Tank Car Question


John Barry
 

Ken,

Incoming crude and outgoing product where generally the vast majority of traffic at any refinery, but there was also a significant fraction of feed stocks imported or exported as needed for the scheduled products.  These feed stocks would have mostly shipped in the cars leased to the originator.  

The four refineries in Martinez and Richmond generally received their crude via pipeline or coastal tanker, not so much by rail.  They did ship both finished products, AVGAS, MOGAS, Diesel, Navy Special Fuel Oil, Bunker C, Asphalt, etc. and feed stocks like cumene for use at other refineries.  They also received feed stocks like cumene, codimer, and motor fuel additive (tetra-ethyl lead).  The last mostly came from the Ethyl Corporation with plants in New Jersey and Louisiana.  The BLI Ethyl car is your friend for that business.  Three EBAX cars arrived at Port Chicago on the Santa Fe for the Shell and Tidewater refineries in the last ten days of November 1944 according to a detention report in the National Archives at San Bruno.  There were 96 tank cars noted in the report:
9 PSPX GASOLINE
9 SWLX GASOLINE
16 GATX GASOLINE
17 UTLX GASOLINE
32 UTLX CUMENE
3 GATX CUMENE
2 WEOX CUMENE
1 COSX CUMENE
1 MPCX CUMENE
1 OELX CUMENE
1 RPX CUMENE
1 TIDX CUMENE
3 EBAX ETHYL MOTOR FUEL ADDITIVE

The mix likely changed after the war and the end of the 100 octane AVGAS program, but it does illustrate some variety in tank cars at a refinery.  It also omits all of the on-line traffic to and from the SP that did not interchange from the ATSF at Port Chicago.  Also note that no traffic is shown for either Union Oil at Oleum or Standard at Richmond.

John Barry
 
ATSF North Bay Lines 
Golden Gates & Fast Freights 
Lovettsville, VA


707-490-9696 






On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 at 01:03:33 PM EDT, Ken Adams <smadanek44g@...> wrote:


So, I  am looking at tank cars being switched in the early 1950's at Port Costa to service Union Oil in Martinez (SCCX), Associated/Tidewater at Avon (TWOX, AOX?) and Union Oil at Oleum (UOCX).  All the cars UTLX I seem to have accumulated because it is the most common lettering scheme (witness the new Rapico cars I have pre-ordered and coming next year) will be assumed to be traveling to and from the Richmond refinery and will have to stay in the through traffic freights in the background mainline tracks of my tiny HO Port Costa Layout.  

I have a couple of Walthers Proto2000 10K gallon SCCX cars but accurate TWOX cars do not seem to be available (particularly the Standard Tank Car variety)and I may have to look for more undecorated for UOCX. 

Then there are the SP O-13's Athearn kitbashes that have never been finished...hung up on the handrails...
--
Ken Adams
Covid Variants may come and go but I choose to still live mostly in splendid Shelter In Place solitude
Location: About half way up Walnut Creek
Owner PlasticFreightCarBuilders@groups.io


nyc3001 .
 

Notice how many tank cars in Dave's photo have one safety valve on either end of the dome. This is a spotting feature of tank cars built by Standard Tank Car and Pennsylvania Tank Car, which were very common in the GATX fleet into the 1950s. Based on the sizes of the domes, I assume that the tanks are likely longitudinal-course.

Unfortunately, there is no model or kit available of any PTC tank cars or the longitudinal-course STC tanks. Southern Car and Foundry made kits of radial-course STC tank cars up until a few years ago. The last time I spoke to Jon Cagle, he was planning a rerelease.

-Phil Lee


Ken Adams
 

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 05:23 PM, Scott H. Haycock wrote:
Scott Haycock
The Tangent 1917 cars already have been issued as undecorated kits. I have one in my tank cars to be built bin...
 
--
Ken Adams
Covid Variants may come and go but I choose to still live mostly in splendid Shelter In Place solitude
Location: About half way up Walnut Creek
Owner PlasticFreightCarBuilders@groups.io


Steve and Barb Hile
 

While I still hope that Tangent will do the 8 and 10 thousand gallon GATC Type 30 tank cars, our late friend, Richard Hendrickson, showed how to kitbash a Type 30 from the Athearn car back in the 90’s in Rail Model Journal.

 

I started the project several years ago using the Intermountain tank and the steps from Yarmouth.

 

 

Steve Hile

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Dave Parker via groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 4:26 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Tank Car Question

 

Dave:

Confining my answer to HO scale, non-insulated, GATC-built cars sporting GATX reporting marks (and no company lettering reflecting a long-term lease):

1.  Tangent's 1917-design cars in both 8000 and 10.000 gallon sizes.  GATX would have had thousands (how many thousands I cannot say) in the 1920s, and "many" would have survived until 1952.  But, for reasons I can't explain, Tangent has yet to offer these cars in a plain-Jane GATX scheme.  I solved this with a couple of RTRs finished with 1934-era decals that I made myself.

2.  GATC "type 30" cars with longitudinal course built in the 1930s +/-.  Sunshine did these in the 8000-gal size if you can find one and aren't squeamish about price.  Frank Hodina built one by cannibalizing two Tangent underframes and then attaching a tank cast by Tom Madden:  http://blog.resincarworks.com/gatx-type-30-tank-car-project.  I don't know if Tom is still making those tanks available, but they are very nice. To date, I have not attempted a Type 30 build.

3.  Tangent has also offered some welded GS cars from 1948+ that I know very little about (well past my era).  Here, I believe the plain GATX scheme was available.

There were also a couple of intermediate GATC designs with longitudinal courses dating to ca 1922 and 1926 IIRC.   I am not aware of any models, although I do know that David Lehlbach (Tangent prez) has a keen interest in GATC cars along with a very large collection of relevant photos.

Hope this helps.
--
Dave Parker
Swall Meadows, CA


Tangent Scale Models
 

Dave,

Apology accepted regarding the GATX "plain-jane" scheme comment.

As for the 10,000 gallon 1917-Design cars, we do not have very good car photos of a "plain" car to work from, hence no models yet.  We are still waiting for the elusive dumpster full of GATC tank car builder photos...but I will settle for a binder. 

David Lehlbach
Tangent Scale Models


Dave Parker
 

David:

My bad.  In 20 or 25 years you'll discover, as I have, that memory is a faulty resource at best.  I had forgotten about the run represented by the the photo of 13916, and I missed it when I zipped through your "Sold Out" archives earlier today.

In my defense, these cars are not in my era as they were reweighed two years in the future.  Which is why, in part, I did my own lettering.

And, I believe my statement stands with respect to the 10,000-gal cars.  Please correct me if I missed those also.

With best regards.
--
Dave Parker
Swall Meadows, CA


Tangent Scale Models
 

Scott Haycock said "Will these eventually be available as kits?"

We just announced and released (on the same day) a production of our General American (GATC) 8,000 gallon, 1917-design tank cars.  And as usual, we re-ran the kits.

On this page, scroll down in the grid at the right and click on "Undecorated Kit":
https://www.tangentscalemodels.com/general-american-8000-gallon-1917-design-radial-course-tank-car/

Tangent Scale Models always releases kits for our cars, even when it is a second or third or "X" production. 

Thank you for your support,

David Lehlbach
Tangent Scale Models


Steve and Barb Hile
 

There’s a lot of discussion on this topic in the Carr UTLX history book.  Prior to the breakup of Standard Oil, Union Tank Line was not required to make a profit, just to provide good service to all off the Standard Refineries.  (They even had their cars painted red.)

 

After the breakup, Union Tank Line had to make a profit, but they had a huge built up market base in all of the broken up Standard companies and, for a long time, there was not even much need to seek non-Standard business.  They repainted their cars black.

 

Things began to change in the 30’s as General American became an important competitor.  For a while, they even had a subsidiary called Products Tank Line (PX reporting marks) to provide cars to refineries that still harbored anti-Standard feelings.

 

There is a bit more on all of this in my UTLX book.

 

Steve Hile

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 11:40 AM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Tank Car Question

 

Wasn't one of the MAJOR reasons for the break up of Rockefeller's Standard Oil was his monopolization
of both the means of production and transportation ?? When was Standard Oil finally forced to break up?
After the break up did the Union Tank Car Company even have the right to refuse to lease cars based on
them not being part of Standard Oil ?



On 10/19/2022 12:09 PM, Tony Thompson wrote:

On Oct 19, 2022, at 8:35 AM, Bob Chaparro via groups.io <chiefbobbb@...> wrote:
 
A friend asked me:
"A basic question as I have never understood tank car operations. Would a refinery or producing oil field use tanks cars from only one fleet, such as all UTLX cars or all GATX cars. Or were cars a mix?"
I didn't know so I ask here.
 
As with so many things, the answer is, “It depends.” All the various Standard Oil operations around the country did continue to use UTLX cars as their main tank car fleet, and few other oil companies did so — until the 1950s, when UTLX began to branch out and lease to non-Standard companies. By far the biggest leasing fleet was GATX, not only in assigned leases (when the car was often decorated for the lessee) but in otherwise unmarked “pool” cars. A distant second was SHPX, same situation with leases, and a distant third behind them was NATX.
 
Bottom line, UTLX cars would mostly carry Standard products, even after the 1950s. Then any other oil company that had leased cars, from GATX or whomever, would of course mostly use those, but if a little short of cars, would use pool cars from their lessor, or maybe even get hold of pool cars from a lessor that did not provide their main fleet. The need to move products outweighed details of tank car ownership.
 
Tony Thompson


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Scott H. Haycock
 

Dave,

Beautiful models, as usual!

Will these eventually be available as kits?

Scott Haycock




O Fenton Wells
 

Amen to that David


On Oct 19, 2022, at 8:09 PM, Tangent Scale Models via groups.io <tangentscalemodels@...> wrote:

Dave Parker said:

"Tangent's 1917-design cars in both 8000 and 10.000 gallon sizes.  GATX would have had thousands (how many thousands I cannot say) in the 1920s, and "many" would have survived until 1952.  But, for reasons I can't explain, Tangent has yet to offer these cars in a plain-Jane GATX scheme."

To which I reply, Tangent certainly did.  In your era, no less:
https://www.tangentscalemodels.com/product/gatx-1936-lease-gatc-1917-design-8000-gallon-tank-car/

Here is a photo:
gatx16.3.4.1200logo.jpg

If only the manufacturers knew what they were doing.

David Lehlbach
Tangent Scale Models


Tangent Scale Models
 

Dave Parker said:

"Tangent's 1917-design cars in both 8000 and 10.000 gallon sizes.  GATX would have had thousands (how many thousands I cannot say) in the 1920s, and "many" would have survived until 1952.  But, for reasons I can't explain, Tangent has yet to offer these cars in a plain-Jane GATX scheme."

To which I reply, Tangent certainly did.  In your era, no less:
https://www.tangentscalemodels.com/product/gatx-1936-lease-gatc-1917-design-8000-gallon-tank-car/

Here is a photo:


If only the manufacturers knew what they were doing.

David Lehlbach
Tangent Scale Models


 

Todd,
 
I'm aware of what Carbide did in the valley, being the grandson of a Carbider and having grown up there. And you're correct, the overwhelming majority of loads in and out of the Carbide facilities were not the traditional refined petroleum products. Yet they did operate a petrochemical refinery at the South Charleston site, rated at ~2500 barrels per days in 1947 (1/10th the rating of Cattletsburg for comparison). This was primarily for their own internal use producing feed stock needed for the various product lines at the facility, but they did export waste/refined petroleum products.
 
--
Andy Cummings
who is actively modeling Charleston in the current decade
;)


Tony Thompson
 

Todd Sullivan wrote:

The duPont and [Union] Carbide plants in and around the Charleston WV area were big chemical plants. Carbide certainly had a lot of tank cars, but most were for chemical commodities, not petroleum products.
You make a good point, Todd. Lots of modelers seem to think a tank car is a tank car, and you will see chlorine cars sent to bulk oil dealers, and oil company TM tank cars sent to the chlorine plant. As Tony Koester has said, using “Rule 1” on your layout means you aren’t particularly serious about modeling the RAILROADING.

Tony Thompson
tony@...


Todd Sullivan
 

Andy,

The duPont and [Union] Carbide plants in and around the Charleston WV area were big chemical plants.  Carbide certainly had a lot of tank cars, but most were for chemical commodities, not petroleum products.

Todd Sullivan
who briefly modeled Charleston a couple of decades ago


Dave Parker
 

Dave:

Confining my answer to HO scale, non-insulated, GATC-built cars sporting GATX reporting marks (and no company lettering reflecting a long-term lease):

1.  Tangent's 1917-design cars in both 8000 and 10.000 gallon sizes.  GATX would have had thousands (how many thousands I cannot say) in the 1920s, and "many" would have survived until 1952.  But, for reasons I can't explain, Tangent has yet to offer these cars in a plain-Jane GATX scheme.  I solved this with a couple of RTRs finished with 1934-era decals that I made myself.

2.  GATC "type 30" cars with longitudinal course built in the 1930s +/-.  Sunshine did these in the 8000-gal size if you can find one and aren't squeamish about price.  Frank Hodina built one by cannibalizing two Tangent underframes and then attaching a tank cast by Tom Madden:  http://blog.resincarworks.com/gatx-type-30-tank-car-project.  I don't know if Tom is still making those tanks available, but they are very nice. To date, I have not attempted a Type 30 build.

3.  Tangent has also offered some welded GS cars from 1948+ that I know very little about (well past my era).  Here, I believe the plain GATX scheme was available.

There were also a couple of intermediate GATC designs with longitudinal courses dating to ca 1922 and 1926 IIRC.   I am not aware of any models, although I do know that David Lehlbach (Tangent prez) has a keen interest in GATC cars along with a very large collection of relevant photos.

Hope this helps.
--
Dave Parker
Swall Meadows, CA


Dave Wetterstroem
 

Andy, 

"GATX TANK CARS ON ASHLAND, OIL CO REFINERY SIDING AT LEACH, KY 1954" 


 

Dave,

For your layout just about any era-appropriate tank car would be found on C&O manifests, with lots of overhead traffic to choose from. There were several other refineries in our district in addition to Catlettsburg (Pure, Elk, and Carbide in WV), not to mention duPont, Carbide, and all the other operations in the Kanawha Valley. And there were several Standard Oil bulk oil distribution facilities along the C&O, at least two in Charleston, so UTLX cars would also be in the mix (the 1952 Standard Oil strike not withstanding). Also keep in mind the UTLX fleet was more than 1/3rd of the total tank car fleet in 1950, and the GATC fleet was only slightly smaller. 

As to the cars in your photo, most look to be of a GATC design at first glance. Note the apparent lack of a pronounced end sill under the walkways - one of the usual (but not always guaranteed) GATC spotting features. Tangent's cars are a good starting point in plastic RTR; I'll leave it to other folks for resin, brass, and other plastic recommendations.


Some of those tanks do look to be of an older and/or different design. Any idea as to the year that photo was taken?

--
Andy Cummings
Houston, TX


Nelson Moyer
 

And none of the ones I can see running boards are X-3 type. There’s also a combination of tank sizes.

 

Nelson Moyer

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Eric Hansmann
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 2:01 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Tank Car Question

 

A good side view would be helpful with identifying the different cars here. I see four different designs with a cursory glance.

 


Eric Hansmann

Murfreesboro, TN

 

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Dave Wetterstroem
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 1:33 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Tank Car Question

 

Really great timing for this question. 

I model the C&O in 1952 and have been wondering about tank car operations. This photo shows a large amount of tank cars at the Ashland Oil refinery in Catlettsburg Ky. From my reading the posts above, could I assume that Ashland had a contract with GATX and that putting 4-6 of these on a manifest would be appropriate. Any suggestions on what model would be the best representation for these. 

 


Dave Wetterstroem
 

Yes, it would be helpful, but unfortunately, not something that is available. 

 

Dave


Eric Hansmann
 

A good side view would be helpful with identifying the different cars here. I see four different designs with a cursory glance.

 


Eric Hansmann

Murfreesboro, TN

 

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Dave Wetterstroem
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 1:33 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Tank Car Question

 

Really great timing for this question. 

I model the C&O in 1952 and have been wondering about tank car operations. This photo shows a large amount of tank cars at the Ashland Oil refinery in Catlettsburg Ky. From my reading the posts above, could I assume that Ashland had a contract with GATX and that putting 4-6 of these on a manifest would be appropriate. Any suggestions on what model would be the best representation for these.