Date
1 - 6 of 6
ADMIN: New rules concerning commercial announcements.
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
Denis Blake says:
Doesn't this constitute flaming someone? Shouldn't Jeff report to ModerateApparently Denis is referring to Jeff's comment: "it is Mike who is verbose." I don't understand. Why should Jeff go to jail for making a complimentary statement? If General Longstreet had been more verbose, Gettysburg might have had a different ending...to name one example. Mike Brock...Hmmm. Wonder if I should include the history of the word "verbose" and even "jail"? |
|
gn999gn
I applaud the moderator ( Mike ) for this post.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It is, in my view, long overdue and I hope that we all support him and do our share to enforce the rules. It is to the benefit of ALL that we separate the users forum from commercial self interest. It is not a line that should be crossed. Let us not forget why this forum exists and benefits us. I have ABSOLUTELY no problem with commercial interests what-so-ever! And please; this is Not intended to be finger-pointing at anyone. I run a commercial (self) interest as well in this genre. But, this is not the place for it. We all have our own websites that we pay for anyway. Our lives are loaded with examples of commercial interests that have nearly permeated everything. I suspect that most of us rather enjoy having a medium such as this where we can talk shop and escape from those issues. Thank you Mike. Not just for this posting, but for running one of the better forums. Ronald A. dePierre MDA --- In STMFC@..., "Mike Brock" <brockm@...> wrote:
|
|
seaboard_1966
Doesn't this constitute flaming someone? Shouldn't Jeff report to Moderate Jail for this?
Denis Blake Formerly of Moderate Jail OHIO -------------------------------------------------- From: "Aley, Jeff A" <Jeff.A.Aley@...> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 2:39 PM To: <STMFC@...> Subject: RE: [STMFC] Re: ADMIN: New rules concerning commercial announcements. Tim,
|
|
Aley, Jeff A
Tim,
No problem. The rule is short; it is Mike who is verbose. :) The rule: "Announcements of commercial products for sale are permitted but only with permission of the group owner and his staff." Regards, -Jeff Aley Deputy Moderator, STMFC From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 9:11 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: ADMIN: New rules concerning commercial announcements. Yikes! Is this overridden by the Rule of All Rules, which says that if the Rule takes more than a sentence or two to explain, then the Rule is too complicated to understand? Tim "I plead the fourth!" O'Connor |
|
Yikes! Is this overridden by the Rule of All Rules, which says
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
that if the Rule takes more than a sentence or two to explain, then the Rule is too complicated to understand? Tim "I plead the fourth!" O'Connor At 3/8/2010 10:54 PM Monday, you wrote:
Well...it has been some time since I...the STMFC Head judge...have had to |
|
Mike Brock <brockm@...>
Well...it has been some time since I...the STMFC Head judge...have had to remind the members of certain of the group rules. The rules state:
"Announcements of frt car related items for sell are permitted BUT actual lists of items should be made available from the seller upon request rather than in the message. Announcements of such sells should be kept at a minimum. The primary objective of the group is to exchange information concerning the subject." Perhaps the term "minimum" is not understood or perhaps a better choice of words might have been better. The point that the rules were trying to convey is that the STMFC is not a forum for advertising commercial products. Nor is it a forum for repeatedly announcing sales of any product. However, OCCASIONAL announcements of either have been permitted...hence the tern "minimum". I might add that I have indicated quite a few times that responses MUST be OFF Group. I note today that no less than 3 such responses were ON GROUP. During two consecutive days, 3 commercial messages from the same manufacturer were attempted to be sent through the STMFC. This does not seem to satisfy my concept of "minimum". For some time I have been warning that continued violations of the rules might result in changes. The solution? Simple. As of today, the new STMFC rule is in effect: "Announcements of commercial products for sale are permitted but only with permission of the group owner and his staff." Violation will...well, you know. BTW, I found the key to Moderate Jail...rusted as it is from lack of use...unlocking the door I guess. OTOH, if you have something to sell...but not as a commercial enterprise...announce it but ONLY include the address to a site where the product is listed or from where a list may be sent to the member. The group management team will monitor such messages to ensure that the number is not excessive. For those that can't seem to understand that responses to any sale operation must be off group, I can only hope that you are well fed and wear warm clothes because there ain't no heat in Moderate Jail and the food? Well... Mind you, do not confuse a commercial message with a member's message complimenting or criticizing a product. That IS an important aspect of the group. The point of all this is that the STMFC was founded on the principle of it being a forum to discuss steam era freight cars and that's what it will continue to do. An occasional commercial message will be beneficial rather than harmful but a retail forum it won't be. Mike Brock STMFC Owner |
|