Date
1 - 20 of 40
Kato ACF Covered Hoppers
StephenK
Last weekend I picked up two sets of Kato covered hopper kits at a local trainshow for very little $$$. One is Wabash and one is Erie. I searched the group but was unable to get answers to two questions. First, are the Kato couplers worth using, or should I used the Accumates that I generally use? Also, since I really don't need three of each of these(which is why I never bought these before--at the regular price), I am looking for other prototypes/decals to paint these. I found some nice sets from Prime Mover Decals for EL, but would like a few other alternatives. Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance, Steve Kay |
|
Jerry Dziedzic
I have no opinion of the Kato couplers. I'd take advantage of experience and use the couplers you're most familiar with -- Accumates.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
If you're the Steve Kay from NJ, L&NE would be a natural choice for a third road name. I believe that Champ still offers decals in L&NE's billboard scheme. They're intended for a different prototype than this car, but they have enough material to select from to letter this car. N&B would be another selection. Herald King had decals. Don't know whether they remain available. There are probably minor differences in detail between the Kato version and the prototypes I suggested. One I'd want to check is whether or not the prototype has the triangular cut out in the sides at the center of the car. I don't remember whether the Kato car has this feature or not. I can suggest L&NE and N&B number series to you, but this will have to wait until mid-April because I'm away from my files right now. Let me know if you'd like this. Jerry Dziedzic Pattenburg, NJ --- In STMFC@..., "StephenK" <thekays100@...> wrote:
|
|
StephenK
Actually I'm the Steve Kay from Cleveland, Ohio, and I model UP. Most of the western roads that had these cars painted them gray, and the Kato model have a lot of flexible plastic parts, so painting them could be a problem. I am looking at alternatives, but leaving all the cars in their factory paint jobs is another alternative....
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
SKay --- In STMFC@..., "jdziedzic08802" <jerdz@...> wrote:
|
|
Aley, Jeff A
Steve,
I didn't see any other responses to your query. Since you model the UP, why not model a UP car? Assuming these are the 2-bay covered hoppers, the open-side kit is suitable for UP CH-70-1, and the closed-side kit is suitable for the UP CH-70-2 and CH-70-3. Regards, -Jeff From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of StephenK Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 7:24 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: Kato ACF Covered Hoppers Actually I'm the Steve Kay from Cleveland, Ohio, and I model UP. Most of the western roads that had these cars painted them gray, and the Kato model have a lot of flexible plastic parts, so painting them could be a problem. I am looking at alternatives, but leaving all the cars in their factory paint jobs is another alternative.... SKay --- In STMFC@...<mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com>, "jdziedzic08802" <jerdz@...> wrote:
|
|
StephenK
Jeff --
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The problem is the flexible plastic parts--I am concerned that the paint will just flake off. The brake parts, latches and coupler box covers (and maybe a few others) are flexible. I tested painting the spues with various paints, but it didn't stick. I see that Nickle Plate cars are black, along with a few private owners, but I am still contemplating this. I may keep them all in factory paint and sell completed cars on EBay.... Steve --- In STMFC@..., "Aley, Jeff A" <Jeff.A.Aley@...> wrote:
|
|
Roland Levin
Steve,
I have repainted several of the Kato Covered Hoppers. They used a very dark gray color for the DRGW cars and I decided to strip and repaint them. I haven't had any problems with the paint. I airbrushed them with Polyscale and used decals from Oddball. I have a picture of them at my website: http://hem.bredband.net/drgw/pics/model/Kato_covered_hoppers.jpg The dark gray DRGW is the original and the light gray is my repaint. The other two are UP and SSW original paint from Kato. I have tried to find a prototype photo for a SSW car with that color, but without success. Roland Levin Stockholm, Sweden http://hem.bredband.net/drgw Från: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] För StephenK Skickat: den 8 april 2010 14:17 Till: STMFC@... Ämne: [STMFC] Re: Kato ACF Covered Hoppers Jeff -- The problem is the flexible plastic parts--I am concerned that the paint will just flake off. The brake parts, latches and coupler box covers (and maybe a few others) are flexible. I tested painting the spues with various paints, but it didn't stick. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
Steve,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Sell 'em. I have always thought the Bowser cars are easier to work with. The plastic is easier to drill and remove cast on details. The draft gear is better and accepts any make of coupler unlike the Kato only box. I can't defend the Bowsers for any accuracy deffeciencies. I did a CB&Q conversion with the Portland Cement Sunshine mini-kit ribbed seam roof and hatches, It was in RMJ. The only concession I had to make was to center the roof panels and sand back each end to match the Bowser roof overhang. Sincerely, Rob Manley ----- Original Message -----
From: StephenK To: STMFC@... Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 7:16 AM Subject: [STMFC] Re: Kato ACF Covered Hoppers Jeff -- The problem is the flexible plastic parts--I am concerned that the paint will just flake off. The brake parts, latches and coupler box covers (and maybe a few others) are flexible. I tested painting the spues with various paints, but it didn't stick. I see that Nickle Plate cars are black, along with a few private owners, but I am still contemplating this. I may keep them all in factory paint and sell completed cars on EBay.... Steve --- In STMFC@..., "Aley, Jeff A" <Jeff.A.Aley@...> wrote: > > Steve, > > I didn't see any other responses to your query. Since you model the UP, why not model a UP car? Assuming these are the 2-bay covered hoppers, the open-side kit is suitable for UP CH-70-1, and the closed-side kit is suitable for the UP CH-70-2 and CH-70-3. > > Regards, > > -Jeff > > > From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of StephenK > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 7:24 PM > To: STMFC@... > Subject: [STMFC] Re: Kato ACF Covered Hoppers > > > > Actually I'm the Steve Kay from Cleveland, Ohio, and I model UP. Most of the western roads that had these cars painted them gray, and the Kato model have a lot of flexible plastic parts, so painting them could be a problem. I am looking at alternatives, but leaving all the cars in their factory paint jobs is another alternative.... > > SKay > > --- In STMFC@...<mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com>, "jdziedzic08802" <jerdz@> wrote: > > > > I have no opinion of the Kato couplers. I'd take advantage of experience and use the couplers you're most familiar with -- Accumates. > > > > If you're the Steve Kay from NJ, L&NE would be a natural choice for a third road name. I believe that Champ still offers decals in L&NE's billboard scheme. They're intended for a different prototype than this car, but they have enough material to select from to letter this car. > > > > N&B would be another selection. Herald King had decals. Don't know whether they remain available. > > > > There are probably minor differences in detail between the Kato version and the prototypes I suggested. One I'd want to check is whether or not the prototype has the triangular cut out in the sides at the center of the car. I don't remember whether the Kato car has this feature or not. > > > > I can suggest L&NE and N&B number series to you, but this will have to wait until mid-April because I'm away from my files right now. Let me know if you'd like this. > > > > > > Jerry Dziedzic > > Pattenburg, NJ > > > > --- In STMFC@...<mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com>, "StephenK" <thekays100@> wrote: > > > > > > Last weekend I picked up two sets of Kato covered hopper kits at a local trainshow for very little $$$. One is Wabash and one is Erie. I searched the group but was unable to get answers to two questions. First, are the Kato couplers worth using, or should I used the Accumates that I generally use? Also, since I really don't need three of each of these(which is why I never bought these before--at the regular price), I am looking for other prototypes/decals to paint these. I found some nice sets from Prime Mover Decals for EL, but would like a few other alternatives. Any suggestions? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Steve Kay > > > > > > > > > > |
|
Greg Martin
Jeff and Steve,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
If I am not mistaken I beleive that the UP received some of the LNE cars after the bankruptcy. I say this because Bill Metzger mdeled one of the cars as a "faded paint" version showing the original LNE lettering showing through. Although it really wouldn't be in that condition in the scope of this list, but a good reason to put at least one in UP. Greg Martin -----Original Message-----
From: Aley, Jeff A <Jeff.A.Aley@...> To: STMFC@... <STMFC@...> Sent: Wed, Apr 7, 2010 4:15 pm Subject: RE: [STMFC] Re: Kato ACF Covered Hoppers Steve, I didn't see any other responses to your query. Since you model the UP, why not model a UP car? Assuming these are the 2-bay covered hoppers, the open-side kit is suitable for UP CH-70-1, and the closed-side kit is suitable for the UP CH-70-2 and CH-70-3. Regards, -Jeff From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of StephenK Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 7:24 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: Kato ACF Covered Hoppers Actually I'm the Steve Kay from Cleveland, Ohio, and I model UP. Most of the western roads that had these cars painted them gray, and the Kato model have a lot of flexible plastic parts, so painting them could be a problem. I am looking at alternatives, but leaving all the cars in their factory paint jobs is another alternative.... SKay --- In STMFC@...<mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com>, "jdziedzic08802" <jerdz@...> wrote: [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] = [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
Benjamin Hom
Greg Martin wrote:
"If I am not mistaken I beleive that the UP received some of the LNE cars after the bankruptcy." Actually, the LNE was NOT bankrupt when they ceased operations in 1961. Ben Hom |
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Roland Levin wrote:
I have repainted several of the Kato Covered Hoppers. They used a very dark gray color for the DRGW cars and I decided to strip and repaint them . . . I have tried to find a prototype photo for a SSW car with that color, but without success.Kato did a lot of research for their car colors. The SSW car in a kind of greenish gray IS correct. I don't know about the D&RGW. Did you have evidence the dark color was wrong, or did it just not look right? Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history |
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Rob Manley wrote:
Sell 'em. I have always thought the Bowser cars are easier to work with. The plastic is easier to drill and remove cast on details. The draft gear is better and accepts any make of coupler unlike the Kato only box.The cast-on Bowser details are even bulkier than the Kato, and both look seriously poor in comparison to the new InterMountain cars. If you're going to redetail and paint anyway, I guess you could feel Bowser was better, but their atrocious lettering, often not even CLOSE to the prototype, is a major turn-off for me. If you're going to sell the Kato cars, buy InterMountain, not Bowser. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history |
|
On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:55 AM, STMFC@... wrote:
Posted by: "StephenK" thekays100@... up4024Steve, Hit your local autoparts emporium and get a spray can of "adhesion promoter" on the car color spray bomb rack. Mist it on the flexible parts, let it dry 10-15 minutes then spray your Floquil/Scalecoat/ Pollyscale/etc over it. Works very well - if you really bend the part it will flake, but in normal handling it's pretty darn good. -- Craig Zeni It IS as bad as you think, and they are coming to get you. |
|
Roland Levin
Tony,
I haven’t seen any builders photos of the DRGW 1958 covered hopper, but I have never seen any car with the dark color. We had a discussion about the color of the DRGW car on the DRGW list and the conclusion was that it is to dark. Jim Eager even stated “Way too dark”. I made the choice to paint my cars in the color I have seen on pictures and videos taken during the sixties, my main modeling interest. Roland Levin Stockholm, Sweden http://hem.bredband.net/drgw Från: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] För Anthony Thompson Skickat: den 8 april 2010 18:27 Till: STMFC@... Ämne: Re: SV: [STMFC] Re: Kato ACF Covered Hoppers I don't know about the D&RGW. Did you have evidence the dark color was wrong, or did it just not look right? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
D. Scott Chatfield
Cleveland Kay wrote:
Last weekend I picked up two sets of Kato covered hopper kits at a Well, first off, they aren't ACF cars at all, despite what the box sez. They match GATC and Ralston 1,958cf hoppers. The main difference is in the hatch hold-down bars, with the latch handles being in the wide area between the outer hatches rather than in the center right smack between the middle hatches where cement spillage often clogged them. Most of the GATCs and all (I think) of the Ralstons also had the solid sides. I seem to recall CDS dry transfers having sets for rr-owned 1958cf cement hoppers, and Microscale did some decals for private-owner versions. Haven't looked at them in a while, but I thought the Kato couplers worked very similar to the Accumates. Scott Chatfield |
|
It's possible the manufacturer got hold of photos that showed cars
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
that appeared to be a darker gray. In the MS Rio Grande Color Guide on pages 86-87 are photos of two 1950's era Rio Grande cars (one of them in fresh 1967 repaint) in a medium gray color. On the other hand, Kato really screwed the pooch with those GREEN Cotton Belt cars! Woof! Tim O'Connor Tony, |
|
Tony
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You have said this before, but when I asked Ed Hawkins about it he told me the color was wrong. Certainly I have never seen a photo of a Cotton Belt car in this color. Are there any such photos? Tim O'Connor Kato did a lot of research for their car colors. The SSW car in a |
|
Greg
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The UP got some ex-L&NE Greenville covered hoppers, which look quite different than any of the available ACF or PS models. Missouri Pacific got some ex-L&NE PS 2003's. I have photos of both with LNE lettering clearly visible. Tim O'Connor Jeff and Steve, |
|
Ed Hawkins
Tim,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I can see there's some misinformation about this. In the mid-1990s I furnished Kato an ACF paint sample for a SSW 1,958 cu.ft. covered hopper car, and they matched the color perfectly. The sample is very much a shade of gray and olive green. However, Kato made an error by applying this color to the wrong series of SSW cars. I didn't know about the error until after the models were produced. The ACF paint sample I provided Kato was from ACF lot no. 3376, built 10-49, series 77000-77049. ACF built one other order of 1.958 cu. ft. cars for SSW in 8-51, lot 3547, series 76050-76074. There was no paint sample for the second order, so I don't know if the color was the same as the 1949-built cars. Kato chose to model cars from the second series, but to be more accurate they should have used the first series. Regards, Ed Hawkins On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Tim O'Connor wrote:
Tony |
|
Ed Hawkins
On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Ed Hawkins wrote:
The ACF paint sample I provided Kato was from ACF lot no. 3376, builtSorry guys, my typing could use improvement! The second group of SSW 1,958 cuf. ft. cars built in 1951 was series 77050-77074. Regards, Ed Hawkins |
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Roland Levin wrote:
I haven’t seen any builders photos of the DRGW 1958 covered hopper,Sounds good to me, Roland. The color of the recent InterMountain D&RGW cars is a light gray. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history |
|