Date
1 - 3 of 3
Coupler droop, height and centering
Malcolm H. Houck
Does anyone have experience with the scale couplers and were any changes
required to insure reliable operation? There has been considerable concern about whether or not "scale" couplers will "gather" properly and couple with other sizes, or if they will or will not couple properly on curved track. If this's a problem it is, in my opinion more related to the side play between wheelsets and truck frames; -- a topic much discussed with JP Barger. An answer is to replace the "one size fits all" wheelsets with ReBoxx wheelsets that are (can be) more carefully matched to the varying distances across truck frames between journals. This can easily be done since ReBoxx are made in a variety of lengths and, with careful measurement taking into account the manufactured specification of lengths, can be matched to a nearest 0.001". With replacement wheelsets all cars center on the track and scale coupler matched are not a problem. . . at all! In addition, since the elimination of truck side plat also eliminates vertical play, couplers will be (should be) all at a proper height above the rails. In replacing all OEM and other replacement wheelsets with ReBoxx sets I have ben able to discard nearly all shim washers previously needed to obtain correct coupler height. An additional benefit is that with a correctly fitted ReBoxx wheelset a truck rolls extremely well. The finer tread width seems to have no problems with well done track, besides. Mal Houck
|
|
Tony Thompson
Mal Houck wrote:
Does anyone have experience with the scale couplers and were any changes required to insure reliable operation?Obviously it depends on the sharpness of the curves. I assume you are comparing #5 with #58 couplers, and yes of course, the smaller heads have less gathering range. And you know what? The prototype is the same. Prototype drawbars often have to be kicked or otherwise nudged to couple on curved track, and on a strong curvature, it may not be possible to couple conventional freight cars. (That's why traction lines had special couplers.) Some modelers do complain about the small-head couplers, in this regard, but to me it is, if anything, a step toward realism, and away from the toy-train " couple anything, anywhere" routine we were used to. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, tony@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
William Keene <wakeene@...>
Hello Group,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I install and operate using Sergent scale couplers and have found them to be quite reliable. And I second what Tony Thompson has commented that nudging coupler drawbars is a more realistic operation. I have also noticed that switching operations are done at slower speeds which is also more prototypically correct. Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
On Jul 13, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Tony Thompson <tony@signaturepress.com> wrote:
Mal Houck wrote:Does anyone have experience with the scale couplers and were any changes required to insure reliable operation?Obviously it depends on the sharpness of the curves. I assume you are comparing #5 with #58 couplers, and yes of course, the smaller heads have less gathering range. And you know what? The prototype is the same. Prototype drawbars often have to be kicked or otherwise nudged to couple on curved track, and on a strong curvature, it may not be possible to couple conventional freight cars. (That's why traction lines had special couplers.) Some modelers do complain about the small-head couplers, in this regard, but to me it is, if anything, a step toward realism, and away from the toy-train " couple anything, anywhere" routine we were used to.
|
|