Date
1 - 7 of 7
X43C side sills
SUVCWORR@...
In a message dated 1/15/2009 10:45:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
cinderandeight@... writes: <snip> X43 cars were acquired in two distinct groups. Five digit cars were bought the old fashion way with car trusts, while six digit cars were leased. A small triangle appears between the car number and road name to indicate "segregated maintenance" of the leased cars. I've never seen exactly what different maintenance program applied to these cars were, but when the leases ran out they were all collected together in Hubbard, OH and cut up as a group (with a lot of "triangle" X44 cars too). I was told by the wrecking crews that the hard wood flooring in the cars was "brand new" and selling for a pretty penny to dealers. The leased cars where leased from Chicago Car. The triangle was for accounting purposes. The terms of the lease provided that all repairs were chargeable back to the lessor. This information was gathered by Dick Schweiger when C&BT shops introduced the X43 family in the late 80's. Rich Orr **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De cemailfooterNO62) |
|
cinderandeight@...
Guys,
I surveyed a dozen photos of X43 sub classes to tease out dates for the full length vs. under door side sill reinforcements. I find the earliest under door job dated 5/61, and the latest dated 6/66. As for a date without reinforcement I found a car repainted in 6/59 without it. Of course there is nothing to say that the 6/66 paint job might not have been done after the original work on the side sills, but I sort of think it was done at the same time. The PRR didn't have the money to repaint cars every four or five years. The full length bolster to bolster reinforcements were dated from 2/67 to 1/68 in my photos, indicating they were being done right up to the eve of the merger at least. I didn't go into PC cars (out of the blog's era). As for paint jobs all these cars had the plain Keystone with large gothic lettering except for the 6/59 and a 6/61 dated car which were shadowed Keystone cars. I think this later car had it's reweigh data done at the time of the sill reinforcement, but was not completely repainted. As for how universal the repairs were? I found only one car painted in the Plain Keystone scheme without a reinforcement (date not visible), and that car was parked as a storage car for so long it's paint had almost completely left it. X43 cars were acquired in two distinct groups. Five digit cars were bought the old fashion way with car trusts, while six digit cars were leased. A small triangle appears between the car number and road name to indicate "segregated maintenance" of the leased cars. I've never seen exactly what different maintenance program applied to these cars were, but when the leases ran out they were all collected together in Hubbard, OH and cut up as a group (with a lot of "triangle" X44 cars too). I was told by the wrecking crews that the hard wood flooring in the cars was "brand new" and selling for a pretty penny to dealers. **************Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage from the nation's capital.(http://www.aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000027) |
|
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
Andy;
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I am sure you are right, but I did not go into some of the issues I do not have good enough info on. I do not know if the cross-bearers were beefed up on the 8-foot door cars, or not (I suspect not), but the introduction of door gussets, beefed-up side sills, and introduction of newer, heavier designs was clearly a response to the perceived inadequacies of some of the lightweight designs and other designs adopted earlier for use by the PRR. If most of their box cars had spent their time hauling grain, these fixes may not have ever been necessary. Elden Gatwood ________________________________ From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Andy Miller Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:46 AM To: STMFC@... Subject: Re: [STMFC] X43C side sills I suspect the X43C's were also the worst because they had the widest doors (8 ft) and therefore the least longitudinal strength. regards, Andy Miller ----- Original Message -----
From: Gatwood, Elden J SAD To: STMFC@... <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:55 AM Subject: RE: [STMFC] X43C side sills . . . The X43 classes (X43 through X43C) were a disappointment to the PRR. They rapidly exhibited sagging and cracking problems, necessitating these fixes. The X43C was the worst, since they were often diverted into coil service and other uses involving forklifts, that contributed to the problem. . . . Elden Gatwood Recent Activity a.. 3New Members Visit Your Group Yahoo! News Odd News You won't believe it, but it's true Sitebuilder Build a web site quickly & easily with Sitebuilder. Group Charity i-SAFE Keep your kids safer online . |
|
mopacfirst
Thanks, this is what I needed. I have the culprit (Branchline) half-
built and I realized all the photos I saw were the modified cars with plain keystone. For the early 60s era, then, I'm in the clear. Thanks also to the PRR truck list that shows ASF A-3 for these cars. Ron Merrick --- In STMFC@..., "Gatwood, Elden J SAD " <elden.j.gatwood@...> wrote: bolster? doorway area fitted to some X43 carshave my photos here to check), and also involved removal of running boardsand some ladder cut-downs. Cars were repainted into the then-current "PlainKeystone" scheme.appeared to me that the majority of X43 class cars got this fix. No, I do notremember it going into PC days, so the program may have only run through '67.trapezoidal shape reinforcement, but I will have to find a photo. I think there is aphoto in one of the Morning Sun books.I have never seen one. All of the later fixes I have seen were repaintedin PK lettering, since SK repaints ended in Dec of '61.PRR. They rapidly exhibited sagging and cracking problems, necessitatingthese fixes. The X43C was the worst, since they were often diverted into coilservice and other uses involving forklifts, that contributed to the problem.The PRR, just a few years after buying all those X43 cars, decided to designtheir own class to follow, the X46, which featured a full-length side sillmade of shallow channel, doorway stiffeners, and an extra side post abovethe bolster. These latter cars lasted until CR, while the X43 weresold off, some to companies like USRE, who refurbished them and sold/leasedthem to other RRs. |
|
Andy Miller <aslmmiller@...>
I suspect the X43C's were also the worst because they had the widest doors (8 ft) and therefore the least longitudinal strength.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
regards, Andy Miller ----- Original Message -----
From: Gatwood, Elden J SAD To: STMFC@... Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:55 AM Subject: RE: [STMFC] X43C side sills . . . The X43 classes (X43 through X43C) were a disappointment to the PRR. They rapidly exhibited sagging and cracking problems, necessitating these fixes. The X43C was the worst, since they were often diverted into coil service and other uses involving forklifts, that contributed to the problem. . . . Elden Gatwood Recent Activity a.. 3New Members Visit Your Group Yahoo! News Odd News You won't believe it, but it's true Sitebuilder Build a web site quickly & easily with Sitebuilder. Group Charity i-SAFE Keep your kids safer online . |
|
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
Ron;
Were the PRR X43C built with side sill tabsYes, just like other "standard" AAR '44 design cars. and modified later to side sills that spanned from bolster to bolster? Yes, but there was also an intermediate fix that just spanned the doorway area fitted to some X43 cars If so, roughly when did that program start and end. From photos it appears that the full bolster-to-bolster side sill reinforcement program began in very late '66 or early '67 (I do not have my photos here to check), and also involved removal of running boards and some ladder cut-downs. Cars were repainted into the then-current "Plain Keystone" scheme. Were all the cars upgraded, I do not know if the program was all-encompassing, but it sure appeared to me that the majority of X43 class cars got this fix. No, I do not remember it going into PC days, so the program may have only run through '67. and were different styles of side sill reinforcement applied? Yes, there was an intermediate fix applied that featured a trapezoidal shape reinforcement, but I will have to find a photo. I think there is a photo in one of the Morning Sun books. For a car painted Shadow Keystone, which style would be most likely? They may have applied the earlier fix to a car in SK lettering, but I have never seen one. All of the later fixes I have seen were repainted in PK lettering, since SK repaints ended in Dec of '61. The X43 classes (X43 through X43C) were a disappointment to the PRR. They rapidly exhibited sagging and cracking problems, necessitating these fixes. The X43C was the worst, since they were often diverted into coil service and other uses involving forklifts, that contributed to the problem. The PRR, just a few years after buying all those X43 cars, decided to design their own class to follow, the X46, which featured a full-length side sill made of shallow channel, doorway stiffeners, and an extra side post above the bolster. These latter cars lasted until CR, while the X43 were sold off, some to companies like USRE, who refurbished them and sold/leased them to other RRs. Elden Gatwood |
|
mopacfirst
Were the PRR X43C built with side sill tabs and modified later to side
sills that spanned from bolster to bolster? If so, roughly when did that program start and end. Were all the cars upgraded, and were different styles of side sill reinforcement applied? For a car painted Shadow Keystone, which style would be most likely? Ron Merrick |
|