Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
ed_mines wrote: The yellow area aound the reporting marks on the 2 very dirty reefers is rectangular with clean cut edges. I doubt it would look that way if someone rubbed or washed the grime off by hand. Sometimes a clean area DID have pretty regular edges, but it was also sometimes the case that fresh paint has been sprayed right over the grime. Hard to be sure without a high-resolution image, to look whether corners are sharp or rounded, and edges truly straight. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
--- In STMFC@..., Al Brown wrote:
Without having seen the picture, I infer that the "black" cars were extra-dirty, and the yellow(-orange) patches around the reporting marks were where they'd been cleaned for legibility? Without seeing the photo I'd assume that too. The yellow area aound the reporting marks on the 2 very dirty reefers is rectangular with clean cut edges. I doubt it would look that way if someone rubbed or washed the grime off by hand. I found something interesting which I hadn't noticed before. Adjacent to the PFE section there's a second, much smaller "clean" area (maybe for repack data?) which is orange on one of the cars. I've asked the editor if I can get a copy of the original. Ed
|
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Al Brown wrote: Without having seen the picture, I infer that the "black" cars were extra-dirty, and the yellow(-orange) patches around the reporting marks were where they'd been cleaned for legibility? I would assume the same. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Without having seen the picture, I infer that the "black" cars were extra-dirty, and the yellow(-orange) patches around the reporting marks were where they'd been cleaned for legibility? Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla. --- In STMFC@..., Anthony Thompson <thompson@...> wrote: ed_mines wrote:
I thought prototype modelers wanted to accurately model cars (and entire trains) as they appeared in service, not as built. Any
group of cars might have a couple of freshly painted cars but most would
be weathered to varying degrees including paint that shifted color. Yes, and a yellowish cast is fine for well-weathered cars. But
part of the sharp reaction by both Richard and me is that there have been model manufacturers, and individual modelers, who have painted PFE cars bright yellow, without weathering. That's wrong.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
--- In STMFC@..., Anthony Thompson <thompson@...> wrote: Yes, and a yellowish cast is fine for well-weathered cars. Didn't PFE wash their reefers every few trips? They got pretty sooty passing through Erie's Otisville Tunnel. I guess you have to see the picture. Ed
|
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
ed_mines wrote: I thought prototype modelers wanted to accurately model cars (and entire trains) as they appeared in service, not as built. Any group of cars might have a couple of freshly painted cars but most would be weathered to varying degrees including paint that shifted color. Yes, and a yellowish cast is fine for well-weathered cars. But part of the sharp reaction by both Richard and me is that there have been model manufacturers, and individual modelers, who have painted PFE cars bright yellow, without weathering. That's wrong. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
--- In STMFC@..., Anthony Thompson <thompson@...> wrote: Ed: they were not yellow. Period. The "Daylight Orange" paint did weather in the direction of yellow, but the cars were not wearing yellow paint. If you'd run your thumbnail over that "yellow" color, you would have seen the deep orange underneath. I've done exactly that exercise with some preserved PFE cars. And as Richard observed, the original colors are VERY well documented and have been published in the form of carefully printed color panels. What an elderly slide has to do with that somewhat escapes me. The original colors are well documented. I thought prototype modelers wanted to accurately model cars (and entire trains) as they appeared in service, not as built. Any group of cars might have a couple of freshly painted cars but most would be weathered to varying degrees including paint that shifted color. Ed
|
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Edward Mines wrote: The color cover of the most recent Diamond (E-L society) shows 3 PFE reefers from a color photo or slide taken in 1954. The furthest reefer (smallest in the picture) has 2 B&W heralds and is yellow, without a trace of orange. Ed: they were not yellow. Period. The "Daylight Orange" paint did weather in the direction of yellow, but the cars were not wearing yellow paint. If you'd run your thumbnail over that "yellow" color, you would have seen the deep orange underneath. I've done exactly that exercise with some preserved PFE cars. And as Richard observed, the original colors are VERY well documented and have been published in the form of carefully printed color panels. What an elderly slide has to do with that somewhat escapes me. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
On Aug 26, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Edward Mines wrote: The color cover of the most recent Diamond (E-L society) shows 3 PFE reefers from a color photo or slide taken in 1954.
The furthest reefer (smallest in the picture) has 2 B&W heralds and is yellow, without a trace of orange. The 2 closest reefers are almost black with rectangular yellow patches around the reporting marks.
The little photo inside giving information about the photo shows a fourth PFE reefer which has some orange in the color. There's even part of a fifth reefer (slightly orange too) but it may not be a PFE reefer
Any comments Tony? Richard? Schuyler? Until I saw the small photo I thought the photo might have selective fading.
Ed, you keep raising the subject of reefer paint colors, and, as has been stated before on this list, the facts are really quite simple. In the 1930s through 1950s, the sides of PFE reefers were painted yellow-orange. Not yellow. Not orange. Yellow-orange. We know what color it was because drift panels have survived, and one of them is quite accurately reproduced in Tony's PFE book. FWIW, the sides of Santa Fe reefers were painted in a color that was almost identical. Of course, the paint was subject to fading. weathering and dirt. But basing any conclusions about paint color on vintage color slides, and especially on printed reproductions of them, is an exercise in futility. They may not have been accurate to start with, depending on lighting, exposure, filters etc.; older slides have often color-shifted; and the color in a printed reproduction can vary a great deal from the original image. Speculation prompted by such unreliable evidence is pointless, especially since we KNOW what color the cars were painted. What is it about this that you don't understand? Richard Hendrickson
|
|
The color cover of the most recent Diamond (E-L society) shows 3 PFE reefers from a color photo or slide taken in 1954.
The furthest reefer (smallest in the picture) has 2 B&W heralds and is yellow, without a trace of orange. The 2 closest reefers are almost black with rectangular yellow patches around the reporting marks.
The little photo inside giving information about the photo shows a fourth PFE reefer which has some orange in the color. There's even part of a fifth reefer (slightly orange too) but it may not be a PFE reefer
Any comments Tony? Richard? Schuyler? Until I saw the small photo I thought the photo might have selective fading.
Typical or not?
There's good roof detail on 2 box cars with unpainted running boards.
Ed
Edward B. Mines 238 Willard Dr. Hewlett, NY 11557 516 205-6523
|
|