Correct Color for Missouri Pacific Boxcars


Tim O'Connor
 


That's true, but our eyes perceive less light as we age -- it may diminish as much as 80% by age 80 in many people.
So brighter lighting really does make a difference.


On 11/12/2022 9:36 PM, Nelson Moyer wrote:

Lumens is a measure of light intensity. Kelvin temperature (K) is the wavelength of the light. They are separate characteristics.

Nelson Moyer


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Nelson Moyer
 

Correction, I meant to say color temperature,not wavelength. K is color temperature.


Nelson Moyer
 

Lumens is a measure of light intensity. Kelvin temperature (K) is the wavelength of the light. They are separate characteristics.

Nelson Moyer

-----Original Message-----
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Kevin Macomber
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2022 7:13 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Cc: Todd Sullivan via groups.io <sullivant41@...>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Correct Color for Missouri Pacific Boxcars

If I may, 5000K is the upward end on the lumens, but how I have my entire layout. This was the advice of a MRR photographer. Above that 'blue' kicks in.

On 2022-11-12 19:00, Todd Sullivan via groups.io wrote:
I agree with Kevin.

I have tried, over the past 15 years, to ensure that the lighting I
have on my layout (a blend of 3500K and 5000K lights) is the same over
my workbench and paint booth. This hopefully ensures that the
painting and weathering I do looks the same on the layout as it did on
my workbench.

Todd Sullivan


Links:
------
[1] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/message/196604
[2] https://groups.io/mt/94968320/645454
[3] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/post
[4] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/editsub/645454
[5]
https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/leave/11334620/645454/765963421/xyz
zy
--
Kevin Macomber
NGMC
(717) 474-8399
www.narrowgaugemodeling.com


Kevin Macomber
 

If I may, 5000K is the upward end on the lumens, but how I have my entire layout. This was the advice of a MRR photographer. Above that 'blue' kicks in.

On 2022-11-12 19:00, Todd Sullivan via groups.io wrote:
I agree with Kevin.
I have tried, over the past 15 years, to ensure that the lighting I
have on my layout (a blend of 3500K and 5000K lights) is the same over
my workbench and paint booth. This hopefully ensures that the
painting and weathering I do looks the same on the layout as it did on
my workbench.
Todd Sullivan
Links:
------
[1] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/message/196604
[2] https://groups.io/mt/94968320/645454
[3] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/post
[4] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/editsub/645454
[5] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/leave/11334620/645454/765963421/xyzzy
--
Kevin Macomber
NGMC
(717) 474-8399
www.narrowgaugemodeling.com


Todd Sullivan
 

I agree with Kevin.

I have tried, over the past 15 years, to ensure that the lighting I have on my layout (a blend of 3500K and 5000K lights) is the same over my workbench and paint booth.  This hopefully ensures that the painting and weathering I do looks the same on the layout as it did on my workbench.

Todd Sullivan


Kevin Macomber
 

Being I'm in the paint business, the biggest influencer honestly is the lighting above your work.

Lumens and color will alter most. Some of the lights will totally change the look.

I saw the one comment close is good, but it still has to be within the hue scheme.

Kevin
NGMC

On 2022-11-12 18:45, Nathan Obermeyer via groups.io wrote:
It's all in good to say just pick any color, but to be close you have
to have a color to start from and a recommendation of that color is
helpful. I for one ask for color recommendations as you learn
additional information like what Charlie posted and I would have asked
also. One key thing is that colors in pictures and what we see in
digital images may not actually match what the prototype looked like.
Kinda like pictures of MKT box cars when the question is for Missouri
Pacific cars.
Nate
Links:
------
[1] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/message/196602
[2] https://groups.io/mt/94968320/645454
[3] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/post
[4] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/editsub/645454
[5] https://RealSTMFC.groups.io/g/main/leave/11334620/645454/765963421/xyzzy
--
Kevin Macomber
NGMC
(717) 474-8399
www.narrowgaugemodeling.com


Nathan Obermeyer
 

It’s all in good to say just pick any color, but to be close you have to have a color to start from and a recommendation of that color is helpful. I for one ask for color recommendations as you learn additional information like what Charlie posted and I would have asked also. One key thing is that colors in pictures and what we see in digital images may not actually match what the prototype looked like. Kinda like pictures of MKT box cars when the question is for Missouri Pacific cars. 


Nate


WILLIAM PARDIE
 

Very well put Chuck.   My thoughts exactly.  We spend enough time worring about the right truck or brake wheel.  I would venture to say that even the best researched and perfectly matched paint on a model would be a bit off if set next to the prototype.

Bill Pardie



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Chuck Cover <chuck.cover@...>
Date: 11/12/22 4:08 AM (GMT-10:00)
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Correct Color for Missouri Pacific Boxcars

This is a question that comes up frequently from modelers of all railroads.  My advice is close is good enough.  When you look at prototype photos of any railroad, one always sees a variety of shades of color, due to many reasons including slightly different paint mixes, where the car has traveled, the time since it was repainted, etc.  So I always wonder why folks are so worried about the exact color to paint a specific car? As demonstrated by the photos attached to Tim’s email, close is good enough.

 

Chuck Cover

Santa Fe, NM


radiodial868
 

It has taken awhile to break my OCD adherence to exactness, but I fully embrace that concept now to the point of making it a point to paint batches of cars just a little off from each other, as I did with my last batch of my 1939 era SP B-50-13/-14's, and am in the process of the B-50-15/-16's.
--
-------------------
RJ Dial

Mendocino, CA


Chuck Cover
 

This is a question that comes up frequently from modelers of all railroads.  My advice is close is good enough.  When you look at prototype photos of any railroad, one always sees a variety of shades of color, due to many reasons including slightly different paint mixes, where the car has traveled, the time since it was repainted, etc.  So I always wonder why folks are so worried about the exact color to paint a specific car? As demonstrated by the photos attached to Tim’s email, close is good enough.

 

Chuck Cover

Santa Fe, NM


Tim O'Connor
 


Ah, yes, the old color matching question :-P

On 11/12/2022 4:34 AM, Charlie Duckworth via groups.io wrote:

Eric
Ed Hawkins recommends using TruColor MKT Freight Car Brown as the correct match for the MP cars. TCP-188. The later red hue didn’t come until the early 1960’s. 
--
Charlie Duckworth 
Omaha, Ne.

--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Charlie Duckworth
 
Edited

Eric
Ed Hawkins recommends using TruColor MKT Freight Car Brown as the correct match for the MP cars. TCP-188. The later red hue didn’t come until the early 1960’s. 
--
Charlie Duckworth 
Omaha, Ne.


Eric Thur
 

All,
I am currenting working on a couple MP Boxcar Kits, one is SS Models 120000 series 36' Wood and a SS Mini Kit a MP 1942 Steel Boxcar.
 My Question is this: Sunshine calls for the 36' Wood Boxcar to be painted Boxcar Red (Circa 1948) and the AAR 1942 Boxcar to be painted Oxide Red. Were the Wood cars ever painted Oxide Red Post WW II? What year was the Color change, if any?

 Thanks

Eric Thur