Date
1 - 5 of 5
Fords in Crates WAS: Re: New file uploaded to STMFC
cvsne <mjmcguirk@...>
Garth,
Thanks for the response. I need to clarify what I meant. My comment was meant to indicate my disagreement over the time period of this photo with some of the other members of the historical society. I know it was a shipment of Fords - I strongly suspect this was not during the war but instead shows an overseas shipment of autos in the years after the war. In any event, would make a neat string of cars to model. I do find it odd war production materiel -- Willys or Ford Jeeps or otherwise -- would be shipped in a crate marked "Ford" whereas the vast majority of war materiel I've seen being loaded onto ships was devoid of the manufacturer's name or logo. I have a similiar photo showing a shipment of aircraft engines being loaded into a boxcar at the P&W factory and the crates have some stencilling on them, but not a "company" logo or even name. Marty McGuirk |
|
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
Marty, you are correct. The War Department prohibited commercial markings on Government equipment. This went so far as to cause the factories to alter the stamping dies so that commercial logos did noy appear on truck hoods, grilles, or tailgates.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
KL ----- Original Message -----
From: cvsne I do find it odd war production materiel -- Willys or Ford Jeeps or otherwise -- would be shipped in a crate marked "Ford" whereas the vast majority of war materiel I've seen being loaded onto ships was devoid of the manufacturer's name or logo. I have a similiar photo showing a shipment of aircraft engines being loaded into a boxcar at the P&W factory and the crates have some stencilling on them, but not a "company" logo or even name. |
|
Charlie Vlk
This may have been true on the EXTERIOR of vehicles, etc... but recently I visited the USS Bowfin
and EMD and GE logos were all over the engine room and other model nameplates clearly had manufacturer names and logos displayed. Charlie Vlk |
|
Bill Schneider <branchline@...>
Actually, at least early production Ford GPW's ("Jeeps") had the Ford script stamped into the rear body panel much like a pick-up truck until (I think) mid 1943, (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Fordjeeplogo.JPG ) and a quick web search turned up this page http://www.olive-drab.com/od_mvg_jeeps_overseas_shipping.php showing a similar crate with a smaller Ford script stamped on it, so I guess it would be at least plausible that these are Ford Jeeps crated for oversees shipment.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Bill Schneider Ford Enthusiast with many hours working on a '44 GPW (without script fenders) ----- Original Message -----
From: Kurt Laughlin To: STMFC@... Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Fords in Crates WAS: Re: New file uploaded to STMFC Marty, you are correct. The War Department prohibited commercial markings on Government equipment. This went so far as to cause the factories to alter the stamping dies so that commercial logos did noy appear on truck hoods, grilles, or tailgates. KL ----- Original Message ----- From: cvsne I do find it odd war production materiel -- Willys or Ford Jeeps or otherwise -- would be shipped in a crate marked "Ford" whereas the vast majority of war materiel I've seen being loaded onto ships was devoid of the manufacturer's name or logo. I have a similiar photo showing a shipment of aircraft engines being loaded into a boxcar at the P&W factory and the crates have some stencilling on them, but not a "company" logo or even name. |
|
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
Mid-43 was about the time that the Ordnance Department took over
vehicle procurement from the Quartermaster Corps. The QMC was much more tolerant of that than OCO-D. (QMC era parts manuals were essentially civilian manuals with new covers while the Ord era manuals were definitely G.I.) War Department packaging, however, was pretty non-descript overall from what I've seen. A brandname marking would be better classified as "possible", rather than "plausible", in my opinion. In any case I think the HRPOE photos referenced in other messages show pre-43 packing and shipping and would be good guides for modeling. Regarding nameplates, yes they would have the manufacturer's name and perhaps even logo on them. However, remember that the Navy Department was not the War Department, so virtually nothing was common between the two! Even the War Dept. (Army) was splintered, with Army Air Forces using different procurement practices from the Army Service Forces and the six supply services within ASF having their own procedures as well. It's surprising anything got done. KL --- In STMFC@..., "Bill Schneider" <branchline@...> wrote: Actually, at least early production Ford GPW's ("Jeeps") had the Fordscript stamped into the rear body panel much like a pick-up truck until (I think) mid 1943, |
|