Date
1 - 20 of 25
New Shapes to come
Ed <nprybiged@...>
All
I'm going to go to Evergreen and ask them if they would consider marketing Styrene Rail in HO, O and N scale in codes 100,83 and 55 in packages of 6, in 24" or 36" in lenght. So, to give them a feeling of what the modelers thing about buying something like this, would you please let me know what your thoughts are? Thank you Ed Ursem
|
|
ronald parisi
Group:
I think that asking them to model in all 3 scales might be excessive. I would definitely buy it in HO scale. Ron parisi On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Ed <nprybiged@comcast.net> wrote: ** [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Brian Ehni <behni@...>
If you make them to CODE, they are scale immaterial. He's only asking for
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
three sizes. Thanks! -- Brian P. Ehni
On 6/20/12 2:02 PM, "ronald parisi" <ronald.parisi@gmail.com> wrote:
Group:
|
|
Dennis Storzek
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Ed" <nprybiged@...> wrote:
You might also want to add Code 125, which would pick up the On3 modelers. The narrow gauge was a big user of re-purposed rail for building bins, and braces of all sorts. If you find a receptive ear, you might also suggest two more strip sizes at the small end of their selection; .010 x .010, and .010 x .015. All their strip selections end with .020" wide material; these smaller sizes would be useful for building windows, among other things. Dennis
|
|
Ed <nprybiged@...>
Ron
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I have dealt in designing model projects in the NPRHA and have found when we did a model and produced it in HO scale the first thing we heard was "when are you going to do this in N Scale?" and then "when are you going to do this in O Scale?" So that's why I worded the request that way in hopes that I get responces from all three Scale Modelers. Yes Ron, I to would only buy HO Scale, but I think, it's only fair to ask the question in all three scales. Thanks for your responce Ron Ed
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, ronald parisi <ronald.parisi@...> wrote:
|
|
Michael Watnoski
Hi Ed, and All,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I would be interested in the code 83 and 55 in long lengths. This is a much needed item for detailing many structures. It was often used for making fences and hose racks, etc around shops. Michael
On 6/20/2012 2:57 PM, Ed wrote:
All
|
|
MDelvec952
I'd vote for rail-shapes in various cross sections as well -- very useful when the rest of the structure is in styrene.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I'd also vote for molding the rail-shapes in a "rail brown" color. ....Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Watnoski <freestatesystems1@comcast.net> To: STMFC <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wed, Jun 20, 2012 3:52 pm Subject: Re: [STMFC] New Shapes to come Hi Ed, and All, I would be interested in the code 83 and 55 in long lengths. This is a much needed item for detailing many structures. It was often used for making fences and hose racks, etc around shops. Michael On 6/20/2012 2:57 PM, Ed wrote: All [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
William Keene <wakeene@...>
Hello Mike and Group,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Let's not complicate things... White material is OK. I believe that most of us would paint and weather our own and white is a good place to start. Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:19 PM, MDelvec952@aol.com wrote:
|
|
Ed <nprybiged@...>
Thanks Bill
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Ed
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, William Keene <wakeene@...> wrote:
|
|
jerryglow2
I don't understand the need for it - what's wrong with real rail?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Jerry Glow
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, Michael Watnoski <freestatesystems1@...> wrote:
|
|
Bill Schneider
Thanks Jerry, I was wondering that myself!
For the few places on my layout that I needed rail shapes I used cut-off bits of rail. About the only place that I really could see a use for plastic rail would be for something like a gon load or similar. I also am missing the need for 36” sections which (as has been stated) would be a nightmare from a distribution standpoint. Assuming the gon load or scenic use, then wouldn’t 39 scale feet work better? Bill Schneider From: jerryglow@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:09 PM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: [STMFC] Re: New Shapes to come I don't understand the need for it - what's wrong with real rail? Jerry Glow --- In mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com, Michael Watnoski <freestatesystems1@...> wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Dennis Storzek
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Schneider" <bschneider424@...> wrote:
Assuming the gon load or scenic use, then wouldn’t 39 scale feet work better? One of Ed's initial suggested uses was welded rail, either laid out along the ROW, or on a rail train. Actual drawn metal rail is much too stiff to lay on the ground like the prototype, and it certainly won't do for a welded rail train load. Styrene in that small a cross section likely would be limber enough that multiple lengths would bend around curves. For both these uses long lengths would be advantageous, but desire must be tempered by manufacturing reality. If 24" is the longest length Evergreen can handle within their existing product line, it would still be usefull, and easily filed to splice with scarf joints. Dennis
|
|
John Degnan <Scaler164@...>
Bill and Jerry,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The initial posting (if I'm remembering correctly) dealt with the possibilirty of modeling a "welded rail train"... which cannot be done with actual rail due to it's rigidity. There is also likelihood of cheaper cost when using it for something other than track. This is just to mention a few of the possibilities and bebefits of such a product. John Degnan Scaler164@comcast.net Scaler187@comcast.net
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Schneider To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 05:19 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: New Shapes to come Thanks Jerry, I was wondering that myself! For the few places on my layout that I needed rail shapes I used cut-off bits of rail. About the only place that I really could see a use for plastic rail would be for something like a gon load or similar. I also am missing the need for 36” sections which (as has been stated) would be a nightmare from a distribution standpoint. Assuming the gon load or scenic use, then wouldn’t 39 scale feet work better? Bill Schneider From: jerryglow@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:09 PM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: [STMFC] Re: New Shapes to come I don't understand the need for it - what's wrong with real rail? Jerry Glow [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Ed <nprybiged@...>
Jerry
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I consided myself as the average modeler. So I want to build and detail a track gane center with some out buildings and with one or two piles of different sizes of rail and have a section of mian line with sections of rail laying on both sides, that would look impressive. Now if I do this and use nickle silver rail that could very easily be in double diget dollars. I would think twice before doing that when I could, for the same amount, add a piece of rolling stock or structure. Now for half that amount, using Styrene, I could do that detail project. It's my guess that's the same thought that the other average modelers would have, but then I might wrong. Thanks for your reply Ed
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, jerryglow@... wrote:
|
|
Jerry
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
One problem with real rail is WEIGHT. A gondola or flat that weighs the NMRA recommended amount (or even more than that) becomes ridiculously heavy with a full (realistic) load of nickel silver rail. I think Sunshine made a resin rail load, for example. Tim O'
At 6/20/2012 05:09 PM Wednesday, you wrote:
I don't understand the need for it - what's wrong with real rail?
|
|
I would have an interst in buying code 83 rail. How much is the question. I can think of several projects but the quantity of 6 piece package is great; just one per project.
Jim Babcock ________________________________ From: Ed <nprybiged@comcast.net> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:57 AM Subject: [STMFC] New Shapes to come All I'm going to go to Evergreen and ask them if they would consider marketing Styrene Rail in HO, O and N scale in codes 100,83 and 55 in packages of 6, in 24" or 36" in lenght. So, to give them a feeling of what the modelers thing about buying something like this, would you please let me know what your thoughts are? Thank you Ed Ursem [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Bud Rindfleisch
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, James Babcock <babcockjames@...> wrote:
Bud Rindfleisch
|
|
jerryglow2
I had the same situation when making a coil load of real soft iron wire. I made one wrap coils on the bottom layer and multiple wrap ones on top.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I just can't see any manufacturer making plastic rail esp in 3' lengths just for limited use like a rail train. We hobbiests love to suggest new products but lets get realistic unless you want to invest your life's savings. Jerry Glow
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
|
|
jerryglow2
I don't think you're going to find a specialized shape like rail much cheaper than nickel silver esp if you can salvage the rail from used track.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Jerry Glow
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Ed" <nprybiged@...> wrote:
|
|
albyrno
A would use it to fill isolating gaps cut in rails for appearance and to make even flow of rail,I would prefer white plastic to best match ns rail,it would also be useful for guardrails in complex turnouts with multiple guard rails to avoid possible shorts and excessive number of isolating gaps and power feeds
Alan ________________________________ From: Brian Ehni <behni@comcast.net> To: STMFC List <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] New Shapes to come If you make them to CODE, they are scale immaterial. He's only asking for three sizes. Thanks! -- Brian P. Ehni On 6/20/12 2:02 PM, "ronald parisi" <mailto:ronald.parisi%40gmail.com> wrote: Group: [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|