Date
1 - 11 of 11
What Roads Had This Car?
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Brian J Carlson wrote:
The assumption so far is that this car has a prototype. Until a picture is posted submitting potential roads is premature. How do we know that it isn't a brass version of a "generic" 50' boxcar. The car is older and prototype fidelity wasn't as critical back then.You're absolutely right, Brian, but I think the goal was to find out if there are reasonably close prototypes, even if no exact match. But: as we've been discussing, there may not even be any, if the wood running board is retained. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history |
|
Rod Miller
Photos of my "mystery cars" have been posted in the Files area under
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the folder "What Roads Had These Cars". There is a sub-folder for each car. Some of the links yahoogroups automatically posted to announce the new files won't work because I put the wrong photos in one folder and fixed it, and then made a typo in another folder name and fixed it. Your best best is to browse the folders manually to find the photos for which the link doesn't work. The folder names are pretty self-descriptive. The tank car folder includes two "acid dome" versions that are painted and are waiting for weathering. Hopefully the collective expertise of this group will be able to identify appropriate paint schemes for the unpainted cars. For that I thank all of you very much. Rod Anthony Thompson wrote: Brian J Carlson wrote:The assumption so far is that this car has a prototype. Until a picture is posted submitting potential roads is premature. How do we know that it isn't a brass version of a "generic" 50' boxcar. The car is older and prototype fidelity wasn't as critical back then.You're absolutely right, Brian, but I think the goal was to find out if there are reasonably close prototypes, even if no exact match. But: as we've been discussing, there may not even be any, if the wood running board is retained. |
|
On Sat, December 29, 2007 7:38 pm, Rod Miller wrote:
The tank car folder includes two "acid dome" versions that are Rod, The 10K tank car looks to be a Type 27 AC&F car (although it could be a type 21). The channel side sills on the ends are the spotting feature. These were almost all privately owned. SHPX is a good bet since that is the AC&F leasing arm... but numerous other companies leased or owned these cars. The AC&F tank car book is a good place to go for photos of these. Regards Bruce Bruce Smith Auburn, AL |
|
Richard Hendrickson
On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Rod Miller wrote:
Photos of my "mystery cars" have been posted in the Files area underRod, I haven't had time to look at all of them yet, but I can identify two for sure. The 40' single sheathed automobile car model is a dead ringer for Missouri-Kansas-Texas 69001-69200, and I have prototype photos of these cars. The unpainted tank car is (as Bruce Smith suggested) a 10,000 gal. AC&F Type 27 which could be accurately painted and lettered for numerous owners, including AC&F's own leasing subsidiary, Shippers Car Line. Again, I have photos. Personally, I'd choose a prototype based on the availability of accurate decal lettering. I'll have more later on the two acid car models, both of which represent AC&F-built prototype cars. Richard Hendrickson |
|
40' box with DP roof, 8' door .. At first I thought this
might be an EJ&E box car but the roof is wrong. I can't see the ends very well in the photos, but judging from the panels not being of equal width, this looks like a car that was built with 6' doors and later rebuilt with 8' doors. Tim O'Connor |
|
proto48er
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...>
wrote: under for eachthe folder "What Roads Had These Cars". There is a sub-folder identifycar.Rod, I haven't had time to look at all of them yet, but I can two for sure. The 40' single sheathed automobile car model is adead ringer for Missouri-Kansas-Texas 69001-69200, and I have prototypepainted and lettered for numerous owners, including AC&F's own leasingI'd choose a prototype based on the availability of accurate decalof which represent AC&F-built prototype cars. Rod - I think that PSC used the 1940 CBC plans for the M-K-T double door single sheathed boxcar for their models. The 40' single sheathed double door boxcar with steel ends and "vertical" brake staff (PSC#15549) represents the M-K-T car as built in about 1937. The same car, with steel ends and "Ajax" brakes (PSC#15551) is an unknown to me; however, since the prototype M-K-T boxcars were ALL converted to single door boxcars by 1945, and were also ALL converted to "Ajax" brakes at that time. Perhaps a couple of the original double door cars were converted to Ajax brakes before rebuilding, but I doubt it. ORER data for EX HT would show this, but none of my ORERs indicate this. I am converting my two PSC#15551 to single door cars (not easy!) PSC also imported a 40' single sheathed boxcar with double doors, WOOD braced ends and vertical brake staff (PSC#15553) - I think this is good for a Milwaukee prototype, also pictured in the CBC. I am also interested to hear what others have to say about these cars! A.T. Kott |
|
proto48er
--- In STMFC@..., Rod Miller <rod@...> wrote:
each car.Rod - I think the steel refrigerator car (PSC#15597) with "steel" roofwalks is a PFE R-40-20. NP also had similar cars, but theirs may have had wood roofwalks (not an NP expert!). If so, PSC#15517 is the exact same car with wood roofwalks, and is also correct for only one of the PFE R-40-20 cars. Tony's PFE book has the number of that unique car (book is at home, and I am at work, goofing off). A.T. Kott |
|
Richard Hendrickson
On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Rod Miller wrote:
Photos of my "mystery cars" have been posted in the Files area under[snip] The tank car folder includes two "acid dome" versions that areRod, both cars are painted and lettered according to the instructions supplied with Champ decals. Unfortunately, the Champ decals and instructions for theMathieson model were bogus, and therefore the model in incorrect. None of the ORERs in my collection show a Mathieson tank car with the number 994, and the decal set is not for an acid car but for a 6,000 gal. ICC-105 in liquid chlorine service. I would add that the color is way off; the Mathieson tank car were painted a much darker olive green. Ca. 1953 Mathieson owned only six 8,000 gal. TA class cars, and they were numbered 1202-1207. In the absence of a photo, there's no way to know whether the model is even remotely close to those prototypes. I have better news about the Dow Chemical car. DOWX 38321 was a correct number for one of three 8,000 gal. lined acid tank cars in the 39320-38322 series, and it appears that the Champ decal set was based on sightings or photos of an actual car. I can't say whether all the details on the model are correct, but based on other photos of similar cars, nothing about the model is obviously implausible. Richard Hendrickson |
|
Richard Hendrickson
On Dec 30, 2007, at 10:38 AM, proto48er wrote:
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> I think that PSC used the 1940 CBC plans for the M-K-T double doorThis all squares with the information I have. The in-service photo I have of M-K-T 69170, showing it in 5-36 with auto rack markings on the doors, is a right hand 7/8 A end shot (from the Joe Collias collection) which doesn't show the hand brake, but the ORER dimensions indicate a vertical staff, not an Ajax, hand brake, so that's one detail that would have to be changed on the model (and even then, as you point out, the cars were all rebuilt as single door cars in the mid-1940s, so that's a problem for anyone who models a later era). Richard Hendrickson |
|
proto48er
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...>
wrote: is a doordead ringer for Missouri-Kansas-Texas 69001-69200....I think that PSC used the 1940 CBC plans for the M-K-T double unknownsingle sheathed boxcar for their models. The 40' single sheathed convertedto me; however, since the prototype M-K-T boxcars were ALL to "Ajax"to single door boxcars by 1945, and were also ALL converted Ibrakes at that time. Perhaps a couple of the original double doorThis all squares with the information I have. The in-service photo have of M-K-T 69170, showing it in 5-36 with auto rack markings onthe doors, is a right hand 7/8 A end shot (from the Joe Colliascollection) which doesn't show the hand brake, but the ORER dimensions indicatea vertical staff, not an Ajax, hand brake, so that's one detail thatout, the cars were all rebuilt as single door cars in the mid-1940s, so Richard - As usual, I have a couple of corrections/additions to my previous post! (We need a computer at home where the train stuff is!) The M-K-T plans were also in the 1928 and 1931 CBCs. The MILW plans and a photo of CM&StP #59499 are only in the 1928 CBC. The MILW cars are a mystery to me, however. The photo of #59499 indicates that it was built 9/22 by General American Car Co. It is a 40-ton car with 41'-4 1/2" L over strikers, 40'-1/2" IL, 8'-6" IW and 10'-5 5/16" IH, 11'-0" door opening, with double WOOD doors. The number would indicate to me that it was the LAST in a number series. Nice general arrangement drawings are in the 1928 CBC for the car. However, the 2/1925 ORER has no such number series for these cars. Nor do any subsequent ORERs until the number series was taken up by logging flats in the late 1940's. Did the MILW assign these cars to another subsidiary? It is hard to identify the MILW subsidiaries in the earlier ORERs, including the 1925 and 1927 ones I looked in. The CBC photo says "CM&StP" on the car. As an aside to the "O" scalers out there, the MILW car has 30'-0" truck centers, while the M-K-T cars are 6'' further apart, so the model may not work for the MILW car if you are too anal about these things. Probably a difference in draft gears. A.T. Kott |
|
proto48er
--- In STMFC@..., "proto48er" <atkott@...> wrote:
under fixedthe folder "What Roads Had These Cars". There is a sub-folder foreachcar. prettyit. Your best best is to browse the folders manually to find the thatself-descriptive. roofwalksI thank all of you very much.Rod - is a PFE R-40-20. NP also had similar cars, but theirs may havehad wood roofwalks (not an NP expert!). If so, PSC#15517 is the exactthe PFE R-40-20 cars. Tony's PFE book has the number of that uniquecar (book is at home, and I am at work, goofing off). Rod - Went home at lunch and looked in Tony's PFE book. The correct number series for your car (R-40-20) as built in 1945 is PFE #45701-#46702. I cannot find any reference to one car having wood running boards, but this is no problem for you, since yours has steel ones, as did at least 999 cars in the series. However, the thickness of the steel running boards on the model IS a problem! They are too ham-fisted thick! The edges need to be thinned down to about 0.030" thickness, but this means they have to be mounted off the roof (with standoffs). The Korean model builders cut into the roof ribs when mounting these steel roofwalks, so some Bondo might be in order to fill the little cuts before remounting them. Sweet are the uses of adversity that doth, like a toad, pour forth a deadly venom, and yet hath a jewel in its head. A.T. Kott |
|