awfully long time for someone to do a Sante Fe Rr-30 in anything other than brass. I bought and still have brass Overland HO models of the Rr-30 and Rr-42 (another reefer that did was not built in large numbers) for almost 12 years. Considering the large amount of reefers that Santa Fe and PFE ran, not to mention all the other roads and private owners, having one or two would be a drop in the bucket on any good size model railroad where you ran reefer blocks, especially east of the Mississippi. There is this strange fascination for freight cars and locomotives that were a very minority of any given railroad's roster with the model manufacturers and importers. An example would be that I still would like to see a "Welded PRR 250P(or F)75 tender". For the non-PRR guys, this is a tender with a short coal bunker and a 25,000 gallon capacity water space. They were used to eliminate numerous water stops on engines in passenger service. Eventually they were removed and re-assigned to freight engines. I have never seen photographs of a welded version of this tender, but Railworks brought out two welded versions of this tender, although riveted versions abound. The same goes for freight cars in various scales: the more obscure the car, the more models of it are built. Tom Olsen 7 Boundary Road, West Branch Newark, Delaware, 19711-7479 (302) 738-4292 tmolsen@udel.edu Mike Brock wrote:
Keith Jordan writes:
|
|
Miller, Andrew S. <asmiller@...>
If one were to have a frozen food warehouse as an on-line industry, the
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
probability of seeing these cars goes up. BTW "The World Wonders" was not part of Nimitz's message it was the "pad", a random phrase put on the end of the message to confuse any Japanese cryptologist trying to break the code. It was an unfortunate choice because it seemed to fit the message and the decoding clerk mistakenly left it in, thus leading to the perceived insult to Halsey! Now for the trivia contest. What was the pad on the front of that famous message? regards, Andy Miller
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Brock If one applies the Dave Nelson/Tim Gilbert "probability of occurrence" to these cars, one MIGHT be allowed one tenth of a car to be on the layout during a month of operating sessions. OTOH, if one were to...for some reason...model say two days [ as in May 14 and May 15, 1954 ] AND had proof that 4 of the Rr-30 reefers were in one train on one of those days in the area modeled...Bingo!...one could run 4 of them. No idea what to do about modeling and running the other 2400 or so cars active on those days in the area of the RR modeled. Not my problem. "The World Wonders"....Nimitz to Halsey, Oct 1944 Mike Brock
|
|
An interesting aside regarding this discussion. I finally got the Athearn
news announcement this morning (Thursday) at 1:15 and can now see what everyone's been talking about. (I never saw a link in any of the posts when this started.) It appears that Athearn doesn't send out all their e-mail announcements at the same time. I knew it was a long way here when shipping things, but I didn't know it took longer for the internet too!<G> Dan Stinson Helena, Montana
|
|