Other cars not suitable of interchange
|
Paul Koehler
Brian:
Yes I read it and I would like you to explain your comment. You stated that the four cars that you pictures were “Other cars not suitable of interchange?”. . All four cars could be seen in interchange, you are mistaken with your comment.
Paul C. Koehler
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of BRIAN PAUL EHNI
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 10:18 AM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Photo: Cloverland/CDPX 102 Milk Car (Undated)
Did you read Schuyler’s comment? It’s in the string below.
Thanks!
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Paul Koehler <koehlers@...>
Brian:
Please explain, as all of these cars were used in interchange service.
Paul C. Koehler
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of BRIAN PAUL EHNI
Other cars not suitable of interchange?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Notice the question mark? My statement was directed to Schuyler since the car has reporting marks and WAS used in interchange service, as were REX and others similarly marked.
Sheesh.
Thanks!
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Paul Koehler <koehlers@...>
Brian:
Yes I read it and I would like you to explain your comment. You stated that the four cars that you pictures were “Other cars not suitable of interchange?”. . All four cars could be seen in interchange, you are mistaken with your comment.
Paul C. Koehler
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of BRIAN PAUL EHNI
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 10:18 AM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Photo: Cloverland/CDPX 102 Milk Car (Undated)
Did you read Schuyler’s comment? It’s in the string below.
Thanks!
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Paul Koehler <koehlers@...>
Brian:
Please explain, as all of these cars were used in interchange service.
Paul C. Koehler
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of BRIAN PAUL EHNI
Other cars not suitable of interchange?
Thanks!
|
|
|
