gons containing coal


ed_mines
 

Has anyone seen photos which show gons loaded with coal off the gon's home road?


Ed Mines




Paul Koehler
 

Ed:

 

I haven’t seen any pictures, but I have seen the real thing.  When I was with the SP in the late 1960’s about once a month a gondola was spotted at the Firestone Park TT with a gondola load of coal ,which took about three days for two gentlemen to unload by shoveling it into a dump truck and delivering to a non rail served foundry in South Gate CA.  Yes it did happen.

 

Paul C. Koehler

 


From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 1:17 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] gons containing coal

 

 

Has anyone seen photos which show gons loaded with coal off the gon's home road?

 

Ed Mines

 

 


Michael Aufderheide
 

Ed,

I haven't looked through my photos, but there are many in the 1947-9 Monon conductor logs I have.  Out of the 537 cars loaded with coal 107 were gons.  Of those 107, 27 were Monon cars and the rest foreign.  Highest count among the foreign cars are connecting roads, MILW-18, SOU-17 and of course PRR with 10.

Mike Aufderheide


George Eichelberger
 

I expect coal shipments in gons were quite common into at least the 1920s. Although the term sounds a bit “toy train” to us nowadays, multiple railroads listed coal carrying (usually drop-bottom cars?) gondolas as “coal cars”. A quick look at the March, 1924 RER list cars by that description as CofG 14500-14600, then cars in series 15250-16049 and 17001-17200 as “coal gondolas”. The A&WP lists cars as “coal, solid or drop bottom” in seven or eight car series with a few “self clearing” coal (sic hoppers?) at the end of the RER entry. Examples of “coal cars” continue through the RER.

As most freight cars were more or less free running, Could we assume that gons loaded with coal would be common in interchange service?

On the Southern, early steel cars used for coal did not have particularly long service lives. Part of the reason may have been the first groups (incl the USRA examples) were about 20 years old during the depression and were simply not needed. Was steel produced in the teens and early twenties less able to deal with the corrosive effects of coal loads than more modern steel?


Tim O'Connor
 

Ike

The C&O, D&RGW, CB&Q, NP, UP had fleets of gondolas in coal service beyond the
1960 cutoff of the STMFC list. I always thought preferences were based on the
versatility of the cars for other uses as well as coal. Even today 55+ years after
the STMFC era gondolas and hoppers are both in use in coal service.

Tim O'Connor



I expect coal shipments in gons were quite common into at least the 1920s.
------------------------------------
Posted by: george eichelberger
------------------------------------


Eric Hansmann
 

Bob Chapparo shared a cool image earlier of a tipple with four NYC Lines cars being loaded. Two were hoppers and two were gondolas.

The Pennsy built many of their GS gons with hopper bottom doors in the GSd class. Most were converted to flat bottom solid cars through the 1920s.

The Pennsy G22 class also had many cars built with clamshell hoppers.

There's lots of neat freight car stuff that happened in the first half of the years this list covers.

Eric Hansmann
El Paso, TX

On Oct 12, 2016, at 7:56 PM, george eichelberger geichelberger@... [STMFC] <STMFC@...> wrote:

I expect coal shipments in gons were quite common into at least the 1920s. Although the term sounds a bit “toy train” to us nowadays, multiple railroads listed coal carrying (usually drop-bottom cars?) gondolas as “coal cars”. A quick look at the March, 1924 RER list cars by that description as CofG 14500-14600, then cars in series 15250-16049 and 17001-17200 as “coal gondolas”. The A&WP lists cars as “coal, solid or drop bottom” in seven or eight car series with a few “self clearing” coal (sic hoppers?) at the end of the RER entry. Examples of “coal cars” continue through the RER.

As most freight cars were more or less free running, Could we assume that gons loaded with coal would be common in interchange service?

On the Southern, early steel cars used for coal did not have particularly long service lives. Part of the reason may have been the first groups (incl the USRA examples) were about 20 years old during the depression and were simply not needed. Was steel produced in the teens and early twenties less able to deal with the corrosive effects of coal loads than more modern steel?

------------------------------------
Posted by: george eichelberger <geichelberger@...>
------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links



np328
 

George writes: I expect coal shipments in gons were quite common into at least the 1920s

I gave a short .5 hour presentation on gons to my historical society convention recently. 
Some exerts from it.

In 1929, on the NP, there were 5,759 gons and 98 hoppers.  
In 1933                                      4,713 gons and 199 hoppers

From a letter dated April 2, 1940: 4,256 gons and 599 hoppers.
     Oldest of these gons, 100 of them being 35 years old - composite gons of the NP 55,500 class.
the entire number of composite gons on this date - 1,196  
     Of the hoppers - 49 are 18 years old, 150 are 8 years old, and the rest are 1 year old.

By April 1950 these numbers reverse somewhat - on the NP 3,814 gons and 4,509 hoppers. 

So yes, common in the 1920's and for some time on. 
I believe that gons loomed large on the roster of the Q according to the BHRS Bulletin #35  http://www.burlingtonroute.com/costore/

 

 
 Of gons in interchange, the Reverend Doug Harding placed within the STMFC files in 2009 a wonderful document  - Watertown, MN 1954 Waybills  that list numerous examples of coal traffic from the Twin Ports onto the M&StL with car description and car routing.    

Your question about steel on early gons. Others like Tony could better answer that. However on the NP about 300 gons being scrapped each year due to wear before 1950 was pretty average. 

The composite gons (and hoppers) are notable in lasting till they are quite old.  
                                                                                                                   Jim Dick - St. Paul 


Tim O'Connor
 


Dick, I think you included ORE JENNIES as "hoppers" here. Technically they are
hopper cars, but I don't think they were used in coal service... I could be wrong.

If you don't count the jennies, there were nearly equal numbers in 1950 - 3,509
open hoppers [the majority of them Selective Service "MWB" cars like the ATLAS model
and a bunch of cars like the TRIX model], and 3,814 gondolas. But clearly the NP
greatly increased its fleet of "coal" hopper cars after 1940, I agree with that.

Tim O'Connor



By April 1950 these numbers reverse somewhat - on the NP 3,814 gons and 4,509 hoppers.
Jim Dick - St. Paul 


water.kresse@...
 

It was "gondolas to the Lakes AND hopper cars to Tidewater for the C&O and N&W railroads up to WW One.  Their Tidewater ports had high high-piers with side bunkers to dump coal in to load the coal boats.  The upstart Virginian Railroad had a Lake-level dumper installed in 1907 and used 50-ton gondola cars on the Chesapeake Bay.

By 1922 or so they had figured out the relationship between steel quality and rivet holes, Bessemer versus Open-Hearth steel purity, and were looking at more expensive copper-bearing steel.

Al Kresse


From: "george eichelberger geichelberger@... [STMFC]"
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:56:23 PM
Subject: [STMFC] Re: gons containing coal

 

I expect coal shipments in gons were quite common into at least the 1920s. Although the term sounds a bit “toy train” to us nowadays, multiple railroads listed coal carrying (usually drop-bottom cars?) gondolas as “coal cars”. A quick look at the March, 1924 RER list cars by that description as CofG 14500-14600, then cars in series 15250-16049 and 17001-17200 as “coal gondolas”. The A&WP lists cars as “coal, solid or drop bottom” in seven or eight car series with a few “self clearing” coal (sic hoppers?) at the end of the RER entry. Examples of “coal cars” continue through the RER.

As most freight cars were more or less free running, Could we assume that gons loaded with coal would be common in interchange service?

On the Southern, early steel cars used for coal did not have particularly long service lives. Part of the reason may have been the first groups (incl the USRA examples) were about 20 years old during the depression and were simply not needed. Was steel produced in the teens and early twenties less able to deal with the corrosive effects of coal loads than more modern steel?



water.kresse@...
 

Versatility was an issue.  As labor costs went up, you could rationalize the cost a trestle and dumping coal via hopper doors . . . . or getting a crane with a bucket.  Power plants began to seriously using rotary dumpers around WW Two.

Al Kresse


From: "Tim O'Connor timboconnor@... [STMFC]"
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 10:11:54 PM
Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: gons containing coal

 

Ike


The C&O, D&RGW, CB&Q, NP, UP had fleets of gondolas in coal service beyond the
1960 cutoff of the STMFC list. I always thought preferences were based on the
versatility of the cars for other uses as well as coal. Even today 55+ years after
the STMFC era gondolas and hoppers are both in use in coal service.

Tim O'Connor



I expect coal shipments in gons were quite common into at least the 1920s.
------------------------------------
Posted by: george eichelberger
------------------------------------



water.kresse@...
 

The C&O/PM used used Ore Jennies in captured coal service in a pinch.  These cars, designed for higher density ore, had extended sides for carrying lighter coal loads, and they refueled the Lake Michigan Car Ferries via between the rails into bunkers with augers.

Al Kresse


From: "Tim O'Connor timboconnor@... [STMFC]"
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 2:55:27 AM
Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: gons containing coal

 


Dick, I think you included ORE JENNIES as "hoppers" here. Technically they are
hopper cars, but I don't think they were used in coal service... I could be wrong.


If you don't count the jennies, there were nearly equal numbers in 1950 - 3,509
open hoppers [the majority of them Selective Service "MWB" cars like the ATLAS model
and a bunch of cars like the TRIX model], and 3,814 gondolas. But clearly the NP
greatly increased its fleet of "coal" hopper cars after 1940, I agree with that.

Tim O'Connor



By April 1950 these numbers reverse somewhat - on the NP 3,814 gons and 4,509 hoppers.
Jim Dick - St. Paul 



Jim Betz
 

Hi,

I will theorize that the destination had a lot to do with whether
the car used was a coal hopper or a gondola. Especially if the
receiver wasn't set up to unload by opening the doors below.

Also - don't forget that cement plants use coal for heating and
drying the product - so even if you aren't modeling a "coal road"
you can still have loads of coal that are going to a cement plant
(rather than a power plant).
And coal for heating - to small towns - would often be sold
or delivered to/from open 'bins'.
Neither of these are large volume users when compared to the
amount used for power generation or a steel mill - although the
amount of coal to a cement plant isn't "trivial".
And let's not forget the seasonal variations in the coal traffic.

- Jim B.


Ted Culotta
 

There are many examples of gons, including a fair number off-line, carrying coal, in the Bob Charles Collection that was the fodder for the NMRA Postwar Freight Car Fleet book. Off the top of my head, I can think of NH, B&M, MILW, NYC, and PRR (the NYC is a gon where I can't see the load, but it's in a cut of hoppers).

Cheers,
Ted


Tim O'Connor
 

I have a shot of a P&LE 65 foot mill gondola loaded with coal. :-)

There are many examples of gons, including a fair number off-line, carrying coal, in the Bob Charles Collection that was the fodder for the NMRA Postwar Freight Car Fleet book. Off the top of my head, I can think of NH, B&M, MILW, NYC, and PRR (the NYC is a gon where I can't see the load, but it's in a cut of hoppers).

Cheers,
Ted


destorzek@...
 




---In STMFC@..., <jimbetz@...> wrote :

Hi,

I will theorize that the destination had a lot to do with whether
the car used was a coal hopper or a gondola. Especially if the
receiver wasn't set up to unload by opening the doors below...
===============

I wholeheartedly agree. Let's not forget, until the end of WWII, the going rate for unskilled labor was about a dollar a day - you could get a lot of coal unloaded for not much dollars. Gravity unloading requires a significant difference in elevation; you either put in a coal trestle, or a pit, with a mechanical conveyor to bring the coal back up where you need it. Neither was particularly cheap, compared to that dollar a day labor. Of course, wage inflation during the war and certainly in the decade afterwards changed that equation, and then hoppers steadily replaced gondolas as the car of choice for coal.

I am reminded of a thirties era aerial photo I have of the Fox Head Brewery in Waukesha, WI (home of "Fox Head 400" beer). This was by no means a small brewery - it occupied a good city block, wedged into the angle between the junction of two railroads; C&NW, and the Soo Line. The shipping doors are on the C&NW, across the tracks from their depot, and there are seven or eight reefers spotted for loading. Not a small operation at all.

The boiler house is on the other side of the complex, along a spur off the Soo. Spotted alongside is a gon half filled with coal - half filled as in only one end is empty. In the middle of the gon, barely visible, is a man, diligently shoveling his way from one end of the car to the other, throwing the coal into the boiler house through an opening in the wall. There is absolutely no evidence of any dump pit.

For a long time, labor was cheaper than mechanization, and a whole army of men fed their families by trudging off to do manual labor each day.

Dennis Storzek



np328
 

   In the Northern Pacific files, in the President's Subject Files, the Chief Engineering Files and the Mechanical Department files are found a report, Report of Committee on Open Top Dump Cars, this report commissioned in 1929, updated in 1935, and then again 1939 - listed as the coal traffic between the Twin Ports and the Twin Cities to be the #1 determinant in open top car purchases on the NP.  
     Given the time that most cars remain in service, the 1939 update would pretty much cover this sites time frame.

    To answer another post, No Tim, I did not confuse the Ore cars with the others. I believe you are wrong there. Of course, you are welcome to back your assertion with source data.
    
    Of Jim Betz,
Jim - If you are a member of the GNRHS (I believe you are) please check GNRHS reference sheet 248 of December 1996. It (in a very nice article by Martin Evoy III) does list operations and preferences) so no need to theorize. There is plenty of factual data available for those that care to research.

In the article, He (Martin) does list the hand unloading that Dennis Storzek references in a more current post.

    I also have (copies of letters) letters from the NP's General Managers office to shipping agents in Duluth/Superior regarding coal loads that were refused when they came in the wrong type of car, and these are some rather strongly worded letters as railroaders tend to speak. Yes, the consignee was free to specify the car type.   

We seem to cover this topic of coal and gons and hoppers every several years. Or like September 2015 - Seasonal coal loadings was the topic.

Ben Hom (I believe it was) commented once about - Doesn't anyone check the files? 

Of clamshell bucket unloading of gons, see in the Photo area my postings from April 9. 2008 - Small Town Coal Operations. There is a crane with clamshell unloading an NP composite gon, among the photos. Date of photos is early 1930's.

Of other coal postings - see postings 111293, 65630, and 65627.

                                                                                                                                           Jim Dick - St. Paul

 


A&Y Dave in MD
 

Totally agree. The 1934 conductor log used "C" as car type for gondolas carrying coal, but used "G" when carrying other loads.  I need to check when a gon was empty (we used car number to identify the type independent of the log car type). The log contained "H" for hoppers when they carried anything, coal as well as empties and gravel.

Dave

Sent from Dave Bott's iPad

On Oct 12, 2016, at 9:56 PM, george eichelberger geichelberger@... [STMFC] <STMFC@...> wrote:

 

I expect coal shipments in gons were quite common into at least the 1920s. Although the term sounds a bit “toy train” to us nowadays, multiple railroads listed coal carrying (usually drop-bottom cars?) gondolas as “coal cars”. A quick look at the March, 1924 RER list cars by that description as CofG 14500-14600, then cars in series 15250-16049 and 17001-17200 as “coal gondolas”. The A&WP lists cars as “coal, solid or drop bottom” in seven or eight car series with a few “self clearing” coal (sic hoppers?) at the end of the RER entry. Examples of “coal cars” continue through the RER.

As most freight cars were more or less free running, Could we assume that gons loaded with coal would be common in interchange service?

On the Southern, early steel cars used for coal did not have particularly long service lives. Part of the reason may have been the first groups (incl the USRA examples) were about 20 years old during the depression and were simply not needed. Was steel produced in the teens and early twenties less able to deal with the corrosive effects of coal loads than more modern steel?


Clark Propst
 

Here in the Upper Midwest, seems coal loaded in the Twin Ports (Duluth/Superior) was into box cars while coal from SE Iowa and NW Illinois was in gondolas/hoppers. Most town coal dealers had sheds to keep the coal out of the weather with only a small opening to shovel it into from the car.
Clark Propst
Mason City Iowa


Nelson Moyer
 

The CB&Q shipped coal from Southern Illinois mines in gondolas, mostly in captive service. Burlington Bulletin No. 35 titled “The Q in the Coal Fields” chronicles this traffic. During the late 19th and early 20 centuries, the Q owned coal mines in South Central Iowa as well. The Q had a number of open top coal pockets with multiples of 16 ft. square bins, and clamshell cranes were used to load the bins from gondolas. The coal pocket at Western Yard in South Chicago had six bins, and the coal pocket in Burlington had three bins. Burlington Bulletin No. 23 on Burlington, IA has a photos of the three bin coal pocket, including one photo of the crane being spotted by a K-4 ten wheeler. Black and white photos of Burlington yard show large piles of what appears to be coal and ballast near the service tracks, both shipped in drop bottom gondolas, and both transferred with a clamshell crane.

Nelson Moyer

From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 2:20 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: gons containing coal


In the Northern Pacific files, in the President's Subject Files, the Chief Engineering Files and the Mechanical Department files are found a report, Report of Committee on Open Top Dump Cars, this report commissioned in 1929, updated in 1935, and then again 1939 - listed as the coal traffic between the Twin Ports and the Twin Cities to be the #1 determinant in open top car purchases on the NP.
Given the time that most cars remain in service, the 1939 update would pretty much cover this sites time frame.

To answer another post, No Tim, I did not confuse the Ore cars with the others. I believe you are wrong there. Of course, you are welcome to back your assertion with source data.

Of Jim Betz,
Jim - If you are a member of the GNRHS (I believe you are) please check GNRHS reference sheet 248 of December 1996. It (in a very nice article by Martin Evoy III) does list operations and preferences) so no need to theorize. There is plenty of factual data available for those that care to research.

In the article, He (Martin) does list the hand unloading that Dennis Storzek references in a more current post.

I also have (copies of letters) letters from the NP's General Managers office to shipping agents in Duluth/Superior regarding coal loads that were refused when they came in the wrong type of car, and these are some rather strongly worded letters as railroaders tend to speak. Yes, the consignee was free to specify the car type.

We seem to cover this topic of coal and gons and hoppers every several years. Or like September 2015 - Seasonal coal loadings was the topic.

Ben Hom (I believe it was) commented once about - Doesn't anyone check the files?

Of clamshell bucket unloading of gons, see in the Photo area my postings from April 9. 2008 - Small Town Coal Operations. There is a crane with clamshell unloading an NP composite gon, among the photos. Date of photos is early 1930's.

Of other coal postings - see postings 111293, 65630, and 65627.

Jim Dick - St. Paul


Gary Wildung
 


I have a photo of the NP hauling coal in ore cars around the Duluth - Superior area. . The photo show the ore car for the heating plant at 5 Ave yard.

Gary


From: STMFC@... on behalf of Nelson Moyer npmoyer@... [STMFC]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 4:03 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: RE: [STMFC] Re: gons containing coal
 
 

The CB&Q shipped coal from Southern Illinois mines in gondolas, mostly in captive service. Burlington Bulletin No. 35 titled “The Q in the Coal Fields” chronicles this traffic. During the late 19th and early 20 centuries, the Q owned coal mines in South Central Iowa as well. The Q had a number of open top coal pockets with multiples of 16 ft. square bins, and clamshell cranes were used to load the bins from gondolas. The coal pocket at Western Yard in South Chicago had six bins, and the coal pocket in Burlington had three bins. Burlington Bulletin No. 23 on Burlington, IA has a photos of the three bin coal pocket, including one photo of the crane being spotted by a K-4 ten wheeler. Black and white photos of Burlington yard show large piles of what appears to be coal and ballast near the service tracks, both shipped in drop bottom gondolas, and both transferred with a clamshell crane.

Nelson Moyer

From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 2:20 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: gons containing coal


In the Northern Pacific files, in the President's Subject Files, the Chief Engineering Files and the Mechanical Department files are found a report, Report of Committee on Open Top Dump Cars, this report commissioned in 1929, updated in 1935, and then again 1939 - listed as the coal traffic between the Twin Ports and the Twin Cities to be the #1 determinant in open top car purchases on the NP.
Given the time that most cars remain in service, the 1939 update would pretty much cover this sites time frame.

To answer another post, No Tim, I did not confuse the Ore cars with the others. I believe you are wrong there. Of course, you are welcome to back your assertion with source data.

Of Jim Betz,
Jim - If you are a member of the GNRHS (I believe you are) please check GNRHS reference sheet 248 of December 1996. It (in a very nice article by Martin Evoy III) does list operations and preferences) so no need to theorize. There is plenty of factual data available for those that care to research.

In the article, He (Martin) does list the hand unloading that Dennis Storzek references in a more current post.

I also have (copies of letters) letters from the NP's General Managers office to shipping agents in Duluth/Superior regarding coal loads that were refused when they came in the wrong type of car, and these are some rather strongly worded letters as railroaders tend to speak. Yes, the consignee was free to specify the car type.

We seem to cover this topic of coal and gons and hoppers every several years. Or like September 2015 - Seasonal coal loadings was the topic.

Ben Hom (I believe it was) commented once about - Doesn't anyone check the files?

Of clamshell bucket unloading of gons, see in the Photo area my postings from April 9. 2008 - Small Town Coal Operations. There is a crane with clamshell unloading an NP composite gon, among the photos. Date of photos is early 1930's.

Of other coal postings - see postings 111293, 65630, and 65627.

Jim Dick - St. Paul




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]