Date
1 - 11 of 11
TC boxcar nomenclature correction
Jim King
It was pointed out to me yesterday that terminology I used (as provided to
me during the design phase) on the 1941-built Tennessee Central boxcar was incorrect. The design IS correct and, therefore, so is the model, so those of you who purchased the kit have nothing to worry about. The comments made to me indicated that the web image, a low rez image required for fast loading for folks still using dial-up connections, seemed to show roof ribs. Weathering with oils along the rivet rows, photo angle, combined with the low resolution image, caused the visual problem. The Pullman riveted roof does, indeed, have ONLY rows of rivets, no ribs. My web page description has been corrected to reflect proper Pullman terminology for the roof and ends. Jim King Smoky Mountain Model Works, Inc. Ph. (828) 777-5619 <www.smokymountainmodelworks.com> |
|
David Sieber
Jim,
Thank God - I was beginning to doubt my sanity or my memory (or both), since I thought the TC boxcar had been built with the Pullman riveted roof (smooth, with overlapping sections above internal carlines) instead of the even-less-common Murphy flat-panel roof (flat, no raised rectangular or diagonal panels, between external carlines, as on some late '30s Canadian boxcars). I hadn't thought the TC as-built roof had "ribs" - but that web photo sure seemed to have 'em. Not that I was worried about my model since the rebuilds had a replacement roof. I was going to email you to ask about that, but the web photo made me hesitate; I'm glad someone else mentioned to you, though; this posting greatly eased my mind. Then again, I might mention that you (like most everyone) missed a minor identifying characteristic of Pullman-Standard's boxcars of the '40s, seen on both their AAR standard boxcars and the very earliest PS-1s: stepped bolster tabs. Take a real close look at the prototype photos and you'll see an inch/inch-and-a-half squared-off section at both the bottom and the top of each bolster tab. Ted Culotta noted this in his Essential Freight Cars article on the early PS-1s; once you first see it, you start noticing it on Pullman-Standard boxcars built from the very late '30s through about 1949 or so (but not cars built by ACF, Magor, or anyone else). It's one of those tiny oddities that make prototype modeling fun or maddening, or both in various proportions at different times. Gotta' have a little fun with it, Dave Sieber Reno NV To: STMFC@... From: jimking3@... Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:52:28 -0400 Subject: [STMFC] TC boxcar nomenclature correction It was pointed out to me yesterday that terminology I used (as provided to me during the design phase) on the 1941-built Tennessee Central boxcar was incorrect. The design IS correct and, therefore, so is the model, so those of you who purchased the kit have nothing to worry about. The comments made to me indicated that the web image, a low rez image required for fast loading for folks still using dial-up connections, seemed to show roof ribs. Weathering with oils along the rivet rows, photo angle, combined with the low resolution image, caused the visual problem. The Pullman riveted roof does, indeed, have ONLY rows of rivets, no ribs. My web page description has been corrected to reflect proper Pullman terminology for the roof and ends. Jim King Smoky Mountain Model Works, Inc. Ph. (828) 777-5619 <www.smokymountainmodelworks.com> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
David Sieber
My apologies to all - that last email was intended to go only to Jim King. I'm a very satisfied customer of Smokey Mountain Model Works. Dave Sieber
|
|
Andy Harman
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:26:05 -0700, David Sieber wrote
My apologies to all - that last email was intended to go only to Jim King.Maybe but the stepped bolster tab info is pretty interesting, and I will start looking for it and hopefully use it to at least identify PS built cars from prototype photos :-) Andy |
|
rwitt_2000
Dave Sieber wrote: "Jim, Then again, I might mention that you (like
most everyone) missed a minor identifying characteristic of Pullman-Standard's boxcars of the '40s, seen on both their AAR standard boxcars and the very earliest PS-1s: stepped bolster tabs. Take a real close look at the prototype photos and you'll see an inch/inch-and-a-half squared-off section at both the bottom and the top of each bolster tab. Ted Culotta noted this in his Essential Freight Cars article on the early PS-1s; once you first see it, you start noticing it on Pullman-Standard boxcars built from the very late '30s through about 1949 or so (but not cars built by ACF, Magor, or anyone else). It's one of those tiny oddities that make prototype modeling fun or maddening, or both in various proportions at different times." =================================== I am looking at photos, mostly from Bob's, of the B&O versions of these P-S boxcars ca. 1941, classes M-55a/M-55B, built with Duryea underframes and they don't have the "stepped bolster tabs". Possibly the spotting feature only applies to boxcars with AAR center sills and underframe design. One can always rely on the B&O to have something different. Regards, Bob Witt |
|
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Dave Sieber wrote:
Then again, I might mention that you (like most everyone) missed a minor identifying characteristic of Pullman-Standard's boxcars of the '40s, seen on both their AAR standard boxcars and the very earliest PS-1s: stepped bolster tabs. . . on Pullman-Standard boxcars built from the very late '30s through about 1949 or so (but not cars built by ACF, Magor, or anyone else).Not true, Dave. You can see it on Pressed Steel Car and Bethlehem cars built before WW II. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroad history |
|
Isn't that "step" just where the tab is bent into an "L" shape,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
i.e. aren't we looking at the bottom of the "L" edge-on? If so, maybe the "stepless" tabs were trimmed differently, so when they were folded (bent into an L) the taper appears to be continuous. Tim O'Connor At 4/14/2011 04:40 PM Thursday, you wrote:
Dave Sieber wrote:Then again, I might mention that you (like most everyone) missedNot true, Dave. You can see it on Pressed Steel Car and |
|
James F. Brewer <jfbrewer@...>
Jim,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Any idea when these will ship? Jim Brewer ----- Original Message -----
From: "SMMW" <jimking3@...> To: STMFC@... Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:52:28 PM Subject: [STMFC] TC boxcar nomenclature correction It was pointed out to me yesterday that terminology I used (as provided to me during the design phase) on the 1941-built Tennessee Central boxcar was incorrect. The design IS correct and, therefore, so is the model, so those of you who purchased the kit have nothing to worry about. The comments made to me indicated that the web image, a low rez image required for fast loading for folks still using dial-up connections, seemed to show roof ribs. Weathering with oils along the rivet rows, photo angle, combined with the low resolution image, caused the visual problem. The Pullman riveted roof does, indeed, have ONLY rows of rivets, no ribs. My web page description has been corrected to reflect proper Pullman terminology for the roof and ends. Jim King Smoky Mountain Model Works, Inc. Ph. (828) 777-5619 <www.smokymountainmodelworks.com> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
David Sieber
--- In STMFC@..., Anthony Thompson wrote [to my comment on stepped bolster tabs as an identifier for Pullman-Standard boxcars of the late '30s/early '40s]: "Not true, Dave. You can see it on Pressed Steel Car and Bethlehem cars built before WW II."
--- and Bob Witt wrote: "I am looking at photos, mostly from Bob's, of the B&O versions of these P-S boxcars ca. 1941, classes M-55a/M-55B, built with Duryea underframes and they don't have the "stepped bolster tabs". Possibly the spotting feature only applies to boxcars with AAR center sills and underframe design..." Now I'm glad I (mis)sent my comment to the Group - I learn something new every day. My photo collection is nowhere near as large (plus is skewed toward the '50s) compared to many on this List, especially the acknowledged experts ... Thanks, Tony and Bob! |
|
Bill Kelly
Some of the sections that tabs are made from are bulb angle, unequal
angle or channel. The flange (short side of the "L") is cut square while the web or the surface we see is cut at an angle. Tabs made of channel have two flanges cut square and the web cut at an angle between those two square cut flanges resulting in the steps we see. Tabs made from angles have only one square cut flange and it is up against the side sill and very hard to see in photos. The side we see is simply cut at an angle, no step. I hope this makes some sort of sense, I always have trouble describing something without using may hands.... Later, Bill Kelly Tim O'Connor wrote: ____________________________________________________________ Groupon.com Official Site 1 huge daily deal on the best stuff to do in your city. Try it today! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4da8684c46baa7b3b1m02vuc |
|
thanks Bill. that made sense, after I looked up "bulb angle" :-)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Tim O' Some of the sections that tabs are made from are bulb angle, unequal |
|