Date
1 - 20 of 36
UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car decal questions
Brad Andonian
Gentlemen,
I have a Pac Limited USRA single sheathed outside braced model I need appropriate road names for as well as clarification on the Pac Ltd UP box car.
Is the UP model the same as the image in ted culotta's ARA 1932 box car book [reference page 214]?
Photo is by Mr. Hendrickson---please chime in sir!
Many thanks from the chilly nw
Brad Andonian
I have a Pac Limited USRA single sheathed outside braced model I need appropriate road names for as well as clarification on the Pac Ltd UP box car.
Is the UP model the same as the image in ted culotta's ARA 1932 box car book [reference page 214]?
Photo is by Mr. Hendrickson---please chime in sir!
Many thanks from the chilly nw
Brad Andonian
Richard Hendrickson
On Jan 5, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "cereshill" <cereshill@...> wrote:
Since you're citing the image in Ted's book, I assume the model represents a steel sheathed box car, but the Union Pacific owned a lot of those, both built new and rebuilt from older cars. Without more information, that question can't be answered either.
Richard Hendrickson
Gentlemen,Appropriate road names for what date? I assume the Pacific Limited model represents the USRA 50 ton single sheathed box cars as built. Some of those cars survived into the early '50s without rebuilding (e.g. Milwaukee, Reading, Southern Pacific) Many others were rebuilt into all steel cars (PMCK&Y) or extensively modified (Pennsylvania RR, Erie) to the point where a model representing the cad as built isn't correct. It's impossible to answer this question without knowing the date being modeled.
I have a Pac Limited USRA single sheathed outside braced model I need appropriate road names for….
Is the UP model the same as the image in ted culotta's ARA 1932 box car book [reference page 214]?I can't answer that question without seeing the model, or a good image of it, but I doubt it very much. The Union Pacific only owned one box car built to the AAR 1932 specs., B-50-18 class UP 182500. It's highly unlikely that Pat O'Boyle imported models representing a single car.
Since you're citing the image in Ted's book, I assume the model represents a steel sheathed box car, but the Union Pacific owned a lot of those, both built new and rebuilt from older cars. Without more information, that question can't be answered either.
Richard Hendrickson
Bill Welch
The Clinchfield's 50-ton SS USRA cars also survived as built, albeit w/AB brake conversion, into the 1950s with CC&O reporting marks.
Al Westerfield captured the very distinctive stenciling spelling out of "Clinchfield" with his decals
Bill Welch
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Al Westerfield captured the very distinctive stenciling spelling out of "Clinchfield" with his decals
Bill Welch
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson wrote:
On Jan 5, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "cereshill" wrote:Gentlemen,Appropriate road names for what date? I assume the Pacific Limited model represents the USRA 50 ton single sheathed box cars as built. Some of those cars survived into the early '50s without rebuilding (e.g. Milwaukee, Reading, Southern Pacific) Many others were rebuilt into all steel cars (PMCK&Y) or extensively modified (Pennsylvania RR, Erie) to the point where a model representing the cad as built isn't correct. It's impossible to answer this question without knowing the date being modeled.
I have a Pac Limited USRA single sheathed outside braced model I need appropriate road names for….Is the UP model the same as the image in ted culotta's ARA 1932 box car book [reference page 214]?I can't answer that question without seeing the model, or a good image of it, but I doubt it very much. The Union Pacific only owned one box car built to the AAR 1932 specs., B-50-18 class UP 182500. It's highly unlikely that Pat O'Boyle imported models representing a single car.
Since you're citing the image in Ted's book, I assume the model represents a steel sheathed box car, but the Union Pacific owned a lot of those, both built new and rebuilt from older cars. Without more information, that question can't be answered either.
Richard Hendrickson
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What number is on the Box?
Rich
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of
cereshill
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 4:59 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car
decal questions
Gentlemen,
I have a Pac Limited USRA single sheathed outside braced model I need
appropriate road names for as well as clarification on the Pac Ltd UP box
car.
Is the UP model the same as the image in ted culotta's ARA 1932 box car book
[reference page 214]?
Photo is by Mr. Hendrickson---please chime in sir!
Many thanks from the chilly nw
Brad Andonian
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of
cereshill
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 4:59 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car
decal questions
Gentlemen,
I have a Pac Limited USRA single sheathed outside braced model I need
appropriate road names for as well as clarification on the Pac Ltd UP box
car.
Is the UP model the same as the image in ted culotta's ARA 1932 box car book
[reference page 214]?
Photo is by Mr. Hendrickson---please chime in sir!
Many thanks from the chilly nw
Brad Andonian
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Richard Hendrickson wrote:
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
Appropriate road names for what date? I assume the Pacific Limited model represents the USRA 50 ton single sheathed box cars as built. Some of those cars survived into the early '50s without rebuilding (e.g. Milwaukee, Reading, Southern Pacific) Many others were rebuilt into all steel cars (PMCK&Y) or extensively modified (Pennsylvania RR, Erie) to the point where a model representing the cad as built isn't correct.Richard is of course right that most railroads rebuilt their USRA cars in later years. That includes SP. All surviving SP USRA box cars were rebuilt in 1949 to an entirely different appearance. A few decrepit ones, not regarded as in sufficiently good condition to rebuild, were assigned to MOW service, but none survived into the 1950s in revenue service.
Since you're citing the image in Ted's book, I assume the model represents a steel sheathed box car, but the Union Pacific owned a lot of those, both built new and rebuilt from older cars. Without more information, that question can't be answered either.Nope, he cites Ted's 1932 ARA box car book, showing the ONE and only UP car of that design, page 214. This is not remotely like the USRA SS cars.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
Brad Andonian
Rich,
Â
The USRA model is Pac Ltd 100 Single sheathed outside braced. USRA 40'
Â
Â
The UP car is at work; cannot check today.   I believe that i have confused you guys---I have two cars that I am inquiring about.
Â
Per the listing I have for Pac Ltd:
Â
The UP car was Pac Ltd Pl-3100
* I have notes that is it UP #182500 B-50-18.    I am wishing to confirm this is correct.
Â
Â
Thanks,
Brad Andonian
________________________________
From: Richard Yoder <oscale48@...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: [STMFC] UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car decal questions
Â
What number is on the Box?
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
cereshill
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 4:59 PM
To: mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [STMFC] UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car
decal questions
Gentlemen,
I have a Pac Limited USRA single sheathed outside braced model I need
appropriate road names for as well as clarification on the Pac Ltd UP box
car.
Is the UP model the same as the image in ted culotta's ARA 1932 box car book
[reference page 214]?
Photo is by Mr. Hendrickson---please chime in sir!
Many thanks from the chilly nw
Brad Andonian
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
Â
The USRA model is Pac Ltd 100 Single sheathed outside braced. USRA 40'
Â
Â
The UP car is at work; cannot check today.   I believe that i have confused you guys---I have two cars that I am inquiring about.
Â
Per the listing I have for Pac Ltd:
Â
The UP car was Pac Ltd Pl-3100
* I have notes that is it UP #182500 B-50-18.    I am wishing to confirm this is correct.
Â
Â
Thanks,
Brad Andonian
________________________________
From: Richard Yoder <oscale48@...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: [STMFC] UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car decal questions
Â
What number is on the Box?
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
cereshill
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 4:59 PM
To: mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [STMFC] UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car
decal questions
Gentlemen,
I have a Pac Limited USRA single sheathed outside braced model I need
appropriate road names for as well as clarification on the Pac Ltd UP box
car.
Is the UP model the same as the image in ted culotta's ARA 1932 box car book
[reference page 214]?
Photo is by Mr. Hendrickson---please chime in sir!
Many thanks from the chilly nw
Brad Andonian
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Brad Andonian wrote:
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
The UP car was Pac Ltd Pl-3100That's the right car number. UP owned just ONE of these cars and that's the one. Your call, of course, but I believe that to model rarities just complicates the problem of creating reality in modeling.
* I have notes that is it UP #182500 B-50-18. I am wishing to confirm this is correct.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
Richard Hendrickson
On Jan 5, 2013, at 2:36 PM, lnbill <fgexbill@...> wrote:
Richard Hendrickson
The Clinchfield's 50-ton SS USRA cars also survived as built, albeit w/AB brake conversion, into the 1950s with CC&O reporting marks.Bill, I was just citing examples, not trying to compile a complete list. Other (smaller) RRs whose USRA 50 ton cars also survived for a long time as built, IIRC, included RF&P, MEC, CNJ. But my point remains that it's impossible to say for sure without knowing the date being modeled.
Richard Hendrickson
Richard Hendrickson
On Jan 5, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Brad Andonian <cereshill@...> wrote:
Richard Hendrickson
Rich,That's easy to determine, Brad. The single B-50-18 class car was 13'10-1/2" from rails to the top of the running board, while several thousand later UP steel sheathed AAR box cars (classes B-50-19. B-50-21, B-50-24, B-50-27) were 14'7-1/2" - a 9" difference that's easily measured in O scale.
The USRA model is Pac Ltd 100 Single sheathed outside braced. USRA 40'
The UP car is at work; cannot check today. I believe that i have confused you guys---I have two cars that I am inquiring about.
Per the listing I have for Pac Ltd:
The UP car was Pac Ltd Pl-3100
* I have notes that is it UP #182500 B-50-18. I am wishing to confirm this is correct.
Richard Hendrickson
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Brad Andonian wrote:
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
Thank you, what are other appropriate options? Can you post an image!?I don't have rights to post such images on the web, but I can send you one off-list. What roads would you prefer?
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
proto48er
Tony -
Pacific Limited did in fact import a model of the single UP boxcar. Pat O'Boyle imported brass models of about 16 different varieties of the 1932 ARA boxcar, with the appropriate roadname on each of the boxes. He also imported a PRR car - I recall that there were 5 cars in that series?? (My info is at home and only computers are at the office. I did not purchase models of the very low quantity prototypes, and will have to look up the data.)
Pat's builder would make cars with an indentical underframe, changing the car sides, roof, ends, doors, ladders and other details to make models of various prototypes. Pat was extremely anal about prototype details and would put together a project with cars having many variations. His NYC USRA steel boxcar project was another example - he did about 15 varieties for them also. The more exotic models were made in quantities of only 15 or 20 cars.
We were very happy to have a great selection of prototypes!
A.T. Kott
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Pacific Limited did in fact import a model of the single UP boxcar. Pat O'Boyle imported brass models of about 16 different varieties of the 1932 ARA boxcar, with the appropriate roadname on each of the boxes. He also imported a PRR car - I recall that there were 5 cars in that series?? (My info is at home and only computers are at the office. I did not purchase models of the very low quantity prototypes, and will have to look up the data.)
Pat's builder would make cars with an indentical underframe, changing the car sides, roof, ends, doors, ladders and other details to make models of various prototypes. Pat was extremely anal about prototype details and would put together a project with cars having many variations. His NYC USRA steel boxcar project was another example - he did about 15 varieties for them also. The more exotic models were made in quantities of only 15 or 20 cars.
We were very happy to have a great selection of prototypes!
A.T. Kott
--- In STMFC@..., Anthony Thompson wrote:
Brad Andonian wrote:The UP car was Pac Ltd Pl-3100That's the right car number. UP owned just ONE of these cars and that's the one. Your call, of course, but I believe that to model rarities just complicates the problem of creating reality in modeling.
* I have notes that is it UP #182500 B-50-18. I am wishing to confirm this is correct.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
proto48er
Ben -
You are right! Pat did do the demonstrator cars.
A.T. Kott
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You are right! Pat did do the demonstrator cars.
A.T. Kott
--- In STMFC@..., Benjamin Hom wrote:
A. T. Kott wrote:
"He also imported a PRR car - I recall that there were 5 cars in that series??"
NO! Just one car - PRR 36986, Class X35.
You were probably thinking about the five demonstator cars.
Ben Hom
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
A.T. Kott wrote:
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
Tony -If I gave the impression I did not believe the car was done, I apologize. I did not think that and did not mean to say it. My comment was that for most modelers, CHOOSING to include this car, which was one of a kind, strikes me as an extreme rarity and a poor addition to a layout freight car fleet. But obviously YMMV.
Pacific Limited did in fact import a model of the single UP boxcar. Pat O'Boyle imported brass models of about 16 different varieties of the 1932 ARA boxcar, with the appropriate roadname on each of the boxes.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
Benjamin Hom
A. T. Kott wrote:
"He also imported a PRR car - I recall that there were 5 cars in that
series??"
I replied:
"NO! Just one car - PRR 36986, Class X35.
You were probably thinking about the five demonstator cars."
A. T. replied:
"You are right! Pat did do the demonstrator cars."
To be fair to A. T., PRR 36986 was one of the five demonstration cars:
ARA 1 -> NYC 100000
ARA 2 -> C&O 1900
ARA 3 ->Â PRR 36986
ARA 4 -> C&O 1901
ARA 5 -> C&O 1902
Ben Hom
"He also imported a PRR car - I recall that there were 5 cars in that
series??"
I replied:
"NO! Just one car - PRR 36986, Class X35.
You were probably thinking about the five demonstator cars."
A. T. replied:
"You are right! Pat did do the demonstrator cars."
To be fair to A. T., PRR 36986 was one of the five demonstration cars:
ARA 1 -> NYC 100000
ARA 2 -> C&O 1900
ARA 3 ->Â PRR 36986
ARA 4 -> C&O 1901
ARA 5 -> C&O 1902
Ben Hom
proto48er
Tony -
I fully agree with you! Only a card-carrying UP fan would want to purchase one! Pat must have had one such modeler assisting him on the project; hence the UP car. Thanks for your great responses!
A.T. Kott
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I fully agree with you! Only a card-carrying UP fan would want to purchase one! Pat must have had one such modeler assisting him on the project; hence the UP car. Thanks for your great responses!
A.T. Kott
--- In STMFC@..., Anthony Thompson wrote:
A.T. Kott wrote:Tony -If I gave the impression I did not believe the car was done, I apologize. I did not think that and did not mean to say it. My comment was that for most modelers, CHOOSING to include this car, which was one of a kind, strikes me as an extreme rarity and a poor addition to a layout freight car fleet. But obviously YMMV.
Pacific Limited did in fact import a model of the single UP boxcar. Pat O'Boyle imported brass models of about 16 different varieties of the 1932 ARA boxcar, with the appropriate roadname on each of the boxes.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history
proto48er
Ben -
Thanks for providing the identities of the (5) demonstrator cars. I thought the UP car might have been one of them, but I did not purchase any of the PL models unless they had prototype numbers of (50) or more cars (rule to prevent falling off the fiscal model train cliff.) All my train stuff is at home, and I posted from memory.
Thanks for all the great posts on this list!
A.T. Kott
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks for providing the identities of the (5) demonstrator cars. I thought the UP car might have been one of them, but I did not purchase any of the PL models unless they had prototype numbers of (50) or more cars (rule to prevent falling off the fiscal model train cliff.) All my train stuff is at home, and I posted from memory.
Thanks for all the great posts on this list!
A.T. Kott
--- In STMFC@..., Benjamin Hom wrote:
A. T. Kott wrote:
"He also imported a PRR car - I recall that there were 5 cars in that
series??"
I replied:
"NO! Just one car - PRR 36986, Class X35.
You were probably thinking about the five demonstator cars."
A. T. replied:
"You are right! Pat did do the demonstrator cars."
To be fair to A. T., PRR 36986 was one of the five demonstration cars:
ARA 1 -> NYC 100000
ARA 2 -> C&O 1900
ARA 3 ->Â PRR 36986
ARA 4 -> C&O 1901
ARA 5 -> C&O 1902
Ben Hom
Tony,
I subscribe to the contrary philosophy, that says if your layout contains NO unusual cars, then it's not
very representative of most railroads, since one can often spot unusual cars in photos of the prototype.
Of course, all things must be done in moderation. :-)
Tim O'Connor
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I subscribe to the contrary philosophy, that says if your layout contains NO unusual cars, then it's not
very representative of most railroads, since one can often spot unusual cars in photos of the prototype.
Of course, all things must be done in moderation. :-)
Tim O'Connor
----- Original Message -----
From: "proto48er" <atkott@...>
If I gave the impression I did not believe the car was done, I apologize. I did not think that and did not mean to say it. My comment was that for most modelers, CHOOSING to include this car, which was one of a kind, strikes me as an extreme rarity and a poor addition to a layout freight car fleet. But obviously YMMV.
Tony Thompson
From: "proto48er" <atkott@...>
If I gave the impression I did not believe the car was done, I apologize. I did not think that and did not mean to say it. My comment was that for most modelers, CHOOSING to include this car, which was one of a kind, strikes me as an extreme rarity and a poor addition to a layout freight car fleet. But obviously YMMV.
Tony Thompson
Brad Andonian
Hi Fellas,
Â
I am having the decals created as I like to have the car correct for the box---  Tony's point is fine except I don't see any other UP decals in O that are readily available---so I may as well have the correct decal made.    Now, would I purchase another of these models---not likely as then to have two of a car when only one existed would create a different dilemma.
Â
Anyhow---a lively discussion.
Â
Brad Andonian
From: "timboconnor@..." <timboconnor@...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 1:11 PM
Subject: [STMFC] Re: UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car decal questions
Â
Tony,
I subscribe to the contrary philosophy, that says if your layout contains NO unusual cars, then it's not
very representative of most railroads, since one can often spot unusual cars in photos of the prototype.
Of course, all things must be done in moderation. :-)
Tim O'Connor
----- Original Message -----
From: "proto48er" mailto:atkott%40swbell.net>
If I gave the impression I did not believe the car was done, I apologize. I did not think that and did not mean to say it. My comment was that for most modelers, CHOOSING to include this car, which was one of a kind, strikes me as an extreme rarity and a poor addition to a layout freight car fleet. But obviously YMMV.
Tony Thompson
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Â
I am having the decals created as I like to have the car correct for the box---  Tony's point is fine except I don't see any other UP decals in O that are readily available---so I may as well have the correct decal made.    Now, would I purchase another of these models---not likely as then to have two of a car when only one existed would create a different dilemma.
Â
Anyhow---a lively discussion.
Â
Brad Andonian
From: "timboconnor@..." <timboconnor@...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 1:11 PM
Subject: [STMFC] Re: UP box car and USRA single sheathed outside braced box car decal questions
Â
Tony,
I subscribe to the contrary philosophy, that says if your layout contains NO unusual cars, then it's not
very representative of most railroads, since one can often spot unusual cars in photos of the prototype.
Of course, all things must be done in moderation. :-)
Tim O'Connor
----- Original Message -----
From: "proto48er" mailto:atkott%40swbell.net>
If I gave the impression I did not believe the car was done, I apologize. I did not think that and did not mean to say it. My comment was that for most modelers, CHOOSING to include this car, which was one of a kind, strikes me as an extreme rarity and a poor addition to a layout freight car fleet. But obviously YMMV.
Tony Thompson
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]