1. RealSTMFC | Main
  2. Topics

Atlas re-releasing their steel rebuilt box cars

spsalso
 

Ben,

I would think they went with the same IH as the original cars.

The extreme height of my model (to the top of the running board) is 1.86"--scale equivalent:  162" or 13' - 6".

Most of the prototype cars on the Frisco were 13' - 7" to top of running board (from ORER).



Ed

Edward Sutorik

Benjamin Scanlon
 



What's an estimate of the Atlas rebuild car's IH ? (I don't own one nor have I seen one here in England.)

The Georgia ARA rebuild I think retained the 8'6" IH of the original - the rebuilds look extraordinarily low beside other cars and RPCYC #18 doesn't say different. 
--
Ben Scanlon
Tottenham, England

Mike Clements
 

The PC car is lettered as an ex-PRR X29G. Not even close (although it is closer than anything NYC had). 

--
Mike Clements
Wakefield, MA
nyc65.wordpress.com

Brian Carlson
 

The PC is not. It’s labeled as an X29g. 

Currently imaging Ben Hom throwing up a little as he reads this. <grin> 

Brian J. Carlson 

On Jan 17, 2023, at 6:31 PM, spsalso via groups.io <Edwardsutorik@...> wrote:

Bill,

Of this latest batch from Atlas, only the PC car has any chance at all of being right (It would have been through NYC).  And I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.


Ed

Edward Sutorik

--
Brian J. Carlson, P.E.
Cheektowaga NY

spsalso
 

Bill,

Of this latest batch from Atlas, only the PC car has any chance at all of being right (It would have been through NYC).  And I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.


Ed

Edward Sutorik

Bill Parks
 

According to my 1953 ORER, most of these railroads did not have boxcars with the road numbers shown in the links.  In fact, Chicago West Pullman & Southern didn't even have any boxcars at that point.  Don't know if they existed prior or after 1953 for these railroads, or if they truly are pure fantasy cars.


--
Bill Parks
Cumming, GA
Modelling the Seaboard Airline in Central Florida

Tim O'Connor
 


I was not referring specifically to the Frisco cars but rather to the intentions of the Atlas model?
I thought someone had said it was a rebuild of the mid 1920's ARA cars. But I guess those would
not have fishbelly underframes. :-\

On 1/17/2023 3:34 PM, Benjamin Hom wrote:

Tim O'Connor asked:
Were these [Frisco] ARA [sic] cars originally built as double sheathed box cars, or single sheathed?

These rebuilds were originally USRA double-sheathed boxcars from SL-SF 127000-130499; however, not all cars were rebuilt, and the original DS, rebuilt steel cars, and unrelated backfills due to wreck replacements were lumped into the same series, making these a bit challenging to track in the ORERs.


Ben Hom


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts

Benjamin Hom
 

Tim O'Connor asked:
Were these [Frisco] ARA [sic] cars originally built as double sheathed box cars, or single sheathed?

These rebuilds were originally USRA double-sheathed boxcars from SL-SF 127000-130499; however, not all cars were rebuilt, and the original DS, rebuilt steel cars, and unrelated backfills due to wreck replacements were lumped into the same series, making these a bit challenging to track in the ORERs.


Ben Hom


spsalso
 

The Frisco model does have a fishbelly underframe.


Ed

Edward Sutorik



On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:05 PM, Benjamin Hom wrote:
Ed Sutorik wrote:
"The Frisco model has the tackboard mounted about a foot too low.  And the sidesill should have a lot more relief.
That's all I found wrong with it."
 
Does it have a fishbelly underframe?  This is not apparent in the model photos that I was able to find online.
 
 
Ben Hom 

Tim O'Connor
 


were these ARA cars originally built as double sheathed box cars, or single sheathed ?

On 1/17/2023 3:05 PM, Benjamin Hom wrote:

Ed Sutorik wrote:
"The Frisco model has the tackboard mounted about a foot too low.  And the sidesill should have a lot more relief.
That's all I found wrong with it."

Does it have a fishbelly underframe?  This is not apparent in the model photos that I was able to find online.


Ben Hom

--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts

Benjamin Hom
 

Ed Sutorik wrote:
"The Frisco model has the tackboard mounted about a foot too low.  And the sidesill should have a lot more relief.
That's all I found wrong with it."

Does it have a fishbelly underframe?  This is not apparent in the model photos that I was able to find online.


Ben Hom 

Tim O'Connor
 


And a slighty taller door.

On 1/17/2023 12:53 AM, Don DeLay via groups.io wrote:

Wishing they would rerun these NP cars. Can be made pretty accurate with a straight sidesill.

Don DeLay

Attachments:



--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts

spsalso
 

The Frisco model has the tackboard mounted about a foot too low.  And the sidesill should have a lot more relief.

That's all I found wrong with it.



Ed

Edward Sutorik

Benjamin Scanlon
 

These mouldings aren't a model of any one car, they are a combination of features that no prototype USRA rebuild had.  Big railroad or small railroad, you can't roster something that never existed. Sounds like a last-ditch attempt to flog these cars by painting them in obscure RR names.

The Georgia RR one was a rebuild of an ARA car. But for a start, the Atlas has the wrong roof- Georgia ARA rebuilds had rectangular or diagonal panel roofs. I am not going to search back and find out how else it is wrong, but there will be more than one error I am sure. 


--
Ben Scanlon
Tottenham, England

Don DeLay
 

Wishing they would rerun these NP cars. Can be made pretty accurate with a straight sidesill.

Don DeLay

Don Burn
 

Ben,

You are correct, I am not sure what I was thinking when typing that.

Don Burn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Benjamin Hom via groups.io
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 10:02 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Atlas re-releasing their steel rebuilt box cars

Don Burn wrote:
"To even be close with Atlas you have 3 railroads that the cars can be a stand in for. The railroads are:

1. Atlantic Coast Line
2. Charleston and Western Carolina Railway (C&WC)
3. Missouri Kansas and Texas"

Disagree with M-K-T, unless you can point to specific evidence. #3 should be SL-SF, though the model needs work to accurately represent any of these prototypes.

This model is a blight on the market in multiple scales.


Ben Hom

Brian Carlson
 

The model is probably killing the market for accurate RTR rebuilds as discussed kat week since many people “have them already” sadly.

Brian J. Carlson

On Jan 16, 2023, at 10:01 PM, Benjamin Hom <b.hom@...> wrote:

Don Burn wrote:
"To even be close with Atlas you have 3 railroads that the cars can be a stand in for. The railroads are:

1. Atlantic Coast Line
2. Charleston and Western Carolina Railway (C&WC)
3. Missouri Kansas and Texas"

Disagree with M-K-T, unless you can point to specific evidence. #3 should be SL-SF, though the model needs work to accurately represent any of these prototypes.

This model is a blight on the market in multiple scales.


Ben Hom




--
Brian J. Carlson, P.E.
Cheektowaga NY

Benjamin Hom
 

Don Burn wrote:
"To even be close with Atlas you have 3 railroads that the cars can be a stand in for.  The railroads are:

      1.  Atlantic Coast Line
      2.  Charleston and Western Carolina Railway (C&WC)
      3.  Missouri Kansas and Texas"

Disagree with M-K-T, unless you can point to specific evidence.  #3 should be SL-SF, though the model needs work to accurately represent any of these prototypes.

This model is a blight on the market in multiple scales.


Ben Hom

spsalso
 

And Frisco.

Atlas did a Frisco.


Ed

Edward Sutorik

Don Burn
 

To even be close with Atlas you have 3 railroads that the cars can be a stand in for. The railroads are:

1. Atlantic Coast Line
2. Charleston and Western Carolina Railway (C&WC)
3. Missouri Kansas and Texas

Unfortunately, I don't think Atlas has released the car in any appropriate scheme.

Don Burn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Jeffrey White via groups.io
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 8:06 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: [RealSTMFC] Atlas re-releasing their steel rebuilt box cars

I know we've talked about these cars at length in the past. Are any of these paint schemes any closer to reality:

https://shop.atlasrr.com/p-65346-ho-usra-steel-rebuilt-box-car-canton-railroad-611.aspx?mc_cid=f56b40f497&mc_eid=8e3bddd63a

https://shop.atlasrr.com/p-65348-ho-usra-steel-rebuilt-box-car-chicago-west-pullman-southern-10001.aspx?mc_cid=f56b40f497&mc_eid=8e3bddd63a

https://shop.atlasrr.com/p-65350-ho-usra-steel-rebuilt-box-car-georgia-railroad-39436.aspx?mc_cid=f56b40f497&mc_eid=8e3bddd63a

https://shop.atlasrr.com/p-65356-ho-usra-steel-rebuilt-box-car-santa-fe-32527.aspx?mc_cid=f56b40f497&mc_eid=8e3bddd63a

https://shop.atlasrr.com/p-65358-ho-usra-steel-rebuilt-box-car-wellsville-addison-galeton-rr-4134.aspx?mc_cid=f56b40f497&mc_eid=8e3bddd63a

https://shop.atlasrr.com/p-65360-ho-usra-steel-rebuilt-box-car-great-northern-limited-edition-3-pack-27025-34000-2511.aspx?mc_cid=f56b40f497&mc_eid=8e3bddd63a

I have a couple of the earlier kits that I never built after reading about how bad they were here. Are any of these new cars prototypical?

Jeff White

Alma IL

1 - 20 of 21