Not that I am aware.
The direct interchange of railcars to other rail lines, no matter where they maybe, requires the receiving rail line to use the same standards for clearances, track gauge, couplers and brake systems.
Rail gauge is the most obvious difference, but there are differences in coupler designs and also different brake systems which are not compatible.
The US standard is not quite the same for all South American or Central American railroads, nor for European, Middle Eastern and some Asian railroads.
For the most part, railroads in most other countries are controlled and run or owned by the national government.
Another was building railways in colonial countries, such as done in the expanding British Empire of the 1800's.
When many such railroads we first built they used English engineering and design which set their standard. Egypt, Israel (Palestine back then) and Jordan's railways (India's too) were built to what became the 'standard gauge,' using English designs for motive power and rolling stock along with English couplings and vacuum brake systems.
Such were railways in many other places under British influence.
World War II had the effect of changing the way some railroads were equipped and operated, using US design equipment modified for their clearances yet using knuckle couplers and air brakes. Even at that, such differences and the prospect of long, trans-oceanic voyages for interchanging rail freight also makes it less than desirable for the bottom line, which is to make a profit.
Ed Bommer
