Date
1 - 7 of 7
B&O Class W-1A Truck Identification
benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
Finsishing up an article for the November-December issue of The B&O
Modeler on Class W-1 and subclass hoppers and came across some odd trucks. I've uploaded a detail photo in the STMFC files section titled "B&O 334344 Class W-1A Truck Detail.JPG": http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFC/files Anyone know the type of this truck? Thanks in advance! Ben Hom
|
|
Richard Hendrickson
On Dec 6, 2006, at 3:16 PM, benjaminfrank_hom wrote:
Finsishing up an article for the November-December issue of The B&OBen, it's an arch bar truck with a Pilcher trussed side frame. See the 1922 Car Builders' Cyclopedia, p. 628. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
jim_mischke <jmischke@...>
I would defer to Richard on his truck identification here.
Yet B&O also had some proprietary truck designs that research is only starting to uncover. Examples would be the Washburn truck and the Tatum XLT truck. Until recently, they looked like plain old archbars to everyone. B&O also was nuts about recycling trucks (and other hardware) in their rebuilding and new construction programs. So trucks out of era would show up on B&O cars. Examples: the M-26 (plain) boxcars inherited Tatum XLT trucks from scrapped hopper cars. O-41 gondola cars (I think, I'm winging it here) got BR&P trucks. The surviving gondola off the West Virginia northern stored at Tunnelton, WV is an example of this. --- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> wrote: B&O theModeler on Class W-1 and subclass hoppers and came across some oddBen, it's an arch bar truck with a Pilcher trussed side frame. See 1922 Car Builders' Cyclopedia, p. 628.
|
|
rwitt_2000 <rmwitt@...>
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...>
wrote: Richard, I don't have that CBC to compare the photos, but according to an article in Railway Age (April 12, 1924) it describes the use of arch bar trucks designed by Edwin C. Washburn, assistant to the president of the B&O. The trucks were placed on new cars ordered in 1922 with capacities of 40-ton, 55-ton and 70-ton. The class W-1a were rebuilt by various car builders ~1922 for the B&O so there is a high probability that the trucks used were of this Washburn design. The illustrations of the side frame in the RA article appear very similar to the one in the photo posted by Ben. Bob Witt Indianapolis, Indiana
|
|
Richard Hendrickson
On Dec 9, 2006, at 6:19 PM, rwitt_2000 wrote:
I don't have that CBC to compare the photos, but according to anBob, there is a drawing of the Washburn truck side frame in the 1928 Car Builders' Cyclopedia, as well as a photo of a very similar truck identified as a "Tatum XLT Improved Arch Bar Truck Used on the Baltimore & Ohio." Neither is the truck shown in Ben Hom's photo. I'll stick with my original identification of the truck on the W-1a; it's unmistakably a Pilcher arch bar truck. I will add that the B&O was well known (one might even say notorious) for its determination during the 1920s to keep using arch bar trucks of one design or another at a time when virtually every other RR in North America was converting to cast steel side frames. None of the improvements that originated in the B&O's mechanical department overcame the basic weakness of the arch bar design, which was that the nuts and bolts holding it together tended to loosen or fail unless the trucks received regular and frequent preventive maintenance – which, of course, couldn't be assured on cars that traveled widely off-line in interchange service and might not come back through the owner's shops for literally years. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Guy Wilber
In a message dated 12/10/2006 8:31:30 PM Central Standard Time,
rmwitt@... writes: We have yet to find a company memo explaining and/or justifying the expenditures to replace all those arch bar trucks. Bob, The justification for expenditures to replace all those arch bar trucks was to conform with the AAR's ban on arch bar side frames in interchange (July 1, 1940). Regards, Guy Wilber West Bend, WI
|
|
rwitt_2000 <rmwitt@...>
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...>
wrote: Richard, thank you for sharing your source material and noting the differences in these truck designs. Yes, the B&O with Washburn and Tatum tried to keep the arch bar truck alive. We have yet to find a company memo explaining and/or justifying the expenditures to replace all those arch bar trucks. Bob Witt Indianapolis, Indiana
|
|