Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?


Dave Nelson
 

I can tell you loads about Utah coal, right down to monthly carloadings.  But instead I refer you to what I said: “…wasn’t much coal west of the Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively”.   Below is the ICC origin  (red) and destination states (Blue) for rail shipped Bit Coal in tons, lifted from a spreadsheet of mine that does pivots.  Be sure to use a magnifying class to guestimate production numbers from west of the Mississippi.

 

 

Dave Nelson

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2022 1:33 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Dave

??? Perhaps you have not heard of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, or even Arizona, or Washington ? :-D

On 12/6/2022 3:31 PM, Dave Nelson wrote:

In the steam era there wasn’t much coal west of the  Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively. More on the east bank but still not as much as back east.   So why have a fleet of hoppers large enough for the fall rush of heating coal sit around for most of the year?  GS gons could carry everything.

 

Dave Nelson

 


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Jim and Barbara van Gaasbeek
 

Dave,

 

Useful data.  What year do the data represent?

 

Jim van Gaasbeek

Irvine, CA


Alex Schneider
 

Dave, are you familiar with a logarithmic chart? It makes such widely varying information readable. 

Alex Schneider


From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Dave Nelson <Western.Pacific.203@...>
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 11:56:00 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?
 

I can tell you loads about Utah coal, right down to monthly carloadings.  But instead I refer you to what I said: “…wasn’t much coal west of the Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively”.   Below is the ICC origin  (red) and destination states (Blue) for rail shipped Bit Coal in tons, lifted from a spreadsheet of mine that does pivots.  Be sure to use a magnifying class to guestimate production numbers from west of the Mississippi.

 

 

Dave Nelson

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2022 1:33 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Dave

??? Perhaps you have not heard of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, or even Arizona, or Washington ? :-D

On 12/6/2022 3:31 PM, Dave Nelson wrote:

In the steam era there wasn’t much coal west of the  Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively. More on the east bank but still not as much as back east.   So why have a fleet of hoppers large enough for the fall rush of heating coal sit around for most of the year?  GS gons could carry everything.

 

Dave Nelson

 


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


ted schnepf
 

Hi Dave,

What date is your data?

Ted Schnepf
Elgin, Illinois
847-697-5353


On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 11:56 PM Dave Nelson <Western.Pacific.203@...> wrote:

I can tell you loads about Utah coal, right down to monthly carloadings.  But instead I refer you to what I said: “…wasn’t much coal west of the Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively”.   Below is the ICC origin  (red) and destination states (Blue) for rail shipped Bit Coal in tons, lifted from a spreadsheet of mine that does pivots.  Be sure to use a magnifying class to guestimate production numbers from west of the Mississippi.

 

 

Dave Nelson

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2022 1:33 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Dave

??? Perhaps you have not heard of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, or even Arizona, or Washington ? :-D

On 12/6/2022 3:31 PM, Dave Nelson wrote:

In the steam era there wasn’t much coal west of the  Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively. More on the east bank but still not as much as back east.   So why have a fleet of hoppers large enough for the fall rush of heating coal sit around for most of the year?  GS gons could carry everything.

 

Dave Nelson

 


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Dave Nelson
 

1950.  I transcribed all of the state to state commodity shipments, put it into a database, and then built a pivot table to read that database and produce the chart I posted.  As for interesting, it’s ok.  I did a similar project for the April 1950 ORER that’s much more interesting.

 

Thinking… I recall the largest commodity shipped from Washington D.C. was scrap paper.  No surprise actually.

 

Dave Nelson

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jim and Barbara van Gaasbeek
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2022 10:24 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Dave,

 

Useful data.  What year do the data represent?

 

Jim van Gaasbeek

Irvine, CA


Dave Nelson
 

No, but I suppose I could poke around with this to see what comes up.

 

Dave Nelson

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Alex Schneider
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2022 6:29 AM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Dave, are you familiar with a logarithmic chart? It makes such widely varying information readable. 

 

Alex Schneider


From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Dave Nelson <Western.Pacific.203@...>
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 11:56:00 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

I can tell you loads about Utah coal, right down to monthly carloadings.  But instead I refer you to what I said: “…wasn’t much coal west of the Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively”.   Below is the ICC origin  (red) and destination states (Blue) for rail shipped Bit Coal in tons, lifted from a spreadsheet of mine that does pivots.  Be sure to use a magnifying class to guestimate production numbers from west of the Mississippi.

 

 

Dave Nelson

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2022 1:33 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Dave

??? Perhaps you have not heard of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, or even Arizona, or Washington ? :-D

On 12/6/2022 3:31 PM, Dave Nelson wrote:

In the steam era there wasn’t much coal west of the  Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively. More on the east bank but still not as much as back east.   So why have a fleet of hoppers large enough for the fall rush of heating coal sit around for most of the year?  GS gons could carry everything.

 

Dave Nelson

 


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Dave Nelson
 

Ted, from 1950.

 

Dave nelson

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of ted schnepf
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2022 7:06 AM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Hi Dave,

 

What date is your data?


Ted Schnepf

Elgin, Illinois

847-697-5353

 

 

On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 11:56 PM Dave Nelson <Western.Pacific.203@...> wrote:

I can tell you loads about Utah coal, right down to monthly carloadings.  But instead I refer you to what I said: “…wasn’t much coal west of the Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively”.   Below is the ICC origin  (red) and destination states (Blue) for rail shipped Bit Coal in tons, lifted from a spreadsheet of mine that does pivots.  Be sure to use a magnifying class to guestimate production numbers from west of the Mississippi.

 

 

Dave Nelson

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Tim O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2022 1:33 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Dave

??? Perhaps you have not heard of Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, or even Arizona, or Washington ? :-D

On 12/6/2022 3:31 PM, Dave Nelson wrote:

In the steam era there wasn’t much coal west of the  Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively. More on the east bank but still not as much as back east.   So why have a fleet of hoppers large enough for the fall rush of heating coal sit around for most of the year?  GS gons could carry everything.

 

Dave Nelson

 


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Nelson Moyer
 

That explains why some of the midwestern production is so small, especially in Iowa. The Southcentral Iowa coal fields had played out shortly after the turn of the 20th century, and coal production in Southern Illinois was greater during the first 30-40 years of the 20th century. The Q owned mines in Illinois, and almost all of the coal was shipped in composite gondolas until the late 1940s when steel was gain available to build hoppers.

 

Nelson Moyer

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Dave Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 12:57 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Ted, from 1950.

 

Dave nelson

 


Tim O'Connor
 


Montana production was 2.5 million tons in 1950, but barely registers on your chart.

I grabbed this PDF document (snapshot attached) from a USGS web site with the complete
history of coal production from 1950 to 2000's by state -- I just grabbed the one for Montana.


On 12/7/2022 12:56 AM, Dave Nelson wrote:

I can tell you loads about Utah coal, right down to monthly carloadings.  But instead I refer you to what I said: “…wasn’t much coal west of the Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively”.   Below is the ICC origin  (red) and destination states (Blue) for rail shipped Bit Coal in tons, lifted from a spreadsheet of mine that does pivots.  Be sure to use a magnifying class to guestimate production numbers from west of the Mississippi.



--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Tim O'Connor
 


Also I forgot to say that total US coal production in 1950 was around 600 million tons, but it doesn't
look like your chart numbers add up to that much.


On 12/7/2022 12:56 AM, Dave Nelson wrote:

I can tell you loads about Utah coal, right down to monthly carloadings.  But instead I refer you to what I said: “…wasn’t much coal west of the Mississippi as compared to the east, hardly any relatively”.   Below is the ICC origin  (red) and destination states (Blue) for rail shipped Bit Coal in tons, lifted from a spreadsheet of mine that does pivots.  Be sure to use a magnifying class to guestimate production numbers from west of the Mississippi.



--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Eric Hansmann
 

Someone mentioned era on this thread and that is a valid point. If you check ORER listings between 1905 to 1919, you will find many drop bottom gondolas among the fleets of the big three eastern rail lines; B&O, NYCL, and PRR.

 

As an example from the October 1919 ORER, the B&O listed 8,108 gondolas in their O-18 class. These were 41-foot, 5-inch interior length, all-steel gons with drop bottoms built in 1912-1913.

 

But wait, there’s more! In the same ORER, the B&O lists 2.990 40-foot, 6-inch interior length, all-steel gons with drop bottom doors in the O-17 class. These were 1906 products of Pressed Steel Car company.

 

They also had 34-foot interior length, all-steel gons with drop bottom doors in a couple classes. The O-12 class was built in 1899 and . 1,393 cars are listed in the 1919 ORER. The 1901-built O-14 class had similar dimensions with 1,723 cars listed.

 

Granted, the B&O did list more hoppers at this time (31,000), but these 14,214 cars in four gondola classes were a significant part of their coal hauling fleet.

 

You can find similar drop bottom steel gons on the Pennsy listings. Many of the GS design cars were built with drop doors or shallow hopper bottom doors. Bob McGlone shared his work upgrading a Bowser plastic kit to follow the GSa class cars with shallow hopper bottom doors.

http://designbuildop.hansmanns.org/2019/05/17/updating-a-bowser-gs-gondola/

 

A review of the NYC gons built before 1920 on the Canada Southern site will unearth quite a few examples used on the Central lines.

 

These gon fleets noted are often overlooked because the associated hopper fleets are HUGE. It’s also the type of car we associate most with eastern coal mining. In reviewing the western gondola fleets, some of you had noted how those lines had few hoppers. With that imbalance, the gondolas will stand out more.

 

Era and context are two elements to keep in mind when this type of question arises.

 

 

Eric Hansmann

Murfreesboro, TN

 

 

 

 

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ray Breyer via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 12:21 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io; main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

And, this completely discounts all of the MIDwestern roads who also had larger fleets of coal-hauling gondolas (instead of hoppers). The IC, C&NW, L&N, CB&Q, M&StL, Soo, Big Four, and other mineral-hauling roads in the midwest all ran huge gondola fleets through the 1950s, when hoppers took over.  All of thesese roads (and others) mostly hauled coal (people tend to forget that Illinois is the third largest coal producing state, after PA and WV).

 

Ray Breyer
Elgin, IL

 

 

 

 

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 11:06:50 AM CST, Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:

 

 

Doug

People who don't model western railroads often think that. :-)

In 1955 over 20% of the SP's freight cars were gondolas, mostly GS and Hart gondolas (which were classified as hoppers in the ORER)

And almost 20% of the fleet was flat cars !! (Nobody originated more lumber than the SP, I think.)

The SP and T&NO moved a LOT of rock and sand and even sulfur in gondolas (and hoppers too). Sugar beets, and lemons too.

The cars tended to stay online, just as eastern coal cars tended to do the same.


On 12/6/2022 11:52 AM, Douglas Harding wrote:

Western roads did not have as much mineral traffic as some eastern roads. So they preferred drop bottom gons, which were more versatile. Gons could be used for loads other than mineral so they did not sit around like unused hoppers.

 

Doug Harding

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.harding.3156/

Youtube: Douglas Harding Iowa Central Railroad

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ray Carson via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 12:33 AM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Western railroads had a preference for gondolas than hoppers which were more common in the east. Was it due to mineral traffic or just gondolas being more universal than hoppers?


--
Tim O'Connor
Sterling, Massachusetts


Steve SANDIFER
 

I model a southern Kansas. There were coal dealers and grain elevators that received coal in gondolas because they used human power to unload them. They would pull their pickup truck beside the gondola and shovel the coal into them. They also had coal bins beside the track with big flap doors that were lifted up and coal shoveled into the bins for later sales.  The elevator at Moline, KS, received a total of 3-4 gondolas a year, primarily for government buildings and schools.

 

 

J. Stephen Sandifer

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jerry Michels
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 1:21 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

Ray, We need to include the Missouri Pacific which hauled a lot of coal from Southern Illinois to St. Louis and for its own use system-wide.  I think the assumption that 'western roads' used more gondolas than hoppers needs to be looked at more closely.  Where is the distinction drawn between mid-western and western, the Rockies?

 

Jerry Michels


Dennis Storzek
 

On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 04:01 PM, Steve SANDIFER wrote:
There were coal dealers and grain elevators that received coal in gondolas because they used human power to unload them.
This is a key statement. The use of hoppers was more era dependent than anything else. Before the turn of the twentieth century there were precious few hopper cars anywhere, because labor was cheap and it is difficult to build a wood framed hopper car. As time moved forward and steel framed cars became the norm, there were still plenty of gondolas in coal service because smaller customers could not deal with unloading hoppers. In the east, where most of the coal originated, was also where most heavy industry was located; big facilities where it made sense to invest the money in unloading trestles or conveyors to realize the efficiencies that hoppers afforded. In the west, where most customers were small concerns, gondolas prevailed. Eventually the western roads could no longer ignore the demands of their larger customers and installed small fleets of hopper cars of their own. Meanwhile, coal went from being the dominant heating fuel to a strictly industrial fuel, and the gondola fleets shrank. Several Midwestern roads, Soo Line and Milwaukee Road come to mind, removed the troublesome drop doors from their coal gon fleets and continued to use them in pulpwood service into the sixties and seventies.

Dennis Storzek


Ted Larson
 

Regarding 

They also had coal bins beside the track with big flap doors that were lifted up and coal shoveled into the bins for later sales.

This is very common in small Minnesota towns.  
I will look for my photos of these enclosed structures.  




--
Ted Larson
trainweb.org/mhrr/        --------        NASG.org        --------        https://www.nasg.org/Clubs/RegionsMinnesota.php
GN in 1965


Chuck Soule
 

For the sake of flogging gondolas for coal out west, here is shot of a Utah Coal Route gondola in 1929.  However, in this picture it is spotted at a gravel pit at Steilacoom, WA.  So it was intended for coal, but used as needed for other materials.

Chuck Soule


Douglas Harding
 

Chuck here are some URC drop bottom gons hauling logs. Demonstrating the versatility of a gon over a hopper.

 

A train on the railway tracks

Description automatically generated with low confidence

 

Doug Harding

https://www.facebook.com/douglas.harding.3156/

Youtube: Douglas Harding Iowa Central Railroad

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Chuck Soule
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 10:03 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Why were gondolas more popular in the west for hauling minerals than hoppers?

 

For the sake of flogging gondolas for coal out west, here is shot of a Utah Coal Route gondola in 1929.  However, in this picture it is spotted at a gravel pit at Steilacoom, WA.  So it was intended for coal, but used as needed for other materials.

Chuck Soule