CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions


Dan Sweeney Jr
 

Now on the workbench in Sunshine kit 2.4., steel side rebuilt XM.  I understand that the prototype received new power hand brakes and steel running board in the mid-fifties.  Does anyone know the manufacturer(s) of the prototype power hand brakes, running board, and brake step?  Thanks!
Dan Sweeney, Jr.
Alexandria, VA


Eric Lombard
 

For what road and series?

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:14 PM Dan Sweeney Jr <dlsweeney@...> wrote:
Now on the workbench in Sunshine kit 2.4., steel side rebuilt XM.  I understand that the prototype received new power hand brakes and steel running board in the mid-fifties.  Does anyone know the manufacturer(s) of the prototype power hand brakes, running board, and brake step?  Thanks!
Dan Sweeney, Jr.
Alexandria, VA


gary laakso
 

The subject line has CMO as the road and 1658 as the series.

 

Gary Laakso

Northwest of Mike Brock

 

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Eric Lombard
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 12:17 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions

 

For what road and series?

 

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:14 PM Dan Sweeney Jr <dlsweeney@...> wrote:

Now on the workbench in Sunshine kit 2.4., steel side rebuilt XM.  I understand that the prototype received new power hand brakes and steel running board in the mid-fifties.  Does anyone know the manufacturer(s) of the prototype power hand brakes, running board, and brake step?  Thanks!
Dan Sweeney, Jr.
Alexandria, VA


Eric Lombard
 

Well that was a fat thumb response.
Try this one: Miner handbrake
I will dig some more to see if info on the running board exists.

Eric Lombard
Homewood, IL

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:14 PM Dan Sweeney Jr <dlsweeney@...> wrote:
Now on the workbench in Sunshine kit 2.4., steel side rebuilt XM.  I understand that the prototype received new power hand brakes and steel running board in the mid-fifties.  Does anyone know the manufacturer(s) of the prototype power hand brakes, running board, and brake step?  Thanks!
Dan Sweeney, Jr.
Alexandria, VA


Eric Lombard
 

Working on the brake step and running board. In the meantime, these may interest you.

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:14 PM Dan Sweeney Jr <dlsweeney@...> wrote:
Now on the workbench in Sunshine kit 2.4., steel side rebuilt XM.  I understand that the prototype received new power hand brakes and steel running board in the mid-fifties.  Does anyone know the manufacturer(s) of the prototype power hand brakes, running board, and brake step?  Thanks!
Dan Sweeney, Jr.
Alexandria, VA


Tim O'Connor
 



On 11/12/2021 3:17 PM, Eric Lombard wrote:

For what road and series?

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:14 PM Dan Sweeney Jr <dlsweeney@...> wrote:
Now on the workbench in Sunshine kit 2.4., steel side rebuilt XM.  I understand that the prototype received new power hand brakes and steel running board in the mid-fifties.  Does anyone know the manufacturer(s) of the prototype power hand brakes, running board, and brake step?  Thanks!
Dan Sweeney, Jr.
Alexandria, VA


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Dan Sweeney Jr
 

Eric, thanks much for the info.  I'm amazed by the availability of disposition of individual wrecked car numbers.  Please share with us the source of that info.  Thank you.  And thanks to Tim for the photos, especially the color photo that clearly shows the brake wheel.


Eric Lombard
 

Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 

Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.

When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).

I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 

Eric L
Homewood, IL





On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 8:33 PM Dan Sweeney Jr <dlsweeney@...> wrote:
Eric, thanks much for the info.  I'm amazed by the availability of disposition of individual wrecked car numbers.  Please share with us the source of that info.  Thank you.  And thanks to Tim for the photos, especially the color photo that clearly shows the brake wheel.


Ed Hawkins
 


On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Eric Lombard <elombard@...> wrote:

Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 

Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.

When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).

I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 

Eric L
Homewood, IL

Dan & Eric,
Sorry for being late to this discussion. Today I contacted Jeff Koeller, who I consider an extremely thorough source on steam-era CNW/CMO freight cars. Jeff provided the following information that pertains to the 200 CMO steel rebuilds numbered 37100-37498 (even numbers only) rebuilt in 1941-1942, then received some rehabilitation in 1954 when 187 remaining cars were renumbered 1658-1844 and painted green & yellow.

When rebuilt, all 200 cars received Universal hand brakes, U.S. Gypsum running boards & brake steps of the expanded metal type, and retained Andrews trucks. The doors were split with 100 each of two types:

1941 cars - CMO 37100-37298 (even) - Superior doors (7-panel design).
1942 cars - CMO 37300-37498 (even) - Youngstown doors.

In my conversation with Jeff, I did not ask for the specific renumbered car numbers that received Youngstown doors vs. Superior doors. That would involve looking at each CNW car card that have “old” and “new” car numbers. Any new 1954 car number with an old car number 39100-39298 (even) would have Superior doors. Similarly, old car numbers 39300-39498 (even) would have Youngstown doors.

Photos in Pat Wider’s RP CYC Volume 23 article on steel rebuilds of double-sheathed USRA box cars include CMO 1682 & 1808 that received Superior doors. Whereas CMO 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors. It’s thus apparent that the 1954 renumbering was not in the same original car number sequence.

Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 

Thanks much to Jeff Koeller for sharing this information that he had spent considerable time researching. 

Lastly, once upon a time was an overhead photo of CMO 1682 on eBay in which the U.S. Gypsum running board received yellow paint but with some black car cement overspray at the ends. A color photo available from Bob’s Photo provides a ground view of CMO 1672 also revealing yellow along most of the running board edge but some black overspray at the ends. 

Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins


Steve and Barb Hile
 

FWIW, there is a photo of CMO 1720 in the Vancouver collection of Bill Lane photos.  It has a seven panel Superior door with the placard board on the second batten down from the top.  The view is slightly upwards and shows, sort of, the brake platform and running board.

 

Steve Hile

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ed Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:40 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions

 

 

On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Eric Lombard <elombard@...> wrote:

 

Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 

 

Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.

 

When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).

 

I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 

 

Eric L

Homewood, IL

 

Dan & Eric,

Sorry for being late to this discussion. Today I contacted Jeff Koeller, who I consider an extremely thorough source on steam-era CNW/CMO freight cars. Jeff provided the following information that pertains to the 200 CMO steel rebuilds numbered 37100-37498 (even numbers only) rebuilt in 1941-1942, then received some rehabilitation in 1954 when 187 remaining cars were renumbered 1658-1844 and painted green & yellow.

 

When rebuilt, all 200 cars received Universal hand brakes, U.S. Gypsum running boards & brake steps of the expanded metal type, and retained Andrews trucks. The doors were split with 100 each of two types:

 

1941 cars - CMO 37100-37298 (even) - Superior doors (7-panel design).

1942 cars - CMO 37300-37498 (even) - Youngstown doors.

 

In my conversation with Jeff, I did not ask for the specific renumbered car numbers that received Youngstown doors vs. Superior doors. That would involve looking at each CNW car card that have “old” and “new” car numbers. Any new 1954 car number with an old car number 39100-39298 (even) would have Superior doors. Similarly, old car numbers 39300-39498 (even) would have Youngstown doors.

 

Photos in Pat Wider’s RP CYC Volume 23 article on steel rebuilds of double-sheathed USRA box cars include CMO 1682 & 1808 that received Superior doors. Whereas CMO 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors. It’s thus apparent that the 1954 renumbering was not in the same original car number sequence.

 

Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 

 

Thanks much to Jeff Koeller for sharing this information that he had spent considerable time researching. 

 

Lastly, once upon a time was an overhead photo of CMO 1682 on eBay in which the U.S. Gypsum running board received yellow paint but with some black car cement overspray at the ends. A color photo available from Bob’s Photo provides a ground view of CMO 1672 also revealing yellow along most of the running board edge but some black overspray at the ends. 

 

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Ed Hawkins

 


Ed Hawkins
 



Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 

Correction: Photos of CMO cars show 1682 & 1808 rebuilt in 1941 had Superior doors and 8-panel sides. Cars 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors and the unusual version 10-panel sides with the half-panels nearest the doors. 

My apology for missing this while proofing. 
Regards,
Ed Hawkins


Robert kirkham
 

Steve - can you say where to find that collection?

Rob 

On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:

FWIW, there is a photo of CMO 1720 in the Vancouver collection of Bill Lane photos.  It has a seven panel Superior door with the placard board on the second batten down from the top.  The view is slightly upwards and shows, sort of, the brake platform and running board.
 
Steve Hile
 
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ed Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:40 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions
 
 
On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Eric Lombard <elombard@...> wrote:
 
Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 
 
Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.
 
When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).
 
I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 
 
Eric L
Homewood, IL
 
Dan & Eric,
Sorry for being late to this discussion. Today I contacted Jeff Koeller, who I consider an extremely thorough source on steam-era CNW/CMO freight cars. Jeff provided the following information that pertains to the 200 CMO steel rebuilds numbered 37100-37498 (even numbers only) rebuilt in 1941-1942, then received some rehabilitation in 1954 when 187 remaining cars were renumbered 1658-1844 and painted green & yellow.
 
When rebuilt, all 200 cars received Universal hand brakes, U.S. Gypsum running boards & brake steps of the expanded metal type, and retained Andrews trucks. The doors were split with 100 each of two types:
 
1941 cars - CMO 37100-37298 (even) - Superior doors (7-panel design).
1942 cars - CMO 37300-37498 (even) - Youngstown doors.
 
In my conversation with Jeff, I did not ask for the specific renumbered car numbers that received Youngstown doors vs. Superior doors. That would involve looking at each CNW car card that have “old” and “new” car numbers. Any new 1954 car number with an old car number 39100-39298 (even) would have Superior doors. Similarly, old car numbers 39300-39498 (even) would have Youngstown doors.
 
Photos in Pat Wider’s RP CYC Volume 23 article on steel rebuilds of double-sheathed USRA box cars include CMO 1682 & 1808 that received Superior doors. Whereas CMO 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors. It’s thus apparent that the 1954 renumbering was not in the same original car number sequence.
 
Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 
 
Thanks much to Jeff Koeller for sharing this information that he had spent considerable time researching. 
 
Lastly, once upon a time was an overhead photo of CMO 1682 on eBay in which the U.S. Gypsum running board received yellow paint but with some black car cement overspray at the ends. A color photo available from Bob’s Photo provides a ground view of CMO 1672 also revealing yellow along most of the running board edge but some black overspray at the ends. 
 
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins
 



Steve and Barb Hile
 

Take a look here

 

Boxcars - City of Vancouver Archives

 

Steve Hile

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Robert kirkham
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 11:41 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions

 

Steve - can you say where to find that collection?

 

Rob 

 

On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:

 

FWIW, there is a photo of CMO 1720 in the Vancouver collection of Bill Lane photos.  It has a seven panel Superior door with the placard board on the second batten down from the top.  The view is slightly upwards and shows, sort of, the brake platform and running board.

 

Steve Hile

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ed Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:40 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions

 

 

On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Eric Lombard <elombard@...> wrote:

 

Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 

 

Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.

 

When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).

 

I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 

 

Eric L

Homewood, IL

 

Dan & Eric,

Sorry for being late to this discussion. Today I contacted Jeff Koeller, who I consider an extremely thorough source on steam-era CNW/CMO freight cars. Jeff provided the following information that pertains to the 200 CMO steel rebuilds numbered 37100-37498 (even numbers only) rebuilt in 1941-1942, then received some rehabilitation in 1954 when 187 remaining cars were renumbered 1658-1844 and painted green & yellow.

 

When rebuilt, all 200 cars received Universal hand brakes, U.S. Gypsum running boards & brake steps of the expanded metal type, and retained Andrews trucks. The doors were split with 100 each of two types:

 

1941 cars - CMO 37100-37298 (even) - Superior doors (7-panel design).

1942 cars - CMO 37300-37498 (even) - Youngstown doors.

 

In my conversation with Jeff, I did not ask for the specific renumbered car numbers that received Youngstown doors vs. Superior doors. That would involve looking at each CNW car card that have “old” and “new” car numbers. Any new 1954 car number with an old car number 39100-39298 (even) would have Superior doors. Similarly, old car numbers 39300-39498 (even) would have Youngstown doors.

 

Photos in Pat Wider’s RP CYC Volume 23 article on steel rebuilds of double-sheathed USRA box cars include CMO 1682 & 1808 that received Superior doors. Whereas CMO 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors. It’s thus apparent that the 1954 renumbering was not in the same original car number sequence.

 

Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 

 

Thanks much to Jeff Koeller for sharing this information that he had spent considerable time researching. 

 

Lastly, once upon a time was an overhead photo of CMO 1682 on eBay in which the U.S. Gypsum running board received yellow paint but with some black car cement overspray at the ends. A color photo available from Bob’s Photo provides a ground view of CMO 1672 also revealing yellow along most of the running board edge but some black overspray at the ends. 

 

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Ed Hawkins

 

 


Robert kirkham
 

Ah, the Walter E. Frost photo collection.

Thanks,

Rob  

On Nov 17, 2021, at 10:23 PM, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:

Take a look here
 
 
Steve Hile
 
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Robert kirkham
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 11:41 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions
 
Steve - can you say where to find that collection?
 
Rob 
 
On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:
 
FWIW, there is a photo of CMO 1720 in the Vancouver collection of Bill Lane photos.  It has a seven panel Superior door with the placard board on the second batten down from the top.  The view is slightly upwards and shows, sort of, the brake platform and running board.
 
Steve Hile
 
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ed Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:40 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions
 
 
On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Eric Lombard <elombard@...> wrote:
 
Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 
 
Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.
 
When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).
 
I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 
 
Eric L
Homewood, IL
 
Dan & Eric,
Sorry for being late to this discussion. Today I contacted Jeff Koeller, who I consider an extremely thorough source on steam-era CNW/CMO freight cars. Jeff provided the following information that pertains to the 200 CMO steel rebuilds numbered 37100-37498 (even numbers only) rebuilt in 1941-1942, then received some rehabilitation in 1954 when 187 remaining cars were renumbered 1658-1844 and painted green & yellow.
 
When rebuilt, all 200 cars received Universal hand brakes, U.S. Gypsum running boards & brake steps of the expanded metal type, and retained Andrews trucks. The doors were split with 100 each of two types:
 
1941 cars - CMO 37100-37298 (even) - Superior doors (7-panel design).
1942 cars - CMO 37300-37498 (even) - Youngstown doors.
 
In my conversation with Jeff, I did not ask for the specific renumbered car numbers that received Youngstown doors vs. Superior doors. That would involve looking at each CNW car card that have “old” and “new” car numbers. Any new 1954 car number with an old car number 39100-39298 (even) would have Superior doors. Similarly, old car numbers 39300-39498 (even) would have Youngstown doors.
 
Photos in Pat Wider’s RP CYC Volume 23 article on steel rebuilds of double-sheathed USRA box cars include CMO 1682 & 1808 that received Superior doors. Whereas CMO 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors. It’s thus apparent that the 1954 renumbering was not in the same original car number sequence.
 
Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 
 
Thanks much to Jeff Koeller for sharing this information that he had spent considerable time researching. 
 
Lastly, once upon a time was an overhead photo of CMO 1682 on eBay in which the U.S. Gypsum running board received yellow paint but with some black car cement overspray at the ends. A color photo available from Bob’s Photo provides a ground view of CMO 1672 also revealing yellow along most of the running board edge but some black overspray at the ends. 
 
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins
 
 



Tim O'Connor
 


Ed, I never noticed that before! I'll have to look again at my photos. 😁

On 11/18/2021 12:31 AM, Ed Hawkins wrote:

Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 

Correction: Photos of CMO cars show 1682 & 1808 rebuilt in 1941 had Superior doors and 8-panel sides. Cars 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors and the unusual version 10-panel sides with the half-panels nearest the doors. 

My apology for missing this while proofing. 
Regards,
Ed Hawkins


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


 

That link on shows “boxcars” (a couple of reefers are in there). I backed out and did a search for just his photos. OMG what a trove! Other freight cars, CN steam & diesel, CP steam & diesel, ships (naval and cargo), etc., etc., etc.! Over 13,000 results.

 

 

Thanks!
--

Brian Ehni

 

 

From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Robert kirkham <rdkirkham@...>
Reply-To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Date: Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 10:07 AM
To: "main@realstmfc.groups.io" <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions

 

Ah, the Walter E. Frost photo collection.

 

Thanks,

 

Rob  

 

On Nov 17, 2021, at 10:23 PM, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:

 

Take a look here

 

 

Steve Hile

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Robert kirkham
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 11:41 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions

 

Steve - can you say where to find that collection?

 

Rob 

 

On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:

 

FWIW, there is a photo of CMO 1720 in the Vancouver collection of Bill Lane photos.  It has a seven panel Superior door with the placard board on the second batten down from the top.  The view is slightly upwards and shows, sort of, the brake platform and running board.

 

Steve Hile

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ed Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:40 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions

 

 

On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Eric Lombard <elombard@...> wrote:

 

Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 

 

Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.

 

When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).

 

I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 

 

Eric L

Homewood, IL

 

Dan & Eric,

Sorry for being late to this discussion. Today I contacted Jeff Koeller, who I consider an extremely thorough source on steam-era CNW/CMO freight cars. Jeff provided the following information that pertains to the 200 CMO steel rebuilds numbered 37100-37498 (even numbers only) rebuilt in 1941-1942, then received some rehabilitation in 1954 when 187 remaining cars were renumbered 1658-1844 and painted green & yellow.

 

When rebuilt, all 200 cars received Universal hand brakes, U.S. Gypsum running boards & brake steps of the expanded metal type, and retained Andrews trucks. The doors were split with 100 each of two types:

 

1941 cars - CMO 37100-37298 (even) - Superior doors (7-panel design).

1942 cars - CMO 37300-37498 (even) - Youngstown doors.

 

In my conversation with Jeff, I did not ask for the specific renumbered car numbers that received Youngstown doors vs. Superior doors. That would involve looking at each CNW car card that have “old” and “new” car numbers. Any new 1954 car number with an old car number 39100-39298 (even) would have Superior doors. Similarly, old car numbers 39300-39498 (even) would have Youngstown doors.

 

Photos in Pat Wider’s RP CYC Volume 23 article on steel rebuilds of double-sheathed USRA box cars include CMO 1682 & 1808 that received Superior doors. Whereas CMO 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors. It’s thus apparent that the 1954 renumbering was not in the same original car number sequence.

 

Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 

 

Thanks much to Jeff Koeller for sharing this information that he had spent considerable time researching. 

 

Lastly, once upon a time was an overhead photo of CMO 1682 on eBay in which the U.S. Gypsum running board received yellow paint but with some black car cement overspray at the ends. A color photo available from Bob’s Photo provides a ground view of CMO 1672 also revealing yellow along most of the running board edge but some black overspray at the ends. 

 

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Ed Hawkins

 

 

 


Dan Sweeney Jr
 

Ed, our hobby is greatly indebted to people such as yourself, Mr. Koeller, Eric Lombard, and Tim O'Connor (to mention only a few) who unselfishly share their time and knowledge with others.  I doubt that a similar situation obtains in many other hobbies.  Thank you!
Dan Sweeney, Jr.
Alexandria, VA


Eric Lombard
 

Ed, Thank you (and Jeff ) for this authoritative information. I really appreciate the effort that went into getting it together and for me, indeed, it is a help. 

About the unusual rivet pattern on some cars... Why would one cut a perfectly good Youngstown side at that point to replace it with two narrow sheets? I'd like to argue that the rivet placement on the sheet bordering the door does not join two narrow sheets but is a standard wide sheet with a rivet line to an internal post at that point (I have misplaced the general arrangement drawing showing that post or I'd share it). Perhaps it provides extra stiffening of that wide sheet or there is something interesting going on with the internal arrangement of those cars. Also note that there is no bracket at the side sill for that rivet line. 

Thanks again for the information!
Eric L
Homewood, IL

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 5:40 PM Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@...> wrote:

On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Eric Lombard <elombard@...> wrote:

Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 

Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.

When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).

I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 

Eric L
Homewood, IL

Dan & Eric,
Sorry for being late to this discussion. Today I contacted Jeff Koeller, who I consider an extremely thorough source on steam-era CNW/CMO freight cars. Jeff provided the following information that pertains to the 200 CMO steel rebuilds numbered 37100-37498 (even numbers only) rebuilt in 1941-1942, then received some rehabilitation in 1954 when 187 remaining cars were renumbered 1658-1844 and painted green & yellow.

When rebuilt, all 200 cars received Universal hand brakes, U.S. Gypsum running boards & brake steps of the expanded metal type, and retained Andrews trucks. The doors were split with 100 each of two types:

1941 cars - CMO 37100-37298 (even) - Superior doors (7-panel design).
1942 cars - CMO 37300-37498 (even) - Youngstown doors.

In my conversation with Jeff, I did not ask for the specific renumbered car numbers that received Youngstown doors vs. Superior doors. That would involve looking at each CNW car card that have “old” and “new” car numbers. Any new 1954 car number with an old car number 39100-39298 (even) would have Superior doors. Similarly, old car numbers 39300-39498 (even) would have Youngstown doors.

Photos in Pat Wider’s RP CYC Volume 23 article on steel rebuilds of double-sheathed USRA box cars include CMO 1682 & 1808 that received Superior doors. Whereas CMO 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors. It’s thus apparent that the 1954 renumbering was not in the same original car number sequence.

Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 

Thanks much to Jeff Koeller for sharing this information that he had spent considerable time researching. 

Lastly, once upon a time was an overhead photo of CMO 1682 on eBay in which the U.S. Gypsum running board received yellow paint but with some black car cement overspray at the ends. A color photo available from Bob’s Photo provides a ground view of CMO 1672 also revealing yellow along most of the running board edge but some black overspray at the ends. 

Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins


Robert kirkham
 

Yes, and that is just the Frost photos in the Vancouver Archives.  In the BC archives there is the Bordertown collection, in the Northern BC Archives there are other great railway collections.  In the Vancouver Public Library other collections.  And same for many communities in the Okanagan.  We have great archival records on our railroad history up here.  That and sometimes too much rain . . . 

Rob  

On Nov 18, 2021, at 11:47 AM, BRIAN PAUL EHNI <bpehni@...> wrote:

That link on shows “boxcars” (a couple of reefers are in there). I backed out and did a search for just his photos. OMG what a trove! Other freight cars, CN steam & diesel, CP steam & diesel, ships (naval and cargo), etc., etc., etc.! Over 13,000 results.
 
 
Thanks!
--
<image001.png>
Brian Ehni
 
 
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Robert kirkham <rdkirkham@...>
Reply-To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Date: Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 10:07 AM
To: "main@realstmfc.groups.io" <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions
 
Ah, the Walter E. Frost photo collection.
 
Thanks,
 
Rob  
 
On Nov 17, 2021, at 10:23 PM, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:
 
Take a look here
 
 
Steve Hile
 
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Robert kirkham
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 11:41 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions
 
Steve - can you say where to find that collection?
 
Rob 
 
On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:
 
FWIW, there is a photo of CMO 1720 in the Vancouver collection of Bill Lane photos.  It has a seven panel Superior door with the placard board on the second batten down from the top.  The view is slightly upwards and shows, sort of, the brake platform and running board.
 
Steve Hile
 
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ed Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:40 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] CMO 1658 Series Rebuild Questions
 
 
On Nov 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Eric Lombard <elombard@...> wrote:
 
Dan, I have searched for an authoritative source for the brake step and running board and have come up empty. One thing is clear from photos available to me is that both are steel. 
 
Those dates (and locations) of wrecks and ordinary retirement (as removal from service: RMFS) are from the car cards made available for purchase on the website of the Chicago and Northwestern Historical Society. Also available is their collection of obsolete equipment diagrams. I am working through both. The obsolete diagrams, at least for box cars (my interest) seem to document cars built 1937-1956. All other types of cars are included in the collection and I am on page 440 of 808 so ongoing work may reveal a broader range of dates.
 
When the car cards for a series are complete it is possible to account for the fate of every car. Attached are examples. I do not intend to do this complete analysis for every series: imagine the work hours for a series of 1000 cars! Rather, my approach is to document early wrecks and the serial numbers and dates of the last half dozen to be removed from service. If you are a modeler, this provides some serial numbers to avoid due to early loss and nearly sure bets for serial numbers that would be in service throughout the life of the series. Also note in the attached examples the occasional discordance between the count of active cars in the ORER and the documented count from the car cards. The passage of paperwork through the system is sometimes rather slow! I am coming to see the C&NW paperwork as more sluggish than on the UP where equivalent data is available (an example in the attachment).
 
I enjoyed the search for the brake step and running board! It's a bit unsatisfying to say "they were both steel"! 
 
Eric L
Homewood, IL
 
Dan & Eric,
Sorry for being late to this discussion. Today I contacted Jeff Koeller, who I consider an extremely thorough source on steam-era CNW/CMO freight cars. Jeff provided the following information that pertains to the 200 CMO steel rebuilds numbered 37100-37498 (even numbers only) rebuilt in 1941-1942, then received some rehabilitation in 1954 when 187 remaining cars were renumbered 1658-1844 and painted green & yellow.
 
When rebuilt, all 200 cars received Universal hand brakes, U.S. Gypsum running boards & brake steps of the expanded metal type, and retained Andrews trucks. The doors were split with 100 each of two types:
 
1941 cars - CMO 37100-37298 (even) - Superior doors (7-panel design).
1942 cars - CMO 37300-37498 (even) - Youngstown doors.
 
In my conversation with Jeff, I did not ask for the specific renumbered car numbers that received Youngstown doors vs. Superior doors. That would involve looking at each CNW car card that have “old” and “new” car numbers. Any new 1954 car number with an old car number 39100-39298 (even) would have Superior doors. Similarly, old car numbers 39300-39498 (even) would have Youngstown doors.
 
Photos in Pat Wider’s RP CYC Volume 23 article on steel rebuilds of double-sheathed USRA box cars include CMO 1682 & 1808 that received Superior doors. Whereas CMO 1672 & 1720 had Youngstown doors. It’s thus apparent that the 1954 renumbering was not in the same original car number sequence.
 
Another detail to be aware of are differences in the riveted sides sheets. Photos of 1682 & 1720 with Superior doors rebuilt in 1941 show four essentially-equal side sheets on both sides of the door (i.e., 8-panel sides). Photos of 1942 rebuilt cars with Youngstown doors 1672 & 1720 show an unusual version of a 10-panel side arrangement in which two essentially-equal side sheets nearest the door comprised the same width as one sheet of the 1941 rebuilds, which for this I’ll use the term “half-panels” that Jeff thought was a descriptive term. In Jeff’s research, he indicated that the last 60 CMO cars having Youngstown doors (37380-37498, even) had this unusual side arrangement. 
 
Thanks much to Jeff Koeller for sharing this information that he had spent considerable time researching. 
 
Lastly, once upon a time was an overhead photo of CMO 1682 on eBay in which the U.S. Gypsum running board received yellow paint but with some black car cement overspray at the ends. A color photo available from Bob’s Photo provides a ground view of CMO 1672 also revealing yellow along most of the running board edge but some black overspray at the ends. 
 
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins
 
 
 

<image001.png>


Doug Polinder
 

Yes, an interesting year in the Fraser Canyon.  First a new Canadian record high temperature (was that Lillooet?) and now enough rain to cut the transcontinental mainlines.  Rob, I saw an image of a washout that cut three tracks.  Was that CP or CN?

While Walter Frost took the vast majority of his photos in Vancouver and environs, I see that he traveled some to take pictures.  He has some shots of NP six-axle units that did not get within 100 miles/160 km of the border (probably he took those in Seattle or Tacoma).  Are you aware of other locations he might have taken pictures?  Did he get into the interior to shoot PGE?

Doug Polinder
Whatcom County WA native