Date
1 - 14 of 14
Question re 12-Panel boxcars
jim peters
Sorry for the late respose,
In your post from a month ago, Mark you mentioned C&BT kits 10'-6" IH, 12-pnl boxcar. Looking at Walthers "Reference" book, I see 3 different kit numbers listed (193-13500, -10500, -11300) . . . it was my understanding most of C&BT's later efforts are more like "Blue-Box" wanna-be's. The question is are any of the kit number above the older style kit with separate ladders, grabs, etc? All I really want is the body shell/s. Jim Peters Coquitlam, BC To: STMFC@yahoogroups.comFrom: Goatfisher2@comcast.netDate: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:35:44 -0800Subject: RE: [STMFC] Boxcar details and paint, series GN 20500-21449 Mark,Here's some info that may help you out:3) All in this series had the 5 panel Superior Door.5) Build date for series 20500 - 21499 is 1952.6) Yup - that's original paint. Consider also Microscale 87-185.For references:Mainline Modeler - 9/85, 11/2001, 12/2001RMJ - 10/1998 IIRC, the Mainline articles are your better bet - the RMJ article was mostlyabout a Duane Buck customization of an Intermountain 10' 12 panel car, butmight have had photos of the 10' 6" car.Best starting point - C&BT 10'6" 12-panel car* with 4/3/1 ends. Throw awaythe details and replace with appropriate details from Plano, Branchline,etc.* At some point in the past there was discussion of Branchline bringing outa 10' 6" 12-panel car. I'm not aware of this happening, but if it did, itmight well be a better choice.Ping me if you need more.Best regards,Steve HaasSammamish, WA _________________________________________________________________
|
|
SUVCWORR@...
In a message dated 1/17/2008 12:10:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mikado2206@hotmail.com writes: In your post from a month ago, Mark you mentioned C&BT kits 10'-6" IH, 12-pnl boxcar. Looking at Walthers "Reference" book, I see 3 different kit numbers listed (193-13500, -10500, -11300) . . . it was my understanding most of C&BT's later efforts are more like "Blue-Box" wanna-be's. The question is are any of the kit number above the older style kit with separate ladders, grabs, etc? All I really want is the body shell/s. NO. C&BT on the advice of several well known modelers changed from separate grabs, ladders etc. to molded on parts by recuting the dies. Once the ladders, grabs etc, were cut into the dies, there was no going back without making all new dies. All boxcars produced since that fateful time, have the details molded on. Rich Orr **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
|
|
SUVCWORR@...
Larry,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I can only state what the die cutter told Dick Schweiger. Not my area of expertise. Maybe the die cutter just didn't want to do it. I don't know. Rich Orr
In a message dated 1/17/2008 8:05:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
Ljack70117@comcast.net writes: see below Thank you Larry Jackman ljack70117@comcast.net Boca Raton FL 33434 I want to die in my sleep like my grandfather did, not screaming like the other people in his car. On Jan 17, 2008, at 7:50 PM, SUVCWORR@aol.com wrote: Wrong. you can fill any cavities that you do not want. If Brass molds you use soldier. If steel you can weld. Then you can re-cut the area as you want it. In My machine shop experience I have saves several dies and molds that way. Some times you make a mistake and you cut the area out weld or soldier a new block in the hole and start cutting again. Easy to fix mistakes or change things. there was no going back without making all **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
|
|
SUVCWORR@...
In a message dated 1/17/2008 8:28:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
thompson@signaturepress.com writes: Rich Orr wrote: I can only state what the die cutter told Dick Schweiger.Given some of the other claims and performances of Dick's die cutter, Rich, you need to consider the source. Tony, I can't argue with that. The die cutter is why we don't have the X29b and X29d. Rich **************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
|
|
Larry Jackman <Ljack70117@...>
see below
Thank you Larry Jackman ljack70117@comcast.net Boca Raton FL 33434 I want to die in my sleep like my grandfather did, not screaming like the other people in his car. On Jan 17, 2008, at 7:50 PM, SUVCWORR@aol.com wrote: Wrong. you can fill any cavities that you do not want. If Brass molds you use soldier. If steel you can weld. Then you can re-cut the area as you want it. In My machine shop experience I have saves several dies and molds that way. Some times you make a mistake and you cut the area out weld or soldier a new block in the hole and start cutting again. Easy to fix mistakes or change things. there was no going back without making all
|
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Larry Jackman wrote:
Wrong. you can fill any cavities that you do not want . . . then you can re-cut the areaLarry's exactly right. This is how it works. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Rich Orr wrote:
I can only state what the die cutter told Dick Schweiger.Given some of the other claims and performances of Dick's die cutter, Rich, you need to consider the source. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Larry Jackman <Ljack70117@...>
You may have hit it on the head. But I have never seen a mold or die that could not be changed.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thank you Larry Jackman ljack70117@comcast.net Boca Raton FL 33434 My parents did not raise any stupid children. They sent the ten of us to the neighbors to play and then moved. They raised the four of us that found them.
On Jan 17, 2008, at 8:25 PM, SUVCWORR@aol.com wrote:
|
|
Larry Jackman <Ljack70117@...>
I do not believe that either. How many 10s of thousand mold makers are there in this world. One could not stop the project> If one wont do it then find a second or third. The person doing the project is at fault.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thank you Larry Jackman ljack70117@comcast.net Boca Raton FL 33434 I was born with nothing and I have most of it left.
On Jan 17, 2008, at 8:31 PM, SUVCWORR@aol.com wrote:
|
|
Gatwood, Elden J SAD <Elden.J.Gatwood@...>
Guys;
How does the C&BT compare to the Intermountain 12-panel? Is there some difference that makes the C&BT the only choice for this application? Thanks, Elden Gatwood ________________________________ From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jim peters Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:09 PM To: stmfc@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [STMFC] Question re 12-Panel boxcars Sorry for the late respose, In your post from a month ago, Mark you mentioned C&BT kits 10'-6" IH, 12-pnl boxcar. Looking at Walthers "Reference" book, I see 3 different kit numbers listed (193-13500, -10500, -11300) . . . it was my understanding most of C&BT's later efforts are more like "Blue-Box" wanna-be's. The question is are any of the kit number above the older style kit with separate ladders, grabs, etc? All I really want is the body shell/s. Jim Peters Coquitlam, BC To: STMFC@yahoogroups.comFrom <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.comFrom> : Goatfisher2@comcast.netDate <mailto:Goatfisher2%40comcast.netDate> : Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:35:44 -0800Subject: RE: [STMFC] Boxcar details and paint, series GN 20500-21449 Mark,Here's some info that may help you out:3) All in this series had the 5 panel Superior Door.5) Build date for series 20500 - 21499 is 1952.6) Yup - that's original paint. Consider also Microscale 87-185.For references:Mainline Modeler - 9/85, 11/2001, 12/2001RMJ - 10/1998 IIRC, the Mainline articles are your better bet - the RMJ article was mostlyabout a Duane Buck customization of an Intermountain 10' 12 panel car, butmight have had photos of the 10' 6" car.Best starting point - C&BT 10'6" 12-panel car* with 4/3/1 ends. Throw awaythe details and replace with appropriate details from Plano, Branchline,etc.* At some point in the past there was discussion of Branchline bringing outa 10' 6" 12-panel car. I'm not aware of this happening, but if it did, itmight well be a better choice.Ping me if you need more.Best regards,Steve HaasSammamish, WA __________________________________________________________
|
|
Carl J. Marsico <Carlmarsico@...>
CB&T is 10'6" IH, Intermountain is 10' IH. Branchline had announced 12-panel cars awhile back, presumably 10'6" IH to fit their existing components, but I've heard a problem arose w/their die maker.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Carl J. Marsico
----- Original Message ----
From: "Gatwood, Elden J SAD" <Elden.J.Gatwood@sad01.usace.army.mil> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 6:24:02 AM Subject: RE: [STMFC] Question re 12-Panel boxcars Guys; How does the C&BT compare to the Intermountain 12-panel? Is there some difference that makes the C&BT the only choice for this application? Thanks, Elden Gatwood ____________ _________ _________ __ From: STMFC@yahoogroups. com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of jim peters Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:09 PM To: stmfc@yahoogroups. com Subject: RE: [STMFC] Question re 12-Panel boxcars Sorry for the late respose, In your post from a month ago, Mark you mentioned C&BT kits 10'-6" IH, 12-pnl boxcar. Looking at Walthers "Reference" book, I see 3 different kit numbers listed (193-13500, -10500, -11300) . . . it was my understanding most of C&BT's later efforts are more like "Blue-Box" wanna-be's. The question is are any of the kit number above the older style kit with separate ladders, grabs, etc? All I really want is the body shell/s. Jim Peters Coquitlam, BC To: STMFC@yahoogroups. comFrom <mailto:STMFC% 40yahoogroups. comFrom> : Goatfisher2@ comcast.netDate <mailto:Goatfisher2 %40comcast. netDate> : Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:35:44 -0800Subject: RE: [STMFC] Boxcar details and paint, series GN 20500-21449 Mark,Here's some info that may help you out:3) All in this series had the 5 panel Superior Door.5) Build date for series 20500 - 21499 is 1952.6) Yup - that's original paint. Consider also Microscale 87-185.For references:Mainline Modeler - 9/85, 11/2001, 12/2001RMJ - 10/1998 IIRC, the Mainline articles are your better bet - the RMJ article was mostlyabout a Duane Buck customization of an Intermountain 10' 12 panel car, butmight have had photos of the 10' 6" car.Best starting point - C&BT 10'6" 12-panel car* with 4/3/1 ends. Throw awaythe details and replace with appropriate details from Plano, Branchline,etc. * At some point in the past there was discussion of Branchline bringing outa 10' 6" 12-panel car. I'm not aware of this happening, but if it did, itmight well be a better choice.Ping me if you need more.Best regards,Steve HaasSammamish, WA ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
|
|
Gatwood, Elden J SAD <Elden.J.Gatwood@...>
Thank you, Carl!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Elden Gatwood ________________________________ From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl J. Marsico Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 7:36 AM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [STMFC] Question re 12-Panel boxcars CB&T is 10'6" IH, Intermountain is 10' IH. Branchline had announced 12-panel cars awhile back, presumably 10'6" IH to fit their existing components, but I've heard a problem arose w/their die maker. Carl J. Marsico
----- Original Message ----
From: "Gatwood, Elden J SAD" <Elden.J.Gatwood@sad01.usace.army.mil <mailto:Elden.J.Gatwood%40sad01.usace.army.mil> > To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 6:24:02 AM Subject: RE: [STMFC] Question re 12-Panel boxcars Guys; How does the C&BT compare to the Intermountain 12-panel? Is there some difference that makes the C&BT the only choice for this application? Thanks, Elden Gatwood ____________ _________ _________ __ From: STMFC@yahoogroups. com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of jim peters Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:09 PM To: stmfc@yahoogroups. com Subject: RE: [STMFC] Question re 12-Panel boxcars Sorry for the late respose, In your post from a month ago, Mark you mentioned C&BT kits 10'-6" IH, 12-pnl boxcar. Looking at Walthers "Reference" book, I see 3 different kit numbers listed (193-13500, -10500, -11300) . . . it was my understanding most of C&BT's later efforts are more like "Blue-Box" wanna-be's. The question is are any of the kit number above the older style kit with separate ladders, grabs, etc? All I really want is the body shell/s. Jim Peters Coquitlam, BC To: STMFC@yahoogroups. comFrom <mailto:STMFC% 40yahoogroups. comFrom> : Goatfisher2@ comcast.netDate <mailto:Goatfisher2 %40comcast. netDate> : Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:35:44 -0800Subject: RE: [STMFC] Boxcar details and paint, series GN 20500-21449 Mark,Here's some info that may help you out:3) All in this series had the 5 panel Superior Door.5) Build date for series 20500 - 21499 is 1952.6) Yup - that's original paint. Consider also Microscale 87-185.For references:Mainline Modeler - 9/85, 11/2001, 12/2001RMJ - 10/1998 IIRC, the Mainline articles are your better bet - the RMJ article was mostlyabout a Duane Buck customization of an Intermountain 10' 12 panel car, butmight have had photos of the 10' 6" car.Best starting point - C&BT 10'6" 12-panel car* with 4/3/1 ends. Throw awaythe details and replace with appropriate details from Plano, Branchline,etc. * At some point in the past there was discussion of Branchline bringing outa 10' 6" 12-panel car. I'm not aware of this happening, but if it did, itmight well be a better choice.Ping me if you need more.Best regards,Steve HaasSammamish, WA ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
|
|
The C&BT tooling is pretty crude by current standards.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
At 1/18/2008 07:36 AM Friday, you wrote:
Thank you, Carl!
|
|
Gatwood, Elden J SAD <Elden.J.Gatwood@...>
Tim;
You are right. My C&BT X29B has rivets the size of my fist (well, if I was little, that is). Elden ________________________________ From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:47 AM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [STMFC] Question re 12-Panel boxcars The C&BT tooling is pretty crude by current standards. At 1/18/2008 07:36 AM Friday, you wrote: Thank you, Carl![mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Carl J. Marsico
|
|