Happy Public Domain day
Dave Nelson
Everything published in 1927 now moves into the public domain.
Dave Nelson |
|
Eric Hansmann
Yay!!!!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Eric Hansmann Media, PA On Jan 1, 2023, at 5:20 PM, Dave Nelson <Western.Pacific.203@...> wrote:
|
|
Including MICKEY MOUSE !! Oh my. :-D On 1/1/2023 5:22 PM, Eric Hansmann wrote: Yay!!!! --
Tim O'Connor Sterling, Massachusetts |
|
Dave Nelson
Indeed. Can we now return to the rational set of laws that existed before Disney got the laws changed to protect the damn mouse?
Dave Nelson
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2023 2:52 PM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Happy Public Domain day
|
|
I have practiced law in this area for over 30 years. Mickey Mouse, having first appeared in 1928 in Steamboat Willie, will enter the public domain in 2024 or afterward (depending on the date of the product), not this year. While Disney sought the Copyright Term Extension Act, it faced almost no opposition in the 1998 Congress that we all had elected, and the EU had already increased copyright term by 20 years, which is what the Act added to the US regime. IP was then and still is considered a pillar of US economic strength. It will be interesting to see if present Disney leadership seeks another bill in the present Congress, although given its focus on everything except economic growth, I doubt the environment is right. And Disney’s leadership may be ready to yield to the academics who argue that a public domain Mickey would increase his “currency” or level of public attention. |
|
Alex Schneider
Chris, thanks for sharing a professional viewpoint on this.
Regardless of what the EU may legislate within their jurisdiction, Article I, section 8, clause 8 empowers Congress to secure to authors protection for "limited terms". Are repeated extensions, so expiration is always "another day away", consistent with this
provision? The Supreme Court held that voting rights protections couldn't be justified indefinitely (to my disappointment), and how is this different?
|
|
Alex,
You're stating the arguments that didn’t prevail in 1998. Reasonable minds can disagree on those and I have no public opinion on them nor any expertise with voting rights statutes. The arguments are too far afield from the subject matter of this list, as well. List readers likely are only interested in whether they can display or publish old rail photos, maps, or books, and that question has been answered. Chris |
|